Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrant ý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

TREE.COM, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

o

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        Not applicable
 
    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        Not applicable
 
    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        Not applicable
 
    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        $55,888,536
 
    (5)   Total fee paid:
        $6,489
 

ý

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        
 
    (3)   Filing Party:
        
 
    (4)   Date Filed:
        
 

Table of Contents

LOGO

11115 Rushmore Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28277

Dear Stockholder:

        You are invited to attend a special meeting of stockholders of Tree.com, Inc., which will be held on August 26, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., local time, at Tree.com's corporate headquarters at 11115 Rushmore Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28277.

        On May 12, 2011, Tree.com, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries LendingTree, LLC, Home Loan Center, Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc. entered into an asset purchase agreement with Discover Bank, a wholly owned subsidiary of Discover Financial Services, pursuant to which Tree.com, Inc. and its subsidiaries have agreed to sell substantially all of the operating assets of Home Loan Center, Inc.'s LendingTree Loans business, which we refer to as the HLC asset sale transaction. Tree.com's board of directors has unanimously approved the HLC asset sale transaction and recommends that stockholders vote in favor of such transaction.

        At the special meeting of stockholders, you will be asked to approve the HLC asset sale transaction and to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation to certain of our named executive officers in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction. If there are insufficient votes to approve the HLC asset sale transaction, you may be asked to vote to adjourn or postpone the special meeting of stockholders to solicit additional proxies. The HLC asset sale transaction is conditioned upon receiving approval from the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock of Tree.com, Inc. outstanding and entitled to vote thereon.

        The accompanying proxy statement contains important information concerning the HLC asset sale transaction, certain benefits to be received by an executive officer of Tree.com in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction, specific information about the special meeting and how to cast your vote. We encourage you to read the accompanying proxy statement in its entirety.

        Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting of stockholders, please vote by proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by mailing the enclosed proxy card. If your shares of Tree.com, Inc. common stock are held in "street name" by your broker, bank or other nominee, then in order to vote you will need to instruct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your shares using the instructions provided by your broker, trust, bank or other nominee.

        I look forward to greeting those of you who will be able to attend the meeting.

    Sincerely,

 

 

GRAPHIC
    Douglas R. Lebda
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities regulatory agency has approved or disapproved the HLC asset sale transaction, passed upon the merits or fairness of the HLC asset sale transaction or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of the disclosure in this proxy statement. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.


Table of Contents

LOGO

11115 Rushmore Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28277

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Stockholders of Tree.com, Inc.:

        A special meeting of stockholders of Tree.com, Inc. will be held on August 26, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. local time, at our corporate headquarters at 11115 Rushmore Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28277. At the special meeting, stockholders will be asked to adopt resolutions:

        By approving the HLC Asset Sale Proposal, our stockholders are also authorizing us to make any non-material changes that our board of directors deem advisable to the asset purchase agreement and the other transaction documents contemplated in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction.

        Our board of directors has fixed June 27, 2011, as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. Only holders of record of shares of our common stock at the close of business on the record date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting. At the close of business on the record date, we had 11,024,271 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

        The proxy statement accompanying this notice is deemed to be incorporated into and forms part of this notice. The accompanying proxy statement, dated August 1, 2011, and proxy card for the special meeting are first being mailed to our stockholders on or about August 3, 2011.

        Our board of directors has unanimously approved the asset purchase agreement and unanimously recommends that you vote "FOR" the approval of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal, "FOR" the approval of the HLC Transaction-Related Compensation Arrangements Proposal and "FOR" the approval of the Proposal to Adjourn or Postpone the Special Meeting. Your vote is very important. Please vote your shares by proxy whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting.


Table of Contents

        Only stockholders and persons holding proxies from stockholders may attend the special meeting. If your shares are registered in your name, you should bring a form of photo identification to the special meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, you should bring a proxy or letter from that broker, bank or other nominee that confirms you are the beneficial owner of those shares, together with a form of photo identification. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the special meeting. All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the special meeting.

    By Order Of The Board Of Directors,

 

 

GRAPHIC
August 1, 2011   Douglas R. Lebda
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  Page  

PROXY STATEMENT

    1  

SUMMARY TERM SHEET

   
1
 
 

Information About the Parties

   
1
 
 

Asset Purchase Agreement

   
2
 
 

Purchase Price

   
2
 
 

Recommendation of Our Board of Directors

   
2
 
 

Reasons for the HLC Asset Sale Transaction

   
2
 
 

Opinion of Our Financial Advisor

   
3
 
 

Special Meeting

   
3
 
 

Voting and Support Agreements

   
4
 
 

Interests of Certain Persons in the HLC Asset Sale Transaction

   
4
 
 

Conditions to Closing

   
4
 
 

Solicitation of Other Offers

   
5
 
 

Company Board Recommendation

   
5
 
 

Termination

   
5
 
 

Termination Fees

   
7
 
 

Indemnification

   
7
 
 

Expected Completion of HLC Asset Sale Transaction

   
7
 
 

Effects on Our Business if the HLC Asset Sale Transaction is Completed

   
7
 
 

Effects on Our Business if the HLC Asset Sale Transaction is Not Completed

   
8
 
 

Ancillary Agreements

   
8
 
 

Governmental and Regulatory Approval

   
8
 
 

No Appraisal or Dissenters' Rights

   
8
 
 

Anticipated Accounting Treatment

   
9
 
 

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the HLC Asset Sale Transaction

   
9
 
 

Risk Factors

   
9
 

THE SPECIAL MEETING

   
10
 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

   
16
 

RISK FACTORS

   
17
 
 

Risk Related to Our Company

   
17
 
 

Risks Related to the HLC Asset Sale Transaction

   
27
 

i


 
  Page  

PROPOSAL #1 HLC ASSET SALE PROPOSAL

    32  
 

Parties to the Asset Purchase Agreement

   
32
 
 

Background of the HLC Asset Sale Transaction

   
32
 
 

Past Contacts, Transactions or Negotiations

   
39
 
 

Reasons for the HLC Asset Sale Transaction and Recommendation of our Board of Directors

   
40
 
 

Opinion of Our Financial Advisor

   
42
 
 

Projections

   
49
 
 

Governmental and Regulatory Approvals

   
51
 
 

When the HLC Asset Sale Transaction is Expected to be Completed

   
51
 
 

Effects on Our Company if the HLC Asset Sale Transaction is Completed and the Nature of Our Business Following the Transaction

   
51
 
 

Effects on Our Company if the HLC Asset Sale Transaction is Not Completed

   
52
 
 

No Appraisal or Dissenters' Rights

   
53
 
 

Interests of Certain Persons in the HLC Asset Sale Transaction

   
53
 
 

Anticipated Accounting Treatment

   
53
 
 

Use of Proceeds

   
53
 
 

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

   
53
 
 

Vote Required

   
54
 

ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT

   
55
 
 

General

   
55
 
 

Purchase and Sale of Assets

   
55
 
 

Purchase Price

   
56
 
 

Representations and Warranties

   
57
 
 

Conduct of Business

   
58
 
 

Discover Bank to Apply for FDIC Approval

   
60
 
 

Investor Arrangements with Discover Bank

   
60
 
 

Additional Covenants

   
60
 
 

Stockholders' Meeting

   
61
 
 

Solicitation of Other Offers

   
61
 
 

Company Board Recommendation

   
63
 
 

Conditions to Closing

   
64
 
 

Termination

   
66
 
 

Termination Fees

   
68
 
 

Indemnification

   
68
 

ii


 
  Page  
 

Amendments and Waivers

    69  
 

Governing Law

   
69
 
 

Voting and Support Agreements

   
69
 
 

Ancillary Agreements

   
69
 

PROPOSAL #2 HLC TRANSACTION-RELATED COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS PROPOSAL

   
72
 

PROPOSAL #3 PROPOSAL TO ADJOURN OR POSTPONE THE SPECIAL MEETING

   
73
 

OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

   
74
 

PROPOSALS BY STOCKHOLDERS FOR PRESENTATION AT OUR 2012 ANNUAL MEETING

   
75
 

HOUSEHOLDING OF MATERIALS

   
75
 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

   
75
 

OTHER MATTERS

   
75
 

 

Appendix A

 

Asset Purchase Agreement dated May 12, 2011 by and among Tree.com, Inc., Home Loan Center, Inc., LendingTree,  LLC, HLC Escrow, Inc. and Discover Bank

Appendix B

 

Opinion of Milestone Advisors, LLC dated May 12, 2011

Appendix C

 

Description of the Business

Appendix D

 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the period ended December 31, 2010

Appendix E

 

Tree.com, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009

Appendix F

 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2011

Appendix G

 

Tree.com, Inc. and Subsidiaries Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for the three month period ended March 31, 2011

Appendix H

 

Tree.com, Inc. and Subsidiaries Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements

Appendix I

 

Home Loan Center, Inc. and Subsidiaries Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

iii


Table of Contents

Tree.com, Inc.

11115 Rushmore Drive,
Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
(704) 541-5351

PROXY STATEMENT

        The board of directors of Tree.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation (which we refer to as "Tree.com," the "company," "we," "our," and "us") is soliciting the enclosed proxy for use at the special meeting of stockholders to be held on August 26, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. local time, at our corporate headquarters at 11115 Rushmore Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28277. This proxy statement, dated August 1, 2011, and proxy card are first being mailed to our stockholders on or about August 3, 2011.


SUMMARY TERM SHEET

        This summary term sheet, together with the question and answer section that follows, highlights selected information from this proxy statement about the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of our wholly owned subsidiary Home Loan Center, Inc. (which we refer to as the HLC asset sale transaction). This summary term sheet and the question and answer section may not contain all of the information that is important to you. For a more complete description of the HLC asset sale transaction, you should carefully read this proxy statement and the asset purchase agreement attached hereto as Appendix A in their entirety. The location of the more detailed description of each item in this summary is provided in the parentheses in each sub-heading below. Also see "WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION" on page 71.


Information About the Parties (page 32)

        Tree.com is the parent of LendingTree, LLC, Home Loan Center, Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc. Tree.com is publicly traded on the NASDAQ Global Market (symbol: TREE). We currently operate our business in two segments. Under our LendingTree Loans segment we originate, process, approve and fund various residential real estate loans through Home Loan Center, Inc., which we sometimes refer to as HLC Inc. We sometimes refer to the business we operate under this segment as the LendingTree Loans business. Under our Exchanges segment we provide online lead generation networks and call centers that connect consumers and service providers principally in the lending, real estate, higher education, home services, insurance and automobile marketplaces. We sometimes refer to the business we operate under this segment as the LendingTree Exchanges business. The principal executive offices of Tree.com, Inc. and LendingTree, LLC are located at 11115 Rushmore Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28277 and the phone number is (704) 541-5351. The principal executive offices of HLC Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc. are located at 163 Technology Drive, Irvine, California 92618 and the phone number is (888) 866-1212.

        Discover Bank, a Delaware banking corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discover Financial Services which is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (symbol: DFS). Discover Financial Services is a direct banking and payment services company which offers credit cards, student loans, personal loans and deposit products through Discover Bank. Through other subsidiaries, Discover Financial Services also operates the Discover Network, a credit card payments network; the PULSE network, an automated teller machine, debit and electronic funds transfer network; and Diners Club International, a global payments network. Discover Financial Services is a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, subject to oversight, regulation and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and is also a financial holding company under the

1


Table of Contents

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. The principal executive offices of Discover Bank are located at 12 Read's Way, New Castle, Delaware 19720 and the phone number is (302) 323-7184.


Asset Purchase Agreement (page 55 and Appendix A)

        On May 12, 2011, we and our wholly-owned subsidiaries LendingTree, LLC, HLC Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc., entered into an asset purchase agreement with Discover Bank, pursuant to which we have agreed, subject to specified terms and conditions, including approval of the HLC asset sale transaction by our stockholders at the special meeting, to sell to Discover Bank substantially all of the operating assets of HLC Inc., which we sometimes refer to as the LendingTree Loans business. We will retain cash, certain cash equivalents, most of our residential mortgage loans owned or originated and closed prior to the closing and certain other assets of the LendingTree Loans business. Discover Bank generally will not assume liabilities of our LendingTree Loans business, but it will assume certain contracts, real property leases and specified liabilities of the LendingTree Loans business arising after the completion of the HLC asset sale transaction.

        A copy of the asset purchase agreement is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement. We encourage you to read the asset purchase agreement in its entirety.


Purchase Price (page 56)

        If the HLC asset sale transaction is completed, then at the closing Discover Bank will be required to pay $35,888,536 to HLC Inc., subject to certain adjustments for utility expenses for office leases assumed by Discover Bank, fees, expenses and deposits we prepaid in respect of contracts, leases and other assets acquired by Discover Bank and earned but unpaid compensation for employees that will be employed by Discover Bank following the closing. HLC Inc. will also have the right to receive an additional $10 million on each of the first and second anniversaries of the closing, subject to certain conditions, including that Discover Bank has not terminated the master services agreement it entered into with us concurrently with the execution of the asset purchase agreement, and that we have maintained the LendingTree Exchanges business and satisfied certain financial and operational metrics associated with the LendingTree Exchanges business.

        A portion of the initial purchase price based on our loan loss reserves at the end of the quarter prior to the closing ($20.3 million at March 31, 2011) will be held in escrow pending the discharge of certain liabilities that will remain with us.


Recommendation of Our Board of Directors (page 40)

        After careful consideration, our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote:


Reasons for the HLC Asset Sale Transaction (page 40)

        After taking into account all of the material factors relating to the asset purchase agreement and the HLC asset sale transaction, our board of directors unanimously determined that the asset purchase agreement and the HLC asset sale transaction are expedient, advisable, and in the best interests of our company and our stockholders. Our board of directors did not assign relative weights to the material factors it considered. In addition, our board of directors did not reach any specific conclusion on each of the material factors considered, but conducted an overall analysis of all of the material factors. Individual members of our board of directors may have given different weights to different factors.

2


Table of Contents


Opinion of Our Financial Advisor (page 42 and Appendix B)

        On May 12, 2011, Milestone Advisors, LLC delivered its opinion to our board of directors to the effect that, as of such date, based upon, and subject to, the assumptions made, matters considered and limits of such review, in each case as set forth in its opinion, the sum of (i) the $35,888,536 payable to our company at the closing of the transaction plus (ii) the net liquidation value of certain assets and liabilities of HLC Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc. that are not being purchased or assumed by Discover Bank, as estimated by our and HLC Inc.'s senior management team as of March 31, 2011, is fair, from a financial point of view, to Tree.com.

        The opinion of Milestone Advisors was directed to, and for the use of, our board of directors in connection with its consideration of the HLC asset sale transaction, does not address the underlying business decision to proceed with or effect the HLC asset sale transaction or the relative merits of the HLC asset sale transaction as compared to any strategic alternatives that may be available to our company and does not constitute a recommendation as to how any of our stockholders should vote with respect to the HLC asset sale transaction.

        The full text of the written opinion of Milestone Advisors dated as of May 12, 2011, which sets forth the assumptions made, matters considered and limits on the scope of the review undertaken in connection with the opinion is attached as Appendix B to this proxy statement. We encourage you to read the written opinion of Milestone Advisors in its entirety.


Special Meeting (page 10)

        Date, Time and Place.    The special meeting will be held on August 26, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. local time, at our corporate headquarters at 11115 Rushmore Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28277.

        Record Date and Voting Power.    You are entitled to vote at the special meeting if you owned shares of our common stock at the close of business on June 27, 2011, the record date for the special meeting. You will have one vote at the special meeting for each share of our common stock you held at the close of business on the record date. There are 11,024,271 shares of our common stock entitled to be voted at the special meeting.

        Required Vote.    The asset purchase agreement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock outstanding at the close of business on the record date to approve the HLC Asset Sale Proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes against the HLC Asset Sale Proposal. The HLC Transaction-Related Compensation Arrangements Proposal is a non-binding stockholder advisory vote and will be approved if the number of shares voted in favor of that proposal are greater than those voted against that proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the HLC Transaction-Related Compensation Arrangements Proposal. If a quorum is present at the special meeting, the Proposal to Adjourn or Postpone the Special Meeting will be approved if the number of shares voted in favor of that proposal are greater than those voted against that proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the Proposal to Adjourn or Postpone the Special Meeting if it is submitted for stockholder approval when a quorum is present at the meeting. If a quorum is not present at the special meeting, the Proposal to Adjourn or Postpone the Special Meeting will be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the special meeting. Abstentions would have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" this proposal and broker non-votes would have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal if it is submitted for approval when no quorum is present at the special meeting.

3


Table of Contents


Voting and Support Agreements (page 69)

        In connection with the execution of the asset purchase agreement, Douglas R. Lebda, our chairman and chief executive officer, the trustee of a family trust for Mr. Lebda, and certain of our other stockholders executed voting and support agreements. Under the agreements, such stockholders have committed to vote all of the shares of our common stock owned by them in favor of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal. The shares subject to the voting and support agreements constitute approximately 49% of our outstanding common stock as of the record date.

        Notwithstanding the foregoing, if our board of directors properly changes its recommendation with respect to the HLC Asset Sale Proposal due to a superior proposal, the stockholders that entered into the voting and support agreements, other than Mr. Lebda and the trustee of the family trust for Mr. Lebda, will collectively be required to vote 15% of the total outstanding shares of our common stock on the record date in favor of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal. Mr. Lebda and the trustee of the family trust for Mr. Lebda will be required to vote all of the shares beneficially owned by Mr. Lebda in favor of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal. Mr. Lebda beneficially owned approximately 20% of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote on the record date.


Interests of Certain Persons in the HLC Asset Sale Transaction (page 53)

        The closing of the HLC asset sale transaction by Discover Bank is conditioned upon David Norris, the president of HLC Inc. and one of our executive officers, accepting employment with Discover Bank effective upon the closing. Tree.com has agreed to pay compensation to Mr. Norris based on the HLC asset sale transaction. For further information regarding the compensation arrangements between Mr. Norris and Tree.com, see "ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT—Summary of Golden Parachute Arrangements in Connection with the HLC Asset Sale Transaction."


Conditions to Closing (page 64)

        The closing of the HLC asset sale transaction is subject to the satisfaction or, to the extent permissible under applicable law or pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, waiver of certain conditions on or prior to the closing. Such conditions include, in addition to customary closing conditions, stockholder approval of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal and the absence of certain defaults or termination under the master services agreement entered into between us and Discover Bank.

        The obligation of Discover Bank to complete the HLC asset sale transaction is subject to the satisfaction or, to the extent permissible under applicable law or pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, waiver of certain conditions on or prior to the closing. Such conditions include, among others:

4


Table of Contents


Solicitation of Other Offers (page 61)

        Generally, we and our subsidiaries are required to terminate discussions with respect to, or that could be reasonably expected to lead to, an acquisition proposal and we are required to use our reasonable best efforts to cause our or our subsidiaries' representatives not to, directly or indirectly, initiate, solicit, assist or knowingly take any other action to facilitate any inquiries or the making of any acquisition proposal.

        Notwithstanding the foregoing, if our board of directors determines in good faith that an unsolicited acquisition proposal constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to a superior proposal, we may participate in negotiations regarding the acquisition proposal if our board of directors determines in good faith that not doing so would constitute, or would reasonably be likely to constitute, a breach of its fiduciary duties under applicable law.


Company Board Recommendation (page 63)

        Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote for the HLC Asset Sale Proposal. Until our stockholders vote on the HLC Asset Sale Proposal, neither we nor our board of directors is permitted to change, qualify, withdraw or modify or publicly propose to change, qualify, withdraw or modify, such recommendation in any manner adverse to Discover Bank.

        Notwithstanding the foregoing, if we receive an unsolicited, bona fide acquisition proposal deemed to be a superior proposal, or (other than in connection with an acquisition proposal) an event or circumstance occurs that is material to us and our subsidiaries, taken as a whole, and, in either case, our board of directors determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal and financial advisors, that the failure to change its recommendation would constitute, or would reasonably be likely to constitute, a breach of its fiduciary duties under applicable law, our board of directors will be permitted to change its recommendation, provided certain procedures are followed.

        Discover Bank has the right to terminate the asset purchase agreement if our board of directors changes its recommendation prior to the approval by our stockholders of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal. We do not have a right to terminate the asset purchase agreement upon a change in recommendation by our board of directors, and we are obligated to hold the special meeting notwithstanding such a change in recommendation.


Termination (page 66)

        We or Discover Bank may terminate the asset purchase agreement:

5


Table of Contents

        Discover Bank may terminate the asset purchase agreement:

        Until the closing of the HLC asset sale transaction, we are required to maintain certain ratios and metrics related to the LendingTree Loans business regarding the loan-to-value ratio of mortgage loans originated, the FICO scores for borrowers of mortgage loans originated, the principal amount of mortgage loans funded during a rolling three-month period and the number of licensed mortgage loan originators employed by HLC Inc.

        Under certain circumstances, we or Discover Bank have the right to extend the termination date beyond October 9, 2011. If Discover Bank elects to extend the termination date, in accordance with the asset purchase agreement, due to its failure to have received (i) the required binding written proposals from certain identified financial institutions relating to their commitment to purchase mortgage loans funded by the LendingTree Loans business after the closing or (ii) the approval from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, then, subject to certain exceptions, Discover Bank will be required to pay HLC Inc. a specified fee with respect to each extension request. All fees paid by Discover Bank in connection with an extension request will be credited toward the purchase price to be paid at closing or toward any payment of liquidated damages required if the asset purchase agreement is terminated under certain circumstances.

6


Table of Contents


Termination Fees (page 68)

        We are required to pay Discover Bank $2.2 million in cash if the asset purchase agreement is properly terminated:

        Discover Bank will be obligated to pay us $5.0 million in cash, reduced by the extension payments described above, if the asset purchase agreement is terminated because the HLC asset sale transaction has not closed by October 9, 2011, unless otherwise extended, due solely to (i) the failure of Discover Bank to obtain approval of its FDIC Bank Merger Act application or, if required, approval of the Delaware Office of State Bank Commission, or (ii) subject to certain exceptions, the failure of Discover Bank to obtain the required number of binding written proposals from certain identified financial institutions regarding their commitment to purchase mortgage loans funded by the LendingTree Loans business after the closing.


Indemnification (page 68)

        We and Discover Bank have agreed to indemnify each other for damages as a result of any breach of a representation or warranty contained in the asset purchase agreement and for certain other specified matters. The representations and warranties extend for various periods of time depending on the nature of the claim. Except for breaches of certain specified representations, damages for breaches of representations and warranties must exceed $500,000 before either party is required to pay the indemnification claims and the aggregate indemnification claims payable by either party for breaches of representations and warranties may not exceed $10 million.


Expected Completion of HLC Asset Sale Transaction (page 51)

        We expect to complete the HLC asset sale transaction as soon as practicable after all of the closing conditions in the asset purchase agreement, including approval of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal by our stockholders, have been satisfied or waived. Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of these conditions, we expect the HLC asset sale transaction to close by the end of 2011. However, there can be no assurance that the HLC asset sale transaction will be completed at all or, if completed, when it will be completed.


Effects on Our Business if the HLC Asset Sale Transaction is Completed (page 51)

        If the HLC asset sale transaction is completed, we will no longer conduct the LendingTree Loans business. Instead, we will focus on our Lending Tree Exchanges business. Our assets that are currently used in connection with this business will not be transferred to Discover Bank as part of the HLC asset sale transaction.

7


Table of Contents

        We will continue to work to maximize stockholder interests with a goal of returning value to our stockholders. The HLC asset sale transaction will not alter the rights, privileges or nature of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. A stockholder who owns shares of our common stock immediately prior to the closing of the HLC asset sale transaction will continue to hold the same number of shares immediately following the closing.

        Our reporting obligations as a U.S. public company will not be affected as a result of completing the HLC asset sale transaction. We believe that after the HLC asset sale transaction we will continue to qualify for listing on the NASDAQ Global Market. However, following the HLC asset sale transaction our business will be smaller, and therefore we may fail to satisfy the continued listing standards of that market. If we are unable to satisfy the continued listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Market, our common stock may be delisted from that market.


Effects on Our Business if the HLC Asset Sale Transaction is Not Completed (page 52)

        If the HLC asset sale transaction is not completed, we will continue to conduct the LendingTree Loans business, and we may consider and evaluate other strategic opportunities. In such a circumstance, there can be no assurances that our continued operation of the LendingTree Loans business or any alternative strategic opportunities will result in the same or greater value to our stockholders as the proposed HLC asset sale transaction.

        If the asset purchase agreement is terminated under certain circumstances described in this proxy statement and set forth in the asset purchase agreement, we may be required to pay Discover Bank a termination fee of $2.2 million, or Discover Bank may be required to pay us a termination fee of $5.0 million.


Ancillary Agreements (page 69)

        In connection with the HLC asset sale transaction:


Governmental and Regulatory Approval (page 51)

        Discover Bank will need to obtain approval of its FDIC Bank Merger Act application and may need the approval of the Delaware Office of State Bank Commissioner to acquire the LendingTree Loans business. The receipt of the foregoing approvals (as necessary) is a condition to Discover Bank's obligation to close the HLC asset sale transaction.


No Appraisal or Dissenters' Rights (page 53)

        No appraisal or dissenters' rights are available to our stockholders under Delaware law or our certificate of incorporation or bylaws in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction.

8


Table of Contents


Anticipated Accounting Treatment (page 53)

        Under generally accepted accounting principles, upon completion of the HLC asset sale transaction, we will remove the net assets sold from our consolidated balance sheet and record a gain from the HLC asset sale transaction equal to the total amount of consideration realized. Amounts held in escrow will be recognized as assets when released from escrow.


Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the HLC Asset Sale Transaction (page 53)

        The HLC asset sale transaction will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a taxable sale upon which we will recognize gain or loss. The amount of gain or loss we recognize with respect to the sale of a particular asset will be measured by the difference between the amount realized by us on the sale of that asset and our tax basis in that asset. The determination of whether we will recognize gain or loss will be made with respect to each of the assets to be sold. Accordingly, we may recognize gain on the sale of certain assets and loss on the sale of certain others, depending on the amount of consideration allocated to an asset as compared with the basis of that asset. Further, the sale of certain assets may result in ordinary income or loss, depending on the nature of the asset. To the extent the HLC asset sale transaction results in us recognizing a net gain, we expect that our available net operating loss carryforwards will offset some of such gain.


Risk Factors (page 17)

        In evaluating the HLC Asset Sale Proposal, you should carefully read this proxy statement and consider the factors discussed in the section entitled "RISK FACTORS" beginning on page 16 of this proxy statement.

9


Table of Contents


THE SPECIAL MEETING

Q:    Why am I receiving this proxy statement?

A:
Our board of directors is furnishing this proxy statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be voted at the special meeting of stockholders, or at any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting.

Q:    When and where will the special meeting be held?

A:
The special meeting will be held on August 26, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. local time, at our corporate headquarters at 11115 Rushmore Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28277.

Q:    What matters will the stockholders vote on at the special meeting?

A:
The stockholders will vote on the following proposals:

To approve the HLC Asset Sale Proposal;

To approve the HLC Transaction-Related Compensation Arrangements Proposal; and

To approve the Proposal to Adjourn or Postpone the Special Meeting.

Q:    What is the HLC Asset Sale Proposal?

A:
The HLC Asset Sale Proposal is a proposal to sell substantially all of the operating assets of HLC Inc., which we refer to as the LendingTree Loans business, pursuant to an asset purchase agreement dated as of May 12, 2011 by and among Tree.com, LendingTree, LLC, HLC Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc., on the one hand, and Discover Bank, on the other hand.

Q:    What will happen if the HLC Asset Sale Proposal is approved by our stockholders?

A:
Under the terms of the asset purchase agreement, if the HLC Asset Sale Proposal is approved by our stockholders and the other closing conditions under the asset purchase agreement have been satisfied or waived, we will sell substantially all of the operating assets of HLC Inc. and we will discontinue the LendingTree Loans business. By approving the HLC Asset Sale Proposal, our stockholders are also authorizing us to make any non-material changes that our officers deem advisable to the asset purchase agreement and the other transaction documents contemplated in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction.

Q:    What is the HLC Transaction-Related Compensation Arrangements Proposal?

A:
The HLC Transaction-Related Compensation Arrangements Proposal is a non-binding advisory vote to approve the payment of certain compensation to our named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the HLC asset sale transaction. For further information regarding the compensation arrangements, see "ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT—Summary of Golden Parachute Arrangements in Connection with the HLC Asset Sale Transaction".

Q:    What will happen if the HLC Transaction-Related Compensation Arrangements Proposal is approved by our stockholders?

A:
The vote on executive compensation payable in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction is a vote separate and apart from the HLC Asset Sale Proposal. Accordingly, approval of this proposal is not a condition to completion of the HLC asset sale transaction, and as an advisory vote, the result will not be binding on our board of directors or on the compensation committee of our board of directors. Therefore, if the HLC asset sale transaction is approved by our stockholders

10


Table of Contents

Q:    What is the Proposal to Adjourn or Postpone the Special Meeting?

A:
The Proposal to Adjourn or Postpone the Special Meeting is a proposal to permit us to adjourn or postpone the special meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies in the event that, at the special meeting, the affirmative vote in favor of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal is less than a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting.

Q:    What will happen if the Proposal to Adjourn or Postpone the Special Meeting is approved by our stockholders?

A:
If there are insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the HLC Asset Sale Proposal and the Proposal to Adjourn or Postpone the Special Meeting is approved at the special meeting, we will be able to adjourn or postpone the special meeting for purposes of soliciting additional proxies to approve the HLC Asset Sale Proposal. If you have previously submitted a proxy on the proposals discussed in this proxy statement and wish to revoke it upon adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, you may do so.

Q:    Am I entitled to appraisal or dissenters' rights in connection with the HLC Asset Sale Proposal, the HLC Transaction-Related Compensation Arrangements Proposal or the Proposal to Adjourn or Postpone the Special Meeting?

A:
No appraisal or dissenters' rights are available to our stockholders under Delaware law or under our certificate of incorporation or bylaws in connection with the types of actions contemplated under the HLC Asset Sale Proposal, the HLC Transaction-Related Compensation Arrangements Proposal or the Proposal to Adjourn or Postpone the Special Meeting.

Q:    Who is entitled to vote at the special meeting?

A:
Holders of our common stock at the close of business on June 27, 2011, the record date for the special meeting established by our board of directors, are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote their shares at, the special meeting and any related adjournments or postponements.

Q:    What are the quorum requirements for the special meeting?

A:
The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock that are entitled to vote at the special meeting constitutes a quorum. You are counted as present at the special meeting for quorum purposes if you are present and vote in person at the special meeting or if you properly submit a proxy by returning the proxy card accompanying this proxy statement in the postage-paid envelope provided or by the telephone or the Internet procedures described under "Q: How do I vote?" A validly submitted proxy will result in your shares counting towards a quorum even if no voting instructions are provided.

Q:    What vote is required to approve each of the proposals?

A:
The approval of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of at least a majority of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock that are entitled to vote at the

11


Table of Contents


The HLC Transaction-Related Compensation Arrangements Proposal is a non-binding stockholder advisory vote and will be approved if the number of shares voted in favor of that proposal are greater than those voted against that proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the HLC Transaction-Related Compensation Arrangements Proposal.

Q:    How do I vote?

A:
You may vote by proxy or in person at the special meeting.

12


Table of Contents

Q:    What happens if I abstain?

A:
Abstentions are counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the approval of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal. Abstentions will not have any effect on the outcome of the vote of the HLC Transaction-Related Compensation Arrangements Proposal. Abstentions will not have any effect on the outcome of the vote on the Proposal to Adjourn or Postpone the Special Meeting if the proposal is submitted for stockholder action when a quorum is present at the special meeting. If the Proposal to Adjourn or Postpone the Special Meeting is submitted for stockholder action when a quorum is not present at the special meeting, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the proposal.

Q:    If I hold my shares in street name through my broker, will my broker vote these shares for me?

A:
If you hold your shares in street name, you must provide your broker, bank or other nominee with instructions in order to vote those shares. To do so, you should follow the voting instructions provided to you by your bank, broker or other nominee. If your bank, broker or nominee holds your shares in its name and you do not instruct it how to vote, it will not have discretion to vote on any of the proposals at the special meeting.

Q:    What happens if I hold my shares in street name through my broker and I do not instruct my broker how to vote my shares?

A:
Brokers, banks or other nominees who hold shares in street name for their customers have the authority to vote on "routine" proposals when they have not received instructions from the beneficial owners of such shares. However, brokers, banks or other nominees do not have the authority to vote shares they hold for their customers on non-routine proposals when they have not received instructions from the beneficial owners of such shares. The HLC Asset Sale Proposal,

13


Table of Contents

Q:    Can I change my vote?

A:
Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before the vote at the special meeting by:

delivering to BNY Mellon Shareowner Services a written notice, bearing a date later than your proxy, stating that you revoke the proxy;

submitting a later-dated proxy (either by mail, the telephone or on the Internet) relating to the same shares prior to the vote at the special meeting; or

attending the special meeting and voting in person (although attendance at the special meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy).

Q:    What if I do not specify a choice for a matter when returning a proxy?

A:
If you hold your shares of record, proxies that are signed and returned without voting instructions will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors. If your shares are held in street name, failure to give voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee will result in a broker non-vote.

Q:    What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a stockholder who holds stock in street name?

A:
If your shares are registered in your name, you are a stockholder of record. If your shares are held in an account with a broker, bank or another holder of record, these shares are held in street name.

Q:    Can I see a list of stockholders of record?

A:
You may examine a list of the stockholders of record as of the close of business on June 27, 2011 for any purpose germane to the special meeting during normal business hours during the 10-day period preceding the date of the meeting at our corporate headquarters at 11115 Rushmore Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28277. This list will also be made available at the special meeting.

14


Table of Contents

Q:    What does it mean if I get more than one proxy card?

A:
If your shares are registered differently and are in more than one account, you may receive more than one proxy card. Please complete, sign, date, and return all of the proxy cards you receive regarding the special meeting to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

Q:    How are proxies solicited and what is the cost?

A:
We will bear all expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation of proxies and printing, filing and mailing this proxy statement. In addition to solicitation by mail, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies from stockholders by telephone, letter, facsimile or in person. These directors, officers and employees will not be paid additional remuneration for their efforts but may be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection therewith. Following the original mailing, we will request brokers, custodians, nominees and other record holders to forward their own notice and, upon request, to forward copies of the proxy statement and related soliciting materials to persons for whom they hold shares of our common stock and to request authority for the exercise of proxies. In such cases, upon the request of the record holders, we will reimburse such holders for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.

Q:    What should I do if I have questions regarding the special meeting?

A:
If you have any questions about how to cast your vote for the special meeting or would like copies of any of the documents referred to in this proxy statement, you should call BNY Mellon Shareowner Services, Proxy Processing at 1-877-296-3711 (toll-free).

15


Table of Contents


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        This proxy statement contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations and assumptions about future events, which are inherently subject to uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. The use of words such as "anticipates," "estimates," "expects," "projects," "intends," "plans" and "believes," among others, generally identify forward-looking statements.

        Actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Factors currently known to management that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include the following: volatility in our stock price and trading volume; our ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms; limitations on our ability to enter into transactions due to restrictions related to our spin-off from InterActiveCorp in August 2008; adverse conditions in the primary and secondary mortgage markets and in the economy; adverse conditions in our industries; adverse conditions in the credit markets and the inability to renew or replace warehouse lines of credit; seasonality in our businesses; potential liabilities to secondary market purchasers; changes in our relationships with network lenders, real estate professionals, credit providers and secondary market purchasers; breaches of our network security or the misappropriation or misuse of personal consumer information; our failure to provide competitive service; our failure to maintain brand recognition; our ability to attract and retain customers in a cost-effective manner; our ability to develop new products and services and enhance existing ones; competition from our network lenders and affiliated real estate professionals; our failure to comply with existing or changing laws, rules or regulations, or to obtain and maintain required licenses; failure of our network lenders or other affiliated parties to comply with regulatory requirements; failure to maintain the integrity of our systems and infrastructure; liabilities as a result of privacy regulations; failure to adequately protect our intellectual property rights or allegations of infringement of intellectual property rights; changes in our management; deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting; uncertainties surrounding the HLC asset sale transaction, including, the uncertainty as to the timing of the closing and whether stockholders will approve the HLC asset sale transaction; the possibility that competing offers for the assets will be made; the possibility that various closing conditions for the transaction may not be satisfied or waived; and the effects of disruption from the transaction making it more difficult to maintain relationships with employees, customers and other business partners.

        These and additional factors to be considered are set forth under "RISK FACTORS" beginning on page 16 of this proxy statement.

        Other unknown or unpredictable factors that could also adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations may arise from time to time. In light of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking statements discussed in this proxy statement may not prove to be accurate. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which only reflect the views of Tree.com management as of the date of this proxy statement. Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results or expectations.

16


Table of Contents


RISK FACTORS

        In addition to the other information contained in this proxy statement, you should carefully consider the following risk factors relating to our company and the HLC asset sale transaction.


Risk Related to Our Company

         Adverse conditions in the primary and secondary mortgage markets, as well as the economy generally, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        The primary and secondary mortgage markets have been experiencing unprecedented and continuing disruption, which has had and is expected to continue to have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. These conditions, coupled with adverse economic conditions and continuing declines in residential real estate prices generally, have resulted in and are expected to continue to result in decreased consumer demand for the lending services provided by our networks and other businesses. Generally, increases in interest rates adversely affect the ability of lenders, including lenders that offer loans to consumers through our network of lenders, to close loans, while adverse economic trends limit the ability of lenders to offer home loans other than low margin "conforming" loans (loans which meet the requirements for purchase by certain Federal Agencies and Government Sponsored Enterprises). We refer to the lenders that offer loans to consumers through our network of lenders as "Network Lenders." Our businesses may experience a further decline in demand for their offerings due to decreased consumer demand as a result of the conditions described above now or in the future. Conversely, during periods of robust consumer demand, which are typically associated with decreased interest rates, some Network Lenders may have less incentive to use our networks, or in the case of sudden increases in consumer demand, Network Lenders may lack the ability to support sudden increases in volume.

        The secondary mortgage markets have also been experiencing unprecedented and continued disruptions resulting from reduced investor demand for mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities and increased investor yield requirements for those loans and securities. These conditions may continue for a prolonged period of time or worsen in the future. HLC Inc. does not have the capital resources or credit necessary to retain the loans it funds and closes and, as a result, sells substantially all such loans within 30 days of funding. Accordingly, a prolonged period of secondary market illiquidity may force HLC Inc. to significantly reduce the volume of loans that it originates and funds, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        These disruptions and volatility in the capital and credit markets have resulted in rapid and steep declines in prevailing stock prices, particularly in the financial services sector, as well as downward pressure on credit availability. These adverse conditions adversely affect Network Lenders, secondary market purchasers, and third-party real estate professionals, and may render them unwilling or unable to continue business relationships with us. If current levels of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, there can be no assurance that we will not experience an adverse effect on our business relationships and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

         Difficult market conditions have adversely affected our industry.

        Declines in the housing market since 2008, with falling home prices and increasing foreclosures, unemployment and under-employment, have negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage loans and resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, government-sponsored entities and major commercial and investment banks. These write-downs, initially of mortgage-backed securities but spreading to other asset-backed securities, credit default swaps and other derivative and cash securities, in turn, have caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital, to merge with larger and stronger institutions and, in some cases, to fail.

17


Table of Contents

        Reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets generally and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and institutional investors have reduced or ceased providing funding to borrowers, including to other financial institutions. This market turmoil and tightening of credit have led to an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction of business activity generally. The resulting economic pressure on consumers and lack of confidence in the financial markets may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        We do not expect that the difficult conditions in the financial markets will likely improve materially in the near future. A worsening of these conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market conditions on us and others in the financial services industry. Further, our business could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other businesses in the financial services sector. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more of these entities, or the financial services industry generally, have led to market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by other institutions. Any such losses or defaults could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

         Adverse conditions in the credit markets could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        The credit markets, in particular those financial institutions that provide warehouse financing and similar arrangements to mortgage lenders, have been experiencing unprecedented and continued disruptions resulting from instability in the mortgage and housing markets. The LendingTree Loans business requires significant financing in order to fund consumer mortgage loans that it originates. The required financing is currently being met through borrowings under warehouse lines of credit or repurchase agreements to fund and close loans, followed by the sale of substantially all loans funded to investors in the secondary mortgage markets. Current credit market conditions, such as significantly reduced and limited availability of credit, increased credit risk premiums for certain market participants and increased interest rates generally, increase the cost and reduce the availability of financing and may continue for a prolonged period of time or worsen in the future.

        As of March 31, 2011, HLC Inc. had two committed lines of credit totaling $150.0 million of borrowing capacity, and a $25.0 million uncommitted line. One of the committed lines is a $50.0 million line of credit scheduled to expire on June 29, 2011 and which can be cancelled at the option of the lender without default upon 60 days notice. The other is a $100.0 million line of credit scheduled to expire on October 28, 2011. See Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements attached as Appendix D to this proxy statement. Borrowings under these lines of credit are used to fund, and are secured by, consumer residential loans that are held for sale. Loans under these lines of credit are repaid using proceeds from the sales of loans by HLC Inc. At March 31, 2011, there was $66.5 million in the aggregate outstanding under the lines of credit.

        Further reductions in our available credit, or the inability to renew or replace these lines, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We attempt to mitigate the impact of current conditions and future credit market disruptions by maintaining committed and uncommitted warehouse lines of credit with several financial institutions. However, these financial institutions, like all financial institutions, are subject to the same adverse market conditions and may be affected by recent market disruptions, which may affect the decision to reduce or renew these lines or the pricing for these lines. Current committed lines of credit may be reduced or not renewed, alternative financing may be unavailable or inadequate to support our operations and the cost of alternative financing may not allow us to operate at profitable levels. Because HLC Inc. is highly dependent on the availability of credit to finance its operations, the continuation of current credit market conditions for a prolonged period of time or the worsening of such conditions could have

18


Table of Contents


an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, particularly over the next few years.

         Our financial results fluctuate as a result of seasonality, which may make it difficult to predict our future performance and may affect our common stock price.

        Our business is generally subject to seasonal trends. These trends reflect the general patterns of housing sales, which typically peak in the spring and summer seasons. Additionally, the broader cyclical trends in the mortgage and real estate markets have upset the usual seasonal trends. As a result, our quarterly operating results may fluctuate, which may negatively impact the price of our common stock.

         Indemnification of secondary market purchasers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

        In connection with the sale of loans to secondary market purchasers, HLC Inc. makes certain representations regarding related borrower credit information, loan documentation and collateral. To the extent that these representations are incorrect, HLC Inc. may be required to repurchase loans or indemnify secondary market purchasers for losses due to borrower defaults. In connection with the sale of loans to secondary market purchasers, HLC Inc. also agrees to repurchase loans or indemnify secondary market purchasers for losses due to early payment defaults (i.e., late payments during a limited time period immediately following HLC Inc.'s origination of the loan). In connection with the sale of a majority of its loans to secondary market purchasers, HLC Inc. also agrees to repay all or a portion of the initial premiums paid by secondary market purchasers in instances where the borrower prepays the loan within a specified period of time. HLC Inc. has made payments for these liabilities in the past and expects to make payments for these in the future even if the HLC asset sale transaction is completed since we have agreed to retain the resident mortgage loans owned or originated by us or our subsidiaries that close prior to the closing of such transaction.

         We depend on relationships with Network Lenders, credit providers and secondary market investors and any adverse changes in these relationships could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Our success depends, in significant part, on the quality and pricing of services provided by, and the continued financial stability of, Network Lenders participating in our networks, credit providers and secondary market investors. Network Lenders could cease participating or choose not to participate in our networks, fail to pay matching and closing fees when due and cease providing quality services on competitive terms. In addition, credit providers and secondary market investors could choose not to make credit available to HLC Inc., and secondary market investors could cease purchasing loans from HLC Inc. Revenues attributable to purchases of loans by three entities, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo, represented approximately 25%, 24% and 11%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues in 2010. The occurrence of one of more of these events with a significant number of Network Lenders, credit providers or secondary market investors could, alone or in combination, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

         Network Lenders are not precluded from offering loans outside of our networks.

        Because our businesses do not have exclusive relationships with Network Lenders, consumers may obtain loans directly from these lenders without having to use our networks. Network Lenders can offer loans directly to consumers through marketing campaigns or other traditional methods of distribution, such as referral arrangements, brick and mortar operations or broker agreements. Network Lenders can also offer loans to prospective customers online directly, through one or more online competitors of our businesses, or both. If a significant number of consumers seek loans directly from Network Lenders

19


Table of Contents


as opposed to through our networks, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

         A breach of our network security or the misappropriation or misuse of personal consumer information may have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Any penetration of network security or other misappropriation or misuse of personal consumer information we maintain could interrupt our business operations and subject us to increased costs, litigation and other liabilities. Claims could also be made against us for other misuse of personal information, such as for unauthorized purposes or identity theft, which could result in litigation and financial liabilities, as well as administrative action from governmental authorities. Security breaches could also significantly damage our reputation with consumers and third parties with whom we do business. For example, in April 2008, several mortgage companies had gained unauthorized access to our customer information database and had used the information to solicit mortgage loans directly from our customers. We promptly reported the situation to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and cooperated fully with the FBI's investigation. While we do not believe this situation resulted in any fraud on the consumer or identity theft, we notified affected consumers as required by applicable law. Several putative class action lawsuits were filed against us seeking to recover damages for consumers allegedly injured by this incident. All but one of these lawsuits have been dismissed or withdrawn.

        As in the case of any financial services company, we may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against and remedy any potential or existing security breaches and their consequences. We also face risks associated with security breaches affecting third parties with which we are affiliated or otherwise conduct business online. Consumers are generally concerned with security and privacy of the Internet, and any publicized security problems affecting our businesses or those of third parties may discourage consumers from doing business with us, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

         Network Lenders may not provide competitive levels of service to consumers, which could adversely affect our brands and businesses and their ability to attract consumers.

        The ability of our businesses to provide consumers with a high-quality experience depends, in part, on consumers receiving competitive levels of convenience, customer service, price and responsiveness from Network Lenders with whom they are matched through our networks. If Network Lenders do not provide consumers with competitive levels of convenience, customer service, price and responsiveness, the value of our various brands may be harmed, the ability of our businesses to attract consumers to our websites may be limited and the number of consumers ultimately matched through our networks may decline, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

         Failure to maintain brand recognition and attract and retain customers in a cost-effective manner could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Our businesses must promote and maintain their various brands successfully to attract visitors to their websites, convert these visitors into paying customers and capture repeat business from existing customers. This requires us to spend money for and devote our resources to online and offline advertising, marketing and related efforts, and continually provide and introduce high-quality products and services.

        We believe that continuing to build and maintain the recognition of our various brands is critical to achieving increased demand for the services we provide because brand recognition is a key differentiating factor among providers of online services. Accordingly, we have spent, and expect to continue to spend, significant amounts of capital on, and devote significant resources to, branding,

20


Table of Contents


advertising and other marketing initiatives, which may not be successful or cost-effective. The failure of our businesses to maintain the recognition of their respective brands and attract and retain customers in a cost-effective manner could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        In addition, publicity from legal proceedings against us or our businesses, particularly governmental proceedings, consumer class action litigation or the disclosure of information security breaches, could negatively impact our various brands, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

         We depend on search engines and other online sources to attract visitors to our websites, and if we are unable to attract these visitors and convert them into customers in a cost-effective manner, our business and financial results may be harmed.

        Our success depends on our ability to attract online consumers to our websites and convert them into customers in a cost-effective manner. We depend, in part, on search engines and other online sources for our website traffic. We are included in search results as a result of both paid search listings, where we purchase specific search terms that will result in the inclusion of our listing, and algorithmic searches that depend upon the searchable content on our sites. Search engines and other online sources revise their algorithms from time to time in an attempt to optimize their search results.

        If one or more of the search engines or other online sources on which we rely for website traffic were to modify its general methodology for how it displays our websites, resulting in fewer consumers clicking through to our websites, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer. If any free search engine on which we rely begins charging fees for listing or placement, or if one or more of the search engines or other online sources on which we rely for purchased listings, modifies or terminates its relationship with us, our expenses could rise, we could lose customers and traffic to our websites could decrease, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

         If we are unable to continually enhance our products and services and adapt them to technological changes and customer needs, including the emergence of new computing devices and more sophisticated online services, we may lose market share and revenue and our business could suffer.

        We need to anticipate, develop and introduce new products, services and applications on a timely and cost-effective basis that keeps pace with technological developments and changing customer needs. For example, the number of individuals who access the internet through devices other than a personal computer, such as personal digital assistants, mobile telephones, tablets, televisions and set-top box devices, has increased significantly, and this trend is likely to continue. Our websites were designed for rich, graphical environments such as those available on desktop and laptop computers. The lower resolution, functionality and memory associated with alternative devices currently available may make the access and use of our websites through such devices difficult. Because each manufacturer or distributor may establish unique technical standards for its devices, our websites may not be functional or viewable on these devices. Additionally, new devices and new platforms are continually being released. It is difficult to predict the problems we may encounter in improving our websites' functionality with these alternative devices, and we may need to devote significant resources to the improvement, support and maintenance of our websites. If we fail to develop our websites to respond to these or other technological developments and changing customer needs cost effectively, we may lose market share, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

21


Table of Contents


         Failure to comply with existing or evolving laws, rules and regulations, or to obtain and maintain required licenses, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        The failure of our businesses to comply with existing laws, rules and regulations, or to obtain required licenses, could result in administrative fines and/or proceedings against us or our businesses by governmental agencies or litigation by consumers or both, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our businesses market and provide services in heavily regulated industries through a number of different online and offline channels across the United States. As a result, our businesses are subject to a variety of laws, rules, regulations, policies and procedures in various jurisdictions in the United States, which are subject to change at any time.

        Our businesses conduct marketing activities via the telephone, the mail and through online marketing channels. These marketing activities are governed by numerous federal and state regulations, such as the Telemarketing Sales Rule, state telemarketing laws, federal and state privacy laws, the CAN-SPAM Act, and the Federal Trade Commission Act.

        Additional federal, state and in some instances, local, laws regulate residential lending activities in particular. These laws generally regulate the manner in which lending and lending-related activities are marketed or made available, including advertising and other consumer disclosures, payments for services and record keeping requirements. These laws include the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, or RESPA, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act and various state laws. In addition, state laws often restrict the amount of interest and fees that may be charged by a lender or mortgage broker, or otherwise regulate the manner in which lenders or mortgage brokers operate or advertise. Furthermore, Congress, many state legislatures and state agencies are proposing, or have recently implemented, additional restrictions on mortgage lending practices. Compliance with these new requirements may render it more difficult to operate or may raise our internal costs. Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulatory requirements may result in, among other things, revocation of required licenses or registrations, loss of approval status, termination of contracts without compensation, administrative enforcement actions and fines, class action lawsuits, cease and desist orders and civil and criminal liability.

        Most states require licenses to solicit, broker or make loans secured by residential mortgages and other consumer loans to residents of those states, and in many cases require the licensure or registration of individual employees engaged in aspects of this business. In 2008, Congress mandated that all states adopt certain minimum standards for the licensing of individuals involved in mortgage lending or loan brokering, and many state legislatures and state agencies are in the process of adopting or implementing additional licensing, continuing education, and similar requirements on mortgage lenders, brokers and their employees. Compliance with these new requirements may render it more difficult to operate or may raise our internal costs. The application of these requirements to persons operating online is not always clear. Moreover, any of the licenses or rights currently held by our businesses or our employees may be revoked prior to, or may not be renewed upon, their expiration. In addition, our businesses or our employees may not be granted new licenses or rights for which they may be required to apply from time to time in the future.

        Likewise, states or municipalities may adopt statutes or regulations making it unattractive, impracticable, or infeasible for our businesses to continue to conduct business in that jurisdiction. The withdrawal from any jurisdiction due to emerging legal requirements could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

22


Table of Contents

        Our businesses are also subject to various state, federal and/or local laws, rules and regulations that regulate the amount and nature of fees that may be charged for transactions and incentives, such as rebates, that may be offered to consumers by our businesses, as well as the manner in which these businesses may offer, advertise or promote transactions. For example, RESPA generally prohibits the payment or receipt of referral fees and fee shares or splits in connection with residential mortgage loan transactions, subject to certain exceptions. The applicability of referral fee and fee sharing prohibitions to lenders and real estate providers, including online networks, may have the effect of reducing the types and amounts of fees that may be charged or paid in connection with real estate-secured loan offerings or activities, including mortgage brokerage and lending, or otherwise limiting the ability to conduct marketing and referral activities.

         Passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and related legislative or executive actions may have a significant impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

        In July 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, which contains a comprehensive set of provisions designed to govern the practices and oversight of financial institutions and other participants in the financial markets. The Dodd-Frank Act requires various federal agencies to adopt a broad range of new rules and regulations, and to prepare numerous studies and reports for Congress, which could result in additional legislative or regulatory action. The federal agencies are given significant discretion in drafting the rules and regulations, and consequently, many of the details and much of the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act may not be known for many months or years.

        The Dodd-Frank Act, as well as other legislative and regulatory changes, could have a significant impact on us by, for example, requiring us to change our business practices, limiting our ability to pursue business opportunities, imposing additional costs on us, limiting fees we can charge, impacting the value of our assets, or otherwise adversely affecting our businesses. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act established the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to regulate consumer financial services and products, including credit, savings and payment products. The effect of the Dodd-Frank Act on our business and operations could be significant, depending upon final implementing regulations, the actions of our competitors and the behavior of other marketplace participants. In addition, we may be required to invest significant management time and resources to address the various provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and the numerous regulations that are required to be issued under it.

        In light of recent conditions in the U.S. financial markets and economy, as well as a heightened regulatory and Congressional focus on consumer lending, regulators have increased their scrutiny of the financial services industry, the result of which has included new regulations and guidance. We are unable to predict the long-term impact of this enhanced scrutiny.

         If Network Lenders fail to produce required documents for examination by, or other affiliated parties fail to make certain filings with, state regulators, we may be subject to fines, forfeitures and the revocation of required licenses.

        Some of the states in which our businesses maintain licenses require them to collect various loan documents from Network Lenders and produce these documents for examination by state regulators. While Network Lenders are contractually obligated to provide these documents upon request, these measures may be insufficient. Failure to produce required documents for examination could result in fines, as well as the revocation of our businesses' licenses to operate in key states, which could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Regulations promulgated by some states may impose compliance obligations on directors, executive officers, large customers and any person who acquires a certain percentage (for example, 10% or more)

23


Table of Contents


of our common stock, including requiring such persons to periodically file financial and other personal and business information with state regulators. If any such person refuses or fails to comply with these requirements, our businesses may be unable to obtain a license, and existing licensing arrangements may be jeopardized. The inability to obtain, or the loss of, required licenses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

         Our success depends, in part, on the integrity of our systems and infrastructures. System interruption and the lack of integration and redundancy in these systems and infrastructures may have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Our success depends, in part, on our ability to maintain the integrity of our systems and infrastructures, including websites, information and related systems, call centers and distribution and fulfillment facilities. We also rely on third-party computer systems, broadband and other communications systems and third-party service providers to assist us provide the services we offer and to facilitate, process and fulfill transactions. Fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failure, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, acts of war or terrorism, acts of God, unauthorized intrusions or computer viruses, and similar events or disruptions may damage or interrupt computer, broadband or other communications systems and infrastructures at any time. System interruption, outages or delays or the lack of integration and redundancy in our information systems and infrastructures or in those of third parties on which we rely may adversely affect our ability to operate websites, process and fulfill transactions, respond to customer inquiries and generally maintain cost-efficient operations. In addition, we may not have adequate insurance coverage to compensate for losses from a major interruption. If any of these adverse events were to occur, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

         We have identified a material weakness in our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, and we may be unable to develop, implement and maintain appropriate controls in future periods.

        We have identified a material weakness in our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting relating to ineffective controls over the application and monitoring of accounting for income taxes. Specifically, we did not have controls designed and in place to ensure effective oversight of the work performed by, and the accuracy of financial information provided by, third party tax advisors. Until remediated, this material weakness could result in a misstatement in tax-related accounts that could result in a material misstatement in our interim or annual consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

        We are currently in the process of addressing and remediating the deficiencies that gave rise to this material weakness. Since the material weakness was identified, we have undertaken an evaluation of our available resources to provide effective oversight of the work performed by our third party tax advisors and are in the process of identifying necessary changes to our processes as required. Additionally, we are evaluating the resources available and provided to us by the third party tax advisors and identifying changes as required.

        If we are unable to maintain appropriate internal controls, we may not have adequate, accurate or timely financial information, we may experience material post-closing adjustments in future financial statements and we may be unable to meet our reporting obligations or comply with the requirements of the SEC or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which could result in the imposition of sanctions, including the inability of registered broker dealers to make a market in our common stock, or investigation by regulatory authorities. Any such action or other negative results caused by our inability to meet our reporting requirements or comply with legal and regulatory requirements or by disclosure of an accounting, reporting or control issue could adversely affect the trading price of our securities. We

24


Table of Contents

cannot provide assurance that our remediation measures will be completed or become effective by any given date.

        Further and continued determinations that there are significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the effectiveness of our internal controls could also reduce our ability to obtain financing or could increase the cost of any financing we obtain and require additional expenditures to comply with applicable requirements.

         The processing, storage, use and disclosure of personal data could give rise to liabilities as a result of governmental regulation, conflicting legal requirements or differing views of personal privacy rights.

        In the processing of consumer transactions, our businesses receive, transmit and store a large volume of personally identifiable information and other user data. The sharing, use, disclosure and protection of this information are governed by our privacy and data security policies. Moreover, there are federal, state and international laws regarding privacy and the storing, sharing, use, disclosure and protection of personally identifiable information and user data. Specifically, personally identifiable information is increasingly subject to legislation and regulations in numerous jurisdictions around the world, the intent of which is to protect the privacy of personal information that is collected, processed and transmitted in or from the governing jurisdiction. We could be adversely affected if legislation or regulations are expanded to require changes in business practices or privacy policies, or if governing jurisdictions interpret or implement their legislation or regulations in ways that negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Our businesses may also become exposed to potential liabilities as a result of differing views on the privacy of consumer and other user data our businesses collect. Our failure, or the failure by the various third party vendors and service providers with which we do business, to comply with applicable privacy policies or federal, state or international laws or any compromise of security that results in the unauthorized release of personally identifiable information or other user data could damage the reputation of our businesses, discourage potential users from our products and services and result in fines and proceedings by governmental agencies and consumers, any which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

         We may fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights or may be accused of infringing intellectual property rights of third parties.

        We may fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights or may be accused of infringing intellectual property rights of third parties. Our intellectual property rights are critical to our success. Our businesses also rely heavily upon software codes, informational databases and other components that make up their products and services.

        We rely on a combination of laws and contractual restrictions with employees, customers, suppliers, affiliates and others to establish and protect these proprietary rights. Despite these precautions, it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use trade secrets or copyrighted intellectual property without authorization which, if discovered, might require legal action to correct. In addition, third parties may independently and lawfully develop substantially similar intellectual properties.

        We have generally registered and continue to apply to register, or secure by contract when appropriate, our principal trademarks and service marks as they are developed and used, and reserve and register domain names when and where we deem appropriate. We generally consider the protection of our trademarks to be important for purposes of brand maintenance and reputation. Effective trademark protection may not be available or may not be sought in every country in which our products and services are made available, and contractual disputes may affect the use of marks governed by private contract. Similarly, not every variation of a domain name may be available or be

25


Table of Contents


registered, even if available. Our failure to protect our intellectual property rights in a meaningful manner or challenges to related contractual rights could result in erosion of brand names and limit our ability to control marketing on or through the Internet using our various domain names or otherwise, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Some of our businesses have been granted patents or have patent applications pending with the United States Patent and Trademark Office or various foreign patent authorities for various proprietary technologies and other inventions. We consider applying for patents or for other appropriate statutory protection when we develop valuable new or improved proprietary technologies or inventions are identified, and will continue to consider the appropriateness of filing for patents to protect future proprietary technologies and inventions as circumstances may warrant. The status of any patent involves complex legal and factual questions, and the breadth of claims allowed is uncertain. Accordingly, any patent application filed may not result in a patent being issued or existing or future patents may not be found by a court to be valid or be afforded adequate protection against competitors with similar technology. In addition, third parties may create new products or methods that achieve similar results without infringing upon patents that we own. Likewise, the issuance of a patent to us does not mean that our processes or inventions will be found not to infringe upon patents or other rights previously issued to third parties.

        From time to time, in the ordinary course of business we are subjected to legal proceedings and claims, or threatened legal proceedings or claims, including allegations of infringement of the trademarks, copyrights, patents and other intellectual property rights of third parties. In addition, litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights claimed by others. Any litigation of this nature, regardless of outcome or merit, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management and technical resources, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Patent litigation tends to be particularly protracted and expensive, as evidenced by the patent litigation settlements we announced in the first quarter of 2010.

         Our framework for managing risks may not be effective in mitigating our risk of loss.

        Our risk management framework seeks to mitigate risk and appropriately balance risk and return. We have established processes and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor and report the types of risk to which we are subject, including credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, legal and compliance risk, and strategic risk. We seek to monitor and control our risk exposure through a framework of policies, procedures and reporting requirements. Management of our risks in some cases depends upon the use of analytical and forecasting models. If the models that we use to mitigate these risks are inadequate, we may incur increased losses. In addition, there may be risks that exist, or that develop in the future, that we have not appropriately anticipated, identified or mitigated. If our risk management framework does not effectively identify or mitigate our risks, we could suffer unexpected losses and could be materially adversely affected.

         Acquisitions or strategic investments that we pursue may not be successful and could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition.

        We may consider or undertake strategic acquisitions of, or material investments in, businesses, products, portfolios of loans or technologies, such as our recent acquisition of certain assets of SurePoint Lending. We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition or investment candidates, or even if we do identify suitable candidates, they may be difficult to finance, expensive to fund and there is no guarantee that we can obtain any necessary regulatory approvals or complete the transactions on terms that are favorable to us. To the extent we pay the purchase price of any acquisition or investment in cash, it would reduce our cash balances and regulatory capital, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition; similarly, if the purchase price is paid with our stock, it would be dilutive to

26


Table of Contents


our stockholders. In addition, we may assume liabilities associated with a business acquisition or investment, including unrecorded liabilities that are not discovered at the time of the transaction, and the repayment of those liabilities may have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

        We may not be able to successfully integrate the personnel, operations, businesses, products, or technologies of an acquisition or investment. Integration may be particularly challenging if we enter into a line of business in which we have limited experience and the business operates in a difficult legal, regulatory or competitive environment. We may find that we do not have adequate operations or expertise to manage the new business. The integration of any acquisition or investment may divert our management's time and resources from our core business, which could impair our relationships with our current employees, customers and strategic partners and disrupt our operations. Acquisitions and investments also may not perform to our expectations for various reasons, including the loss of key personnel or customers. If we fail to integrate acquisitions or investments or realize the expected benefits, we may lose the return on these acquisitions or investments or incur additional transaction costs and our business and financial condition may be harmed as a result.

         Market price and trading volume of our common stock may be volatile and may face negative pressure.

        The market price for our common stock has been volatile since our spin-off. This volatility has likely been exacerbated by recent market instability. The market price for our common stock could continue to fluctuate significantly for many reasons, including the risks identified herein or reasons unrelated to our performance. These factors may result in short or long-term negative pressure on the value of our common stock.


Risks Related to the HLC Asset Sale Transaction

         The failure to complete the HLC asset sale transaction may result in a decrease in the market value of our common stock and limit our ability to grow and implement our business strategies.

        Discover Bank's obligation to close the HLC asset sale transaction is subject to a number of contingencies, including approval by our stockholders, Discover Bank's receipt of approvals from regulatory authorities to complete the transactions contemplated by the asset purchase agreement, Discover Bank's receipt of binding written proposals from certain identified financial institutions relating to their commitments to purchase mortgage loans funded by the LendingTree Loans business after the closing of the HLC asset sale transaction, our obtaining of consents required under certain agreements to which we are a party, Discover Bank's employment of David Norris, the current president of HLC Inc., Discover Bank's employment of a certain number of employees from certain divisions and locations of the LendingTree Loans business, our compliance with certain required ratios and metrics with respect to the LendingTree Loans business during the period prior to the closing, release of all liens on the assets being sold to Discover Bank and other closing conditions set forth in the asset purchase agreement. We cannot control some of these conditions and we cannot assure you that they will be satisfied, or that Discover Bank will waive any that are not satisfied. If the HLC asset sale transaction is not completed, we may be subject to a number of risks, including the following:

27


Table of Contents

        The occurrence of any of these events individually or in combination could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation and the market value of our common stock may decline.

        Additionally, we have incurred substantial transaction costs and diversion of management resources in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction, and we will continue to do so until the closing. If the HLC asset sale transaction is not completed, we will be entitled to receive a termination fee or damages from Discover Bank in only limited circumstances. Even if we do receive such a fee or damages, it may not fully compensate us for costs incurred, lost opportunities and damages to the LendingTree Loans business caused by the pendency of this transaction.

         While the HLC asset sale transaction is pending, it creates uncertainty about our future which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        While the HLC asset sale transaction is pending, it creates uncertainty about our future. As a result of this uncertainty, our current or potential business partners may decide to delay, defer or cancel entering into new business arrangements with us pending completion or termination of the HLC asset sale transaction. In addition, while the HLC asset sale transaction is pending, we are subject to a number of risks, including:

        The occurrence of any of these events individually or in combination could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation.

         The asset purchase agreement limits our ability to pursue alternatives to the HLC asset sale transaction.

        The asset purchase agreement contains provisions that make it more difficult for us to sell the LendingTree Loans business to a party other than Discover Bank. These provisions include a non-solicitation provision (including certain matching rights), a provision requiring that we submit the HLC asset sale transaction to our stockholders for approval unless the asset purchase agreement has been terminated in accordance with its terms, and provisions obligating us to pay Discover Bank a termination fee of $2.2 million under certain circumstances. These provisions could discourage a third party that might have an interest in acquiring all of or a significant part of the LendingTree Loans business from considering or proposing such an acquisition, even if that party were prepared to pay consideration with a higher value than the consideration to be paid by Discover Bank.

         If the HLC asset sale transaction is not completed, there may not be any other offers from potential acquirors.

        If the HLC asset sale transaction is not completed, we may seek another purchaser for such assets. We have no indication that any other party will have an interest in purchasing these assets on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

28


Table of Contents


         We will not receive the two additional $10 million payments if we do not meet certain conditions, including maintenance of the LendingTree Exchanges business and certain financial and operational metrics associated with the LendingTree Exchanges business.

        Of the approximate $55.9 million purchase price for the assets we agreed to sell, $35,888,536 is due upon the closing of the transaction and $10 million is due on each of the first and second anniversaries of the closing of the transaction, subject to certain conditions as described in the asset purchase agreement. The conditions for the first and second $10 million payments include maintenance of the LendingTree Exchanges business and certain financial and operational metrics associated with the LendingTree Exchanges business. Maintenance of such financial and operational metrics is not fully within our control. If any of the conditions to which such $10 million payments are subject are not satisfied, we will not receive such payments. See "ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT—Purchase Price" below.

         The asset purchase agreement may expose us to contingent liabilities.

        Under the asset purchase agreement, we have agreed to indemnify Discover Bank for a breach or inaccuracy of any representation, warranty or covenant made by us in the asset purchase agreement, for any liability of ours that is not being assumed by Discover Bank, for any claims by our stockholders against Discover Bank and for our failure to comply with any applicable bulk sales law, subject to certain limitations. Significant indemnification claims by Discover Bank could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. See "ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT—Indemnification" below.

         We cannot compete in the business of originating, funding or selling of mortgages for three years from the date of closing.

        Subject to specified exceptions, we have agreed we will not establish, own, manage, operate, control, invest in or otherwise engage in the business of origination, funding or sales of mortgages within the United States for three years from the date of closing. See "ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT—Additional Covenants" below. Should market conditions or our strategic direction change, we will not be able to re-establish mortgage lending as part of our business during the restricted period.

         Under specified circumstances, if the asset purchase agreement is terminated and prior to such termination an acquisition proposal has been publicly announced or if our board of directors changes its recommendation that our stockholders approve the HLC asset sale transaction, we will have to pay Discover Bank a fee of $2.2 million. The requirement to pay such termination fee may discourage third parties from submitting an acquisition proposal.

        Under the terms of the asset purchase agreement, we must pay Discover Bank a fee of $2.2 million if (i) we or Discover Bank terminate the asset purchase agreement because the closing of the HLC asset sale transaction has not occurred on or before October 9, 2011, unless otherwise extended, and prior to such termination, an acquisition proposal is publicly disclosed, (ii) we or Discover Bank terminate the asset purchase agreement if our stockholders do not approve the HLC asset sale transaction at the Special Meeting and, prior to such termination, an acquisition proposal is publicly disclosed, (iii) Discover Bank terminates the asset purchase agreement because our board of directors changed its recommendation to our stockholders prior to the approval of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal by our stockholders or we violated certain other covenants related to such recommendation or (iv) Discover Bank terminates the asset purchase agreement because we failed to hold a stockholders meeting to vote on the HLC Asset Sale Proposal by October 9, 2011 and such failure is due to a material breach of our covenants relating to holding such meeting. The requirement that we pay Discover Bank the $2.2 million termination fee may discourage third parties from submitting an acquisition proposal.

29


Table of Contents


         Because the LendingTree Loans business represented approximately 62.7% of our total revenues last year, our business following the HLC asset sale transaction will be substantially reduced. Many of our overhead costs will represent a greater percentage of our revenues.

        The LendingTree Loans business represented approximately 62.7% of our total revenues in 2010, and 54.3% and 42.8% in 2009 and 2008. Following the HLC asset sale transaction, we will continue to operate only the LendingTree Exchanges business.

        Our results of operation and financial condition may be materially adversely effected if we fail to effectively reduce our overhead costs to reflect the reduced scale of our operations or the LendingTree Exchanges business does not perform to our expectations.

         Because our business will be smaller following the HLC asset sale transaction, our common stock may be delisted from the NASDAQ Global Market if we fail to satisfy the continued listing standards of that market.

        If we are unable to satisfy the continued listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Market, our common stock may be delisted from that market. In order to continue to be listed on the NASDAQ Global Market, we must meet the bid price and total stockholders requirements as set forth in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5450(a) and at least one of the three standards in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5450(b). Pursuant to NASDAQ Listing Rule 5450(a), the bid price of our common stock cannot fall below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive business days and we must have at least 400 total stockholders (including both holders of beneficial interest and holders of record). We believe that to continue to qualify for listing on the NASDAQ Global Market, we will need to satisfy the Equity Standard under NASDAQ Listing Rule 5450(b), which requires:

        If we do not satisfy those standards and we are delisted from the NASDAQ Global Market, we may apply to transfer our common stock listing to the NASDAQ Capital Market. However, our application may not be granted if we do not satisfy the applicable listing requirements for the NASDAQ Capital Market at the time of the application. Even if we successfully transfer our common stock listing to the NASDAQ Capital Market, our common stock could be delisted from the NASDAQ Capital Market if we fail to satisfy the continued listing standards for that tier of the NASDAQ Stock Market. If our common stock were delisted from the NASDAQ Stock Market, we may apply to transfer our common stock listing to the NYSE Amex Equities market. However, our application may not be granted if we do not satisfy the applicable listing requirements for that market at the time of the application. If our common stock were to be delisted from the NASDAQ Global Market and we could not satisfy the listing standards of the NASDAQ Capital Market or the NYSE Amex Equities market, trading of our common stock most likely would be conducted in the over-the-counter market on an electronic bulletin board established for unlisted securities such as the Pink Sheets or the OTC Bulletin Board. Such trading could substantially reduce the market liquidity of our common stock. As a result, an investor would find it more difficult to dispose of, or obtain accurate quotations for the price of, our common stock.

30


Table of Contents

        If our common stock is delisted from the NASDAQ Global Market and we could not satisfy the listing standards of the NASDAQ Capital Market or the NYSE Amex Equities market and the trading price were to decline from current levels such that it remained below $5.00 per share, trading in our common stock might also become subject to the requirements of certain rules promulgated under the Exchange Act, which require additional disclosure by broker-dealers in connection with any trade involving a stock defined as a "penny stock" (generally, any equity security not listed on a national securities exchange that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions). Many brokerage firms are reluctant to recommend low-priced stocks to their clients. Moreover, various regulations and policies restrict the ability of stockholders to borrow against or "margin" low-priced stocks, and declines in the stock price below certain levels may trigger unexpected margin calls. Additionally, because brokers' commissions on low-priced stocks generally represent a higher percentage of the stock price than commissions on higher priced stocks, the current price of the common stock can result in an individual stockholder paying transaction costs that represent a higher percentage of total share value than would be the case if our share price were higher. This factor may also limit the willingness of institutions to purchase our common stock. Finally, the additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by these requirements could discourage broker-dealers from facilitating trades in our common stock, which could severely limit the market liquidity of the stock and the ability of investors to trade our common stock.

        If we were to fail to meet the listing requirements of the NASDAQ Stock Market and then do not take such corrective action as the NASDAQ Listing Qualifications Department may require, trading in our securities may be halted and we may be delisted from the NASDAQ Global Market.

31


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL #1
HLC ASSET SALE PROPOSAL

Parties to the Asset Purchase Agreement

        Tree.com is the parent of LendingTree, LLC, Home Loan Center, Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc. Tree.com is publicly traded on the NASDAQ Global Market (symbol: TREE). We currently operate our business in two segments. Under our LendingTree Loans segment we originate, process, approve and fund various residential real estate loans through Home Loan Center, Inc., which we sometimes refer to as HLC Inc. We sometimes refer to the business we operate under this segment as the LendingTree Loans business. Under our Exchanges segment we provide online lead generation networks and call centers that connect consumers and service providers principally in the lending, real estate, higher education, home service, insurance and automobile marketplaces. We sometimes refer to the business we operate under this segment as the LendingTree Exchanges business. The principal executive offices of Tree.com, Inc. and LendingTree, LLC are located at 11115 Rushmore Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28277 and the phone number is (704) 541-5351. The principal executive offices of HLC Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc. are located at 163 Technology Drive, Irvine, California 92618 and the phone number is (888) 866-1212.

        Discover Bank, a Delaware banking corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discover Financial Services which is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange (symbol: DFS). Discover Financial Services is a direct banking and payment services company which offers credit cards, student loans, personal loans and deposit products through Discover Bank. Discover Financial Services is a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, subject to oversight, regulation and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and is also a financial holding company under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. The principal executive offices of Discover Bank are located at 12 Read's Way, New Castle, Delaware 19720 and the phone number is (302) 323-7184.


Background of the HLC Asset Sale Transaction

        Over the past several years, the mortgage industry has experienced significant volatility due to various factors including the decline in housing values, increased mortgage defaults related to such decline and to the relaxed lending standards that preceded such decline, the failure of government intervention in many banks and other financial institutions, and the resulting periods of constrained credit availability and tighter lending standards. The combination of these factors and the general decline in the economy have significantly limited many consumers' ability to qualify for mortgage refinancings or afford new home purchases. Furthermore, a general increase in the interest rate environment has been predicted for some time, which would make the possibility of refinancing existing home mortgages less compelling to consumers and, thereby, adversely affect the LendingTree Loans business. In addition, changes in legal and regulatory requirements to which the LendingTree Loans business is subject have made it more costly in certain respects for us to operate our business. Our board of directors, with the assistance of management, has periodically reviewed and assessed our company's business strategy and the various trends and conditions affecting our company and conditions affecting the mortgage industry in general. Our board of directors has explored a variety of strategic alternatives with the goal to increase revenue and profitability and maximize stockholder value. This review and assessment has included, among other things, consideration of whether it would be in the best interests of our stockholders for our company to continue to operate the LendingTree Loans business.

32


Table of Contents

        During the spring of 2010, representatives of an investment bank contacted Douglas R. Lebda, our chairman and chief executive officer, concerning the possible interest of one of its clients, Party A, in exploring a potential strategic transaction involving HLC Inc.

        On June 8, 2010, Mr. Lebda met with representatives of Party A to discuss the businesses of their respective companies and the possibility a potential strategic transaction involving HLC Inc.

        On June 29, 2010, representatives of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. contacted Mr. Lebda concerning the possible interest by one of its clients in exploring a potential strategic transaction involving HLC Inc. Such client was later identified as Discover Financial Services which we sometimes refer to as DFS.

        On July 22, 2010, we and DFS entered into a mutual non-disclosure and confidentiality agreement in contemplation of a meeting between the parties scheduled for July 30, 2010.

        On July 26, 2010, Mr. Lebda had a telephone call with representatives of JPMorgan to discuss preparations for the July 30, 2010 meeting.

        On July 30, 2010, representatives of our company and DFS met at our corporate headquarters in Charlotte, North Carolina. At that meeting, our representatives provided the DFS representatives with an overview of the LendingTree Loans business and the representatives discussed generally the possibility of a strategic transaction involving HLC Inc.

        On August 2 and 3, 2010, representatives of Party A visited HLC Inc.'s corporate headquarters in Irvine, California, to meet with executives of our company and HLC Inc. At that meeting, our representatives provided the representatives of Party A an overview of the LendingTree Loans business.

        On August 17, 2010, representatives of DFS visited HLC Inc.'s corporate headquarters in Irvine, California, to meet with executives of our company and HLC Inc. At that meeting, our representatives provided the representatives of DFS with an updated overview of the LendingTree Loans business.

        On September 9, 2010, we provided due diligence materials to DFS in response to due diligence requests.

        During September and October 2010, DFS continued its due diligence investigation of the LendingTree Loans business.

        As of September 16, 2010, we executed a non-disclosure agreement with Party B, who was introduced to us by a representative of Milestone Advisors, LLC for the purpose of exploring a potential strategic transaction involving HLC Inc.

        On October 13, 2010, representatives of Party B visited HLC Inc.'s corporate headquarters in Irvine, California, to meet with executives of our company and HLC Inc. At that meeting, our representatives provided the representatives of Party B with an overview of the LendingTree Loans business. Following that meeting, Milestone Advisors informed us that Party B was not interested in pursuing a strategic transaction involving HLC Inc. at this time.

        On November 3, 2010, Mr. Lebda contacted representatives of JPMorgan to inform them that our company was going to conduct an issuer tender offer and that we were discontinuing discussions with DFS regarding a potential strategic transaction involving HLC Inc.

        On November 16, 2010, we announced that HLC Inc. entered into an asset purchase agreement with First Residential Mortgage Network, Inc. dba SurePoint Lending. Pursuant to this agreement, HLC Inc. agreed to purchase certain specified assets and liabilities of SurePoint related to its mortgage loan, title and escrow and related services businesses. We refer to the acquisition by HLC Inc. of these assets and liabilities of SurePoint as the SurePoint acquisition.

33


Table of Contents

        On November 18, 2010, we launched a modified "Dutch auction" issuer tender offer for up to $15 million in value of shares of our common stock. Following expiration of the offer on December 17, 2010, we accepted for purchase 312,339 shares of our common stock at a price of $7.75 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $2.4 million.

        On January 11, 2011, Mr. Lebda contacted representatives of each of Party A and DFS to re-assess their respective interest in restarting discussions concerning a potential strategic transaction involving HLC Inc. The representative of Party A informed Mr. Lebda that Party A was not interested in restarting discussions. The representative of DFS informed Mr. Lebda that DFS was interested in restarting discussions.

        On January 27, 2011, DFS, through JPMorgan, provided a non-binding indication of interest to acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities of the LendingTree Loans business and to establish a multi-year agreement under which we would continue to operate a loan origination business that would serve customers generated by the LendingTree Exchanges, with DFS providing mortgage processing services to HLC Inc. We refer to this non-binding indication of interest as the January 2011 proposal. The January 2011 proposal valued the assets and liabilities proposed to be acquired and assumed at between $50 million and $55 million. The January 2011 proposal reserved judgment, pending further due diligence, as to whether DFS would acquire the assets and liabilities we agreed to acquire in the SurePoint acquisition.

        On February 2, 2011, a representative of our company spoke with representatives of JPMorgan and DFS to discuss the January 2011 proposal. During this conversation, the representative of our company indicated that continuing to maintain our mortgage origination business was undesirable due to the costs involved and the restrictions that would be imposed under continued warehouse lending agreements. The representative of our company indicated that our company would prefer to sell to DFS certain assets and have DFS assume certain liabilities of the LendingTree Loans business, including the assets and liabilities to be acquired in the SurePoint acquisition, for use by DFS in the operation of its own mortgage business. The representatives of both parties agreed to consider additional alternatives that would address our company's concerns and for DFS to commence due diligence on HLC Inc.

        On February 8, 2011, Party C contacted representatives of HLC Inc. concerning its possible interest in exploring a potential strategic transaction involving HLC Inc. or a commercial relationship with HLC Inc. Party C indicated that it had a relationship with potential financing sources that could finance such a transaction or relationship.

        On February 9, 2011, representatives of HLC Inc. provided preliminary information regarding the LendingTree Loans business to Party C.

        On February 14 and 15, 2011, representatives of DFS visited HLC Inc.'s corporate headquarters in Irvine, California, to continue their due diligence on HLC Inc. At that meeting, our representatives provided representatives of DFS with an update on the business and financial position of the LendingTree Loans business.

        On February 25, 2011, representatives of our company and DFS held a telephone meeting to discuss the structure of a potential strategic transaction involving HLC Inc.

        During early March 2011, we terminated discussions with Party C because we determined that such discussions were not reasonably likely to lead to a strategic transaction that would be in the best interests of our company and our stockholders. In particular, we were concerned about Party C's lack of prior operational experience in consumer mortgage lending and the uncertainty of Party C's financing.

34


Table of Contents

        On March 4, 2011, representatives of our company and DFS held a meeting at our corporate headquarters in Charlotte, North Carolina. At that meeting, representatives of DFS presented a revised proposal to acquire all of the operating assets of HLC Inc., including certain of the assets to be acquired in the SurePoint acquisition, and assume certain liabilities for a purchase price of between $50 million and $55 million. In response, representatives of our company requested that DFS propose a purchase price of $55 million rather than the range of between $50 million and $55 million, and that DFS also consider providing our company with a revolving credit facility. The parties agreed that DFS would provide our company with a revised proposal. In addition, the parties discussed the potential terms of a lead sale agreement under which we would sell leads generated by the LendingTree Exchanges to DFS.

        On March 7, 2011, our board of directors held a meeting at which Mr. Lebda provided the board with a report of the March 4, 2011 meeting. The board also discussed the status of the SurePoint acquisition.

        On March 9, 2011, DFS provided a revised non-binding indication of interest to acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities of the LendingTree Loans business and an exclusivity agreement. We refer to this revised non-binding indication of interest as the March 9, 2011 proposal. The exclusivity agreement provided that we would negotiate exclusively with DFS concerning a proposed transaction for 45 days. The March 9, 2011 proposal provided that an affiliate of DFS would acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities of the LendingTree Loans business for a purchase price of $55 million, $40 million of which would be paid at the closing of the transaction and $15 million of which would be payable upon the achievement of performance metrics to be agreed upon and the delivery of certain marketing consulting services. In addition, the March 9, 2011 proposal contemplated that a portion of the consideration otherwise payable at closing would be held back to cover indemnification obligations, if any, of our company.

        On March 14, 2011, HLC Inc. and SurePoint entered into a first amendment to the asset purchase agreement for the SurePoint acquisition. The first amendment extended the date by which the SurePoint acquisition had to be completed from March 15, 2011 to March 16, 2011.

        On March 15, 2011, a representative of our company provided representatives of DFS with a revised draft of the March 9, 2011 proposal and of the proposed exclusivity agreement. In our revised draft we proposed to add greater detail and certainty to the terms under which we would earn the $15 million contingent portion of the proposed purchase price. The revised draft proposal also removed the proposed escrow requirement and proposed that DFS provide our company a $25 million line of credit. The revised draft of the exclusivity agreement provided that DFS would have a 30-day exclusivity period, but if the parties did not reach agreement on the material terms of an agreement for the sale of leads or the marketing consulting services agreement within seven days, then exclusivity would terminate.

        On March 15, 2011, HLC Inc. and SurePoint entered into a second amendment to the asset purchase agreement for the SurePoint acquisition. The second amendment revised the terms of the purchase price HLC Inc. agreed to pay to SurePoint to a single cash payment of $8 million upon the closing of the transaction. On the same day, HLC Inc. completed the SurePoint acquisition.

        Between March 15, 2011 and March 21, 2011, representatives of our company and of DFS continued to negotiate the terms of a non-binding indication of interest and exclusivity agreement.

        On March 21, 2011, our board of directors held a meeting at which Mr. Lebda provided the board with an update on the negotiations with DFS. Mr. Lebda informed the board that the negotiations with DFS had resulted in proposed terms pursuant to which an affiliate of DFS would acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities of the LendingTree Loans business for a purchase price of $55 million, of which $45 million would be paid at the closing of the transaction and $5 million would be payable on

35


Table of Contents


each of the first and second anniversaries of the closing, and that DFS would have a 30-day exclusivity period, but if the parties did not reach agreement on the material terms of an agreement for the sale of leads or the marketing consulting services agreement within 10 days, then exclusivity would terminate. Following a discussion of foregoing terms, our board of directors authorized our entry into an exclusivity agreement substantially in accordance with the terms discussed at that meeting.

        On March 21, 2011, our company and DFS executed a non-binding indication of interest and entered into an exclusivity agreement upon the terms reviewed by our board of directors earlier that day. We refer to this non-binding indication of interest as the indication of interest. The indication of interest contemplated that no approval of our stockholders would be required for the proposed transaction and required a legal opinion from a Delaware law firm to the effect that the transaction was not a sale of all or substantially all of our assets that would require approval of our stockholders under Section 271 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, which we refer to as Section 271.

        On March 28, 2011, representatives of DFS provided representatives of our company drafts of term sheets for a marketing consulting services agreement (sometimes referred to as the master services agreement) and a lead sale agreement (sometimes referred to as the CLO Services Agreement).

        On April 1, 2011, the parties agreed on the material terms of a marketing services agreement and a lead sale agreement. Although this was one day beyond the 10-day period following the execution of the indication of interest, we agreed that the exclusivity agreement would remain in effect for the 30-day period.

        During early April 2011, we engaged in discussions with Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, our Delaware counsel, concerning the due diligence and other items that would be required to obtain a legal opinion that an asset sale would not require stockholder approval under Section 271, as contemplated by DFS in the indication of interest. We also spoke with an investment bank concerning a valuation of our retained LendingTree Exchanges business for purposes of supporting a legal opinion from Morris Nichols.

        On April 8, 2011, we provided to DFS an initial draft of the proposed asset purchase agreement.

        On April 13, 2011, representatives of DFS contacted us to request that we extend the 30-day exclusivity period for two additional weeks to allow DFS to continue its due diligence.

        On April 14, 2011, our board of directors held a meeting at which Mr. Lebda provided the board with an update on the negotiations with DFS, including DFS's request for a two-week extension of its 30-day exclusivity period. Following such meeting, we informed DFS that we would not extend the exclusivity period.

        On April 22, 2011, we agreed with DFS that we would seek the same approval of our stockholders that would be required if the proposed transaction were deemed the sale of all or substantially all of our assets under Section 271. The reasons included the preference of DFS that we obtain such approval to avoid any doubts about the validity of the transaction, the anticipated costs of obtaining a legal opinion and related valuation of our retained business that would be required absent such stockholder approval, and a consideration of the governance benefits of having the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares approve the transaction.

        On April 27, 2011, representatives of DFS provided a revised draft of the proposed asset purchase agreement to our outside counsel for the transaction, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP. This draft of the proposed asset purchase agreement named Discover Bank as the DFS affiliate that would be party to the agreement.

        On April 27, 2011, our board of directors held a meeting at which it reviewed our company's results for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and received an update on the negotiations with DFS. A

36


Table of Contents


representative of Sheppard Mullin provided a summary of the terms of the asset purchase agreement that were still being negotiated, including terms relating to restrictions on our ability to compete in the business of originating, funding or selling of mortgages, our indemnification obligations to Discover Bank for breaches of our representations, warranties and covenants, conditions to Discover Bank's obligation to close the transaction and circumstances under which a party would be required to pay a termination fee to the other party if the transaction did not close. Following discussion, our board of directors instructed management to continue discussions and negotiations with DFS.

        On April 28, 2011, our board of directors engaged Milestone Advisors as its financial advisor to render an opinion to our company and our board of directors regarding the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration to be received in the proposed sale of certain assets and assumption of certain liabilities of HLC Inc. to Discover Bank.

        During the morning of April 30, 2011, Sheppard Mullin provided to DFS and its outside counsel for the transaction, Sidley Austin LLP, a revised draft of the asset purchase agreement. On April 30 and May 1, 2011, representatives of our company, Sheppard Mullin, DFS and Sidley Austin engaged in further discussions and negotiations regarding the terms of the proposed asset purchase agreement.

        On May 1, 2011, Sidley Austin provided a draft of a proposed voting agreement to Sheppard Mullin. The proposed voting agreement provided that Mr. Lebda, who beneficially owns approximately 20% of our outstanding shares of common stock, a subsidiary of Liberty Media Corporation which beneficially owns approximately 25% of our outstanding shares, and various funds managed by Second Curve, LLC, which own less than 5% of our outstanding shares, would agree to vote all shares of our common stock they own in favor of the proposed transaction, would further agree not to dispose of any such shares prior to the closing of the proposed transaction and would agree in certain circumstances to share profits earned from an alternative transaction if the proposed transaction with DFS did not close.

        On May 3, 2011, Sidley Austin provided a revised draft of the asset purchase agreement to Sheppard Mullin.

        On May 4, 2011, representatives of our company, Sheppard Mullin, DFS and Sidley Austin discussed key areas of disagreement on deal terms, including the amount of the purchase price to be escrowed pending the discharge of certain liabilities that would remain with our company, the ability of Discover Bank to offset against the deferred portion of the purchase price for indemnification claims, the availability of specific performance, the end date for closing and the availability of and fees to be paid by Discover Bank for extensions to the end date for the purpose of obtaining regulatory approvals and loan purchase commitments from investors, the termination fee payable by Discover Bank should Discover Bank terminate the agreement for failure of regulatory approvals or the unavailability of loan repurchase commitments, the profit sharing provisions of the voting agreements, and additional compensation to be paid for potential expenses relating to leases for HLC Inc. offices that Discover Bank would not assume. Following agreement in principle on those terms, we announced on the same day that we would delay the release of our earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, from May 6, 2011, as we had previously announced, to May 12, 2011. The primary reason for the delay was to provide extra time to negotiate and finalize the asset purchase agreement and other ancillary agreements so that announcement of the results for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 could include an announcement of a definitive agreement for the HLC asset sale transaction.

        From May 4, 2011 through May 10, 2011, representatives of our company, Sheppard Mullin, DFS, Sidley Austin, and BuckleySandler LLP, additional counsel to DFS, continued negotiations of the terms of the proposed asset purchase agreement, including those identified above, representations and warranties, terms relating to limitations on our ability to solicit or negotiate acquisition proposals and fiduciary exceptions to such limitations, closing conditions, termination rights and the circumstances in which a termination fee would be payable by us to Discover Bank. Negotiations also included the terms of the master services agreement and the and the CLO Services Agreement.

37


Table of Contents

        On May 5, 2011, Sheppard Mullin sent to Liberty Media Corporation a draft of the proposed voting agreement requested by Discover Bank. Between May 5, 2011 and May 12, 2011, representatives of our company, Sheppard Mullin, DFS and Sidley Austin had discussions with various representatives of Liberty Media, including its outside counsel, concerning whether Liberty Media would enter into a voting agreement and the terms of such agreement. Liberty Media agreed to enter into a voting agreement on May 11, 2011, and Liberty Media and Discover Bank agreed upon final terms of such agreement on May 12, 2011.

        On May 9, 2011, Second Curve entered into a confidentiality agreement with our company and a representative of Sheppard Mullin then provided details of the proposed HLC asset sale transaction to a representative of Second Curve and a draft of the proposed voting agreement requested by Discover Bank. Between May 9, 2011 and May 12, 2011, representatives of our company and Sheppard Mullin had discussions with various representatives of Second Curve concerning the terms of the proposed voting agreement, and the representative of Sheppard Mullin conveyed Second Curve's concerns and requests to representatives of Discover Bank and Sidley Austin. Second Curve and Discover Bank agreed upon final terms of such agreement on May 12, 2011.

        On May 10, 2011, we provided our preliminary financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 to DFS.

        On the evening of May 10, 2011, our board of directors met with its financial and legal advisors, including representatives of Milestone Advisors and Sheppard Mullin. Mr. Lebda summarized the economic terms of the proposed HLC asset sale transaction. Sheppard Mullin reviewed with the directors their fiduciary duties associated with approval of the proposed HLC asset sale transaction and a written summary of the terms of the proposed asset purchase agreement and the other ancillary agreements. Milestone Advisors reviewed with the directors its financial analysis of the proposed transaction and rendered to our board of directors its oral opinion, to be confirmed in writing, that, as of that date, the sum of (i) $35.9 million payable by Discover Bank to HLC Inc. plus (ii) the net liquidation value of the assets and liabilities of HLC Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc. not being transferred to Discover Bank in the HLC asset sale transaction was fair, from a financial point of view, to our company. The analysis reviewed by Milestone Advisors with our board of directors at this meeting was substantially similar to the analysis discussed with our board of directors at the May 12, 2011 meeting more fully described beginning on page 41 of this proxy statement, and was based on the terms of the transaction as of May 10, 2011. Following such discussion, our board of directors unanimously determined to approve the proposed asset purchase agreement and the related transaction agreements, and the transactions contemplated by such agreements, and to recommend that our stockholders approve the HLC asset sale transaction.

        Later in the evening of May 10, 2011, a representative of DFS contacted a representative of our company regarding our preliminary financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, and suggested that representatives of each party hold a call to discuss and review the results.

        On May 11, 2011, representatives of DFS and representatives of our company held a telephonic meeting to discuss our preliminary financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.

        Later on May 11, 2011, the board of directors of DFS met to consider the terms of the proposed HLC asset sale transaction. Subsequent to that meeting, a representative of DFS informed Mr. Lebda that Discover Bank would not proceed with the transaction unless certain terms of the transaction were modified. The modification requests included: a decrease in the amount payable at closing to $35.9 million from $45.9 million, with a corresponding increase in the amount payable on each of the first and second anniversaries of the closing from $5 million to $10 million, additional conditions for payment of the deferred payments, including operational metrics for the LendingTree Exchanges business following the closing, additional closing conditions and termination rights in favor of Discover Bank, including operational metrics for the LendingTree Loans business prior to closing and requirements for us to maintain compliance with our warehouse lending arrangements.

38


Table of Contents

        On the evening of May 11, 2011, our directors held an informal meeting during which Mr. Lebda provided an update on the status of negotiations with Discover Bank and its proposed revised terms of the transaction.

        Throughout the evening of May 11, 2011 and the early morning of May 12, 2011, representatives of our company, Sheppard Mullin, DFS, Sidley Austin and BuckleySandler continued to negotiate the terms of the revised terms of the proposed asset purchase agreement and the ancillary agreements.

        Early in the morning on May 12, 2011, our board of directors met with its financial and legal advisors, including representatives of Milestone Advisors and Sheppard Mullin. Mr. Lebda discussed with the directors the events that had transpired since the board met on May 10, 2011. Sheppard Mullin reviewed with the directors a written summary of the revised terms of the proposed asset purchase agreement and the other ancillary agreements. Members of our management discussed with the board a written analysis of our company's ability to meet the operational metrics that were now conditions to closing or conditions to receipt of the total of $20 million of the deferred purchase price. Milestone Advisors reviewed with the directors its financial analysis of the revised terms of the proposed transaction and rendered to our board of directors its oral opinion, to be confirmed in writing, that, as of that date, the sum of (i) $35.9 million payable by Discover Bank to HLC Inc. plus (ii) the net liquidation value of the assets and liabilities of HLC Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc. not being transferred to Discover Bank in the HLC asset sale transaction was fair, from a financial point of view, to our company. Such opinion is described below under the section entitled "—Opinion of Our Financial Advisor." Discussions among the members of our board of directors and its financial and legal advisors ensued, including consideration of the factors described under "—Reasons for the HLC Asset Sale Transaction and Recommendation of our Board of Directors." With respect to the revised terms that Discover Bank insisted upon, our board of directors discussed the implications of these new requirements, including as they related to the period of up to 300 days before Discover Bank might be obligated to close the transaction. Our board of directors recognized that meeting such requirements was not fully within the control of our company, and if we could not meet any one of the closing conditions, Discover Bank could terminate or seek to renegotiate the terms of the asset purchase agreement. Our board of directors discussed the potential damage to our business should that occur. Our board of directors also considered the financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, including the significant losses incurred in the LendingTree Loans business, and the effect those results might have on the continued operation of the LendingTree Loans business or on finding another buyer for the business. Following such discussion, our board of directors unanimously determined to approve the proposed asset purchase agreement and the related transaction agreements, and the transactions contemplated by such agreements, and to recommend that our stockholders approve the HLC asset sale transaction.

        Following the board meeting, Sheppard Mullin worked with Discover Bank's counsel to finalize the proposed asset purchase agreement and ancillary agreements.

        Later on May 12, 2011, our company and Discover Bank exchanged signature pages, and the parties to the voting agreements exchanged signature pages with Discover Bank. Following the close of the market on May 12, 2011, we announced the execution of the asset purchase agreement and our financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, and we held a publicly-accessible conference call in which we discussed both announcements.


Past Contacts, Transactions or Negotiations

        Other than as described in the "—Background of the HLC Asset Sale Transaction" above and the "—Interests of Certain Persons in the HLC Asset Sale Transaction" below, we and our subsidiaries, on the one hand, and Discover Bank and DFS, on the other hand, have not had prior contacts, transactions, or negotiations, and other than as described therein there are no present or proposed

39


Table of Contents


material agreements, arrangements, understandings or relationships between our executive officers or directors and Discover Bank, its executive officers or directors.


Reasons for the HLC Asset Sale Transaction and Recommendation of our Board of Directors

        In reaching its decision to approve the asset purchase agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, and to recommend that our stockholders vote to approve the HLC asset sale transaction, our board of directors consulted with management and financial and legal advisors. Our board of directors considered all of the material factors relating to the asset purchase agreement and the proposed HLC asset sale transaction, many of which our board of directors believed supported its decision, including:

40


Table of Contents

        Our board of directors also considered and balanced against the potential benefits of the HLC asset sale transaction a number of potentially adverse and other factors concerning the HLC asset sale transaction, including the following:

41


Table of Contents

        After taking into account all of the material factors relating to the asset purchase agreement and the HLC asset sale transaction, including those factors set forth above, our board of directors unanimously concluded that the benefits of the asset purchase agreement and the HLC asset sale transaction outweigh the risks and that the asset purchase agreement and the HLC asset sale transaction are expedient, advisable and in the best interests of our company and our stockholders. Our board of directors did not assign relative weights to the material factors it considered. In addition, our board of directors did not reach any specific conclusion on each of the material factors considered, but conducted an overall analysis of all of the material factors. Individual members of our board of directors may have given different weights to different factors.

        For the reasons set forth above, our board of directors has unanimously determined that the HLC asset sale transaction and the asset purchase agreement are expedient, advisable and in the best interests of our company and our stockholders, and unanimously recommends that stockholders vote "FOR" the HLC Asset Sale Proposal.


Opinion of Our Financial Advisor

        Pursuant to an engagement letter dated April 28, 2011, we retained Milestone Advisors as our financial advisor in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction.

        At the meeting of our board of directors on May 12, 2011, Milestone Advisors rendered its oral opinion to our board of directors, which was subsequently confirmed in the written opinion of Milestone Advisors dated May 12, 2011, to the effect that, as of May 12, 2011 and based on and subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth in the written opinion, the Consideration (defined below) to be received by Tree.com in the HLC asset sale transaction is fair,

42


Table of Contents

from a financial point of view, to Tree.com. For purposes of the Milestone Advisors opinion, the term "Consideration" means the sum of (i) $35,888,536 plus (ii) the net liquidation value of the Excluded Assets (as defined in the asset purchase agreement) and the Excluded Liabilities (as defined in the asset purchase agreement) of HLC Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc., collectively referred to as the sellers, as estimated by Tree.com's and HLC Inc.'s senior management team as of March 31, 2011, which is referred to in this section as the Net Liquidated Value Estimates. The Net Liquidated Value Estimates were included as part of the Consideration because a primary consideration for Tree.com entering into the HLC asset sale transaction was the ability to gain access to a portion of the capital and other assets of HLC Inc. that (a) are not being sold to Discover Bank and (b) were otherwise restricted or reserved to meet minimum capital requirements and other covenants under our warehouse lines of credit. Shortly after the completion of the HLC asset sale transaction, the amounts outstanding under such warehouse lines of credit will be repaid and the covenants imposed by such lines of credit will no longer apply. Due to the conditional nature of the two additional payments of $10 million due on each of the first and second anniversaries of the closing of the HLC asset sale transaction, Milestone Advisors did not include these additional payments as part of its analysis for determining the fairness of the Consideration to Tree.com. Milestone Advisors was not requested to opine as to, and Milestone Advisors' opinion does not in any manner address, the underlying business decision of the sellers, LendingTree, LLC and Tree.com, collectively referred to as the seller entities, to proceed with or effect the HLC asset sale transaction or the relative merits of the HLC asset sale transaction as compared to any strategic alternatives that may be available to Tree.com and the other seller entities.

        The full text of the written opinion of Milestone Advisors dated May 12, 2011, which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, factors and matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken, is attached as Appendix B hereto and is incorporated herein by reference. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion, and you should read the opinion carefully and in its entirety. Milestone Advisors' written opinion was addressed to our board of directors in connection with its consideration of the HLC asset sale transaction and does not constitute a recommendation to any of our stockholders as to how such stockholder should vote at the special meeting. Milestone Advisors' written opinion is subject to the assumptions and conditions contained therein and is necessarily based on economic, market and other conditions and the information made available to Milestone Advisors as of the date of its opinion, and Milestone Advisors assumes no responsibility for updating or revising its opinion based on circumstances or events occurring after the date of the opinion.

        In arriving at its opinion, Milestone Advisors:

43


Table of Contents

        In rendering its opinion, Milestone Advisors relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information provided to or discussed with Milestone Advisors by the seller entities or obtained by Milestone Advisors from public sources, including, without limitation, the Projections and the Net Liquidation Value Estimates. With respect to the Projections and the Net Liquidation Value Estimates, Milestone Advisors relied on representations that they have been reasonably prepared in good faith and reflect the best currently available estimates and judgments of the senior management of the seller entities as to the expected future financial performance and condition of the sellers. Milestone Advisors noted that such financial projections are subject to significant uncertainty, particularly in light of recent and on-going conditions in the mortgage sector and the sellers' recent financial performance, current financial condition, current and prospective access to capital, current and prospective liquidity and unclear future prospects. Milestone Advisors has not assumed any responsibility for the independent verification of any such information, including, without limitation, the Projections and the Net Liquidation Value Estimates, and Milestone Advisors has further relied upon the assurances of the senior management of the seller entities that they are unaware of any facts that would make the information, Projections and the Net Liquidation Value Estimates incomplete, inaccurate or misleading in any material respect. Further, Milestone Advisors expresses no opinion with respect to such Projections and the Net Liquidation Value Estimates, their achievability, or the assumptions on which they are based and the resulting impact on the sellers' financial performance, financial condition, liquidity and resulting stockholder value. Milestone Advisors has not considered any aspect or implication of any transaction to which any of the seller entities is or may be a party (other than as specifically described herein with respect to the HLC asset sale transaction).

44


Table of Contents

        Milestone Advisors relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that (a) the representations and warranties of all parties to the asset purchase agreement and all other related documents and instruments that are referred to therein are true and correct in all respects material to Milestone Advisors' analysis, (b) each party to the asset purchase agreement will fully and timely perform all of the covenants and agreements, in all respects material to Milestone Advisors' analysis, required to be performed by such party, (c) all conditions to the consummation of the HLC asset sale transaction will be satisfied in all respects material to Milestone Advisors' analysis without waiver thereof, and (d) the HLC asset sale transaction will be consummated in a timely manner in accordance with the terms described in the asset purchase agreement and documents provided to Milestone Advisors, without any amendments or modifications thereto or any adjustment to the aggregate consideration (through offset, reduction, indemnity claims, post-closing purchase price adjustments or otherwise) or any other financial term of the HLC asset sale transaction, in any respect material to Milestone Advisors' opinion. Milestone Advisors also relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that (i) the HLC asset sale transaction will be consummated in a manner that complies in all respects with all applicable federal and state statutes, rules and regulations, and (ii) all governmental, regulatory, and other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the HLC asset sale transaction will be obtained and that no delay, limitations, restrictions or conditions will be imposed or amendments, modifications or waivers made that would result in the disposition of any material portion of the assets of the seller entities, or otherwise have an adverse effect on the seller entities or any expected benefits of the HLC asset sale transaction. In addition, Milestone Advisors relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that the final form of the asset purchase agreement did not differ in any material respect from the Draft Agreement.

        Furthermore, in connection with the opinion, Milestone Advisors was not requested to make, and did not make, any physical inspection or independent appraisal or evaluation of any of the assets, properties or liabilities (fixed, contingent, derivative, off-balance-sheet or otherwise) of the sellers or any other seller entity, nor was Milestone Advisors provided with any such appraisal or evaluation. Milestone Advisors expresses no opinion regarding the liquidation value of any entity. Milestone Advisors has undertaken no independent analysis of any potential or actual litigation, regulatory action, possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities, to which the seller entities are or may be a party or are or may be subject, or of any governmental investigation of any possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities to which the seller entities are or may be a party or are or may be subject; the opinion makes no assumption concerning, and therefore does not consider, the potential effects of any such litigation, claims or investigations or possible assertion of claims, outcomes or damages arising out of any such matters.

        Under the terms of its engagement, Milestone Advisors was not requested to, and did not, (a) initiate any discussions with, or solicit any indications of interest from, third parties with respect to the HLC asset sale transaction, the assets, businesses or operations of the sellers, or any of the other seller entities, or any alternatives to the HLC asset sale transaction, (b) negotiate the terms of the HLC asset sale transaction, or (c) advise the board of directors of Tree.com or any other party with respect to business combination alternatives to the HLC asset sale transaction. The opinion is necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to Milestone Advisors as of May 12, 2011. Milestone Advisors has not undertaken, and is under no obligation, to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw the opinion, or otherwise comment on or consider events occurring after May 12, 2011. Subsequent events that could materially affect the conclusions set forth in the opinion include, without limitation, adverse changes in industry performance or market conditions; changes to the business, financial condition and results of operations of the seller entities; changes in the terms of the HLC asset sale transaction; and the failure to consummate the HLC asset sale transaction within a reasonable period of time.

45


Table of Contents

        In evaluating the sellers' projected financial results, financial condition, current and prospective access to capital, current and prospective liquidity and future prospects, Milestone Advisors understands, based on Milestone Advisors' review of market conditions and publicly available information, and Milestone Advisors' discussions with Tree.com's and the sellers' senior management, that:

46


Table of Contents

        The following is a summary of the principal framework and valuation analyses performed by Milestone Advisors and presented to the board of directors of Tree.com in connection with rendering its opinion. The following summary, however, does not purport to be a complete description of the financial valuation analyses performed by Milestone Advisors, and the order of the analyses described does not represent the relative importance or weight given to the analyses performed by Milestone Advisors.

        Milestone Advisors' financial valuation methodology involved:

        Milestone Advisors reviewed and analyzed selected precedent merger and acquisition transactions since 2001 involving companies whose lines of business include the origination, servicing, and/or investment in mortgage loans. Milestone Advisors noted that a majority of the transactions were announced in market conditions that were materially different from the currently prevailing mortgage environment and therefore deemed these precedent transactions to be less relevant. In addition, Milestone Advisors noted that the target companies listed below have different business models than the sellers and therefore are less relevant in determining the value of the sellers.

 
   
   
  Deal Value to:  
 
  Announced   Deal Value
($M)
  Book
Value
  Tangible
Book
Value
 

Target/Acquiror

                         
 

Opteum Financial Services, LLC/
Bimini Mortgage Inc

    9/29/2005   $ 81.2     101.5 %   NA  
 

AmNet Mortgage, Inc/
Wachovia Corporation

    9/13/2005   $ 80.8     111.6 %   111.6 %
 

United Financial Mortgage Corp/
WDM Fund L.P. 

    9/6/2005   $ 35.8     110.8 %   114.9 %
 

ELOAN, Inc/
Popular, Inc

    8/3/2005   $ 298.6     312.5 %   312.5 %
 

Columbia National Inc./
American Home Mortgage Inv. Corp. 

    6/13/2002   $ 37.0     112.8 %   NA  
 

Market Street Mortgage/
NetBank, Inc

    4/15/2001   $ 21.1     127.2 %   151.3 %

        Milestone Advisors applied multiple ranges based on the selected transactions to corresponding financial data for the sellers. The selected transaction analysis indicated an implied reference range value for the sellers of $41.5 million to $96.9 million, as compared to the Consideration of $59.6 million. Based on publicly available information, "Deal Value" in the table above represents either the consideration paid by the acquirer for the common stock of the target in the case of a merger stock acquisition transaction or the consideration paid for substantially all assets net of assumed liabilities in the case of a purchase and assumption of assets and liabilities. Since the HLC asset sale

47


Table of Contents


transaction consists of only select assets and liabilities, Net Liquidated Value Estimates are included in Consideration in order to more fully represent the complete economics of the HLC asset sale transaction and to better compare the proceeds recognized by Tree.com to the proceeds included in "Deal Value" for the comparable transactions.

        Milestone Advisors, with the sellers' assistance and reliance on assumptions and projections provided by the sellers, performed a discounted cash flow analysis wherein excess cash is distributed from the sellers to Tree.com. For Milestone Advisors' purposes, excess cash is defined as excess equity capital on the sellers' balance sheet that is available for distribution. Cash available for distribution is then adjusted to maintain the required equity and liquidity in HLC Inc. based on its warehouse covenants. With a return to profitability in 2012, the sellers would be in a position to make distributions to normalize their capital structure. An exit is assumed to occur at the end of year 5 with the exit value based on a multiple of tangible book value. Milestone Advisors used a range of multiples of tangible book value from 100% to 200% based on historical publicly available transaction multiples. The excess cash available for distribution and the exit value were then discounted to present value using a range of discount rates between 15% and 25% based on, among other things, the sellers' weighted average cost of capital. Based on the foregoing analysis, the value of the sellers ranges between $24.0 million and $48.2 million, as compared to the Consideration of $59.6 million.

 
  Price-to-Tangible Equity Exit Multiple  
Discount Rate
  100%   125%   150%   175%   200%  

15.00%

    32,785     36,647     40,508     44,369     48,231  

17.50%

    30,217     33,704     37,190     40,676     44,163  

20.00%

    27,917     31,071     34,226     37,381     40,535  

22.50%

    25,850     28,711     31,571     34,431     37,292  

25.00%

    23,989     26,588     29,186     31,785     34,384  

        Milestone Advisors, with the sellers' guidance and assumptions, analyzed what value might be recognized by the stockholders of Tree.com in an orderly liquidation of the sellers. In arriving at a hypothetical liquidation value, the sellers provided guidance on the net sale value of assets on the balance sheet on March 31, 2011. Based on assumptions provided by the sellers, the value to Tree.com in a hypothetical scenario ranged from ($4.5) million to $28.4 million, as compared to the Consideration of $59.6 million.

        Milestone Advisors examined various valuation metrics, including price-to-book multiples and price-to-tangible book multiples for selected public companies that operate residential mortgage lending platforms. Given the composition of the sellers' balance sheets, Milestone Advisors considered the sellers' book value, tangible book value and adjusted tangible book value (a metric used by HLC Inc.'s senior lenders, which includes adjustments for the deferred tax asset and income tax receivable from Tree.com) as of March 31, 2011. However, due to the dissimilarity between the sellers' business model and such publicly traded competitors, valuation comparisons to any one of these peers could at best be considered indicative and may or may not be relevant. Given the foregoing, Milestone Advisors did not rely on this methodology in determining whether the Consideration to be received by Tree.com in the HLC asset sale transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to Tree.com.

        The selected companies were:

48


Table of Contents

        The selected companies analysis indicated the following:

 
  Mean   Median  

Equity Value as a Multiple of:

             
 

Book Value

    78.1 %   78.1 %
 

Tangible Book Value

    79.5 %   79.5 %

        Milestone Advisors applied multiple ranges based on the selected companies analysis to corresponding financial data for the sellers. The selected companies analysis indicated an implied reference range value of $24.8 million to $49.4 million, as compared to the Consideration of $59.6 million.

        Pursuant to an engagement letter dated April 28, 2011, the board of directors of Tree.com retained Milestone Advisors to provide its opinion to such board of directors as to whether, as of May 12, 2011, the consideration to be received by Tree.com in the HLC asset sale transaction is fair, from a financial point of view to Tree.com. In selecting Milestone Advisors, the Tree.com board of directors considered, among other things, the fact that Milestone Advisors is a well-regarded investment banking firm with extensive experience advising companies in the financial services and mortgage sectors. Milestone Advisors, as part of its investment banking practice, is regularly engaged in the valuation of securities and the evaluation of transactions in connection with mergers and acquisitions of, mortgage banking companies, commercial banks, savings institutions, and other specialty finance companies, as well as business valuations for other corporate purposes for financial services organizations. Pursuant to the engagement letter, Milestone Advisors acted as a financial advisor to Tree.com solely in connection with rendering its opinion and earned a fee of $225,000 for such services, which was payable regardless of the opinion reached therein, and no portion of such fee is contingent upon successful completion of the HLC asset sale transaction. Tree.com paid Milestone Advisors a cash retainer fee of $25,000 upon engaging Milestone Advisors, which amount was credited against the fee paid to Milestone Advisors in connection with rendering its opinion. Tree.com also agreed to reimburse Milestone Advisors for certain expenses and indemnify Milestone Advisors for certain liabilities that may arise out of the rendering of its opinion. Milestone Advisors has previously been engaged by Tree.com to provide investment banking services on matters unrelated to the HLC asset sale transaction, for which Milestone Advisors received customary fees.

        In the ordinary course of business, certain of Milestone Advisors' affiliates, as well as investment funds in which they may have financial interests, may acquire, hold or sell, long or short positions, or trade or otherwise effect transactions, in debt, equity, and other securities and financial instruments (including loans and other obligations) of, or investments in, Tree.com or any other party that may be involved in the HLC asset sale transaction and their respective affiliates or any currency or commodity that may be involved in the HLC asset sale transaction.


Projections

        We do not, as a matter of course, publicly disclose projections regarding anticipated future financial performance due to the unpredictability of the underlying assumptions and estimates. However, we provided Milestone Advisors with the following operating and financial information relating to the businesses and prospects of HLC Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc.: (i) certain unaudited monthly financial information for January through March 2011, (ii) certain wind-down scenarios involving the liquidation of the assets and liabilities of HLC Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc. not being sold to Discover Bank in the HLC asset sale transaction based on the March 31, 2011 balance sheet of

49


Table of Contents


HLC Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc. assuming a consummation of the HLC asset sale transaction, (iii) a hypothetical wind-down scenario based on the March 31, 2011 balance sheet of HLC Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc. assuming the HLC asset sale transaction is not consummated, and (iv) certain monthly and quarterly projections scenarios for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and the years ending December 31, 2011 and 2012, and annual projections for the years 2013, 2014 and 2015, which annual projections, for analytical purposes, assume a stabilization of the LendingTree Loans business in the periods beyond 2012 at levels of loan origination and profit margins consistent with those in 2012. We refer to foregoing as the Projections. The Projections reflect numerous estimates and assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business, economic, regulatory, market and financial conditions, as well as matters specific to our business, many of which are beyond our control. The Projections cover multiple years, and projections by their nature become less reliable for later periods.

($000s)
  Immediate   2Q – 4Q
2011
  2012   2013   2014   2015  

Net Income

  $     $ (894 ) $ 7,711   $ 6,203   $ 6,203   $ 6,203  

Tangible Equity

    56,127     55,233     62,944     61,167     61,167     61,167  

Adjustments to Tangible Equity(1)

    (24,964 )   (24,964 )   (24,964 )   (24,964 )   (24,964 )   (24,964 )
                           
 

Adjusted Tangible Equity(2)

    31,164     30,270     37,981     36,203     36,203     36,203  

Adjusted Tangible Equity Requirement(3)

    30,000     30,000     30,000     30,000     30,000     30,000  

Excess Capital

    1,164     270     7,981     6,203     6,203     6,203  

Eligible For Distribution

    No     No     Yes     Yes     Yes     Yes  
 

Cash Available for Distribution

  $   $   $ 7,981   $ 6,203   $ 6,203   $ 6,203  

(1)
Adjustments to Tangible Book Value include the deferred tax asset ($22.7 million) and income tax receivable from Tree.com ($2.3 million). Adjustments are held constant for the duration of the projection period.

(2)
Adjusted Tangible Book Value is the tangible capital metric utilized by our senior lenders.

(3)
Adjusted Tangible Equity Requirement reflects the $25 million required capital by our senior lenders plus a $5 million working capital cushion.

        The Projections were not prepared with a view to public disclosure and are included in this proxy statement only because SEC regulations require disclosure of information made available to a financial advisor. The Projections were not prepared with a view to compliance with generally accepted accounting principles, the published guidelines of the SEC regarding projections or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for preparation and presentation of prospective financial information. Furthermore, our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte and Touche LLP, has not audited, reviewed, compiled, or applied any procedures to the Projections and, accordingly, Deloitte and Touche LLP assumes no responsibility for, and express no opinion on, the Projections.

        The Projections are subjective and were prepared by our and HLC Inc.'s management solely for internal use and were prepared based upon the best available estimates and judgments of our and HLC Inc.'s management as to the future financial results of HLC Inc. at the time the Projections were prepared. The Projections reflect numerous assumptions and estimates as to future events made by our and HLC Inc.'s management that our and HLC Inc.'s management believed were reasonable at the time the Projections were prepared. Although the Projections are presented as numbers, they are not facts or derived from facts, and they should not be relied upon as being indicative of actual or probable future results. In addition, factors such as industry performance, the market for our and HLC Inc.'s existing and new products and services, the competitive environment, expectations regarding future acquisitions and general business, economic, regulatory, market and financial conditions, all of which

50


Table of Contents


are difficult to predict and beyond our control, may cause actual future results to differ materially from the Projections. In addition, these Projections do not take into account any circumstances or events occurring after the date that they were prepared and, accordingly, do not give effect to the merger or any changes to our operations or strategy that have been or may be implemented after the date the Projections were prepared. As a result, there can be no assurance that the Projections will be realized, and actual results may be materially better or worse than those contained in the Projections. The inclusion of this information should not be regarded as an indication that Milestone Advisors concluded that the Projections will be predictive of actual future results.

        Except to the extent required by applicable federal securities laws, we do not intend, and expressly disclaim any responsibility to, update or otherwise revise the Projections to reflect circumstances existing after the date they were prepared or to reflect the occurrence of future events even in the event that any of the assumptions underlying the Projections have proven to be false or are determined to have been erroneous at the time prepared.


Governmental and Regulatory Approvals

        We are not aware of any federal or state regulatory requirements that we must comply with or approvals that we must obtain to complete the HLC asset sale transaction.

        Discover Bank will need to obtain approval of its FDIC Bank Merger Act application and may need the approval of the Delaware Office of State Bank Commissioner to acquire the LendingTree Loans business. The receipt of the foregoing approvals (as necessary) is a condition to Discover Bank's obligation to close the HLC asset sale transaction.

        If any additional approvals or filings are required to be obtained from or made with any governmental authorities to complete the HLC asset sale transaction, we and Discover Bank must use our reasonable efforts to obtain such approvals and make such filings.


When the HLC Asset Sale Transaction is Expected to be Completed

        We expect to complete the HLC asset sale transaction as soon as practicable after all of the closing conditions in the asset purchase agreement, including approval of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal by our stockholders, have been satisfied or waived. Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of these conditions, we expect the HLC asset sale transaction to close by the end of 2011. However, there can be no assurance that the HLC asset sale transaction will be completed at all or, if completed, when it will be completed.


Effects on Our Company if the HLC Asset Sale Transaction is Completed and the Nature of Our Business Following the Transaction

        If the HLC asset sale transaction is completed, we will no longer conduct the LendingTree Loans business. Instead, we will focus on the LendingTree Exchanges business. Our assets that are currently used in connection with this business will not be transferred to Discover Bank as part of the HLC asset sale transaction.

        Our reporting obligations as a U.S. public company will not be affected as a result of completing the HLC asset sale transaction. However, following the HLC asset sale transaction our business will be smaller, and therefore we may fail to satisfy the continued listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Market. If we are unable to satisfy the continued listing standards of that market, our common stock may be delisted from that market. In order to continue to be listed on the NASDAQ Global Market, we must meet the bid price and total stockholders requirements as set forth in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5450(a) and at least one of the three standards in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5450(b). Pursuant to NASDAQ Listing Rule 5450(a), the bid price of our common stock cannot fall below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive business days and we must have at least 400 total stockholders (including both

51


Table of Contents


holders of beneficial interest and holders of record). We believe that if we continue to qualify for listing on the NASDAQ Global Market, we will satisfy the Equity Standard under NASDAQ Listing Rule 5450(b), which requires:

        Based on our pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements attached as Appendix H to this proxy statement, following the HLC asset sale transaction we will continue to have stockholders' equity of at least $10 million and qualify for listing on the NASDAQ Global Market under the Equity Standard set forth above assuming (i) the bid price of our common stock does not fall below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive business days, (ii) we continue to have at least 400 total stockholders (including both holders of beneficial interest and holders of record), (iii) we continue to have at least 750,000 publicly held shares with a market value of at least $5 million, and (iv) we continue to have at least two registered and active market makers.

        If we are delisted from the NASDAQ Global Market, we may apply to transfer our common stock listing to the NASDAQ Capital Market or the NYSE Amex Equities market, however our application may not be granted if we do not satisfy the applicable listing requirements for those markets. If our common stock were to be delisted from the NASDAQ Global Market and we could not satisfy the listing standards of the NASDAQ Capital Market or the NYSE Amex Equities market, trading of our common stock most likely would be conducted in the over-the-counter market on an electronic bulletin board established for unlisted securities such as the Pink Sheets or the OTC Bulletin Board. See "RISK FACTORS—Risks Related to the HLC Asset Sale Transaction—Because our business will be smaller following the HLC asset sale transaction, our common stock may be delisted from the NASDAQ Global Market if we fail to satisfy the continued listing standards of that market" above.

        We will continue to work to maximize stockholder interests with a goal of returning value to our stockholders. The HLC asset sale transaction will not alter the rights, privileges or nature of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. A stockholder who owns shares of our common stock immediately prior to the closing of the HLC asset sale transaction will continue to hold the same number of shares immediately following the closing. Our reporting obligations as a U.S. public company will not be affected as a result of completing the HLC asset sale transaction.


Effects on Our Company if the HLC Asset Sale Transaction is Not Completed

        If the HLC asset sale transaction is not completed, we will continue to conduct the LendingTree Loans business, and we may consider and evaluate other strategic opportunities. In such a circumstance, there can be no assurances that our continued operation of the LendingTree Loans business or any alternative strategic opportunities will result in the same or greater value to our stockholders as the HLC asset sale transaction.

        If the asset purchase agreement is terminated under certain circumstances described in this proxy statement and set forth in the asset purchase agreement, we may be required to pay Discover Bank a termination fee of $2.2 million, or Discover Bank may be required to pay us a termination fee of $5.0 million. See "ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT—Termination" below.

52


Table of Contents


No Appraisal or Dissenters' Rights

        No appraisal or dissenters' rights are available to our stockholders under Delaware law or our certificate of incorporation or bylaws in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction.


Interests of Certain Persons in the HLC Asset Sale Transaction

        The closing of the HLC asset sale transaction by Discover Bank is conditioned upon David Norris, the president of HLC Inc. and one of our executive officers, accepting employment with Discover Bank effective upon the closing.


Anticipated Accounting Treatment

        Under generally accepted accounting principles, upon completion of the HLC asset sale transaction, we will remove the net assets sold from our consolidated balance sheet and record a gain from the HLC asset sale transaction equal to the total amount of consideration realized. Amounts held in escrow will be recognized as assets when released from escrow.


Use of Proceeds

        Our company, and not our stockholders, will receive all of the net proceeds from the HLC asset sale transaction. We anticipate using the net proceeds for general working capital purposes, including to invest more in growing the LendingTree Exchanges business in all of our current verticals—lending, auto, insurance, higher education and home services—and to invest in new verticals.


Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

        The following is a general discussion of the anticipated material federal income tax consequences of the HLC asset sale transaction. This discussion is a summary for general information only and applies solely to holders of our common stock and to us. This discussion is not intended to be used, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. Each taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

        This discussion is based on the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, administrative pronouncements, judicial decisions and final, temporary and proposed Treasury regulations, all as in effect on the date hereof and all of which may be changed, perhaps retroactively, so as to result in U.S. federal income tax consequences different from those described below. No rulings have been requested or received from the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, as to the tax consequences of the HLC asset sale transaction and there is no intent to seek any such ruling. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge the tax treatment of tax consequences of the HLC asset sale transaction discussed below or, if it does challenge the tax treatment, that it will not be successful.

        The HLC asset sale transaction will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a taxable sale upon which we will recognize gain or loss. The amount of gain or loss we recognize with respect to the sale of a particular asset will be measured by the difference between the amount realized by us on the sale of that asset and our tax basis in that asset. The amount realized by us on the HLC asset sale transaction will include the amount of cash received, the fair market value of any other property received, and total liabilities assumed or taken by Discover Bank. For purposes of determining the amount realized by us with respect to specific assets, the total amount realized by us will generally be allocated among the assets according to the rules set forth in Section 1060(a) of the Code. Our basis in our assets is generally equal to their cost, as adjusted for certain items, such as depreciation. The determination of whether we will recognize gain or loss will be made with respect to each of the assets to be sold. Accordingly, we may recognize gain on the sale of certain assets and loss on the sale of

53


Table of Contents


certain others, depending on the amount of consideration allocated to an asset as compared with the basis of that asset. Further, the sale of certain assets may result in ordinary income or loss, depending on the nature of the asset. To the extent the HLC asset sale transaction results in us recognizing a net gain, we expect that our available net operating loss carryforwards will offset some of such gain.

        Generally, the HLC asset sale transaction will not produce any separate and independent federal income tax consequences to our stockholders. Each stockholder is urged to consult his or her own tax advisor as to the federal income tax consequences of the HLC asset sale transaction, and as to any state, local, foreign or other tax consequences based on his or her particular facts and circumstances.


Vote Required

        Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, the HLC Asset Sale Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock as of the record date for the special meeting. By approving the HLC Asset Sale Proposal, our stockholders are also authorizing us to make any non-material changes that our officers deem advisable to the asset purchase agreement and the other transaction documents contemplated in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have the same effect as an "AGAINST" vote on this proposal.

        On the basis of analyses prepared by our management, our board of directors believes that the HLC asset sale transaction does not constitute a sale of "all or substantially all of our assets" for purposes of Section 271, and accordingly, our board of directors believes that approval of our stockholders is not required as a matter of Delaware law. The analysis of whether the HLC asset sale transaction is subject to Section 271 is, however, inherently fact-driven and, if a court of competent jurisdiction were asked to determine whether Section 271 applied, its analysis would depend, among other things, on its views on the relative fair market value of the assets sold as compared to the fair market value of the assets retained following the transaction and/or the qualitative effect of the HLC asset sale transaction on our company and our business. To eliminate any uncertainty, we and Discover Bank agreed that the HLC asset sale transaction would be conditioned upon an approval of the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock that would meet the requirements of Section 271 if Section 271 applied. Our board of directors also considered such approval to be a matter of good corporate governance. Because the HLC asset sale transaction will be subject to stockholder approval by the stockholder vote that would otherwise be required if we were to sell all or substantially all of our assets, we believe that stockholder approval of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal would ensure that the HLC asset sale transaction has satisfied the requirements of Section 271 if a court of competent jurisdiction ever determined that Section 271 applied to such transaction.

        Based in part on the determination of the full board of directors, the compensation committee of our board of directors determined that the HLC asset sale transaction does not represent a sale of all or substantially all of our assets for purposes of the Second Amended and Restated Tree.com, Inc. 2008 Stock and Annual Incentive Plan, any awards issued thereunder, or any severance or similar agreements we have with any of our employees. Accordingly, we will not deem the HLC asset sale transaction to be an event that triggers the acceleration of vesting of stock options, restricted stock or restricted stock units, or the payment of severance, alone (a "single-trigger") or in combination with a termination of service (a "double-trigger"). It is possible, however, that one or more employees will disagree with such conclusion and initiate legal action to receive benefits that would be available if the HLC asset sale transaction were deemed a sale of all or substantially of our assets and other conditions set forth in the applicable plan or agreement were satisfied. We cannot assure you that we would prevail in any such action.



        OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT OUR STOCKHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" THE HLC ASSET SALE PROPOSAL.

54


Table of Contents


ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT

        This section describes the material terms of the asset purchase agreement. Please note that the summary below and elsewhere in this proxy statement regarding the asset purchase agreement may not contain all of the information that is important to you. The summary below and elsewhere in this proxy statement of the asset purchase agreement does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, reference to the full text of the asset purchase agreement, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A. We encourage you to read the asset purchase agreement carefully in its entirety for a more complete understanding of the HLC asset sale transaction, the terms of the asset purchase agreement, and other information that may be important to you.


General

        On May 12, 2011, we and our wholly-owned subsidiaries LendingTree, LLC, HLC Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc., entered into an asset purchase agreement with Discover Bank, pursuant to which we have agreed, subject to specified terms and conditions, including approval of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal by our stockholders at the special meeting, to sell to Discover Bank substantially all of the operating assets of HLC Inc., which we sometimes refer to as HLC Inc. or the LendingTree Loans business.


Purchase and Sale of Assets

        The assets to be sold include:

        Discover Bank will assume certain contracts, real property leases and specified liabilities related to the LendingTree Loans business that arise after the completion of the HLC asset sale transaction.

55


Table of Contents

        Under the asset purchase agreement, we are not selling, among other things:


Purchase Price

        If the HLC asset sale transaction is completed, then at the closing Discover Bank will be required to pay $35,888,536 to HLC Inc., subject to certain adjustments for utility expenses for office leases assumed by Discover Bank, fees, expenses and deposits we prepaid in respect of contracts, leases and other assets acquired by Discover Bank and earned but unpaid compensation for employees that will be employed by Discover Bank following the closing. A portion of the initial purchase price based on our loan loss reserves at the end of the quarter prior to the closing ($20.3 million at March 31, 2011) will be held in escrow pending the discharge of certain liabilities that will remain with us.

        HLC Inc. will also have a right to receive an additional $10 million on each of the first and second anniversaries of the closing, subject to (i) Discover Bank not having terminated the master services agreement it entered into with us concurrently with the execution of the asset purchase agreement and (ii) a Business Event (defined below) not having occurred before such dates.

        For the purposes of the asset purchase agreement, a "Business Event" will occur if (i) the daily average number of lenders participating in our mortgage network exchange is less than 100 (as measured for any calendar quarter) or (ii) our and our affiliates' aggregate revenue from the LendingTree Exchanges business is less than $20 million for the first six calendar month period beginning on the first day of the calendar month following the closing, or any subsequent six calendar month period thereafter through the second anniversary of the date the asset purchase agreement was

56


Table of Contents


executed, pro rated for the partial six month period, if any, immediately prior to the second anniversary of the date the asset purchase agreement was executed.


Representations and Warranties

        The asset purchase agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants made by Tree.com, LendingTree, LLC, HLC Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc., on the one hand, and Discover Bank, on the other hand, regarding aspects of their respective businesses, financial condition and structure, as well as other facts pertinent to the HLC asset sale transaction. The assertions embodied in those representations and warranties were made solely for purposes of the asset purchase agreement and may be subject to important qualifications and limitations agreed to by the parties in connection with the negotiated terms of the asset purchase agreement. Moreover, some of those representations and warranties may have only been true at a certain date, may be subject to a contractual standard of materiality or may have been used for purposes of allocating risk between us and Discover Bank rather than establishing matters of fact. Our stockholders are not third party beneficiaries under the asset purchase agreement and should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants or any descriptions contained in the asset purchase agreement as characterizations of the actual state of facts or conditions of our company, our subsidiaries or Discover Bank.

        Discover Bank made a number of representations and warranties to us in the asset purchase agreement, including representations and warranties relating to the following subject matters:

        Tree.com, LendingTree, LLC, HLC Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc., which we sometimes refer to as the seller entities, each made a number of representations and warranties to Discover Bank in the asset purchase agreement, including representations and warranties relating to the following subject matters:

57


Table of Contents


Conduct of Business

        Under the asset purchase agreement, we have agreed, until the closing of the HLC asset sale transaction, except under certain circumstances or as consented to in writing by Discover Bank (which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), to (i) conduct the LendingTree Loans business in the ordinary course, (ii) keep and maintain the assets to be acquired by Discover Bank in good operating condition and repair consistent with past practice, (iii) use commercially reasonable efforts to keep the LendingTree Loans business intact and preserve the goodwill of vendors, employees, service providers, borrowers and our other business relationships and (iv) continue the prior course of dealing among the LendingTree Loans business and HLC Inc., on the one hand, and Tree.com, LendingTree, LLC and HLC Escrow, Inc., on the other hand, in all material respects.

58


Table of Contents

        The asset purchase agreement also contains a number of specific restrictions on the operations of the LendingTree Loans business until the closing of the HLC asset sale transaction or termination of the asset purchase agreement. Subject to certain exceptions, these restrictions limit our ability to:

59


Table of Contents

        The restrictions described above do not prohibit actions for which we receive Discover Bank's prior written consent (which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed) and do not prohibit us from negotiating or entering into any agreement with respect to a business combination to be completed after the closing of the HLC asset sale transaction, so long as such transaction is a Permitted Transaction (defined below).


Discover Bank to Apply for FDIC Approval

        Within 30 days following the execution of the asset purchase agreement, Discover Bank is required to apply for approval from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, of its acquisition of the assets to be acquired in the HLC asset sale transaction. To the extent permitted by law, Discover Bank is also required to provide HLC Inc. with monthly updates related to the process of obtaining such FDIC approval. Discover Bank is required to promptly inform us if it becomes aware that such approval is reasonably likely to be materially delayed, conditioned or withheld.


Investor Arrangements with Discover Bank

        Within a reasonable time period after the execution of the asset purchase agreement, Discover Bank is required to contact certain identified financial institutions for the purpose of obtaining binding written proposals for the purchase of mortgage loans funded by the LendingTree Loans business after the closing of the HLC asset sale transaction. Discover Bank is required to provide HLC Inc. with monthly updates related to its progress in obtaining such binding written proposals and to promptly inform us if it becomes aware that the closing condition related to obtaining such binding written proposals is reasonably likely to be materially delayed, conditioned or withheld.

        Discover Bank is not required to close the HLC asset sale transaction unless it has received binding written proposals from at least three of the identified financial institutions.


Additional Covenants

        The asset purchase agreement contains additional agreements between us and Discover Bank relating to, among other things:

60


Table of Contents


Stockholders' Meeting

        Under the terms of the asset purchase agreement, we agreed to call, give notice, convene and hold a meeting of our stockholders as promptly as practicable following the date on which this proxy statement is cleared by the SEC, for the purpose of voting on the HLC asset sale transaction. Subject to the rights discussed in the section entitled "—Termination" below, our obligation to call, give notice of, convene and hold the stockholders' meeting is not limited or otherwise affected by any change in the recommendation of our board of directors to our stockholders with respect to the HLC Asset Sale Proposal.


Solicitation of Other Offers

        Until the closing of the HLC asset sale transaction or the termination of the asset purchase agreement pursuant to its terms, we and our subsidiaries may not, and we and our subsidiaries are required to use our reasonable best efforts to cause each of our respective officers, directors, managers, principals, attorneys, accountants, investment bankers, agents and employees not to, directly or indirectly:

61


Table of Contents

        For purposes of the asset purchase agreement, "Acquisition Proposal" means any proposal concerning the acquisition or purchase of any of the assets to be sold in the HLC asset sale transaction or 15% or more of our common stock (whether by way of merger, purchase of capital stock, tender offer or otherwise).

        If at any time prior to the approval of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal, we, or any of our subsidiaries, is approached about an Acquisition Proposal or a Permitted Transaction Proposal (defined below), we are required to promptly inform Discover Bank of such contact and provide a copy of any inquiry or proposal received, including the name of the third party. We are required to keep Discover Bank reasonably informed of the status and details of any future related notices, requests, correspondence or communications.

        For purposes of the asset purchase agreement, "Permitted Transaction Proposal" means any proposal from any person or group other than Discover Bank and its affiliates that would be an Acquisition Proposal which contemplates a:

        Notwithstanding the restrictions described above, but subject to the obligations in the next sentence, we may furnish non-public information to, and enter into discussions with, any person in response to an Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a breach of our and our subsidiaries' non-solicitation obligations under the asset purchase agreement, if our board of directors determines in good faith that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes or could reasonably result in a Superior Proposal (defined below) and the failure to provide such non-public information and to enter into such discussions would constitute, or would reasonably be likely to constitute, a breach of the fiduciary duties of our board of directors to our stockholders under law. We must provide Discover Bank with written notice within 24 hours of furnishing any non-public information to, or entering into discussion with, such person, identify such person and state the material terms and conditions of the Acquisition Proposal. We are required to keep Discover Bank reasonably informed of the status of any such discussions or negotiations.

        Notwithstanding the restrictions described above, we may enter into discussions or negotiations with a third party regarding a transaction, or a series of transactions, which would result in a Permitted Transaction.

62


Table of Contents

        Nothing contained in the asset purchase agreement prohibits us or our board of directors from disclosing to our stockholders a position contemplated by Rules 14d-9 and 14e-2(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or issuing any "stop, look and listen" communication, if our board of directors has reasonably determined in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal and financial advisors, that the failure to do so would constitute, or would reasonably be likely to constitute, a breach of any applicable law.


Company Board Recommendation

        Our board of directors has unanimously recommended to our stockholders that they vote for the HLC Asset Sale Proposal. Until our stockholders vote on the HLC Asset Sale Proposal, neither we nor our board of directors is permitted to change, qualify, withdraw or modify or publicly propose to change, qualify, withdraw or modify, in any manner adverse to Discover Bank, such recommendation.

        Notwithstanding the restrictions described above, our board of directors may change its recommendation if:

        In the event of a change in recommendation, we must provide Discover Bank with five business days prior written notice of our board of directors' intent to change its recommendation, which notice must include, in the case of a Superior Proposal, the terms and conditions of the Superior Proposal, copies of the agreements proposed to effect such Superior Proposal and the identity of the party making such proposed Superior Proposal. During such five business day period, if requested by Discover Bank, we must engage in good faith negotiations with Discover Bank to amend the asset purchase agreement including, in the case of a Superior Proposal, in such a manner that any Acquisition Proposal that was determined to be a Superior Proposal would no longer constitute a Superior Proposal.

        For purposes of the asset purchase agreement, "Superior Proposal" means any unsolicited bona fide written proposal to acquire 50% or more of the fair market value of the consolidated assets of us and our subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or 50% or more of our common stock (whether by way of merger, purchase of capital stock or otherwise) on terms that our board of directors determines in good faith, after consultation with outside financial and legal advisors and consideration of all relevant factors, would, if completed, result in a transaction that is more favorable from a financial point of view to us and our stockholders than the HLC asset sale transaction, that such transaction is reasonably capable of being completed on the terms set forth in the proposal within a reasonable time period, taking into account all financial, legal, regulatory and other aspects of such proposal, and to the extent external financing is required, includes committed financing.

        For purposes of the asset purchase agreement, "Parent Intervening Event" means an event or circumstance that is material to us and our subsidiaries, taken as a whole (other than an event or circumstance resulting from a breach of the asset purchase agreement by us or any of our subsidiaries),

63


Table of Contents


that was unknown to or the consequences of which would not be reasonably foreseeable to our board of directors on the date of the asset purchase agreement, which event or circumstance becomes known to our board of directors prior to the approval of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal. A Parent Intervening Event does not include (i) the receipt, existence or terms of an Acquisition Proposal or any inquiry or matter relating thereto or consequences thereof, (ii) events or circumstances arising from the announcement or the existence of, or any action taken by us pursuant to and in compliance with the terms of, the asset purchase agreement, and (iii) any increase in the market price of our common stock, in and of itself.

        Discover Bank has the right to terminate the asset purchase agreement if our board of directors changes its recommendation prior to the approval of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal by our stockholders.


Conditions to Closing

        Our obligation to close the HLC asset sale transaction is subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions on or prior to the closing, any or all of which we may waive to the extent permitted by law:

        Discover Bank's obligation to close the HLC asset sale transaction is subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions on or prior to the closing, any or all of which Discover Bank may waive to the extent permitted by law:

64


Table of Contents

        For purposes of the asset purchase agreement, "Material Adverse Change" or "Material Adverse Effect" means any change, event, effect, development, state of facts, condition, circumstance or occurrence that, individually or in the aggregate, has had or would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse change or effect on the business, condition (financial or otherwise), assets, liabilities, results of operations of the LendingTree Loans business or the assets being sold to Discover Bank, taken as a whole. However, none of the following will be deemed to constitute or will be taken into account in determining whether there has been a Material Adverse Change or Material Adverse Effect: any event, circumstance, change or effect arising out of or attributable to (i) general changes in the

65


Table of Contents


United States economy, financial markets or any market as to which the pricing of residential asset backed securities is tied or linked, including changes in prevailing interest rates and market conditions, residential mortgage rates or the securities markets, including any disruption thereof and any decline in the price of any security or any market index; (ii) changes that are the result of acts of war or terrorism; (iii) changes or proposed changes in, or in the application of, U.S. generally accepted accounting principles or applicable laws; (iv) changes to the industry or markets in which the LendingTree Loans business operates that are not unique to the LendingTree Loans business (including changes in the United States housing market); (v) general regulatory or political changes; or (vi) a flood, hurricane, earthquake or other natural disaster, but only to the extent any such circumstance, change or effect arising out of or attributable to the matters set forth in clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v) or (vi) does not disproportionately affect us, the LendingTree Loans business or the assets being sold to Discover Bank in comparison to other persons engaged in mortgage lending.


Termination

        We or Discover Bank may terminate the asset purchase agreement:

        Discover Bank may terminate the asset purchase agreement:

66


Table of Contents

        Until the closing of the HLC asset sale transaction, we are required to maintain the following monthly ratios and metrics related to the LendingTree Loans business:

        The initial October 9, 2011 end date may be extended by an additional 30 days:

        The first extended end date of November 8, 2011, may be further extended:

67


Table of Contents

        Any amounts paid by Discover Bank to HLC Inc. in connection with an extension request will be credited towards the purchase price or any liquidated damages payment that we may otherwise be entitled to if the asset purchase agreement is terminated.

        If Discover Bank elects to extend the initial end date or any end date thereafter and all of the conditions to closing have not been satisfied (other than the FDIC approval and the receipt of binding written proposals from certain identified financial institutions), Discover Bank will not be required to pay to HLC Inc. the amount otherwise specified above in connection with such extension.


Termination Fees

        We are required to pay Discover Bank $2.2 million in cash if the asset purchase agreement is properly terminated:

        Discover Bank will be obligated to pay us $5.0 million in cash, reduced by the extension payments described above, if the asset purchase agreement is terminated because the HLC asset sale transaction has not closed by October 9, 2011, unless otherwise extended, due solely to (i) the failure of Discover Bank to obtain approval of its FDIC Bank Merger Act application or, if required, approval of the Delaware Office of State Bank Commission, or (ii) subject to certain exceptions, the failure of Discover Bank to obtain the required number of binding written proposals from certain identified financial institutions regarding their commitment to purchase mortgage loans funded by the LendingTree Loans business after the closing.

        We believe that we will not be obligated to pay the $2.2 million termination fee upon a termination due to the occurrence of the initial end date (as extended), unless both (i) an Acquisition Proposal was publicly announced and (ii) Discover Bank is not obligated to pay the termination fee described above (whether or not reduced by the extension payments).


Indemnification

        We and Discover Bank have agreed to indemnify each other for damages as a result of any breach of a representation or warranty contained in the asset purchase agreement and for certain other specified matters. The representations and warranties extend for various periods of time depending on the nature of the claim. Except for breaches of certain specified representations, damages for breaches

68


Table of Contents


of representations and warranties must exceed $500,000 before either party is required to pay the indemnification claims and the aggregate indemnification claims payable by either party for breaches of representations and warranties may not exceed $10 million.


Amendments and Waivers

        The asset purchase agreement may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified only by the written consent of Tree.com, LendingTree, LLC, HLC Inc., and Home Loan Escrow, Inc., on the one hand, and Discover Bank, on the other hand.


Governing Law

        The asset purchase agreement is governed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to its conflict of law principles.


Voting and Support Agreements

        In connection with the execution of the asset purchase agreement, Douglas R. Lebda, our chairman and chief executive officer, the trustee of a family trust for Mr. Lebda, and certain of our other stockholders executed voting and support agreements. Pursuant to the voting and support agreements, among other things, each stockholder has agreed (i) to vote all of the shares of our common stock owned by them in favor of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal and (ii) not to transfer the shares of our common stock owned by them prior to the expiration of their voting and support agreement, unless otherwise permitted thereunder. The shares subject to the voting and support agreements constitute approximately 49% of our common stock as of the record date.

        Notwithstanding the foregoing, if our board of directors properly changes its recommendation with respect to the HLC Asset Sale Proposal due to a Superior Proposal, the stockholders that entered into the voting and support agreements, other than Mr. Lebda and the trustee of the family trust for Mr. Lebda, will collectively be required to vote 15% of the total outstanding shares of our common stock on the record date in favor of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal. Mr. Lebda and the trustee of the family trust for Mr. Lebda will be required to vote all of the shares beneficially owned by Mr. Lebda in favor of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal. Mr. Lebda beneficially owned approximately 20% of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote on the record date.


Ancillary Agreements

        In connection with the HLC asset sale transaction:

69


Table of Contents


Summary of Golden Parachute Arrangements in Connection with the HLC Asset Sale Transaction

        Tree.com has agreed to pay compensation to Mr. Norris based on the HLC asset sale transaction, as described more fully below. We are seeking an advisory vote of our stockholders for this compensation, as described under PROPOSAL #2—The HLC Transaction-Related Compensation Arrangements Proposal. Mr. Norris is our only named executive officer entitled to receive compensation in connection with or otherwise related to the HLC asset sale transaction.

        The following table sets forth the aggregate dollar value of the various elements of compensation that Mr. Norris is eligible to receive that is based on or otherwise relates to the HLC asset sale transaction, assuming the following:

        The amounts indicated below are estimates based on multiple assumptions that may or may not actually occur, including the assumptions described above. Some of these assumptions are based on information not currently available and, as a result, the actual amounts, if any, to be received by Mr. Norris may differ in material respects from the amounts set forth below.


Golden Parachute Compensation

Name
  Cash
($)(1)
  Equity
($)(2)
  Pension/
NQDC
($)
  Perquisites/
Benefits
($)
  Tax
Reimbursement
($)(3)
  Other
($)
  Total
($)
 

David Norris(4)(5)

    1,251,898     192,096                     1,443,994  

(1)
In connection with the HLC asset sale transaction, Mr. Norris will: (i) receive $1,000,000 in cash, (a) half of which to be paid on the HLC asset sale transaction consummation date and (b) one-quarter of which to be paid on each of the first and second anniversaries of the HLC asset sale transaction consummation date, subject to his continued employment with Discover Bank and (ii) a prorated portion of his scheduled third quarter bonus based on Company performance through the HLC asset sale transaction consummation date (which amounts to $11,898, assuming a third quarter bonus of $37,744) within ten (10) business days following the HLC asset sale transaction consummation date. The amounts described in the preceding sentence represent "single-trigger" arrangements; that is, amounts triggered by a change-in-control for which payment is not conditioned upon the termination or resignation of Mr. Norris, although payment of certain amounts are dependent upon his continued employment with Discover Bank.

70


Table of Contents


Additionally, to compensate him for his management of HLC Inc. prior to the closing of the HLC asset sale transaction, Mr. Norris will receive a one-time lump-sum payment of $125,000 within five business days following the satisfaction of each of the below conditions:

    HLC receiving proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale on HLC Inc.'s books (other than impaired loans) representing 98.0% of the total carrying amount of all loans held for sale, inclusive of "Fair Value Basis Adjustments", as of the HLC asset sale transaction consummation date; and

    one of the following occurring within 60 days following the HLC asset sale transaction consummation date: (i) all warehouse lines are paid off or (ii) HLC Inc. is permitted to make cash dividends to Tree.com without restriction from warehouse lenders.


Further, Mr. Norris will receive five percent (5%) of the difference between: (a) the aggregate proceeds received from sales of loans held for sale by HLC Inc. as of the HLC asset sale transaction consummation date, minus (b) 101.5% of the total carrying amount of all loans held for sale (before giving effect to "Fair Value Basis Adjustments" and excluding impaired loans) as of the HLC asset sale transaction consummation date, which based on the assumptions detailed above would amount to approximately $115,000. The amount described in the preceding sentence represents a "single-trigger" arrangement.

(2)
The amount in this column reflects the accelerated vesting of Mr. Norris's unvested restricted stock units, which is a "single-trigger" arrangement. The value was computed by multiplying (i) the number of restricted stock units by (ii) $6.23 per share (the average closing market price of Tree.com's common stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market over the first five business days following the first public announcement of the HLC asset sale transaction (which occurred on May 12, 2011)).

(3)
Mr. Norris is not entitled to any tax gross-up or similar payments in connection with the transaction.

(4)
Each payment and benefit under Mr. Norris's separation agreement is contingent on: (i) Mr. Norris delivering a signed waiver and general release of all claims he may have against the company, HLC Inc. and each of their affiliates at the time such payment is made and his not revoking such release, (ii) Mr. Norris accepting employment with Discover Bank and otherwise satisfying all Discover conditions to employment; and (iii) the consummation of the HLC asset sale transaction.

(5)
No amounts are attributable to a "double-trigger" arrangement, in other words, an amount triggered by a change-in-control for which payment is conditioned upon Mr. Norris's termination without cause or resignation for good reason within a limited time period following the change-in-control.

71


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL #2
HLC TRANSACTION-RELATED COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS PROPOSAL

        As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the applicable SEC rules issued thereunder, which were enacted pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, we are submitting a proposal to our stockholders for a non-binding advisory vote to approve the payment of certain compensation to our named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the HLC asset sale transaction. This proposal provides our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the compensation that may be payable to our named executive officers in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction.

        The compensation that may be payable to our named executive officers in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction is summarized in the section entitled "Summary of Golden Parachute Arrangements in Connection with the HLC Asset Sale Transaction" beginning on page 70, including the table entitled "Golden Parachute Compensation". David Norris is the only one of our named executive officers who will receive compensation in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction. Such summary includes all compensation and benefits that may be paid or provided in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction.

        Our board of directors unanimously recommends that the stockholders approve the following resolution:

        "RESOLVED, that the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Tree.com's named executive officers in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction, as disclosed in the table entitled "Golden Parachute Compensation" on page 70, including the associated narrative discussion, and the agreements or understandings pursuant to which such compensation may be paid or become payable, are hereby APPROVED."

        The vote on executive compensation payable in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction is a vote separate and apart from the vote to approve the HLC asset sale transaction. Accordingly, approval of this proposal is not a condition to completion of the HLC asset sale transaction, and as an advisory vote, the result will not be binding on our company, our board of directors or compensation committee. Therefore, if the HLC asset sale transaction is approved by our stockholders and completed, the compensation based on or otherwise relating to the HLC asset sale transaction will be paid to Mr. Norris subject only to the conditions applicable to such payments, regardless of whether our stockholders approve this proposal.

        The HLC Transaction-Related Compensation Arrangements will be approved if the number of shares voted in favor of that proposal are greater than those voted against that proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the HLC Transaction-Related Compensation Arrangements Proposal.

        OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT OUR STOCKHOLDERS VOTE "FOR", ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, THE HLC TRANSACTION-RELATED COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS PROPOSAL.

72


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL #3
PROPOSAL TO ADJOURN OR POSTPONE THE SPECIAL MEETING

        If approved, this proposal would permit us to adjourn or postpone the special meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies in the event that, at the special meeting, the affirmative vote in favor of the HLC Asset Sale Proposal is less than a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting. If this proposal is approved and the HLC Asset Sale Proposal is not approved at the special meeting, we will be able to adjourn or postpone the special meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies to approve the HLC Asset Sale Proposal. If you have previously submitted a proxy on the proposals discussed in this proxy statement and wish to revoke it upon adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, you may do so.

        If a quorum is present at the special meeting, the Proposal to Adjourn or Postpone the Special Meeting will be approved if the number of shares voted in favor of that proposal are greater than those voted against that proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the Proposal to Adjourn or Postpone the Special Meeting if it is submitted for stockholder approval when a quorum is present at the meeting. If a quorum is not present at the special meeting, the Proposal to Adjourn or Postpone the Special Meeting will be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the special meeting. Abstentions would have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" this proposal and broker non-votes would have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal if it is submitted for approval when no quorum is present at the special meeting.



        OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT OUR STOCKHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" THE PROPOSAL TO ADJOURN OR POSTPONE THE SPECIAL MEETING, IF NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE, TO SOLICIT ADDITIONAL PROXIES IF THERE ARE INSUFFICIENT VOTES AT THE TIME OF THE SPECIAL MEETING TO APPROVE THE HLC ASSET SALE PROPOSAL.

73


Table of Contents


OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

        The following table sets forth information as of June 1, 2011, regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock by:

        Information with respect to beneficial ownership has been furnished by each director, executive officer or five percent or more stockholder, as the case may be.

        Percentage of beneficial ownership is calculated based on 11,024,271 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 1, 2011. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission which generally attribute beneficial ownership of securities to persons who possess sole or shared voting power or investment power with respect to those securities and includes shares of our common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options, warrants or other securities that are immediately exercisable or convertible or exercisable within 60 days of June 1, 2011, but does not assume the conversion, exercise or vesting of any such equity securities owned by any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons or entities identified in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them.

Name
  Shares Beneficially
Owned
  % Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
 

Greg Hanson

    22,556 (1)   *  

Peter Horan

    29,564     *  

W. Mac Lackey

    30,713     *  

Douglas R. Lebda

    2,198,100 (2)   20.0 %

Joseph Levin

    18,417     *  

Patrick McCrory

    14,366     *  

Lance Melber

    18,146     *  

David Norris

    25,833 (3)   *  

Steven Ozonian

    11,094     *  

Christopher Hayek

    5,611 (4)   *  

All directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons)

    2,374,400     21.5 %

Liberty Media Corporation

    2,773,987 (5)   25.2 %

*
The percentage of shares beneficially owned does not exceed 1%.

(1)
Includes 3,000 shares subject to options.

(2)
Includes 3,098 shares subject to options.

(3)
Consists of 22,500 shares subject to options and 3,333 restricted stock units vested as of June 28, 2011.

(4)
Consists of 3,112 shares subject to options and 2,499 restricted stock units vested as of June 28, 2011.

(5)
Information based on an amendment to Schedule 13D filed with the SEC by Liberty Media Corporation on May 23, 2011. The address of Liberty Media is 12300 Liberty Boulevard, Englewood, Colorado 80112. Liberty Media is a publicly held corporation. According to Liberty Media's Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on April 18, 2011, Liberty

74


Table of Contents

    Media's chairman, John C. Malone, controls approximately 35% of the voting power of Liberty Media.


PROPOSALS BY STOCKHOLDERS
FOR PRESENTATION AT OUR 2012 ANNUAL MEETING

        Stockholders who intend to have a proposal considered for inclusion in our proxy materials for presentation at our 2012 annual meeting of stockholders must submit the proposal to us at our corporate headquarters no later than December 30, 2011, which proposal must be made in accordance with the provisions of Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act. Stockholders who intend to present a proposal at our 2012 annual meeting of stockholders without inclusion of the proposal in our proxy materials are required to provide notice of such proposal to our Corporate Secretary no earlier than March 10, 2012 and no later than April 9, 2012. We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements.


HOUSEHOLDING OF MATERIALS

        Some banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of "householding." This means that only one copy of this proxy statement may have been sent to multiple stockholders in a household. We will promptly deliver, upon oral or written request, a separate copy of the proxy statement to any stockholder residing at an address to which only one copy was mailed. Requests for additional copies should be directed in writing to a stockholder's broker, bank or other nominee holding shares of our common stock for such stockholder or to Tree.com, Inc., 11115 Rushmore Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28277, Attention: Corporate Secretary, or by telephone to our Corporate Secretary at (704) 541-5351. Stockholders wishing to receive separate copies of our proxy statements in the future, and stockholders sharing an address that wish to receive a single copy of our proxy statements if they are receiving multiple copies of our proxy statements, should contact his or her bank, broker or other nominee record holder, or may contact the corporate secretary at the above address.


WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

        We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy these reports, statements or other information we file at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. Our SEC filings are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and at the website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov. The reports and other information that we file with the SEC are also available in the "Investors" section of our corporate website at www.tree.com.

        For printed copies of any of our reports, including this proxy statement, please contact our Corporate Secretary in writing at Tree.com, Inc., 11115 Rushmore Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28277, Attention: Corporate Secretary, or call our Corporate Secretary at (704) 541-5351.


OTHER MATTERS

        As of the date of this proxy statement, our board of directors does not know of any business to be presented at the special meeting other than as set forth in the notice accompanying this proxy statement. If any other matters should properly come before the special meeting, or any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, it is intended that the shares represented by proxies will be voted with respect to such matters in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting the proxies.

75


Table of Contents


APPENDIX A

ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
by and among

TREE.COM, INC.,
HOME LOAN CENTER, INC.,
LENDINGTREE, LLC,
HLC ESCROW, INC.
and
DISCOVER BANK

Dated May 12, 2011


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
  Page

ARTICLE 1.    DEFINITIONS. 

  A-1
   

1.1

 

Definitions

 
A-1
   

1.2

 

Index of Defined Terms

  A-8


ARTICLE 2.    PURCHASE AND SALE OF ASSETS. 


 

A-9
   

2.1

 

Purchase and Sale of Assets

 
A-9
   

2.2

 

Excluded Assets

  A-10
   

2.3

 

Assumed Liabilities

  A-11
   

2.4

 

Excluded Liabilities

  A-11


ARTICLE 3.    PURCHASE PRICE


 

A-12
   

3.1

 

Purchase Price

 
A-12
   

3.2

 

Adjustments

  A-13
   

3.3

 

Allocation of Purchase Price

  A-14

ARTICLE 4.    CLOSING

 
A-14
   

4.1

 

The Closing

 
A-14
   

4.2

 

Deliveries at the Closing

  A-14

ARTICLE 5.    REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF BUYER

 
A-16
   

5.1

 

Organization; Authority; Enforceability

 
A-16
   

5.2

 

No Conflicts

  A-16
   

5.3

 

No Finders

  A-16
   

5.4

 

No Litigation

  A-16
   

5.5

 

Financing

  A-16
   

5.6

 

Acknowledgment by Buyer

  A-16

ARTICLE 6.    REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF SELLER PARTIES

 
A-17
   

6.1

 

Organization; Authority; Enforceability

 
A-17
   

6.2

 

No Conflicts

  A-18
   

6.3

 

Capitalization

  A-18
   

6.4

 

Financial Statements; No Undisclosed Liabilities

  A-18
   

6.5

 

Subsequent Events

  A-19
   

6.6

 

No Finders

  A-21
   

6.7

 

Actions

  A-21
   

6.8

 

Legal Compliance

  A-21
   

6.9

 

Licenses

  A-22
   

6.10

 

Privacy and Data Security Policies

  A-22
   

6.11

 

Seller Pipeline Loans

  A-22
   

6.12

 

Acquired Assets

  A-23
   

6.13

 

Contracts

  A-23
   

6.14

 

Employees

  A-25
   

6.15

 

Intellectual Property

  A-26
   

6.16

 

Tax

  A-28
   

6.17

 

Transactions With Affiliates

  A-30
   

6.18

 

Employee Benefit Plans; ERISA

  A-30
   

6.19

 

Real Property

  A-31

A-i


Table of Contents

 
   
  Page
   

6.20

 

Vote Required

  A-31
   

6.21

 

Solvency

  A-31
   

6.22

 

Disclosure

  A-31

ARTICLE 7.    PRE-CLOSING COVENANTS

 
A-32
   

7.1

 

Conduct of Business by Seller Parties

 
A-32
   

7.2

 

Access to Information

  A-35
   

7.3

 

Efforts to Close

  A-35
   

7.4

 

Bulk Transfer Compliance

  A-36
   

7.5

 

Proxy Statement

  A-36
   

7.6

 

Stockholders' Meeting

  A-37
   

7.7

 

No Solicitation of Acquisition Proposal

  A-38
   

7.8

 

Notice of Events

  A-42
   

7.9

 

Directors and Officers

  A-43
   

7.10

 

Escrow and Transition Services Agreements

  A-43
   

7.11

 

Owned Software

  A-43
   

7.12

 

Excludable Contracts

  A-43
   

7.13

 

Compliance Certificates

  A-43

ARTICLE 8.    ADDITIONAL COVENANTS

 
A-43
   

8.1

 

Further Assurances

 
A-43
   

8.2

 

Confidentiality

  A-44
   

8.3

 

Non-Competition; Non-Solicitation

  A-45
   

8.4

 

Taxes

  A-46
   

8.5

 

Employees; Employee Benefit Plans

  A-47
   

8.6

 

Seller Parties' Operations After Closing

  A-50
   

8.7

 

New Mortgage Loan Applications; Seller Pipeline Loans

  A-51
   

8.8

 

Nonassignable Assets

  A-52

ARTICLE 9.    CLOSING CONDITIONS

 
A-52
   

9.1

 

Conditions Precedent to Obligations of Buyer

 
A-52
   

9.2

 

Conditions Precedent to Obligations of Seller Parties

  A-53

ARTICLE 10.    TERMINATION

 
A-54
   

10.1

 

Termination of Agreement

 
A-54
   

10.2

 

Effect of Termination

  A-57
   

10.3

 

Termination Fee

  A-57
   

10.4

 

Liquidated Damages

  A-57

ARTICLE 11.    INDEMNIFICATION

 
A-58
   

11.1

 

Survival

 
A-58
   

11.2

 

Indemnification by Seller Parties

  A-58
   

11.3

 

Indemnification by Buyer

  A-59
   

11.4

 

Third Party Claims

  A-60
   

11.5

 

Other Claims

  A-61
   

11.6

 

Limitations

  A-61
   

11.7

 

Mitigation

  A-62
   

11.8

 

Subrogation

  A-62
   

11.9

 

Set-off and Withholding

  A-62
   

11.10

 

Materiality

  A-62

A-ii


Table of Contents

 
   
  Page

ARTICLE 12.    MISCELLANEOUS

  A-63
   

12.1

 

Entire Agreement

 
A-63
   

12.2

 

Notices

  A-63
   

12.3

 

Modifications; Waiver

  A-65
   

12.4

 

Expenses

  A-65
   

12.5

 

Access to Records and Employees after Closing

  A-65
   

12.6

 

Public Announcements

  A-66
   

12.7

 

Assignments, Successors and No Third Party Rights

  A-66
   

12.8

 

Severability

  A-66
   

12.9

 

Governing Law; Arbitration

  A-66
   

12.10

 

Attorneys' Fees

  A-67
   

12.11

 

Time of Essence

  A-67
   

12.12

 

Execution of Agreement

  A-67
   

12.13

 

Interpretation

  A-67
   

12.14

 

Remedies

  A-69


EXHIBIT LIST

Exhibit A—Assignment and Assumption Agreement

Exhibit B—Bill of Sale

Exhibit C—Escrow Agreement Terms

A-iii


Table of Contents


ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT

        This Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 12, 2011, is entered into by and among Home Loan Center, Inc., a California corporation ("HLC Inc."), HLC Escrow, Inc., a California corporation ("HLC Escrow", and together with HLC Inc., "Sellers", and each a "Seller"), LendingTree, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("LendingTree"), and Tree.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Parent", and together with Sellers and LendingTree, "Seller Parties", and each a "Seller Party"), and Discover Bank, a Delaware banking corporation ("Buyer"). Seller Parties and Buyer are sometimes referred to herein together as the "Parties", and each as a "Party."


RECITALS

        A.    Parent owns or controls, directly or indirectly, each of HLC Inc., LendingTree and HLC Escrow.

        B.    Parent and its Affiliates (as defined below) are engaged in the business of (i) originating, refinancing, processing, underwriting, funding and closing residential mortgage loans and (ii) providing title, escrow, settlement and related services (the businesses described in clauses (i) and (ii), collectively, the "Business"). For the avoidance of doubt, the Business does not include the Excluded Business (as defined below).

        C.    Seller Parties desire to sell to Buyer, and Buyer desires to purchase from the Seller Parties, the Acquired Assets (as defined below), all on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein.

        D.    Concurrently with the entry into this Agreement, Parent and Buyer have entered into, and delivered to the other party their respective executed counterpart signature pages to, the Marketing Consulting Services Agreement (as defined herein).


AGREEMENT

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises herein made, and in consideration of the representations, warranties, and covenants contained herein, the Parties agree as follows:


ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS.

        1.1    Definitions.    

        "Action" means any action, appeal, petition, plea, charge, complaint, claim, suit, demand, litigation, investigation, arbitration, mediation, hearing or similar event, occurrence, or proceeding.

        "Affiliate" means, with respect to any specified Person, a Person that, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls or is controlled by, or is under common control with, such specified Person. For purposes of this definition, "control" means, with respect to any specified Person, the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such specified Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by Contract or otherwise. The terms "controlled by" and "under common control with" shall have correlative meanings.

        "Affiliated Group" means any affiliated group within the meaning of Section 1504 of the Code without regard to the limitations contained in Section 1504(b) of the Code and any similar group defined under a similar provision of state, local or foreign Law.

        "Agency" means any Governmental Authority which regulates or supervises (i) the Business, (ii) the Acquired Assets, (iii) any of the activities of Parent or LendingTree with respect to the Business or the Acquired Assets or (iv) HLC Inc., HLC Escrow or any of the Subsidiaries.

A-1


Table of Contents

        "Agreement" means this Asset Purchase Agreement, together with all Exhibits and Schedules (including the Disclosure Schedule) attached hereto, as the same may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time in accordance herewith.

        "Applicable Requirements" means all contractual obligations of, and all requirements of Law and Orders of any Agency or Governmental Authority applicable to, (i) Parent and LendingTree with respect to the Business or the Acquired Assets or (ii) HLC Inc., HLC Escrow or any of the Subsidiaries.

        "Assignment and Assumption Agreement" means the Assignment and Assumption Agreement in the form of Exhibit A.

        "Benefit Plan" means each plan, program, policy, payroll practice or Contract providing for compensation, bonus, incentive, retention, tax gross up, deferred compensation, severance, termination pay, change of control payments or benefits, performance awards, stock or stock related awards, equity compensation, fringe benefits, pension or retirement benefits, welfare benefits, or other employee benefits of any kind, whether formal or informal, funded or unfunded, written or oral, including each "employee benefit plan" within the meaning of Section 3(3) of ERISA.

        "Bill of Sale" means the Bill of Sale in the form of Exhibit B.

        "Bona Fide Proposal" means a binding written proposal from a Tier 1 Investor or Tier 2 Investor, in a form in which such Tier 1 Investor or Tier 2 Investor has indicated it is prepared to execute, to purchase mortgage loans funded by the Business after the Closing that (a) contains terms and conditions that are customary for a bank that is similarly-situated to Buyer (assuming Buyer had a mortgage origination business) and (b) does not contain terms that expressly subject Buyer to liability as a result of transactions or liabilities between HLC Inc. and such investor.

        "Business Day" means any day other than any Saturday, Sunday or other day on which banks in California or Delaware are required or authorized by law or regulation to close.

        "Business Employees" means those employees of Seller Parties or any of their Affiliates that render services as part of their primary job responsibilities for the Business, including the Key Persons.

        "Buyer Disclosure Schedule" means that certain document identified as the Buyer Disclosure Schedule delivered by Buyer to Sellers in connection with the execution of this Agreement. Each Section in the Buyer Disclosure Schedule shall be deemed to qualify the corresponding Section of this Agreement and any other Section of this Agreement to which the application of such disclosure is readily apparent on the face of such disclosure without further inquiry.

        "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

        "Collateral" means any family residence that is encumbered by a Mortgage, including all buildings and fixtures thereon and all accessions thereto, including installations of mechanical, electrical, plumbing, heating and air conditioning systems located in or affixed to such buildings, and all alterations, additions and replacements.

        "Confidential Information" means (i) trade secrets, (ii) ideas, know-how, concepts, methods, processes, formulae, technology, algorithms, models, reports, data, customer lists, supplier lists, mailing lists, business plans and other proprietary information, in each case, that are non-public and derive value, monetary or otherwise, from being maintained in confidence, and (iii) all non-public personal information of loan applicants.

        "Confidentiality Agreement" means that certain Mutual Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreement, dated as of July 22, 2010, by and between Discover Financial Services and Parent.

        "Contract" means any contract, agreement, lease, license, arrangement, bilateral understanding, commitment, obligation or instrument, whether written or oral.

A-2


Table of Contents

        "Copyrights" means copyrights, whether registered or unregistered, in published works and unpublished works, and pending applications to register the same.

        "Custodial Account" means all funds held or directly controlled by any Seller Party or any Subsidiary with respect to any Mortgage Loan, including all principal and interest funds and any other funds due, buydown funds, suspense funds, funds for the payment of Taxes, assessments, insurance premiums, ground rents and similar charges, funds for the payment of bankruptcy and fraud coverage, funds from hazard insurance loss drafts and other mortgage escrow and impound amounts (including interest thereon for the benefit of mortgagors, if applicable); provided, however, that the term "Custodial Account" shall not include any servicing-related funds held or directly controlled by any Seller Party or any Subsidiary with respect to any Mortgage Loan.

        "Disclosure Schedule" means that certain document identified as the Disclosure Schedule delivered by Sellers to Buyer in connection with the execution of this Agreement. Each Schedule in the Disclosure Schedule shall be deemed to qualify the corresponding Section of this Agreement and any other Section of this Agreement to which the application of such disclosure is readily apparent on the face of such disclosure without further inquiry.

        "Discover Financial Services" means Discover Financial Services, a Delaware corporation.

        "Encumbrance" means any security interest, deed of trust, mortgage, pledge, lien, charge, claim, other similar interest, Order, easement, community property interest, equitable interest, right of first refusal, or any other restriction on use, voting, transfer, receipt of income, or exercise of any other attribute of ownership.

        "Enforceable" means, with respect to a Contract entered into by a Person, that such Contract is the legal, valid, and binding obligation of such Person, enforceable against such Person in accordance with such Contract's terms, subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and similar laws affecting creditors' rights generally and to general principles of equity.

        "ERISA" means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

        "Escrow Agent" means The Bank of New York Mellon, in its capacity as escrow agent pursuant to the Escrow Agreement.

        "Escrow Agreement" means an Escrow Agreement, in form and substance satisfactory to Buyer and Seller Parties, providing for the terms set forth on Exhibit C.

        "Escrow Amount" means the amount initially deposited on the Closing Date into escrow with the Escrow Agent pursuant to the Escrow Agreement.

        "Excludable Contract" means each Contract set forth on Schedule 1.1(a) attached hereto.

        "Excluded Business" means the real estate brokerage business or lending network exchange businesses of Parent and LendingTree as presently conducted, as described in Parent's most recently filed Form 10-K or 10-Q filed prior to the date hereof.

        "Facilities" means the real property that is leased under the Assumed Office Leases.

        "FDIC" means the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

        "FDIC Approval" means the approval of the application to the FDIC by Buyer to acquire the Business or the written notice or written confirmation from the FDIC to Buyer that no application to the FDIC is required by Buyer to acquire all or any portion of the Business.

        "FHA" means the United States Federal Housing Administration.

        "FRMN" means First Residential Mortgage Network, Inc., a Kentucky corporation dba SurePoint Lending.

        "GAAP" means United States generally accepted accounting principles.

A-3


Table of Contents

        "Governmental Authority" means any foreign, domestic, federal, territorial, state, municipal or local governmental authority, quasi-governmental authority, instrumentality, court, government, or self-regulatory organization, commission, tribunal or organization or any regulatory, administrative or other agency, or any political or other subdivision, department or branch of any of the foregoing.

        "HLC Settlement" means HLC Settlement Services, Inc., a California corporation.

        "HUD" means the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.

        "Indebtedness" of any Person means (i) all indebtedness for borrowed money, (ii) all obligations issued, undertaken or assumed as the deferred purchase price of property or services other than trade accounts arising in the ordinary course of business, (iii) all reimbursement obligations with respect to surety bonds, letters of credit (to the extent not collateralized with cash or cash equivalents), bankers' acceptances and similar instruments (in each case, whether or not matured), (iv) all obligations evidenced by notes, including promissory notes, bonds, debentures or similar instruments, including obligations so evidenced incurred in connection with the acquisition of property, assets or businesses, (v) all indebtedness created or arising under any conditional sale or other title retention agreement, or incurred as financing, in either case with respect to property acquired by such Person and (vi) all indebtedness referred to in clauses (i) through (v) above secured by (or for which the holder of such Indebtedness has an existing right, contingent or otherwise, to be secured by) any Encumbrance upon or in property (including accounts and contracts rights) owned by such Person, even though such Person has not assumed or become liable for the payment of such Indebtedness.

        "Intellectual Property" means all (a) Patents, (b) Marks, (c) Copyrights, (d) mask works and registrations or applications for registration thereof, (e) Software, (f) Internet web sites, domain names, email addresses and telephone numbers, (g) licenses or franchises from nongovernmental third Persons, (h) Confidential Information, (i) the goodwill of the business associated with or embodied by any of the foregoing, (j) other similar proprietary rights and (k) copies and tangible embodiments of any of the foregoing.

        "Interim Period" means the period commencing on the date of this Agreement and continuing through and including the Closing Date.

        "Investor" means any public or private investor who owns or holds beneficial title to any of the Mortgage Loans or otherwise to whose guidelines any Seller has locked any Seller Pipeline Loan.

        "Investor Agreement" means any agreement between any Seller or any of its Affiliates and any Third Party (a) for the purchase of any residential mortgage loans originated by any Seller or any Subsidiary or any servicing rights with respect thereto or (b) for the purchase of hedging arrangements.

        "Investor Commitment" means the optional or mandatory commitment of any Seller or any Subsidiary to sell to any Person, and a Person to purchase from any Seller or any Subsidiary, a Mortgage Loan or an interest in a Mortgage Loan owned or to be acquired by any Seller or any Subsidiary, or a Seller Pipeline Loan, but specifically excluding obligations of any Seller or any Subsidiary to repurchase any Mortgage Loan.

        "IRS" means the United States Internal Revenue Service.

        "Key Person" means each person listed in Schedule 1.1(b).

        "Knowledge of Seller Parties" and similar phrases means the knowledge of Kenneth Block, Claudette Hampton, Christopher Hayek, Dave Norris, Rian Furey, Tamara Kotronis, Tonya Scherer and Douglas Lebda after due inquiry with respect to the underlying subject matter being represented.

        "Law" means any applicable federal, state, local, municipal, foreign, international, multinational, or other constitution, law, principle of common law, rule, requirement, Order, ordinance, regulation, statute or treaty, including those relating to consumer credit and mortgage lending or brokering.

A-4


Table of Contents

        "Liability" means any debt, liability or obligation, whether known or unknown, asserted or unasserted, absolute or contingent, matured or unmatured, conditional or unconditional, latent or patent, accrued or unaccrued, liquidated or unliquidated, or due or to become due.

        "License" means any permit, license, certificate, approval, consent, franchise, registration, filing, accreditation, or other similar authorization required by any Law or Governmental Authority.

        "Loan Documents" means each Contract evidencing or governing, or executed and delivered by a residential home buyer in connection with, any Seller Pipeline Loan.

        "Loan Files" means, with respect to any Seller Pipeline Loan, any Loan Documents, any books, records, written notes or memoranda, financial statements, credit evaluations and other written documentation maintained by or on behalf of any Seller or any Subsidiary with respect to such Seller Pipeline Loan.

        "Losses" means all losses, costs (including costs of investigation and reasonable fees and expenses of attorneys, accountants, consultants and other professionals), Taxes, claims, Liabilities, damages, lawsuits, amounts paid in settlement, judgments, fines, penalties, deficiencies, demands and expenses, but excluding any punitive or exemplary damages or losses, except to the extent paid to a Third Party.

        "Marketing Consulting Services Agreement" means the Master Services Agreement by and between Parent and Buyer dated May 12, 2011.

        "Marks" means registered or unregistered trademarks, service marks, trade dress, logos, trade names, brand names, corporate names and registrations or applications of the foregoing.

        "Material Adverse Change" or "Material Adverse Effect" means any change, event, effect, development, state of facts, condition, circumstance or occurrence that, individually or in the aggregate, has had or would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse change or effect on the business, condition (financial or otherwise), assets, Liabilities, results of operations of the Business or Acquired Assets, taken as a whole; provided, however, that none of the following shall be deemed to constitute or shall be taken into account in determining whether there has been a Material Adverse Change or Effect: any event, circumstance, change or effect arising out of or attributable to (i) general changes in the United States economy, financial markets or any market as to which the pricing of residential asset backed securities is tied or linked, including changes in prevailing interest rates and market conditions, residential mortgage rates or the securities markets, including any disruption thereof and any decline in the price of any security or any market index; (ii) changes that are the result of acts of war or terrorism; (iii) changes or proposed changes in, or in the application of, GAAP or Laws; (iv) changes to the industry or markets in which the Business operates that are not unique to the Business (including changes in the United States housing market); (v) general regulatory or political changes; or (vi) a flood, hurricane, earthquake or other natural disaster, but only to the extent any such circumstance, change or effect arising out of or attributable to the matters set forth in clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v) or (vi) does not disproportionately affect Sellers, the Subsidiaries, the Acquired Assets or the Business in comparison to other Persons engaged in mortgage lending.

        "Mortgage" means any mortgage, deed of trust, security deed or other instrument creating an Encumbrance on real property with respect to a Mortgage Loan.

        "Mortgage Loans" means all residential mortgage loans owned or originated and closed by any Seller or any Subsidiary prior to the Closing Date.

        "Order" means any order, ruling, decision, verdict, decree, writ, subpoena, mandate, precept, command, directive, consent, approval, award, judgment, injunction, or other similar determination or finding by, before, or under the supervision of any Governmental Authority, arbitrator or mediator.

        "Organizational Documents" means the articles of incorporation, certificate of incorporation, charter, bylaws, articles of formation, regulations, operating agreement, certificate of limited

A-5


Table of Contents


partnership, partnership agreement, and all other similar documents, instruments or certificates executed, adopted, or filed in connection with the creation, formation, or organization of a Person, including any amendments thereto.

        "Parent Stockholder Approval" means the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, of Parent entitled to vote at the Stockholders' Meeting approving this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby.

        "Patents" means United States and non-United States patents, patent applications (including provisional applications), patent disclosures, continuations, continuations-in-part, divisions, reissues, reexaminations, utility models, industrial designs, certificates of invention, inventions (whether or not patentable or reduced to practice), improvements to the foregoing and applications and registrations of the foregoing.

        "Permitted Encumbrances" means (a) Encumbrances for Taxes not yet due or which can be paid currently with no penalty; (b) mechanics' or materialmen's liens statutorily imposed or other like Encumbrances; (c) Encumbrances arising under original purchase price conditional sales contracts and equipment leases with Third Parties; (d) limitations on the rights of any Seller under any Assumed Contract that are expressly set forth in such Assumed Contract; (e) zoning, building codes and other land use Laws regulating the use or occupancy of the Assumed Office Leases or the activities conducted thereon that are imposed by any Governmental Authority; (f) Encumbrances securing indebtedness repaid and released in connection with the Closing; (g) to the extent disclosed on the Disclosure Schedule, licenses of Company Intellectual Property; (h) transfer restrictions on securities under Law; and (i) Encumbrances which, individually or in the aggregate, do not detract (other than in a de minimis manner) from the value, or interfere with (other than in a de minimis manner) the present use, of any Acquired Asset.

        "Person" means any individual, partnership, limited liability company, corporation, association, joint stock company, trust, entity, joint venture, labor organization, unincorporated organization or Governmental Authority.

        "Prepaid Amounts" means all of the pre-paid fees and expenses and/or deposits as of the Closing Date relating to the Assumed Contracts, Assumed Office Leases or other Acquired Assets (other than the assets described in Section 2.1(a)), excluding any amounts paid or payable to Seller Parties or any of their Affiliates.

        "Representative" means, with respect to any Person, any officer, director, manager, principal, attorney, accountant, investment banker, agent, employee or other representative of such Person.

        "Restricted Period" means the period commencing upon the Closing and ending on the third anniversary thereof.

        "RETS" means Real Estate Title Services, LLC, a Kentucky limited liability company.

        "SEC" means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

        "Seller Pipeline Loan" means a pending Mortgage Loan submission to be secured by a Mortgage on a 1-4 family residence made by a residential home buyer or homeowner prior to Closing (and all associated rights), which Mortgage Loan submission has not been (a) funded prior to the Closing or (b) canceled or withdrawn by the applicant prior to the Closing.

        "Software" means any and all (a) computer programs, including any and all software implementations of algorithms, models and methodologies, whether in source code or object code, (b) databases and compilations, including any and all data and collections of data, whether machine readable or otherwise, (c) descriptions, flow-charts and other work product used to design, plan, organize and develop any of the foregoing, screens, user interfaces, report formats, firmware,

A-6


Table of Contents


development tools, templates, menus, buttons and icons, and (d) all documentation including user manuals and other training documentation related to any of the foregoing.

        "Solvent" means, with respect to any Person on a particular date, that on such date (a) the fair value of the property of such Person is greater than the total amount of Liabilities of such Person, (b) the present fair saleable value of the assets of such Person is not less than the amount that will be required to pay the probable liability of such Person on its Liabilities as they become absolute and matured, (c) such Person is able to realize upon its assets and pay its Liabilities as they mature, (d) such Person does not intend to, and does not believe that it will, incur Liabilities beyond such Person's ability to pay as such Liabilities mature, and (e) such Person is not engaged in a business or a transaction, and is not about to engage in a business or a transaction, for which such Person's property would constitute unreasonably small capital.

        "Straddle Period" means any taxable period beginning on or prior to and ending after the Closing Date.

        "Subsidiary" means either of HLC Settlement or RETS.

        "SurePoint Purchase Agreement" means the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2010, among HLC Inc., FRMN, Saul Pohn, Jordan Pohn, The Saul L. Pohn Family Trust and The Jordan S. Pohn Family Trust.

        "Tax" means: (i) any federal, state, local, or foreign income, gross receipts, license, payroll, employment, excise, severance, stamp, occupation, premium, windfall profits, environmental, ad valorem, capital stock, franchise, profits, withholding, social security, unemployment, disability, real or personal property, sales, use, transfer, registration, value added, alternative or add-on minimum, estimated, or other tax of any kind whatsoever, including any interest, penalty, or addition thereto, whether disputed or not; and (ii) any liability for the payment of amounts with respect to payments of a type described in clause (i) as a result of being a member of an Affiliated Group or a consolidated, combined or unitary group, as a result of any obligation under any Tax sharing arrangement or Tax indemnity agreement, or as a result of being a successor or transferee.

        "Tax Group" means any Affiliated Group that, at any time on or before the Closing Date, includes or has included any Seller Party or any Subsidiary or any predecessor of or successor to any Seller Party or any Subsidiary (or another such predecessor or successor), or any other group of corporations that, at any time on or before the Closing Date, files or has filed Tax Returns on a combined, consolidated or unitary basis with any Seller Party or any Subsidiary or any predecessor of or successor to any Seller Party or any Subsidiary (or another such predecessor or successor).

        "Tax Return" means any return, declaration, report, claim for refund, or information return or statement relating to Taxes required to be filed with any Governmental Authority, including any Schedule or attachment thereto, and including any amendment thereof.

        "Third Party" means a Person that is not (a) a Party to this Agreement or (b) an Affiliate of a Party to this Agreement.

        "Third Party Claim" means any claim against any Indemnified Person by a Third Party, whether or not involving an Action.

        "Tier 1 Investor" means any of the four financial institutions set forth on Schedule 1.1(c) under the caption "Tier 1 Investors".

        "Tier 2 Investor" means any of the four financial institutions set forth on Schedule 1.1(d) under the caption "Tier 2 Investors".

        "Transactions" means the execution, delivery, and performance of the documents, instruments, and agreements to be executed, delivered, and performed in connection with each Transaction Document.

A-7


Table of Contents

        "Transaction Documents" mean, as to any Party, this Agreement, the Marketing Consulting Services Agreement and all agreements and instruments to be delivered by such Party pursuant to Section 4.2 of this Agreement.

        "VA" means United States Department of Veterans' Affairs.

        "Warehousing Agreement" means any agreement between any Seller or any of its Affiliates and any Third Party for a warehouse line of credit to be used, in whole or in part, to obtain funding for the origination of residential mortgage loans by any Seller or any Subsidiary, provided that, for purposes of Section 10.1(g), "Warehousing Agreement" means only a warehouse line of credit that is a committed facility.

        "WARN Act" means, collectively, the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act and any and all comparable state, local and other Laws.

        1.2    Index of Defined Terms.    Solely for convenience purposes, the following is a list of certain terms that are defined in this Agreement and the Section numbers where such definitions are contained:

AAA

  12.9

AAA Rules

  12.9

Acquired Assets

  2.1

Acquired Subsidiary Employees

  8.5(b)

Assumed Contracts

  2.1(b)

Assumed Liabilities

  2.3

Assumed Office Leases

  2.1(c)

Balance Sheet

  6.4(b)

Balance Sheet Date

  6.4(b)

Basket Amount

  11.2(b)(i)

Business

  Recitals B

Business Event

  3.1

Buyer

  Preamble

Buyer Closing Condition Failure

  10.4

Buyer Indemnified Persons

  11.2(a)

Buyer's Plans

  8.5(i)

Closing

  4.1

Closing Date

  4.1

Closing Payment

  3.1(a)

Company Intellectual Property

  6.15(a)

Competing Business

  8.3(a)

Compliance Certificate

  7.13

End Date

  10.1(b)

ERISA Affiliate

  6.18(a))

Excluded Assets

  2.2

Excluded Liabilities

  2.4

FCRA

  8.7(b)

Final Stub Period

  3.1

Financial Statements

  6.4(a)

First Measurement Period

  3.1

General Cap Amount

  11.2(b)(ii)

Hired Employees

  8.5(b)

HLC Escrow

  Preamble

HLC Inc.

  Preamble

A-8


Table of Contents

Indemnified Person

  11.4(a)

Indemnifying Person

  11.4(a)

Lead Sale Agreement

  4.2(a)(x)

LendingTree

  Preamble

Material Contracts

  6.13(a)

Measurement Period Revenue

  3.1

Nonassignable Assets

  8.8

Owned Software

  6.15(g)

Parent

  Preamble

Part(ies)

  Preamble

Permitted Section 8.3 Acquirer

  8.3(a)

Permitted Section 8.3 Transaction

  8.3(a)

Property Taxes

  8.4(b)

Proxy Statement

  7.5(a)

Purchase Price

  3.1

Reference Month

  7.13

RETS 401(k) Plan

  8.5(h)

Section 338(h)(10) Election

  8.4(e)

Seller Benefit Plan

  6.18(a)

Seller Indemnified Persons

  11.3(a)

Seller Part(ies)

  Preamble

Seller(s)

  Preamble

Specified Representations

  11.1(a)

Stockholders' Meeting

  7.5(a)

Subsequent Measurement Period

  3.1

Survival Period

  11.1(a)

Transition Services Agreement

  7.10(b)

Wind Down

  8.6(b)


ARTICLE 2. PURCHASE AND SALE OF ASSETS.

        2.1    Purchase and Sale of Assets.    On and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, on the Closing Date, (x) Buyer agrees to purchase from Sellers, and Sellers agree to sell, transfer, convey, and deliver to Buyer, all right, title and interest in and to all of the assets and properties of Sellers, wherever located, personal or mixed, tangible or intangible, used in, necessary for or relating to the operation of the Business, and (y) Buyer agrees to purchase from Parent and LendingTree, and Parent and LendingTree agree to sell, transfer, convey and deliver to Buyer, all right, title and interest in and to all of the assets of Parent and LendingTree described in Section 2.1(m) and listed in subsection (n) of Schedule 2.1, in each case free and clear of all Encumbrances (other than Permitted Encumbrances) (such assets as described in clauses (x) and (y) above and set forth in paragraphs (a) through (n) below, collectively, the "Acquired Assets"), including:

A-9


Table of Contents

For purposes of this Agreement, "Acquired Assets" shall also be deemed to include all of the assets and properties of the Subsidiaries.

        2.2    Excluded Assets.    Notwithstanding Section 2.1 to the contrary, Seller Parties will retain ownership of, and the Acquired Assets shall not include, the following assets (collectively, the "Excluded Assets"):

A-10


Table of Contents

        2.3    Assumed Liabilities.    At the Closing, Buyer will execute and deliver to Sellers the Assignment and Assumption Agreement pursuant to which Buyer will assume and agree to pay, perform and discharge, in accordance with their respective terms, only the following Liabilities of Seller Parties (collectively, the "Assumed Liabilities"): (a) Liabilities under the Assumed Contracts, Assumed Office Leases and hedging instruments assumed pursuant to Section 2.1(a) , but solely to the extent that such Liabilities relate to the Business, arise during the period after Closing and do not arise as a result of or in respect of any pre-Closing breach by Seller Parties or any of their Affiliates of an Assumed Contract, Assumed Office Lease or hedging instrument, and (b) Liabilities set forth on Schedule 2.3 with respect to the Seller Pipeline Loans.

        2.4    Excluded Liabilities.    The Excluded Liabilities will remain the sole responsibility of and will be retained, paid, performed and discharged as and when due solely by Parent and its Affiliates (as applicable). "Excluded Liabilities" means every Liability of Parent and its Affiliates (including the Subsidiaries) other than the Assumed Liabilities, including the following Liabilities of Parent or any of its Affiliates (including the Subsidiaries):

A-11


Table of Contents


ARTICLE 3. PURCHASE PRICE

        3.1    Purchase Price.    Subject to adjustment as provided in this Agreement, in consideration for the sale, transfer and assignment of the Acquired Assets in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and the due and full performance by Seller Parties of their respective obligations hereunder (including Section 8.3), Buyer shall assume the Assumed Liabilities and pay to HLC Inc. an amount (the sum of the following, the "Purchase Price") equal to:

        As used in this Section 3.1, the following terms shall have the meanings ascribed to them below:

        "Business Event" means the occurrence or existence at any time (i) during the period beginning on the date hereof until the second anniversary of the date hereof, of the daily average number of lenders participating on the mortgage network exchange operated by Parent and its Affiliates, as measured for any calendar quarter, being less than 100, or (ii) during the period beginning on the Closing Date until the second anniversary of the date hereof, Parent's and its Affiliates' Measurement Period Revenue (as defined below) measured as of any of the end of the First Measurement Period, any Subsequent Measurement Period or the Final Stub Period (in each case, as defined below) being less than $20,000,000. For the avoidance of doubt, no failure of the conditions set forth in clauses (i) and (ii) shall be subject to cure.

A-12


Table of Contents

        "First Measurement Period" means the period of six (6) calendar months beginning on the first day of the calendar month that begins following the conclusion of the calendar month during which the Closing Date falls, provided, however, that if the Closing Date falls on the first day of any calendar month, then the First Measurement Period shall begin on the Closing Date.

        "Subsequent Measurement Period" means a period of six (6) calendar months beginning on the first day of the calendar month that begins following the conclusion of the First Measurement Period or another Subsequent Measurement Period but not including any Final Stub Period.

        "Final Stub Period" means any number of full calendar months beginning with the calendar month following the conclusion of a Subsequent Measurement Period or the First Measurement Period, as applicable, and ending with the last day of the last full calendar month ending prior to the month in which the effective date of the termination or expiration of the Marketing Consulting Services Agreement falls (or, if the effective date of the termination or expiration of the Marketing Consulting Services Agreement is the last day of a month, such last day of such last month).

        "Measurement Period Revenue" means the aggregate revenue from Parent's and its Affiliates' network exchange business for the First Measurement Period, a Subsequent Measurement Period or the Final Stub Period, as applicable; provided that solely with respect to the Final Stub Period, the Measurement Period Revenue shall be the product of (i) the aggregate revenue from Parent's and its Affiliates' network exchange business for such period and (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is six (6), and the denominator of which is the number of months comprising such Final Stub Period.

        Notwithstanding any other provision of the Marketing Consulting Services Agreement, Parent and its Affiliates shall provide a written report to Buyer, in the form of a letter certified by Parent's chief accounting officer, no later than ten (10) days after the end of a calendar quarter, with sufficient data required to demonstrate Parent's and its Affiliates' compliance with the foregoing requirements during the preceding quarter. Buyer shall have the right, at its own expense, to perform an audit on an annual basis of the reports made by Parent and its Affiliates under this paragraph. Such audits shall be conducted prior to each anniversary of the Closing Date and such audits shall be in addition to any other audit rights set forth in Article VI of the Marketing Consulting Services Agreement. Parent also agrees to provide the same level of cooperation to Buyer and its representatives in their conduct of such audit as required pursuant to an audit under Article VI of the Marketing Consulting Services Agreement.

        3.2    Adjustments.    

A-13


Table of Contents

        3.3    Allocation of Purchase Price.    Buyer and Seller Parties shall be permitted to file their respective Tax Returns in a manner consistent with their own independent allocation of the Assumed Liabilities and Purchase Price to the Acquired Assets. Buyer and Seller Parties shall make such allocations consistent with Sections 338(h)(10) and 1060 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder.


ARTICLE 4. CLOSING

        4.1    The Closing.    The closing of the sale, assignment, transfer and conveyance to Buyer of the Acquired Assets and the assumption by Buyer of the Assumed Liabilities (the "Closing") shall take place at the offices of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, 333 South Hope Street, 48th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071, at 10:00 a.m. Los Angeles time on the third (3rd) Business Day after the conditions set forth in ARTICLE 9 have been satisfied or waived (other than those conditions that, by their nature, are to be satisfied at the Closing, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver of such conditions) or at such other place and time as shall be agreed upon by Buyer and Sellers. The date on which the Closing is actually held is referred to herein as the "Closing Date." The Closing shall be deemed effective as of 11:59 p.m. Los Angeles time on the Closing Date.

        4.2    Deliveries at the Closing.    

A-14


Table of Contents

A-15


Table of Contents


ARTICLE 5. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF BUYER

        Buyer represents and warrants to the Seller Parties that the statements contained in this ARTICLE 5 are correct and complete as of the date hereof and will be correct and complete through, and as of, the Closing Date as though made then.

        5.1    Organization; Authority; Enforceability.    Buyer is a banking corporation duly incorporated, validly existing, and in good standing under the Laws of the State of Delaware. Buyer has the requisite corporate power and authority, and has taken all action necessary, to authorize, execute and deliver the Transaction Documents to which it is a party, to consummate the transactions contemplated thereby and to perform its obligations thereunder. Each Transaction Document to which Buyer is or will be a party has been duly authorized and has been (or will be at Closing) duly executed and delivered by Buyer and (assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery by a Seller Party or a Key Person, as applicable) constitutes (or upon execution and delivery will constitute) the legal, valid and binding obligation of Buyer, Enforceable against Buyer.

        5.2    No Conflicts.    Except as set forth in Section 5.2 of the Buyer Disclosure Schedule, the execution and the delivery by Buyer of the Transaction Documents to which Buyer is a party, the performance by Buyer of its obligations thereunder and consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby by Buyer do not and will not: (a) breach or violate (i) any Law or Order to which Buyer or its assets and properties is subject or (ii) any provision of Buyer's Organizational Documents; (b) breach or conflict with, or constitute a default or an event creating rights of acceleration, termination or cancellation or a loss of rights under, any Contract, Order or License to which Buyer is a party or by which it is bound or to which any of Buyer's assets or properties is subject; or (c) require the approval, consent, authorization or act of, or the making by Buyer of any filing with, any Third Party or Governmental Authority.

        5.3    No Finders.    Buyer has no Liability to pay any compensation to any broker, finder, or agent with respect to the Transactions for which any Seller Party or any Affiliate thereof could become liable.

        5.4    No Litigation.    There is no Action pending or, to the knowledge of Buyer, threatened against Buyer relating to or affecting the Transaction Documents or any of the Transactions.

        5.5    Financing.    Buyer has, and at the Closing shall have, sufficient cash, available lines of credit or other sources of immediately available funds or committed capital to enable it to pay the Purchase Price.

        5.6    Acknowledgment by Buyer.    

A-16


Table of Contents


ARTICLE 6. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF SELLER PARTIES

        Seller Parties jointly and severally represent and warrant to Buyer that, except as set forth in the Disclosure Schedule, the statements contained in this ARTICLE 6 are correct and complete as of the date hereof and will be correct and complete through, and as of, the Closing Date as though made then; provided, that any statement as of a specific date is correct and complete only as of such specific date. For purposes of this ARTICLE 6, references in this ARTICLE 6 to a "Seller", "Seller Party", "Sellers" or "Seller Parties", as applicable, shall include each Subsidiary, such that each representation and warranty in this ARTICLE 6 covers, and is made with respect to, each Seller or Seller Party, as the case may be, and each Subsidiary, except that in Sections 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3, "Seller", "Seller Party", "Sellers" or "Seller Parties" does not include any Subsidiary.

        6.1    Organization; Authority; Enforceability.    

A-17


Table of Contents

        6.2    No Conflicts.    Except as set forth in Schedule 6.2, the execution and delivery by Seller Parties of the Transaction Documents to which they are a party, the performance by Seller Parties of their respective obligations thereunder and consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby by each Seller Party do not and will not: (a) breach or violate (i) any Law or Order to which any Seller Party, any Subsidiary, the Acquired Assets or the Business is subject or (ii) any provision of the Organizational Documents of any Seller Party or any Subsidiary; (b) breach in any material respect or conflict with, or constitute a default or an event creating rights of acceleration, termination or cancellation or a loss of rights under, any Contract, Order or License to which any Seller Party or any Subsidiary is a party or by which it is bound or to which any of the Acquired Assets or the Business is subject; (c) permit any Governmental Authority to terminate, revoke, modify or suspend any material License of any Seller Party or any Subsidiary; (d) result in the imposition of any Encumbrance upon the Acquired Assets; or (e) require the approval, consent, authorization or act of, or the making by any Seller Party or any Subsidiary of any filing with, any Third Party or Governmental Authority.

        6.3    Capitalization.    

        6.4    Financial Statements; No Undisclosed Liabilities.    

A-18


Table of Contents

        6.5    Subsequent Events.    Except as set forth in Schedule 6.5 (with an indication on such Schedule as to the approximate date on which any event described in this Section 6.5 shall have occurred):

A-19


Table of Contents

A-20


Table of Contents

        6.6    No Finders.    Except as set forth in Schedule 6.6, no Seller nor any of their Affiliates has any Liability to pay any compensation to any broker, finder, or agent with respect to the Transactions for which Buyer could become directly or indirectly liable.

        6.7    Actions.    Except as set forth in Schedule 6.7, neither Parent nor LendingTree, with respect to the Business, and no Seller (a) is subject to any outstanding Order, (b) has, since January 1, 2009, been subject to any Order, fine, suspension, settlement, memorandum of understanding, administrative agreement with, or sanction by, or any obligation to indemnify, any Governmental Authority (excluding obligations generally applicable to all participants in HUD and VA lending programs to indemnify HUD or VA for loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by VA, as applicable), or (c) is a party or, to the Knowledge of Seller Parties, threatened to be made a party to any Action relating to or affecting (i) the Acquired Assets, (ii) the Business, (iii) any of the Transaction Documents or (iv) any of the Transactions.

        6.8    Legal Compliance.    Except as set forth in Schedule 6.8:

A-21


Table of Contents

        6.9    Licenses.    

        6.10    Privacy and Data Security Policies.    Sellers' privacy and data security policies, and such policies of Parent and LendingTree, with respect to the Business, have been made available to Buyer. Sellers' privacy and data security policies, and such policies of Parent and LendingTree, with respect to the Business, have not been amended, superseded, modified or terminated, whether in writing or orally, and are in full force and effect. There is no provision of such policies that prohibits the sharing of nonpublic personal information of loan applicants between Seller Parties and Buyer upon consummation of the Transactions or otherwise contravenes 15 U.S.C. § 6802(e)(7) of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. Except as set forth in Schedule 6.10, since January 1, 2009, each Seller and each of Parent and LendingTree, with respect to the Business, has been in compliance in all material respects with such privacy and data security policies as in effect from time to time.

        6.11    Seller Pipeline Loans.    

A-22


Table of Contents

        6.12    Acquired Assets.    Except as set forth in Schedule 6.12:

        6.13    Contracts.    

A-23


Table of Contents

A-24


Table of Contents

        6.14    Employees.    

A-25


Table of Contents

        6.15    Intellectual Property.    

A-26


Table of Contents

A-27


Table of Contents

        6.16    Tax.    Except as set forth on Schedule 6.16:

A-28


Table of Contents

A-29


Table of Contents

        6.17    Transactions With Affiliates.    Schedule 6.17 sets forth a list of all existing Contracts and other business relationships between Parent or LendingTree, with respect to the Business, or any Seller, on the one hand, and any of such Party's Affiliates, officers or directors, on the other hand, including any Contracts or relationships pursuant to which services provided by Parent or any other Affiliate of any Seller to the Business utilizing assets that are not included in the Acquired Assets, other than "at will" employment arrangements with officers or with any Business Employees that are terminable "at will" by any Seller Party without notice or liability.

        6.18    Employee Benefit Plans; ERISA.    

A-30


Table of Contents

        6.19    Real Property.    

        6.20    Vote Required.    Assuming the Parent Stockholder Approval is obtained, no approval of holders of securities of Parent, in their capacity as such, is necessary to approve this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby.

        6.21    Solvency.    Immediately before and immediately after giving effect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including the payment of all fees, expenses and other amounts required to be paid in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, HLC Inc. is and will be Solvent.

        6.22    Disclosure.    None of the representations or warranties of Seller Parties contained herein and none of the information contained in the Disclosure Schedule is false or misleading in any material

A-31


Table of Contents


respect or omits to state a fact herein or therein necessary to make the statements herein or therein not misleading in any material respect.


ARTICLE 7. PRE-CLOSING COVENANTS

        The Parties agree as follows with respect to the Interim Period (or, where expressly so provided, following the Closing):

        7.1    Conduct of Business by Seller Parties.    

A-32


Table of Contents

A-33


Table of Contents

A-34


Table of Contents

        7.2    Access to Information.    Upon reasonable notice, Seller Parties shall, and shall cause their Affiliates to, afford to the Buyer, its Affiliates and their respective Representatives, reasonable access during normal business hours during the Interim Period, coordinated through those persons listed on Schedule 7.2, to the properties, books and records of the Business as Buyer, its Affiliates and their respective Representatives may reasonably request, and Seller Parties shall, and shall cause their Affiliates to, furnish promptly to Buyer, its Affiliates and their respective Representatives such additional information concerning the Business, the Business Employees or the Acquired Assets as Buyer, its Affiliates and their respective Representatives may reasonably request; provided, that no Seller Party nor any of their Affiliates shall have any obligation to provide Buyer with access to, or provide Buyer, its Affiliates and their respective Representatives with, any information the disclosure of which would violate any Applicable Requirement or result in a breach of the confidentiality provisions of any Contract to which any Seller Party or any of their Affiliates is bound; provided, further, that Seller Parties and their Affiliates shall be entitled to withhold only such information that may not be provided without causing such violation or breach. Buyer shall, and shall cause its Affiliates and their respective Representatives to, use reasonable efforts to prevent such access and inspection from materially interfering with the business operations of Seller Parties. No investigation made by Buyer, its Affiliates or their respective Representatives hereunder shall affect any of the representations, warranties, covenants and obligations of Seller Parties hereunder.

        7.3    Efforts to Close.    

A-35


Table of Contents

        7.4    Bulk Transfer Compliance.    Buyer and Sellers hereby mutually agree to waive compliance with the provisions of any bulk transfer or sales Laws, to the extent applicable to the Transactions.

        7.5    Proxy Statement.    

A-36


Table of Contents

        7.6    Stockholders' Meeting.    Parent shall, as promptly as practicable following the date of this Agreement, establish a record date for, duly call, give notice of, convene and hold the Stockholders' Meeting. Unless the Board of Directors of Parent has made a Permitted Change of Recommendation, Parent shall, through its Board of Directors, recommend to its stockholders the approval of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (the "Parent Recommendation"), and take all other action necessary or advisable to secure the Parent Stockholder Approval. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, the obligation of Parent to call, give notice of, convene and hold the Stockholders' Meeting and to hold a vote of Parent's stockholders on the

A-37


Table of Contents

approval of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement at the Stockholders' Meeting shall not be limited or otherwise affected by the commencement, disclosure, announcement or submission to it of any Acquisition Proposal (whether or not a Superior Proposal) or by a Change of Recommendation. In any case in which Parent makes a Change of Recommendation, (a) Parent shall nevertheless submit the transactions contemplated by this Agreement to a vote of its stockholders and (b) the Proxy Statement and any and all accompanying materials (including the proxy card, the "Proxy Materials") shall be the same in form and content to that which would have been prepared by Parent had no Change of Recommendation been made, except for changes to the Proxy Materials stating and explaining the reasons for the Change of Recommendation, including, if applicable, describing matters relating to the Superior Proposal or other event giving rise to the Change of Recommendation, and such other changes as are required by Law or which the Board of Directors of Parent determines that the failure to make would constitute, or would be reasonably likely to constitute, a breach of the fiduciary duties of the Board of Directors of Parent to Parent's stockholders under Law. Parent agrees that, prior to the termination of this Agreement, it shall not submit to the vote of its stockholders any Acquisition Proposal (whether or not a Superior Proposal) or propose to do so. For the avoidance of doubt, Parent shall not be required to hold the Stockholders' Meeting if this Agreement is validly terminated in accordance with Section 10.1.

        7.7    No Solicitation of Acquisition Proposal.    

A-38


Table of Contents

A-39


Table of Contents

A-40


Table of Contents

A-41


Table of Contents

        7.8    Notice of Events.    Each Party shall promptly notify the other Parties of any Action that shall be instituted or threatened against such Party to restrain, prohibit or otherwise challenge the legality or validity of any of the Transactions. Seller Parties shall, and shall cause their Affiliates to, promptly notify Buyer of (i) any Action that may be threatened, brought, asserted or commenced against Seller Parties, the Subsidiaries or the Business that would have been listed on Schedule 6.7 if such Action had arisen prior to the date hereof and (ii) any other event or matter that becomes known to any Seller Party or any Subsidiary that would, or would reasonably be expected to, cause any representation or warranty contained in ARTICLE 6 to be untrue in any material respect. No such notice shall affect any of the representations and warranties of a Party hereunder. Seller Parties shall, and shall cause their Affiliates to, promptly notify Buyer of the occurrence of any of the events that has given or would give,

A-42


Table of Contents

with or without the passage of time or the giving of notice or both, rise to the right of Buyer to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 10.1(g).

        7.9    Directors and Officers.    Sellers shall take all necessary action to ensure that, effective as of the Closing, the board of directors (or equivalent governing body) and officers of each Subsidiary shall consist of those individuals identified by Buyer prior to the Closing.

        7.10    Escrow and Transition Services Agreements.    Each Seller Party and Buyer agrees that it will negotiate in good faith (a) a definitive Escrow Agreement in a manner consistent with, and containing the terms set forth in, Exhibit C and (b) a definitive transition services agreement in a manner consistent with, and containing the terms set forth in, Schedule 7.10(b) (the "Transition Services Agreement"), whereby Parent or its Affiliates will provide certain transition support to Buyer and Buyer will provide certain transition support to Seller Parties, in each case, on other such customary terms to which the Parties may agree, for execution by the applicable Seller Parties and Buyer on the Closing Date.

        7.11    Owned Software.    At all times prior to the Closing, Seller Parties will make all modifications to the Owned Software necessary to reflect changes in Applicable Requirements.

        7.12    Excludable Contracts.    Subject to the remaining provisions of this Section 7.12, the Parties agree that, except for purposes of Section 2.1(b), each Excludable Contract set forth on Schedule 1.1(a) shall be deemed to be an Assumed Contract hereunder. Seller Parties shall use their reasonable efforts to obtain, as promptly as practicable following the date hereof, correct and complete copies of each Excludable Contract and shall, within 30 days following the date hereof, deliver to Buyer (a) correct and complete copies of all Excludable Contracts or (b) with respect to any Excludable Contract for which Seller Parties have been unable to obtain a correct and complete copy, a statement to such effect. Within 30 days following such delivery by Seller Parties, Buyer shall provide to Seller Parties a list of each Excludable Contract that Buyer has determined, in its sole discretion, to be an Assumed Contract for purposes of Section 2.1(b). On or prior to the Closing Date, the Parties shall amend subsection (b) of Schedule 2.1 to include on such Schedule each Excludable Contract identified by Buyer on such list. For the avoidance of doubt, any Excludable Contract that is not identified by Buyer on such list shall, for all purposes of this Agreement, be deemed to be an Excluded Asset.

        7.13    Compliance Certificates.    Within five (5) Business Days following the end of each calendar month (the "Reference Month") during the Interim Period, Parent shall deliver to Buyer a certificate, which shall be signed by the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer of Parent, substantially in the form of Schedule 7.13 attached hereto (each a "Compliance Certificate"), certifying as to the matters set forth in Schedule 7.13 with respect to the applicable Reference Month.


ARTICLE 8. ADDITIONAL COVENANTS

        8.1    Further Assurances.    

A-43


Table of Contents

        8.2    Confidentiality.    

A-44


Table of Contents

        8.3    Non-Competition; Non-Solicitation.    

A-45


Table of Contents

        8.4    Taxes.    

A-46


Table of Contents

        8.5    Employees; Employee Benefit Plans.    

A-47


Table of Contents

A-48


Table of Contents

A-49


Table of Contents

        8.6    Seller Parties' Operations After Closing.    

A-50


Table of Contents

        8.7    New Mortgage Loan Applications; Seller Pipeline Loans.    

A-51


Table of Contents

        8.8    Nonassignable Assets.    Nothing in this Agreement nor the consummation of the Transactions shall be construed as an attempt or agreement to assign any Acquired Asset, including any Assumed Contract, Assumed Office Lease or other certificate, approval, authorization or other right included in the Acquired Assets, which by its terms or by Law is not assignable without consent (Acquired Assets that cannot be assigned due to lack of consent, "Nonassignable Assets") unless and until such consent has been obtained. Sellers shall, and shall cause their Affiliates to, use its reasonable efforts to obtain at the earliest practical date all consents required to consummate the Transactions. To the extent permitted by Law, in the event consents cannot be obtained, such Nonassignable Assets shall be held, as of and from the Closing Date, by any Seller or the applicable Affiliate of Sellers in trust for Buyer and the covenants and obligations thereunder shall be performed by Buyer in such Seller's or such Affiliate's name and all benefits and obligations existing thereunder shall be for Buyer's account. Each Seller or the applicable Affiliate of Sellers shall take or cause to be taken such actions in its name or otherwise as Buyer may reasonably request so as to provide Buyer with the benefits of the Nonassignable Assets and to effect collection of money or other consideration that becomes due and payable under the Nonassignable Assets, and each Seller or the applicable Affiliate of Sellers shall promptly pay over to Buyer all money or other consideration received by it after the Closing Date in respect of all Nonassignable Assets. As of and from the Closing Date, each Seller, on behalf of itself and its Affiliates, authorizes Buyer, to the extent permitted by Law and the terms of the Nonassignable Assets, at Buyer's expense, to perform all of the obligations and receive all of the benefits of such Seller or its Affiliates under the Nonassignable Assets.


ARTICLE 9. CLOSING CONDITIONS

        9.1    Conditions Precedent to Obligations of Buyer.    Buyer's obligation to consummate the purchase of the Acquired Assets and the other transactions contemplated to occur in connection with the Closing are subject to the satisfaction of each condition precedent listed below (any or all of which may be waived by Buyer in whole or in part to the extent permitted by Law).

A-52


Table of Contents

        9.2    Conditions Precedent to Obligations of Seller Parties.    Seller Parties' obligations to consummate the sale of the Acquired Assets and the other transactions contemplated to occur in connection with the Closing are subject to the satisfaction of each condition precedent listed below (any or all of which may be waived by Parent, in whole or in part to the extent permitted by Law).

A-53


Table of Contents


ARTICLE 10. TERMINATION

        10.1    Termination of Agreement.    The Parties may terminate this Agreement as provided below:

A-54


Table of Contents

A-55


Table of Contents

A-56


Table of Contents

        10.2    Effect of Termination.    Except for Section 8.2, this Section 10.2, Section 10.3, Section 10.4 and ARTICLE 12, if this Agreement is terminated under Section 10.1, then all further obligations of the Parties under this Agreement will terminate. If this Agreement is terminated because of a breach of this Agreement by the non-terminating Party or because one or more of the conditions to the terminating Party's obligations under this Agreement are not satisfied as a result of the non-terminating Party's breach of or failure to comply with its obligations under this Agreement, then the terminating Party's right to pursue all legal remedies will survive such termination unimpaired. Each Party's right of termination under Section 10.1 is in addition to any other rights it may have under this Agreement or otherwise, and the exercise of such right of termination will not be an election of remedies.

        10.3    Termination Fee.    

        10.4    Liquidated Damages.    NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY HEREIN, IF (A) THE CLOSING FAILS TO OCCUR ON OR PRIOR TO THE END DATE (AS IT MAY BE EXTENDED PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.1(b)) DUE SOLELY TO (I) BUYER FAILING TO OBTAIN A LICENSE OR APPROVAL OF A GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY SET FORTH ON SCHEDULE 9.1(e), OR (II) THE CONDITION SET FORTH IN SECTION 9.1(m) FAILING TO BE SATISFIED OTHER THAN AS A RESULT OF THE FAILURE OF CLAUSE (B) OF THE DEFINITION OF BONA FIDE PROPOSAL TO BE SATISFIED IN ONE OR MORE PROPOSALS RECEIVED BY BUYER (CLAUSE (I) OR (II), (A "BUYER CLOSING CONDITION FAILURE") AND (B) PARENT IS ENTITLED TO TERMINATE THIS AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.1(b) or 10.1(d), THEN THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE THAT SELLER PARTIES' ACTUAL DAMAGES CAUSED BY A BUYER CLOSING CONDITION FAILURE WOULD BE EXTREMELY DIFFICULT OR IMPRACTICABLE TO DETERMINE. THEREFORE, THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT $5,000,000 HAS BEEN AGREED UPON, AFTER NEGOTIATION, AS THE PARTIES' REASONABLE ESTIMATE OF SELLER PARTIES'

A-57


Table of Contents

DAMAGES THAT WOULD BE CAUSED BY A BUYER CLOSING CONDITION FAILURE, AND THAT AN AWARD OF SUCH LIQUIDATED DAMAGES IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000,000 SHALL BE SELLER PARTIES' EXCLUSIVE REMEDY AGAINST BUYER AS A RESULT OF A BUYER CLOSING CONDITION FAILURE; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT SUCH AMOUNT SHALL BE REDUCED BY THE AGGREGATE AMOUNTS, IF ANY, PAID BY BUYER TO PARENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.1(b) IN CONNECTION WITH EXTENSIONS OF THE END DATE BY BUYER. BUYER AND SELLER PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THE ABOVE PROVISION COVERING LIQUIDATED DAMAGES, AND THAT EACH PARTY WAS REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL WHO EXPLAINED THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES PROVISION AT THE TIME THIS AGREEMENT WAS EXECUTED.


ARTICLE 11. INDEMNIFICATION

        11.1    Survival.    

        11.2    Indemnification by Seller Parties.    

A-58


Table of Contents

        11.3    Indemnification by Buyer.    

A-59


Table of Contents

        11.4    Third Party Claims.    

A-60


Table of Contents

        11.5    Other Claims.    A claim for indemnification for any matter not involving a Third Party Claim may be asserted by notice to the Party from whom indemnification is sought. No Person shall be liable for any claim for indemnification under Section 11.2 or 11.3 above unless written notice specifying in reasonable detail the nature of the claim for indemnification is delivered by the Person seeking indemnification to the Person from whom indemnification is sought prior to the expiration of the Survival Period, in which case the representation, warranty, covenant or agreement which is the subject of such claim shall survive, to the extent of such claim only, until such claim is resolved, whether or not the amount of the Losses resulting from such breach has been finally determined at the time the notice is given.

        11.6    Limitations.    

A-61


Table of Contents

        11.7    Mitigation.    Each of the Parties agrees to take all reasonable steps to mitigate their respective Losses upon and after becoming aware of any event or condition which could reasonably be expected to give rise to any Losses that are indemnifiable hereunder; provided, however, that in no event shall an Indemnified Person be required to pursue any claim under an insurance policy to recover any Losses suffered hereunder.

        11.8    Subrogation.    Upon making any payment to an Indemnified Person for any indemnification claim pursuant to this ARTICLE 11, the Indemnifying Person shall be subrogated, to the extent of such payment, to any rights which the Indemnified Person may have against any insurer with respect to the subject matter underlying such indemnification claim and the Indemnified Person shall assign any such rights to the Indemnifying Person.

        11.9    Set-off and Withholding.    

        11.10    Materiality.    Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, solely for purposes of determining whether a breach of any representation or warranty has occurred, or whether an inaccuracy in any representation or warranty exists, all of the representations and warranties set forth in this Agreement that are qualified as to "material," "materiality," "material respects," "Material Adverse Effect", "Material Adverse Change" or words of similar import or effect shall mean that the representation or warranty is not breached or inaccurate unless the Losses arising from or in connection with such breach of or inaccuracy in such representation or warranty (or the Losses arising from or in connection with a series of breaches or inaccuracies arising from the same facts, events or circumstances) exceeds $50,000. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, solely for purposes of determining the amount of Losses arising from or in connection with any breach of, or inaccuracy in, any representation or warranty (or the Losses arising from or in connection with a series of breaches or inaccuracies arising from the same facts, events or circumstances), all of the representations and warranties set forth in this Agreement that are qualified as to "material," "materiality," "material respects," "Material Adverse Effect", "Material Adverse Change" or words of similar import or effect shall be ignored. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, this Section 11.10 shall not affect the meaning of "Material Adverse Effect" or "Material Adverse Change" except for the limited purpose of determining indemnity as specified herein. Without limiting the generality of the immediately preceding sentence, the Parties acknowledge and agree that for purposes of determining whether the conditions set forth in Sections 9.1(a) and 9.1(c) have been satisfied, the terms "Material Adverse Effect" and "Material Adverse Change" shall be given the meaning set forth in Section 1.1 without regard to anything to the contrary in this Section 11.10.

A-62


Table of Contents


ARTICLE 12. MISCELLANEOUS

        12.1    Entire Agreement.    This Agreement (together with the Disclosure Schedule, Exhibits and other Transaction Documents) supersedes all prior agreements, representations and warranties, whether written or oral, of the Parties with respect to the subject matter contained herein or therein (including the Confidentiality Agreement, any letter of intent, indication of interest, term sheet or the like between Buyer or any of its Affiliates, on the one hand, and Seller, Parent or any of their Affiliates, on the other hand) and constitutes a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement among the Parties with respect to its subject matter.

        12.2    Notices.    All notices, consents and other communications required or permitted by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be (a) delivered to the appropriate address by hand, by nationally recognized overnight service or by courier service (costs prepaid), (b) sent by facsimile or e-mail, or (c) sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, in each case to the following addresses, facsimile numbers or e-mail addresses and marked to the attention of the person (by name or title) designated below (or to such other address, facsimile number, e-mail address or person as a Party may designate by notice to the other Party):

A-63


Table of Contents

All notices, consents, waivers and other communications shall be deemed to have been duly given (as applicable): if delivered by hand, when delivered by hand; if delivered by overnight service, when delivered by nationally recognized overnight service; if delivered by courier, when delivered by courier; if sent via registered or certified mail, five (5) Business Days after being deposited in the mail, postage prepaid; or if delivered by email or facsimile, when received by the recipient prior to 5:00 p.m. local time for the recipient (and if received by the recipient after 5:00 p.m. local time for the recipient, then delivery will be deemed duly given at 9:00 a.m. local time for the recipient on the subsequent Business Day).

A-64


Table of Contents

        12.3    Modifications; Waiver.    No provision of this Agreement may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified except by a written agreement mutually executed by the Parties (except for assignments as permitted hereunder). Any term or provision of this Agreement may be waived, or the time for its performance may be extended, by the Party or Parties entitled to the benefit thereof. Any such wavier shall be validly and sufficiently authorized for purposes of this Agreement if, as to any Party, it is authorized in writing by an authorized representative of such Party. Neither any failure nor any delay by any Party in exercising any right, power or privilege under this Agreement or any of the documents referred to in this Agreement will operate as a waiver of such right, power or privilege, and no single or partial exercise of any such right, power or privilege will preclude any other or further exercise of such right, power or privilege or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege. To the maximum extent permitted by Law, (a) no waiver that may be given by a Party will be applicable except in the specific instance for which it is given, and (b) no notice to or demand on one Party will be deemed to be a waiver of any obligation of that Party or of the right of the Party giving such notice or demand to take further action without notice or demand as provided in this Agreement or the other Transaction Documents.

        12.4    Expenses.    Each Party will bear its respective fees and expenses incurred in connection with the preparation, negotiation, execution and performance of the Transaction Documents and the Transactions, including all fees and expenses of its Representatives. If this Agreement is terminated, the obligation of each Party to pay its own fees and expenses will be subject to any rights of such Party arising from a breach of this Agreement by the other Party.

        12.5    Access to Records and Employees after Closing.    

A-65


Table of Contents

        12.6    Public Announcements.    Any public announcement, press release or similar publicity with respect to this Agreement, the other Transaction Documents or the Transactions will be issued only with the prior written consent of Parent and Buyer, except as and to the extent that any Party shall be obligated by Law or applicable securities exchange rules, in which case the other Party shall be advised and the Parties shall use their commercially reasonable efforts to cause a mutually agreeable release or announcement to be issued.

        12.7    Assignments, Successors and No Third Party Rights.    Prior to the Closing, no Party may assign any of its rights or delegate any of its obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other Parties, except that Buyer may, so long as Buyer remains liable hereunder: (i) assign any of its rights and delegate any of its obligations under this Agreement to (A) any Third Party in connection with a sale of all or substantially all of its assets, sale of its equity interests, change of control or similar transaction, or (B) any Affiliate of Buyer, (ii) assign the right to acquire the equity interests of the Subsidiaries and/or the assets of HLC Escrow to an Affiliate of Buyer, and (iii) collaterally assign its rights hereunder to any financial institution providing financing in connection with the Transactions. Following the Closing, any Party may assign any of its rights hereunder, but no such assignment shall relieve it of its obligations hereunder. Any other purported assignment without written consent of the other Parties shall be void and of no effect. Subject to the foregoing, this Agreement will apply to, be binding in all respects upon and inure to the sole benefit of the successors and permitted assigns of the Parties. Nothing expressed or referred to in this Agreement will be construed to give any Person other than the Parties any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or with respect to any provision of this Agreement, except such rights as shall inure to a successor or permitted assignee pursuant to this Section 12.7 and except for the Buyer Indemnified Persons and the Seller Indemnified Persons.

        12.8    Severability.    Wherever possible, each provision hereof shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under Law, but if any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, the other provisions of this Agreement will remain in full force and effect. Any provision of this Agreement held invalid, illegal or unenforceable only in part or degree will remain in full force and effect to the extent not held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, unless such a construction would be unreasonable. The Parties further agree to replace such invalid or unenforceable provision with a valid and enforceable provision that will achieve, to the extent possible, the economic and business purposes of such invalid or unenforceable provision; provided, that such replacement shall not result in a materially adverse impairment of the rights or obligations of any Party.

        12.9    Governing Law; Arbitration.    This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to its conflict of law principles. All disputes, controversies and claims between the Parties, arising out of or relating to this Agreement, including those involving its interpretation, the obligations of a Party hereto, or the breach thereof, will be resolved by binding arbitration, to be administered in Delaware by the American Arbitration Association ("AAA") in accordance with the AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules then in effect (the "AAA Rules"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Section shall not preclude the Parties from seeking interim provisional, injunctive or other equitable remedies. Each of the Parties irrevocably

A-66


Table of Contents


submits to the jurisdiction of the state and Federal courts, located in Delaware in conjunction with an application for an interim provisional, injunctive or other equitable remedy or for enforcement of this arbitration provision or an award rendered hereunder. There will be one arbitrator selected pursuant to the AAA Rules. The arbitrator shall be bound to apply the applicable substantive law set forth herein to each dispute. The arbitrator shall have the authority to award any remedy that a court of competent jurisdiction could order or grant, including, without limitation, the issuance of an injunction. The arbitrator shall issue a statement of decision in accordance with the express terms of the Agreement and shall take into account usages of the trade applicable to the Agreement. The arbitrator is not empowered to alter, amend, modify or change any of the terms of this Agreement. The Parties shall make the arbitrator aware of this Section 12.9 before the start of any arbitration proceedings. The dispute resolution proceedings and discovery shall be conducted expeditiously. Without limiting the foregoing, to the extent practical and in the interests of justice, it is intended by the Parties that the arbitration hearing for the dispute be completed within ninety (90) days after the selection of the arbitrator. The costs of the arbitration shall be borne by the non-prevailing Party, as determined by the arbitrator, and the prevailing Party in the arbitration shall be awarded its fees and costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees). Judgment upon any award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. Except as necessary in court proceedings to enforce this arbitration provision or an award rendered hereunder, to obtain an interim remedy or as otherwise required by Law, neither a Party nor an arbitrator may disclose the existence, content, or results of any arbitration hereunder without the prior written consent of both Parties. Notwithstanding the choice of law provision included in this Agreement, the United States Federal Arbitration Act shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this arbitration provision.

        12.10    Attorneys' Fees.    If any Action is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement, the successful or prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs incurred in that Action (including costs of collection), in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.

        12.11    Time of Essence.    With regard to all dates and time periods set forth or referred to in this Agreement, time is of the essence.

        12.12    Execution of Agreement.    This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterpart signature pages executed and delivered via facsimile transmission or via email with scan or email attachment. Any such counterpart executed and delivered via facsimile transmission or via email with scan or email attachment will be deemed an original for all intents and purposes. All such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding when two or more counterparts have been signed by each of the Parties and delivered to each other Party.

        12.13    Interpretation.    

A-67


Table of Contents

A-68


Table of Contents

        12.14    Remedies.    Seller Parties and Buyer acknowledge and agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event any of the provisions of this Agreement required to be performed by any of the Parties were not performed in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise breached, and that monetary damages, even if available, may not be an adequate remedy therefor. Accordingly, in the event of any breach or threatened breach by any party of any covenant or obligation contained in this Agreement, notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein to the contrary, Seller Parties or Buyer shall be entitled to obtain, without proof of actual damages or the insufficiency of monetary damages (and in addition to any other remedy to which such party may be entitled at law or in equity): (a) a decree or order of specific performance to enforce the observance and performance of such covenant or obligation; and (b) an injunction restraining such breach or threatened breach. Seller Parties and Buyer hereby waive any requirement for the securing or posting of any bond in connection with any such remedy.

[Signatures on the Following Page(s)]

A-69


Table of Contents

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Asset Purchase Agreement to be entered into as of the date first above written.

    Discover Bank

 

 

By:

 

/s/ CHRISTINA FAVILLA

    Name:  Christina Favilla
Title:    President

 

 

Home Loan Center, Inc.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ DAVID NORRIS

    Name:  David Norris
Title:    President

 

 

Tree.com, Inc.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ DOUGLAS LEBDA

    Name:  Douglas Lebda
Title:    Chairman of the Board and
             Chief Executive Officer

 

 

HLC Escrow, Inc.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ DAVID NORRIS

    Name:  David Norris
Title:    President

 

 

LendingTree, LLC

 

 

By:

 

/s/ DOUGLAS LEBDA

    Name:  Douglas Lebda
Title:    President

A-70


APPENDIX B

OPINION OF MILESTONE ADVISORS, LLC


LOGO

 

1775 Eye St. NW
Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006
Tel     202.367.3000
Fax    202.367.3001
www.milestonecap.com

May 12, 2011

The Board of Directors of Tree.com, Inc.
11115 Rushmore Drive
Charlotte, NC 28277

        We understand that Home Loan Center, Inc., a California corporation ("HLC Inc."), HLC Escrow, Inc., a California corporation ("HLC Escrow", and together with HLC Inc., "Sellers", and each a "Seller"), LendingTree, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("LendingTree"), and Tree.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Parent," and together with Sellers and LendingTree, the "Seller Parties", and each a "Seller Party") and Discover Bank, a Delaware banking corporation ("Buyer") (the Seller Parties and Buyer are sometimes referred to herein together as the "Parties", and each as a "Party"), intend to enter into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") pursuant to which Buyer will acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities from the Seller Parties as more fully described in the Agreement (the "Transaction"). In consideration for the sale, transfer and assignment of the Acquired Assets (as defined in the Agreement), Buyer will assume the Assumed Liabilities (as defined in the Agreement) and pay to HLC Inc. an amount in cash equal to (i) $35,888,536 (the "Closing Payment") and (ii) up to two additional payments in the amount of $10.0 million each (the "Post Closing Payments"), which are payable by Buyer on the one year anniversary of the Closing Date (as defined in the Agreement) and the two year anniversary of the Closing Date, provided Buyer has not properly exercised its right of termination pursuant to Section 8.03(b) of the Marketing Consulting Services Agreement prior to the applicable anniversary date and provided that a "Business Event" as defined in Section 3.1 of the Agreement has not occurred. Due to the conditional nature of the Post-Closing Payments, we did not include the Post Closing Payments as part of our analysis for determining the fairness of the Consideration (as defined below). In addition to the Closing Payment, the Seller Parties will (a) retain the Excluded Assets (as defined in the Agreement) and (b) satisfy the Excluded Liabilities (as defined in the Agreement).

        The Board of Directors of Parent (the "Board of Directors") has requested that Milestone Advisors, LLC ("Milestone") provide an opinion (this "Opinion") to the Board of Directors as to whether, as of the date hereof, the Consideration (as defined below) is fair, from a financial point of view, to Parent. For purposes of this Opinion, the term "Consideration" means the sum of (i) the Closing Payment plus (ii) the net liquidation value of the Excluded Assets and the Excluded Liabilities of the Sellers as estimated by Parent's and HLC Inc.'s senior management team as of March 31, 2011 ("Net Liquidated Value Estimates"). The Consideration is estimated to be between $52.6 million and $66.5 million, with a midpoint of $59.6 million(1). We have not been requested to opine as to, and this Opinion does not in any manner address, the Seller Parties' underlying business decision to proceed


(1)
The final amount of the Consideration will be determined based on the actual net liquidation value received upon the disposition of Excluded Assets and Excluded Liabilities by the Sellers after the consummation of the Transaction.

B-1


with or effect the Transaction or the relative merits of the Transaction as compared to any strategic alternatives that may be available to Parent and the other Seller Parties.

        We have made such reviews and analyses as we have deemed necessary to render this Opinion. Among other things, we have:

        In evaluating Sellers' projected financial results, financial condition, current and prospective access to capital, current and prospective liquidity and future prospects, we understand, based on our review of market conditions and publicly available information, and our discussions with Parent's and Sellers' senior management, that:

B-2


B-3


        In rendering our opinion herein, we have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of the financial, legal, regulatory, tax, accounting and other information provided to or discussed with us by the Seller Parties or obtained by us from public sources, including, without limitation, the Projections and the Net Liquidation Value Estimates. With respect to the Projections and the Net Liquidation Value Estimates, we have relied on representations that they have been reasonably prepared in good faith and reflect the best currently available estimates and judgments of the senior management of the Seller Parties as to the expected future financial performance and condition of the Sellers. We note that such financial projections are subject to significant uncertainty, particularly in light of recent and on-going conditions in the residential mortgage sector and Sellers' recent financial performance, current financial condition, current and prospective access to capital, current and prospective liquidity and unclear future prospects. We have not assumed any responsibility for the independent verification of any such information, including, without limitation, the Projections and the Net Liquidation Value Estimates, and we have further relied upon the assurances of members of senior management of the Seller Parties that they are unaware of any facts that would make the information, Projections and the Net Liquidation Value Estimates incomplete, inaccurate or misleading in any material respect. Further, we express no opinion with respect to the Projections and the Net Liquidation Value Estimates, their achievability, or the assumptions on which they are based and the resulting impact on the Sellers' financial performance, financial condition, liquidity and resulting stockholder value. We have not considered any aspect or implication of any transaction to which any of the Seller Parties is or may be a party (other than as specifically described herein with respect to the Transaction).

        We have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that (i) the representations and warranties of all parties to the Agreement and all other related documents and instruments that are referred to therein are true and correct in all respects material to our analysis, (ii) each party to the Agreement will fully and timely perform all of the covenants and agreements, in all respects material to our analysis, required to be performed by such party, (iii) all conditions to the consummation of the Transaction will be satisfied in all respects material to our analysis without waiver thereof, and (iv) the Transaction will be consummated in a timely manner in accordance with the terms described in the Agreement and documents provided to us, without any amendments or modifications thereto or any adjustment to the aggregate consideration (through offset, reduction, indemnity claims, post-closing purchase price adjustments or otherwise) or any other financial term of the Transaction, in any respect material to our opinion. We also have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that (a) the Transaction will be consummated in a manner that complies in all respects with all applicable federal and state statutes, rules and regulations, and (b) all governmental, regulatory, and other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the Transaction will be obtained and that no material delay, limitations, restrictions or conditions will be imposed or amendments, modifications or waivers made that would result in the disposition of any material portion of the assets of the Seller Parties, or otherwise have an adverse effect on the Seller Parties or any expected benefits of the Transaction. In addition, we have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that the final form of the Agreement will not differ in any material respect from the Draft Agreement.

        Furthermore, in connection with this Opinion, we have not been requested to make, and have not made, any physical inspection or independent appraisal or evaluation of any of the assets, properties or liabilities (fixed, contingent, derivative, off-balance-sheet or otherwise) of the Sellers or any other Seller Party, nor were we provided with any such appraisal or evaluation. We express no opinion regarding the liquidation value of any entity. We have undertaken no independent analysis of any potential or actual litigation, regulatory action, possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities, to which the Seller Parties are or may be a party or are or may be subject, or of any governmental investigation of any possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities to which the Seller Parties are or may be a party or are or may be subject; this Opinion makes no assumption concerning, and therefore does

B-4



not consider, the potential effects of any such litigation, claims or investigations or possible assertion of claims, outcomes or damages arising out of any such matters.

        We have not been requested to, and did not, (i) initiate any discussions with, or solicit any indications of interest from, third parties with respect to the Transaction, the assets, businesses or operations of the Sellers or any of the other Seller Parties, or any alternatives to the Transaction, (ii) negotiate the terms of the Transaction, or (iii) advise the Board of Directors or any other party with respect to business combination alternatives to the Transaction. This Opinion is necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to us as of, the date hereof. We have not undertaken, and are under no obligation, to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw this Opinion, or otherwise comment on or consider events occurring after the date hereof. Subsequent events that could materially affect the conclusions set forth in this Opinion include, without limitation, adverse changes in industry performance or market conditions; changes to the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Seller Parties; changes to the terms of the Transaction; and the failure to consummate the Transaction within a reasonable period of time.

        Milestone, as part of its investment banking practice, is regularly engaged in the valuation of securities and the evaluation of transactions in connection with asset purchases, mergers and other acquisitions of mortgage banking companies, commercial banks, savings institutions, and other specialty finance companies, as well as business valuations for other corporate purposes for financial services organizations. Milestone has experience in, and knowledge of, the valuation of nationwide mortgage banking companies.

        We have acted as a financial advisor to the Board of Directors solely in connection with rendering this Opinion and will receive a customary fee for such services. In addition, the Seller Parties have agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities that may arise out of the rendering of this Opinion.

        This Opinion is directed to, and for the use of, the Board of Directors in connection with its consideration of the Transaction. This Opinion does not constitute a recommendation to the Board of Directors as to whether to approve the Transaction and does not constitute a recommendation to how any Parent stockholder should vote with respect to the Transaction or a recommendation to any other party to take any other action. We express no opinion as to the underlying valuation, future performance or long-term viability of any of the Seller Parties.

        This Opinion may not be reproduced, disseminated, quoted from or referred to at any time, in whole or in part, without our prior written consent; provided, however, that this Opinion may be included in its entirety in any proxy statement, information statement or any other material required to be distributed to stockholders of Parent in connection with the Transaction. This Opinion is subject to the assumptions and conditions contained herein as of the date hereof. Milestone expresses no opinion on matters of a legal, regulatory, tax or accounting nature related to the Transaction. We assume no responsibility for updating or revising this Opinion based on circumstances or events occurring after the date hereof.

        Based on and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Consideration is fair, from a financial point of view, to Parent.

Very truly yours,

/s/ MILESTONE ADVISORS, LLC  

MILESTONE ADVISORS, LLC

B-5


Table of Contents

APPENDIX C

DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS

Proposed HLC Asset Sale Transaction

        Until the closing of the HLC asset sale transaction, we expect to continue the LendingTree Loans business in accordance with our existing business strategy. The description of our business below does not reflect changes to our business strategy that may occur if we complete the HLC asset sale transaction.


History and Overview

        Tree.com is the parent of LendingTree, LLC and is the parent of several companies owned by LendingTree, LLC, including Home Loan Center, Inc. LendingTree, LLC (formerly, LendingTree, Inc.) was incorporated in the state of Delaware in June 1996 and commenced nationwide operations in July 1998. LendingTree, Inc. was acquired by IAC/InterActiveCorp ("IAC") in 2003 and converted to a Delaware limited liability company (LendingTree, LLC) in December 2004. On August 20, 2008, Tree.com, Inc. (along with its subsidiary, LendingTree, LLC) was spun off from IAC into a separate publicly traded company. We refer to the separation transaction as the "spin-off." Tree.com was originally incorporated as a Delaware corporation in April 2008, in anticipation of the spin-off.

        Tree.com is also the owner of several brands and businesses that provide information, tools, advice, products and services for critical transactions in our customers' lives. Our family of brands includes: LendingTree.com®, GetSmart.com®, RealEstate.com®, DegreeTree.com®, HealthTree.com®, LendingTreeAutos.com, DoneRight.com®, and InsuranceTree.com®. Together, these brands serve as an ally for consumers who are looking to comparison shop for loans, real estate and other services from multiple businesses and professionals who will compete for their business.

        These businesses and brands are operated under the segments known as LendingTree Loans and the Exchanges, each of which is discussed below. For additional information regarding these segments, see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements attached as Appendix E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix C is attached.

        On March 10, 2011, our management made the decision and finalized a plan to close all of the field offices of the proprietary full service real estate brokerage business known as RealEstate.com, REALTORS®, which was previously reported within the Real Estate reporting segment. We exited all markets by March 31, 2011. Accordingly, RealEstate.com, REALTORS® are presented as discontinued operations in the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. Unless otherwise noted, this description of our business excludes information related to the discontinued operations.

        In connection with exiting the RealEstate.com, REALTORS® business that is discussed above, we re-evaluated our reporting segments based on our continuing operations. In prior periods, the segments "LendingTree Loans", "Exchanges", "Real Estate" and "Unallocated—Corporate" were presented, which have been changed to "LendingTree Loans" and "Exchanges". The "Exchanges" segment now includes the continuing operations of the previous "Real Estate" segment and the previous "Unallocated—Corporate" segment. Segment results for prior periods have been restated to conform to the new presentation.

        On March 15, 2011, Tree.com, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, HLC Inc., completed its acquisition of certain assets of First Residential Mortgage Network, Inc. dba SurePoint Lending ("SurePoint") and certain shareholders of SurePoint. SurePoint, a LendingTree network lender for eleven years, was a full service residential mortgage provider licensed in 45 states and employing over 500 people, including more than 300 licensed loan officers. HLC Inc. purchased certain specified assets

C-1


Table of Contents


and liabilities of SurePoint related to its business of originating, refinancing, processing, underwriting, funding and closing residential mortgage loans; providing title and escrow services; and providing other mortgage related services. The acquired assets also included all of the equity interests of Real Estate Title Services, LLC. HLC Inc. paid $8.0 million in cash upon the closing of the transaction, subject to certain adjustments. We used available cash to fund the acquisition.


LendingTree Loans

        LendingTree Loans originates, processes, approves and funds various consumer mortgage loans through our subsidiary, HLC Inc., which operates primarily under the brand name "LendingTree Loans®." LendingTree Loans is able to provide a broad range of mortgage loan offerings to consumers in all fifty states and the District of Columbia, primarily conforming and prime loans, and, to a lesser extent, non-conforming and FHA loans. Products available include both adjustable and fixed rate loans. LendingTree Loans recently consolidated its operations into its offices in California and Kentucky, closing its Florida, Indiana and Tennessee offices.

        LendingTree Loans® branded loan originations are principally derived from consumer loan requests received through www.lendingtree.com, www.getsmart.com or 1-800-555-TREE. A portion of all consumer loan request forms received through these channels are referred to LendingTree Loans. LendingTree Loans offers those consumers a choice among various loan alternatives, with loan pricing based upon different wholesale offerings received by LendingTree Loans from the secondary market investors who purchase the loans. LendingTree Loans maintains controls to ensure that its consumer loan pricing correlates to secondary market pricing and to ensure that its consumers receive multiple loan alternatives, thus maintaining the competition and choice elements inherent in the LendingTree brand. Tree.com believes that LendingTree Loans provides value to consumers who do not wish to negotiate with multiple lenders, but still wish to obtain loan alternatives.

        LendingTree Loans® branded loans are funded and closed using proceeds from borrowings under available warehouse lines of credit. Substantially all of the loans funded are sold, along with the accompanying loan servicing rights, to investors in the secondary market, generally within 30 days of funding, with the proceeds from such sales being used to repay borrowings under the warehouse lines of credit. For terms of the warehouse lines of credit, see "MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources" attached as Appendix D to the proxy statement to which this Appendix C is attached.

        Although most of HLC Inc.'s consumer leads are sourced through www.lendingtree.com or 1-800-555-TREE and originated under the LendingTree Loans® brand, a small portion of HLC Inc.'s leads are sourced from a variety of non-LendingTree channels, including third-party online lead aggregators, direct mail marketing campaigns and www.homeloancenter.com . When obtaining leads from third-party sources, Home Loan Center, Inc. operates under its traditional name and brand (Home Loan Center). Consumers who request loans through the Home Loan Center brand typically receive single loan offers. Home Loan Center branded loans are funded, closed and sold into the secondary market in the same manner, and on substantially the same terms, as LendingTree Loans® branded loans.

        Revenues from direct lending operations are principally derived from the sale of loans to secondary market investors and from origination and other fees paid by borrowers. Of HLC Inc.'s five secondary market investors in 2010, the three largest, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo, represented approximately 25%, 24% and 11%, respectively, of our consolidated revenue in 2010. See "RISK FACTORS—We depend on relationships with Network Lenders, real estate professionals, credit providers and secondary market investors and any adverse changes in these relationships could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations" included in the proxy statement to which this Appendix C is attached.

C-2


Table of Contents

        Tree.com believes that the primary competitors of LendingTree Loans are traditional lending institutions, including those that are developing their own direct, online lending channels. While these financial institutions do not operate lending networks, they process, close and fund loans as direct lenders through well-recognized, national brands, many of which are industry leaders. LendingTree Loans also faces additional competition from direct lending websites owned and operated by other online lenders that originate the bulk of their loans through their websites or by phone. These companies typically operate a consumer-branded website and attract consumers via online banner ads, key word placement on search engines, partnering with affiliates, and business development arrangements with other properties, including major online portals.


Exchanges

        Consumers can access Tree.com's nationwide network (the "Network") of more than 150 banks, lenders and loan brokers online (via www.lendingtree.com or www.getsmart.com) or by calling 1-800-555-TREE. Loans offered by these banks, lenders and loan brokers (the "Network Lenders") consist primarily of home mortgages (in connection with refinancings and purchases) and home equity loans.

        Tree.com selects lenders throughout the country in an effort to provide full geographic lending coverage and to offer a complete suite of loan offerings available in the market. Typically, before a lender joins the Network, Tree.com performs credit and financial reviews on the lender. In addition, as a further quality assurance measure, Tree.com checks new lenders against a national antifraud database maintained by the Mortgage Asset Research Institute. All Network Lenders are required to enter into a contract that generally may be terminated upon notice by either party. No individual Network Lender accounted for more than 5% of the Exchanges revenue in any period.

        Consumers seeking mortgage loans through one of Tree.com's lending networks can receive multiple conditional loan offers from Network Lenders, or from Tree.com's subsidiary doing business under the name "LendingTree Loans" (as described above), in response to a single loan request form.

        The process by which Exchanges matches consumers and Network Lenders is referred to herein as the "matching process." This matching process consists of the following steps:

C-3


Table of Contents

        The Exchanges also offer a short-form matching process under the LendingTree® and GetSmart® brands. This process, which provides consumers with lender contact information only, typically requires the consumer to submit less data than that required in connection with the matching process described above.

        The Exchanges do not charge consumers a fee to use their lending networks. Substantially all revenues from lending networks are derived from both up-front matching fees paid by Network Lenders who receive a loan request form and closing fees paid by Network Lenders who close a transaction with the consumer. Because a given loan request form can be matched with more than one Network Lender, up to five match fees may be generated from the same form. Matching fees are recognized at the time the loan request form is transmitted, and closing fees are recognized at the time the Network Lender reports that it has closed the loan, which may be several months after the loan request form is transmitted.

        The Exchanges also offer:

        Revenues from these businesses are derived either from matching and closing fees, or in some cases, volume-based marketing fees. While the revenues from these businesses do not currently represent a significant portion of the revenues of the Exchanges, these revenues are expected to grow over time.

C-4


Table of Contents

        Tree.com's Exchanges compete with other lead aggregators, including online intermediaries that operate network-type arrangements. Tree.com's Exchanges also face additional competition from direct lending websites owned and operated by other online lenders that originate the bulk of their loans through their websites or by phone. These companies typically operate a consumer-branded website and attract consumers via online banner ads, key word placement on search engines, partnering with affiliates, and business development arrangements with other properties, including major online portals.


Regulation and Legal Compliance

        Tree.com businesses market and provide services in heavily regulated industries through a number of different online and offline channels across the United States (see "RISK FACTORS—Failure to comply with existing or evolving laws, rules and regulations, or to obtain and maintain required licenses, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations" and "RISK FACTORS—Passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and related legislative or executive actions may have a significant impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition" included in the proxy statement to which this Appendix C is attached). As a result, they are subject to a variety of statutes, rules, regulations, policies and procedures in various jurisdictions in the United States, including:


Intellectual Property

        We believe that our intellectual property rights are vital to our success. To protect our intellectual property rights in our technology, products, improvements and inventions, we rely on a combination of patents, trademarks, trade secret and other laws, and contractual restrictions on disclosure, including confidentiality agreements with strategic partners, employees, consultants and other third parties. As

C-5


Table of Contents


new or improved proprietary technologies are developed or inventions are identified, we seek patent protection in the United States and abroad as appropriate. We have been issued six U.S. patents relating to our technologies, including those relating to the method and network for coordinating a loan over the internet. Our various patents expire between 2018 and 2025. We also have approximately six pending U.S. patent applications.

        Many of our services are offered under proprietary trademarks and service marks. We generally apply to register or secure by contract our principal trademarks and service marks as they are developed and used. We have approximately 82 trademarks and service marks registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. These registrations can typically be renewed at 10-year intervals. We reserve and register domain names when and where we deem appropriate and we currently have approximately 1,500 registered domain names. We also have agreements with third parties that provide for the licensing of patented and proprietary technology used in our business.

        From time to time, we are subjected to legal proceedings and claims, or threatened legal proceedings or claims, including allegations of infringement of third party trademarks, copyrights, patents and other intellectual property rights of third parties. In addition, litigation may be necessary for us to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights claimed by others. Any litigation of this nature, regardless of outcome or merit, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management and technical resources, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Employees

        As of June 1, 2011, Tree.com had approximately 1,049 employees and approximately 1,025 full-time employees. None of Tree.com's employees are represented under collective bargaining agreements. Tree.com considers its relations with its employees and independent contractors to be good.


Seasonality

        LendingTree Loans and Exchanges revenue are subject to the cyclical and seasonal trends of the U.S. housing market. Home sales typically rise during the spring and summer months and decline during the fall and winter months. Refinancing and home equity activity is principally driven by mortgage interest rates as well as real estate values. The broader cyclical trends in the mortgage and real estate markets have upset the usual seasonal trends.

C-6


Table of Contents

APPENDIX D

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2010

Explanatory Note

        On March 10, 2011, our management made the decision and finalized a plan to close all of the field offices of the proprietary full service real estate brokerage business known as RealEstate.com, REALTORS®, which was previously reported within the Real Estate reporting segment. Tree.com exited all markets by March 31, 2011. Accordingly, RealEstate.com, REALTORS® are presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented in Appendix E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix D is attached. The following discussion, unless otherwise noted, excludes information related to the discontinued operations.

        Tree.com is filing Appendix E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix D is attached to recast the presentation of its consolidated financial statements that were initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in Tree.com's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the SEC on February 28, 2011 (the "Form 10-K") to reflect the reclassification of the business that was previously Tree.com's real estate brokerage business as discontinued operations.

        In connection with exiting the RealEstate.com, REALTORS® business that is discussed above, the Company re-evaluated its reporting segments based on the continuing operations of the Company. In prior periods, the segments "LendingTree Loans", "Exchanges", "Real Estate" and "Unallocated-Corporate" were presented, which have been changed to "LendingTree Loans" and "Exchanges". The "Exchanges" segment now includes the continuing operations of the previous "Real Estate" segment and the previous "Unallocated—Corporate" segment. Segment results for prior periods have been restated to conform to the new presentation.

        The SEC requires that Tree.com include recasted information for previously issued financial statements in the proxy statement to which this Appendix D is attached, whenever a component of the Company is reflected as discontinued operations in financial statements for subsequent periods, but such component is not yet reflected as discontinued operations in such previously issued financial statements. Accordingly, the Company is revising and including in this Appendix D Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation from the Form 10-K and in Appendix C to the proxy statement to which this Appendix D is attached the Business section from the Form 10-K.

        In order to preserve the nature and character of the disclosures set forth in the Form 10-K, no attempt has been made in this Appendix D, and it should not be read, to modify or update disclosures as presented in the Form 10-K to reflect events or occurrences after the date of the filing of the Form 10-K, except for the items included in this Appendix D or in Appendix C and Appendix E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix D is attached, which items are updated solely for matters relating specifically to the reclassification of the real estate brokerage business as discontinued operations as described above. Therefore, this Appendix D should be read in conjunction with the Form 10-K and the Company's filings made with the SEC subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K, including the First Quarter 10-Q. References herein to the Form 10-K or parts thereof refer to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, except to the extent portions of such Form 10-K have been recast, in which case, they refer to the applicable recast portion in Appendices C, D and E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix D is attached.

D-1


Table of Contents


Management Overview

        On August 20, 2008, Tree.com, Inc. ("Tree.com") was spun off from its parent company, IAC/InterActiveCorp ("IAC") into a separate publicly traded company. We refer to the separation transaction as the "spin-off." In connection with the spin-off, Tree.com was incorporated as a Delaware corporation in April 2008.

        Tree.com is the parent of LendingTree, LLC which owns several brands and businesses that provide information, tools, advice, products and services for critical transactions in our customers' lives. Our family of brands includes: LendingTree.com®, GetSmart.com®, RealEstate.com®, DegreeTree.com®, HealthTree.com®, LendingTreeAutos.com, DoneRight.com®, and InsuranceTree.com®. Together, these brands serve as an ally for consumers who are looking to comparison shop for loans, real estate and other services from multiple businesses and professionals who will compete for their business.

        The LendingTree Loans segment originates, processes, approves and funds various residential real estate loans through Home Loan Center, Inc. dba LendingTree Loans ("HLC Inc."). The HLC Inc. and LendingTree Loans brand names are collectively referred to in this Appendix D as "LendingTree Loans."

        The Exchanges segment consists of online lead generation networks and call centers that connect consumers and service providers principally in the lending, real estate, higher education, home services, insurance and automobile marketplaces.


Business Overview

        Interest rate and market risk can be substantial in the mortgage business. Fluctuations in interest rates drive consumer demand for new mortgages and the level of refinancing activity, which in turn affects total revenue from the origination and sale of loans. Typically, a decline in mortgage interest rates will lead to an increase in mortgage originations and revenue, and an increase in mortgage interest rates will lead to a decrease in mortgage originations and revenue.

        Mortgage rates began 2010 slightly above 5.0%, and fluctuated very little through May, but then declined to 4.2% by November. Then in the last two months of 2010, mortgage rates swiftly increased to 5.0% by year-end, and mortgage applications dropped off significantly in December 2010 as a result. Most economic forecasts also predict an increase in mortgage rates of another 0.50% throughout 2011.

        Declines in the housing market since 2008 have impacted various aspects of our businesses. In particular, revenue from the Real Estate segment decreased in 2010 and 2009 from previous years as a result of fewer real estate transactions and lower sales prices. Further, revenues for the LendingTree Loans and Exchange segments have been impacted by falling home prices and increased foreclosures.

        As revenues have declined we have focused on expense savings and are taking various initiatives to reduce costs. During the first quarter of 2011, we commenced a voluntary severance plan for certain corporate employees and conducted a reduction in workforce at HLC Inc. In addition, the Company intends to cut certain ineffective marketing costs. We are seeking to set expenses consistent with our reduced revenues.

        In November 2010, LendingTree Loans entered into an agreement to purchase certain assets and liabilities of SurePoint. SurePoint has been a Network Lender for more than 11 years and was named the number one refinance lender on the LendingTree network in 2009. SurePoint has nearly

D-2


Table of Contents

500 employees, including more than 300 licensed loan officers. Under the terms of the agreement, LendingTree Loans will make an initial payment of approximately $6 million in cash upon the closing of the transaction and will make contingent consideration payments on an annual basis for the next thirty-six months based on LendingTree Loans' pre-tax net income derived from the assets acquired. The aggregate purchase price, including the initial payment and contingent consideration, will not exceed $23 million. The transaction is projected to close in March 2011.


Results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

 
  2010   $ Change   % Change   2009  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

LendingTree Loans:

                         
 

Origination and sale of loans

  $ 113,425   $ 3,105     3 % $ 110,320  
 

Other

    10,755     3,405     46 %   7,350  
                     

Total LendingTree Loans

    124,180     6,510     6 %   117,670  

Exchanges:

                         
 

Match fees

    48,682     3,677     8 %   45,005  
 

Closed loan fees

    9,985     (16,870 )   (63 )%   26,855  
 

Other

    3,244     194     6 %   3,050  
                     

Total Exchanges

    61,911     (12,999 )   (17 )%   74,910  
                     

Total revenue

  $ 186,091   $ (6,489 )   (3 )% $ 192,580  
                     

        Revenue from LendingTree Loans increased only slightly in 2010 from 2009. Both the number of closed loans and the dollar value of closed loans decreased by 2% in 2010, and the average loan amount was flat year-over-year. An increase of 3% in the revenue generated per funded loan offset the declines noted above. LendingTree Loans was able to increase pricing in certain areas as the supply of qualified consumers was at or near capacity for much of 2010. The increased pricing combined with the high numbers of leads caused revenue to be higher than in 2009. In addition, the provision for previously sold loans, which is recorded as reduction of revenue, decreased $4.0 million in 2010 from 2009 to $12.4 million. In 2009, the provision included the loan loss settlements with two buyers of previously purchased limited documentation loans.

        The dollar value of loans closed directly by LendingTree Loans is as follows:

 
  2010   $ Change   % Change   2009  
 
  (Dollars in millions)
 

Refinance mortgages

  $ 2,557   $ 3     % $ 2,554  

Purchase mortgages

    234     (68 )   (22 )%   302  
                     

Total

  $ 2,791   $ (65 )   (2 )% $ 2,856  
                     

        LendingTree Loans originates mortgage loans on property located throughout the United States. Revenue from loans originated for property in California totaled approximately 12% and 11% of Tree.com's consolidated revenue for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

        Revenue from the Exchanges in 2010 declined from 2009 primarily due to fewer loan requests from consumers, resulting in fewer matched requests and fewer loans closed through network lenders. Overall matched requests for 2010 declined 12% from 2009, which reflects a decline of 39% in home loan matches offset by an increase of 65% in matches for the new consumer vertical areas of higher education, home services, insurance, and automobile. Home loan matches were down because of the expansion of volume taken by LendingTree Loans and many lenders experiencing their own high levels of organic lead volume during the low interest rate environment in 2010. Matches in new consumer

D-3


Table of Contents


verticals have grown as a result of both business acquisitions completed in 2009 and increased marketing spending. The overall impact on match fees was an increase of 8%, reflecting a shift in pricing on home loan related matches to increase the average match fee (and decrease the average close loan fee). Also impacting the revenue from closed loan fees was a 31% decline in closed units in the period as a result of the decline in matched loan requests.

        The dollar value of loans closed by Exchange network lenders is as follows:

 
  2010   $ Change   % Change   2009  
 
  (Dollars in millions)
 

Refinance mortgages

  $ 4,008   $ (2,798 )   (43 )% $ 6,806  

Purchase mortgages

    2,093     (456 )   (18 )%   2,549  

Other

    261     (274 )   (51 )%   535  
                     

Total

  $ 6,362   $ (3,528 )   (37 )% $ 9,890  
                     

 
  2010   $ Change   % Change   2009  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

LendingTree Loans

  $ 44,056   $ (4,942 )   (10 )% $ 48,998  

Exchanges

    5,547     (2,737 )   (33 )%   8,284  
                     

Cost of revenue

  $ 49,603   $ (7,679 )   (13 )% $ 57,282  
                     

As a percentage of total revenue

    27 %               30 %

 

As a Percentage of Segment Revenue
  2010   2009  

LendingTree Loans

    35 %   42 %

Exchanges

    9 %   11 %

        Cost of revenue consists primarily of costs associated with loan originations, compensation and other employee-related costs (including stock-based compensation) related to customer call centers and loan officers, as well as credit scoring fees, consumer incentive costs and website network hosting and server fees.

        Cost of revenue in 2010 decreased from 2009 primarily due to decreases of $7.7 million in costs associated with originations at LendingTree Loans and $0.9 million in consumer incentive rebates related to decreased closings at the Exchanges. The decreases in the cost of loan originations are primarily due to a change in the fee structure in October 2009 whereby the origination fee charged to the borrower was reduced and no longer covered certain origination costs that were previously paid and recorded as expense by LendingTree Loans. Under the current fee structure, these origination costs are passed through to the borrower directly.

        Offsetting these decreases in cost of revenue was an increase of $0.9 million in the cost of credit scoring and licensing fees.

 
  2010   $ Change   % Change   2009  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

LendingTree Loans

  $ 22,148   $ 11,921     117 % $ 10,227  

Exchanges

    50,452     2,409     5 %   48,043  
                   

Selling and marketing expense

  $ 72,600   $ 14,330     25 % $ 58,270  
                   

As a percentage of total revenue

    39 %               30 %

D-4


Table of Contents


As a Percentage of Segment Revenue
  2010   2009  

LendingTree Loans

    18 %   9 %

Exchanges

    82 %   64 %

        Selling and marketing expense consists primarily of advertising and promotional expenditures, fees paid to lead sources and compensation and other employee-related costs (including stock-based compensation) for personnel engaged in the sales function. Advertising and promotional expenditures primarily include online marketing, as well as television, print and radio spending. Advertising production costs are expensed in the period the related ad is first run.

        During the third quarter of 2010, we changed our accounting policy for inter-segment revenue and inter-segment marketing expense between the LendingTree Loans and Exchanges segments. This change only impacts the individual segment results, and does not impact our consolidated financial results.

        Marketing expense for the Exchanges is primarily related to the building and maintaining of our core brands, using both online and offline spending, and generates leads not only for the Exchanges but for the LendingTree Loans segment as well. Previously, marketing expense for LendingTree Loans was primarily comprised of inter-segment purchases of leads from the Exchanges, leveraging the LendingTree and GetSmart brands. The Exchanges received inter-segment revenue for the sale of these leads, and that revenue and the related marketing expense at LendingTree Loans would then be eliminated in consolidation of the total Company results.

        We now use a cost sharing approach for these marketing expenses, whereby LendingTree Loans and the Exchanges share the marketing expense on a pro rata basis, based on the quantity of leads received by each segment. There is no longer inter-segment revenue or inter-segment marketing expense related to these leads. Management believes that this cost sharing approach is preferable because it more closely aligns our overall goals with the goals of segment management, and may ultimately drive the company to better performance.

        Segment reporting results for prior periods have been restated to conform to the new presentation.

        Advertising expense is the largest component of selling and marketing expense and is comprised of the following:

 
  2010   $ Change   % Change   2009  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

Online

  $ 47,244   $ 10,678     29 % $ 36,566  

Broadcast

    15,921     1,161     8 %   14,760  

Other

    5,534     2,143     63 %   3,391  
                     

Total advertising expense

  $ 68,699   $ 13,982     26 % $ 54,717  
                     

        The overall increase in advertising expense from 2009 to 2010 is due to several factors. In 2009, Exchanges was able to decrease advertising spending as it experienced naturally higher consumer demand that was driven by the lower mortgage interest rate environment and improvements in organic traffic. Also, LendingTree Loans received "overflow" leads during the early part of 2009 from a partner whose volume of leads exceeded its capacity. While overall mortgage interest rates remained low in 2010, there was not the significant and swift decline in rates as in 2009 that captured the attention of the consumer, so Exchanges responded by increasing advertising spending by 23% and generated a lower quantity of matched requests (a 12% decrease from the same period in 2009). This resulted in marketing expense as a percentage of revenue returning to a more normalized level of 39% in 2010. This increase also directly impacts the allocated cost per lead for LendingTree Loans, which is reflected in the increase in marketing expense for that segment in the table above.

D-5


Table of Contents

        Tree.com anticipates that it will continue to adjust selling and marketing expenditures generally in relation to revenue producing opportunities and that selling and marketing expense will continue to represent a high percentage of revenue as it continues to promote its brands both online and offline.

 
  2010   $ Change   % Change   2009  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

LendingTree Loans

  $ 24,253   $ 3,879     19 % $ 20,374  

Exchanges

    26,234     (10,720 )   (29 )%   36,954  
                     

General and administrative expense

  $ 50,487   $ (6,841 )   (12 )% $ 57,328  
                     

As a percentage of total revenue

    27 %               30 %

 

As a Percentage of Segment Revenue
  2010   2009  

LendingTree Loans

    20 %   17 %

Exchanges

    42 %   49 %

        General and administrative expense consists primarily of compensation and other employee-related costs (including stock-based compensation) for personnel engaged in finance, legal, tax, corporate information technology, human resources and executive management functions, as well as facilities and infrastructure costs and fees for professional services.

        General and administrative expense in 2010 decreased from 2009, reflecting a $2.7 million decrease in professional fees, a $1.9 million reduction in compensation and other employee-related costs (excluding non-cash compensation) as a result of prior restructuring activities, a $1.1 million reduction of expense related to post acquisition adjustments, a $0.8 million reduction in the loss on sales of fixed assets, and a $0.5 million decrease in facilities costs due to occupying fewer facilities. The post acquisition adjustments are a result of the change in fair value of the estimated contingent consideration to be paid for business acquisitions that were completed in 2009. These adjustments are shown as a reduction of expense within general and administrative expense, but are excluded from our definition of Adjusted EBITDA.

        General and administrative expense within the LendingTree Loans segment in 2010 increased primarily due to increases of $2.0 million in compensation and other employee-related costs (excluding non-cash compensation) and $1.1 million in professional fees. The increase in compensation expense is due to increased headcount compared to 2009. The increase in professional fees is due to our acquisition of certain assets of SurePoint that was announced in November 2010 and expected to close in March 2011.

        General and administrative expense within the Exchanges segment decreased in 2010 primarily due to reductions of $3.9 million in compensation and other employee-related costs (excluding non-cash compensation), $3.8 million in professional fees, $0.8 million in the loss on sale of fixed assets, $0.9 million reduction of expense related to post acquisition adjustments, and a decrease of $0.5 million in building rent. The decrease in compensation is due to a reduction in headcount. The reduction in professional fees was a result of two lawsuits settled in late 2009 that generated considerable legal consulting expenses in 2009. The reduction in rent expense is a result of occupying fewer facilities in 2010.

D-6


Table of Contents

        Additionally, general and administrative expense includes non-cash compensation expense of $3.3 million in 2010 and $3.5 million in 2009.

        As of December 31, 2010, there was approximately $1.6 million, $2.9 million and $1.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock, respectively. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.9 years for stock options, 2.0 years for restricted stock units and 2.1 years for restricted stock.

 
  2010   $ Change   % Change   2009  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

LendingTree Loans

  $ 331   $ (187 )   (36 )% $ 518  

Exchanges

    3,652     (618 )   (14 )%   4,270  
                     

Product development

  $ 3,983   $ (805 )   (17 )% $ 4,788  
                     

As a percentage of total revenue

    2 %               2 %

 

As a Percentage of Segment Revenue
  2010   2009  

LendingTree Loans

    %   %

Exchanges

    6 %   6 %

        Product development expense consists primarily of compensation and other employee-related costs (including stock-based compensation) for personnel engaged in product development, which include costs related to the design, development, testing and enhancement of technology that is not capitalized.

        Product development expense decreased in 2010 due to decreased compensation and other employee-related costs, offset by an increase in outsourcing and technology contractors.

        Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ("Adjusted EBITDA") is a non-GAAP measure and is defined in "Tree.com's Principles of Financial Reporting". For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to operating income (loss) for Tree.com's operating segments and to net loss in total, see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements attached as Appendix E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix D is attached.

 
  2010   $ Change   % Change   2009  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

LendingTree Loans

  $ 33,826   $ (4,062 )   (11 )% $ 37,888  

Exchanges

    (21,380 )   (3,403 )   (19 )%   (17,977 )
                     

Adjusted EBITDA

  $ 12,446   $ (7,465 )   (37 )% $ 19,911  
                     

As a percentage of total revenue

    7 %               10 %

 

As a Percentage of Segment Revenue
  2010   2009  

LendingTree Loans

    27 %   32 %

Exchanges

    (34 )%   (24 )%

        The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA from 2009 to 2010 reflects the company's increased operating costs as detailed above. Revenue also decreased in 2010 compared to 2009, but was essentially offset by a similar reduction in cost of revenue.

D-7


Table of Contents

 
  2010   $ Change   % Change   2009  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

LendingTree Loans

  $ 30,147   $ (4,884 )   (14 )% $ 35,031  

Exchanges

    (43,241 )   8,241     16 %   (51,482 )
                     

Operating loss

  $ (13,094 ) $ 3,357     20 % $ (16,451 )
                     

As a percentage of total revenue

    (7 )%               (8 )%

 

As a Percentage of Segment Revenue
  2010   2009  

LendingTree Loans

    24 %   30 %

Exchanges

    (69 )%   (68 )%

        Operating loss in 2010 improved from 2009, primarily as a result of decreased operating expenses. In addition to the reasons provided in the analysis above, operating expenses were less in 2010 due to decreased legal settlement costs, partially offset by increased impairment charges for intangible assets. The reduction in legal settlement costs was the result of two lawsuits settled in 2009. The impairment charges were recorded in connection with our annual impairment assessment as of October 1, 2010. We identified and recorded impairment charges related to trademarks of $9.5 million in the Exchanges. These impairments were the result of our reassessment of our future anticipated cash flows given the continued challenging real estate market conditions. These include an increased rate of mortgage loan delinquencies and home foreclosures.

        Finally, in the fourth quarter of 2009, we recorded a $12.8 million charge related to litigation matters that negatively impacted operating loss. The litigation matters were either settled, or a firm offer for settlement was extended by Tree.com in the fourth quarter, thereby establishing an accrual amount that was both probable and reasonably estimable. The $12.8 million liability was paid in 2010.

        Continued adverse market conditions may cause continued operating losses and require additional restructuring of Tree.com's operations, which could result in additional restructuring charges and additional impairment charges.

        For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, Tree.com recorded a tax benefit of $0.9 million and $0.4 million, respectively, which represents effective tax rates of 6.9% and 2.2%, respectively. The 2010 and 2009 tax rate is lower than the federal statutory rate of 35% due principally to a full valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.

        As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the unrecognized tax benefits, including interest, were $0.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively. In 2010, unrecognized tax benefits decreased due to lapse of statute of limitations. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate is approximately $0.1 million.

        Tree.com recognizes interest and, if applicable, penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. Included in income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is $0.01 million and $0.07 million, respectively for interest on unrecognized tax benefits. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, Tree.com has accrued $0.01 million and $0.07 million, respectively, for the payment of interest. There are no material accruals for penalties.

        Tree.com is subject to audits by federal, state and local authorities in the area of income tax. These audits include questioning the timing and the amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. Income taxes payable include amounts considered sufficient to pay assessments that may result from examination of prior year returns; however, the amount paid upon

D-8


Table of Contents


resolution of issues raised may differ from the amount provided. Differences between the reserves for tax contingencies and the amounts owed by Tree.com are recorded in the period they become known.

        The Internal Revenue Service is currently examining IAC consolidated tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2001 through 2006. The statute of limitations for these years has been extended to December 31, 2011. These examinations are expected to be completed in 2011. Various state and local jurisdictions are currently under examination, the most significant of which are California, New York, and New York City for various tax years beginning with December 31, 2003. These examinations are expected to be completed in 2011. Under the terms of a tax sharing agreement with IAC, which was executed in connection with the spin-off, IAC generally retains the liability related to federal and state returns filed on a consolidated or unitary basis for all periods prior to the spin-off.

        The North Carolina Department of Revenue ("NCDOR") is currently examining our North Carolina corporate income and franchise tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2006 through 2008, and issued preliminary audit reports to us in January 2011. We have until March 17, 2011 to respond to the NCDOR regarding the preliminary audit reports. We have evaluated this matter as a potential loss contingency, and have determined that it is reasonably possible that a loss could be incurred. The range of a possible loss is estimated to be $—0- to $4.0 million. No reserve has been established for this matter as we have determined that the likelihood of a loss is not probable.


Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources

        As of December 31, 2010, Tree.com had $79.4 million of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents.

        Net cash used in operating activities was $21.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $20.1 million in the same period in 2009. This net $41.9 million decrease in cash provided from operations was primarily due to a $14.4 million decrease in the amount of net cash proceeds from the origination and sale of loans, and a $9.8 million decrease in accounts payable and other current liabilities in 2010 compared to a $14.8 million increase in 2009. The 2009 increase in accounts payable and other current liabilities was primarily caused by a $12.8 million increase in litigation related accruals for settled matters and other contingencies as well as a $2.6 million increase in accrued advertising related to relatively higher spending levels in 2009 compared to 2008. The 2010 decrease in accounts payable and other current liabilities was primarily caused by the payment of the litigation related accruals noted above.

        Net cash used in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2010 of $5.0 million primarily resulted from capital expenditures of $7.0 million, offset by the release of restricted cash of $2.2 million. Net cash used in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2009 of $5.6 million primarily resulted from business acquisitions of $5.7 million and capital expenditures of $3.9 million, offset by the release of restricted cash of $4.0 million.

        Net cash provided by financing activities in 2010 of $13.0 million was primarily due to net borrowings under warehouse lines of credit of $22.1 million offset by the use of $8.5 million to purchase treasury stock. Net cash provided by financing activities in 2009 of $4.8 million was primarily due to net borrowings under warehouse lines of credit of $2.3 million and proceeds from the sale of common stock of $3.4 million. The net borrowings and repayments under warehouse lines of credit are related to the change in loans held for sale at LendingTree Loans and are included within cash flows from operations.

        As of December 31, 2010, LendingTree Loans had two committed lines of credit totaling $150.0 million of borrowing capacity. The total borrowing capacity under these lines was increased to $150.0 million effective October 29, 2010 upon renewal of the second line. LendingTree Loans also has a $25.0 million uncommitted line with one of these lenders. Borrowings under these lines of credit are

D-9


Table of Contents


used to fund, and are secured by, consumer residential loans that are held for sale. Loans under these lines of credit are repaid using proceeds from the sales of loans held for sale by LendingTree Loans.

        The $50.0 million first line is scheduled to expire June 29, 2011. This line can be cancelled at the option of the lender without default upon sixty days notice. This first line includes an additional uncommitted credit facility of $25.0 million. This first line is also guaranteed by Tree.com, Inc., LendingTree, LLC and LendingTree Holdings Corp. The interest rate under the first line is 30-day LIBOR or 2.00% (whichever is greater) plus 2.25%. The interest rate under the $25.0 million uncommitted line is 30-day LIBOR plus 1.50%. LendingTree Loans is also required to sell at least 25% of the loans it originates to the lender under this line or pay a "pair-off fee" of 0.25% on the difference between the required and actual volume of loans sold.

        The borrowing capacity of the second line was increased from $75.0 million to $100.0 million upon renewal of the line effective October 29, 2010. The expiration date of this line is October 28, 2011. This second line is also guaranteed by Tree.com, Inc., LendingTree, LLC and LendingTree Holdings Corp. The interest rate under this line was decreased from 30-day Adjusted LIBOR or 2.0% (whichever is greater) plus 2.50% to 3.0% prior to renewal, to 30-day Adjusted LIBOR or 2.0% (whichever is greater) plus 2.25% to 2.5% after renewal, for loans being sold to the lender. Additionally, the interest rate for loans not being sold to the lender was decreased from 30-day Adjusted LIBOR or 2.0% (whichever is greater) plus 2.75% prior to renewal, to 30-day Adjusted LIBOR or 2.0% (whichever is greater) plus 2.25% after renewal.

        Under the terms of these warehouse lines, LendingTree Loans is required to maintain various financial and other covenants. These financial covenants include, but are not limited to, maintaining (i) minimum tangible net worth of $25.0 million, (ii) minimum liquidity, (iii) a minimum current ratio, (iv) a maximum ratio of total liabilities to net worth, (v) a maximum leverage ratio, (vi) pre-tax net income requirements and (vii) a maximum warehouse capacity ratio. During the year ended December 31, 2010, LendingTree Loans was in compliance with the covenants under the lines.

        The LendingTree Loans business is highly dependent on the availability of these warehouse lines. Although we believe that our existing lines of credit are adequate for our current operations, reductions in our available credit, or the inability to renew or replace these lines, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Management has determined that it could continue to operate the LendingTree Loans business, at a reduced capacity, if one but not both of the warehouse lines were lost. We intend to renew the lines that are expiring on June 29, 2011 and October 28, 2011.

        Tree.com anticipates that it will need to make capital and other expenditures in connection with the development and expansion of its overall operations.

        In November 2010, LendingTree Loans entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with First Residential Mortgage Network, Inc. dba SurePoint Lending ("SurePoint") and the shareholders of SurePoint. The Agreement provides for the purchase by LendingTree Loans of certain specified assets and liabilities of SurePoint. The acquired assets also include all of the equity interests of Real Estate Title Services, LLC. Under the terms of the agreement, LendingTree Loans will make an initial payment of approximately $6 million in cash upon the closing of the transaction and will make contingent consideration payments on an annual basis for the next thirty-six months based on LendingTree Loans' pre-tax net income derived from the assets acquired. The aggregate purchase price, including the initial payment and contingent consideration, will not exceed $23 million. The Company expects to use available cash to fund the acquisition. The transaction is projected to close in March 2011.

D-10


Table of Contents

        In connection with the completion of the spin-off, intercompany payable balances with IAC were extinguished and IAC transferred to Tree.com an amount of cash that was sufficient for its initial capitalization. Tree.com has considered its anticipated operating cash flows in 2011, cash and cash equivalents, current capacity under its warehouse lines of credit and access to capital markets, subject to restrictions in the tax sharing agreement, and believes that these are sufficient to fund its operating needs, including debt requirements, commitments, contingencies, capital and investing commitments for the foreseeable future.

        As of December 31, 2010, we did not have controls designed and in place to ensure effective oversight of the work performed by and the accuracy of financial information provided by third party tax advisors. Until remediated, this material weakness could result in a misstatement in tax-related accounts that could result in a material misstatement to our interim or annual consolidated financial statements and disclosures that may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. We are in the process of addressing and remediating the deficiencies that gave rise to this material weakness. Since the above material weakness was identified, we have undertaken an evaluation of our available resources to provide effective oversight of the work performed by our third party tax advisors and are in the process of identifying necessary changes to our processes as required. Additionally, we are evaluating the resources available and provided to us by the third party tax advisor and identifying changes as required. However, the deficiencies have not yet been remediated. We do not believe this to have a significant impact on liquidity.


Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

 
  Payments Due by Period  
Contractual Obligations as of December 31, 2010
  Total   Less Than
1 Year
  1 - 3
Years
  3 - 5 Years   More
Than
5 Years
 
 
  (In thousands)
 

Short-term borrowings(a)

  $ 100,623   $ 100,623   $   $   $  

Purchase obligations(b)

    296     296              

Loan loss settlement obligations

    300     300              

Preferred stock liquidation value and accreted interest(c)

    3,112     3,112              

Termination fee for restructured lease agreement(d)

    1,675     906     414     355        

Operating leases

    12,527     2,658     5,806     4,063      

Capital leases

    98     45     53          
                       

Total contractual cash obligations

  $ 118,631   $ 107,940   $ 6,273   $ 4,418   $  
                       

(a)
The short-term borrowings are our warehouse lines of credit which are used exclusively for funding loans held for sale. These borrowings are collateralized by and are repaid from proceeds from selling the loans held for sale. Interest on these borrowings as of December 31, 2010 is not significant.

(b)
The purchase obligations primarily relate to marketing event contracts in 2011.

(c)
The preferred stock obligation, as more fully described in Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements attached as Appendix E, represents the obligation we have to redeem at maturity the remaining 2,902 shares of preferred stock which our CEO was granted in LendingTree Holdings Corp., a subsidiary of Tree.com at the time of the spin-off from IAC. The preferred stock has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share and cumulative cash dividends accrue on the Preferred

D-11


Table of Contents

(d)
Termination fee payable to lessor for early building lease cancellation.


Seasonality

        LendingTree Loans and the Exchanges revenue are subject to the cyclical and seasonal trends of the U.S. housing market. Home sales typically rise during the spring and summer months and decline during the fall and winter months. Refinancing and home equity activity is principally driven by mortgage interest rates as well as real estate values. The broader cyclical trends in the mortgage and real estate markets have upset the usual seasonal trends.


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        The following disclosure is provided to supplement the descriptions of our accounting policies contained in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements attached as Appendix E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix D is attached in regard to significant areas of judgment. Our management is required to make certain estimates and assumptions during the preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These estimates and assumptions impact the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. They also impact the reported amount of net earnings during any period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Because of the size of the financial statement elements to which they relate, some of our accounting policies and estimates have a more significant impact on our consolidated financial statements than others. A discussion of some of our more significant accounting policies and estimates follows.

        We make estimates as to our exposure related to our obligation to repurchase loans previously sold to investors or to repay the premium paid by the buyer. The reserves are required in the cases of underwriting deficiencies, borrower fraud, documentation defects, early payment defaults and early loan payoffs. The exposure is based on historical and projected loss frequency and loss severity using our loss history (as adjusted for recent trends in loss experience), the original principal amount of the loans previously sold, the year the loans were sold, the lien position of the mortgage in the underlying property, and the extent of documentation received. Given current general industry trends in mortgage loans as well as housing prices, market expectations around losses related to our obligations could vary significantly from the obligation of $17.0 million recorded as of December 31, 2010.

        We make estimates as to the value of our derivatives and loans held for sale, which are carried at fair value. These assets and liabilities are valued using tools such as quantitative risk models and a proprietary database program. The data inputs used in these valuations include market data and quotes as well as the company's own experience in funding and selling loans. These calculations inherently require management's judgment regarding the valuation methodology and the most relevant data to use in the valuation calculations. Due to volatility in the markets and judgments inherent in our estimates, the actual liquidation value of these assets could differ from their carrying values. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements attached as Appendix E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix D is attached for a discussion of our valuation methodologies and the assumptions.

D-12


Table of Contents

        We review the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis as of October 1 or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. We determine the fair value of a reporting unit based upon an evaluation of its expected discounted cash flows and market approach (if applicable). This discounted cash flow analysis utilizes an evaluation of historical and forecasted operating results. The determination of discounted cash flows is based upon forecasted operating results that may not occur. The assessments for 2010 and 2009 identified impairment charges as more fully described above in "Results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009". The value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets that is subject to assessment for impairment is $3.6 million and $43.2 million, respectively, at December 31, 2010.

        As of December 31, 2010, the goodwill balance relates to the Exchange segment. The annual goodwill impairment test as of October 1, 2010 included the following material assumptions: a discounted cash flow model utilizing a discount rate of 22%, a perpetual growth rate of 3% and Adjusted EBITDA margin rates of 3% of revenue from 2011 to 2015. (See Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements attached as Appendix E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix D is attached for the definition of Adjusted EBITDA.) As of December 31, 2010, the remaining indefinite-lived intangible assets balance relates to the Exchanges segment. The material assumptions included in the annual indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment test as of October 1, 2010 were an assumed relief from royalties model, a discount rate of 22%, a perpetual growth rate of 3%, and royalty rates of 1% to 4%. Management of Tree.com believes that the assumptions used in the impairment tests are reasonable. However, Tree.com's reporting units continue to operate in dynamic and challenged industry segments.

        We review the carrying value of all long-lived assets, primarily property and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may be impaired. Impairment is considered to have occurred whenever the carrying value of a long-lived asset exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows that is expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. The determination of cash flows is based upon assumptions that may not occur. The value of long-lived assets that is subject to assessment for impairment is $11.6 million at December 31, 2010.

        Estimates of deferred income taxes and the significant items giving rise to the deferred assets and liabilities are shown in Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements attached as Appendix E, and reflect management's assessment of actual future taxes to be paid on items reflected in the consolidated financial statements, giving consideration to both timing and the probability of realization. Actual income taxes could vary from these estimates due to future changes in income tax law, state income tax apportionment or the outcome of any review of our tax returns by the IRS, as well as actual operating results of Tree.com that vary significantly from anticipated results. We also recognize liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on the two-step process prescribed by the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. This measurement step is inherently difficult and requires subjective estimations of such amounts to determine the probability of various possible outcomes. We consider many factors when

D-13


Table of Contents

evaluating and estimating our tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes.

        As disclosed in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements attached as Appendix E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix D is attached, we did not grant any significant stock options during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. We also issue restricted stock units and restricted stock, and the value of the instrument is measured at the grant date as the fair value of common stock and amortized ratably as non-cash compensation expense over the vesting term.


New Accounting Pronouncements

        Refer to Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements attached as Appendix E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix D is attached for a description of recent accounting pronouncements.


Principles of Financial Reporting

        Tree.com reports Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ("EBITDA"), and adjusted for certain items discussed below ("Adjusted EBITDA"), as supplemental measures to GAAP. These measures are two of the primary metrics by which Tree.com evaluates the performance of its businesses, on which its internal budgets are based and by which management is compensated. Tree.com believes that investors should have access to the same set of tools that it uses in analyzing its results. These non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to results prepared in accordance with GAAP, but should not be considered a substitute for or superior to GAAP results. Tree.com provides and encourages investors to examine the reconciling adjustments between the GAAP and non-GAAP measure which are discussed below.

        Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA excluding (1) non-cash compensation expense, (2) non-cash intangible asset impairment charges, (3) gain/loss on disposal of assets, (4) restructuring expenses, (5) litigation settlements and contingencies, (6) pro forma adjustments for significant acquisitions, and (7) one-time items. Adjusted EBITDA has certain limitations in that it does not take into account the impact to Tree.com's statement of operations of certain expenses, including depreciation, non-cash compensation and acquisition related accounting. Tree.com endeavors to compensate for the limitations of the non-GAAP measure presented by also providing the comparable GAAP measure with equal or greater prominence and descriptions of the reconciling items, including quantifying such items, to derive the non-GAAP measure.

        Tree.com will only present EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA on a pro forma basis if it views a particular transaction as significant in size or transformational in nature. For the periods presented, there are no transactions that Tree.com has included on a pro forma basis.

        EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are presented before one-time items, if applicable. These items are truly one-time in nature and non-recurring, infrequent or unusual, and have not occurred in the past two years or are not expected to recur in the next two years, in accordance with SEC rules. For the periods presented, there are no one-time items.

D-14


Table of Contents

        Non-cash compensation expense consists principally of expense associated with the grants of restricted stock units and stock options. These expenses are not paid in cash, and Tree.com will include the related shares in its future calculations of fully diluted shares outstanding. Upon vesting of restricted stock units and the exercise of certain stock options, the awards will be settled, at Tree.com's discretion, on a net basis, with Tree.com remitting the required tax withholding amount from its current funds.

        Amortization and impairment of intangibles are non-cash expenses relating primarily to acquisitions. At the time of an acquisition, the intangible assets of the acquired company, such as purchase agreements, technology and customer relationships, are valued and amortized over their estimated lives.


Reconciliation of EBITDA

        For a reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to operating income (loss) for Tree.com's operating segments and to net loss in total for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements attached as Appendix E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix D is attached.


Other

        REALTORS®—a registered collective membership mark that identifies a real estate professional who is a member of the National Association of REALTORS® and subscribes to its strict code of ethics

D-15


Table of Contents

APPENDIX E

TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009

Explanatory Note.

        On March 10, 2011, our management made the decision and finalized a plan to close all of the field offices of the proprietary full service real estate brokerage business known as RealEstate.com, REALTORS®, which was previously reported within the Real Estate reporting segment. Tree.com exited all markets by March 31, 2011. Accordingly, RealEstate.com, REALTORS® are presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented in Appendix E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix D is attached. The following discussion, unless otherwise noted, excludes information related to the discontinued operations.

        Tree.com is filing this Appendix E to recast the presentation of its consolidated financial statements that were initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in Tree.com's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the SEC on February 28, 2011 (the "Form 10-K") to reflect the reclassification of the business that was previously Tree.com's real estate brokerage business as discontinued operations.

        In connection with exiting the RealEstate.com, REALTORS® business that is discussed above, the Company re-evaluated its reporting segments based on the continuing operations of the Company. In prior periods, the segments "LendingTree Loans", "Exchanges", "Real Estate" and "Unallocated-Corporate" were presented, which have been changed to "LendingTree Loans" and "Exchanges". The "Exchanges" segment now includes the continuing operations of the previous "Real Estate" segment and the previous "Unallocated—Corporate" segment. Segment results for prior periods have been restated to conform to the new presentation.

        The SEC requires that Tree.com include recasted information for previously issued financial statements in the proxy statement to which this Appendix E is attached, whenever a component of the Company is reflected as discontinued operations in financial statements for subsequent periods, but such component is not yet reflected as discontinued operations in such previously issued financial statements. Accordingly, the Company is revising and including in Appendix C to the proxy statement to which this Appendix E is attached, the Business section from the Form 10-K and in Appendix D to the proxy statement to which this Appendix E is attached.

        In order to preserve the nature and character of the disclosures set forth in the Form 10-K, no attempt has been made in this Appendix E, and it should not be read, to modify or update disclosures as presented in the Form 10-K to reflect events or occurrences after the date of the filing of the Form 10-K, except for the items included in this Appendix E or in Appendix C and Appendix D to the proxy statement to which this Appendix E is attached, which items are updated solely for matters relating specifically to the reclassification of the real estate brokerage business as discontinued operations as described above. Therefore, this Appendix E should be read in conjunction with the Form 10-K and the Company's filings made with the SEC subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K, including the First Quarter 10-Q. References herein to the Form 10-K or parts thereof refer to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, except to the extent portions of such Form 10-K have been recast, in which case, they refer to the applicable recast portion in Appendices C, D and E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix E is attached.

E-1


Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Tree.com, Inc.

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tree.com, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2010. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule included in the proxy statement at Appendix E. These financial statements and financial schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial schedule based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tree.com, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

        As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, beginning January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard for business combinations.

/s/ Deloitte and Touche LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina
February 28, 2011
(August 1, 2011 as to Notes 8 and 9)

E-2


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 
  December 31,
2010
  December 31,
2009
 
 
  (In thousands, except
par value and share amounts)

 

ASSETS:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 68,819   $ 86,093  

Restricted cash and cash equivalents

    10,549     11,590  

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $160 and $213, respectively

    4,264     6,791  

Loans held for sale ($115,908 and $92,236 measured at fair value, respectively)

    116,681     93,596  

Prepaid and other current assets

    11,750     10,751  

Current assets of discontinued operations

    219     480  
           
 

Total current assets

    212,282     209,301  

Property and equipment, net

    11,580     10,395  

Goodwill

    3,632     2,867  

Intangible assets, net

    45,419     57,626  

Other non-current assets

    521     325  

Non-current assets of discontinued operations

    9,368     11,318  
           
 

Total assets

  $ 282,802   $ 291,832  
           

LIABILITIES:

             

Warehouse lines of credit

  $ 100,623   $ 78,481  

Accounts payable, trade

    7,042     5,470  

Deferred revenue

    1,540     1,731  

Deferred income taxes

    2,358     2,211  

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

    38,739     53,446  

Current liabilities of discontinued operations

    1,031     1,683  
           
 

Total current liabilities

    151,333     143,022  

Income taxes payable

    96     510  

Other long-term liabilities

    15,302     11,646  

Deferred income taxes

    13,962     15,380  

Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations

    288     364  
           
 

Total liabilities

    180,981     170,922  

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:

             

Preferred stock $.01 par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares; none issued or outstanding

         

Common stock $.01 par value; authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued 11,893,468 and 10,904,330 shares, respectively, and outstanding 10,770,207 and 10,904,330 shares, respectively

    118     109  

Additional paid-in capital

    908,837     901,818  

Accumulated deficit

    (798,602 )   (781,017 )

Treasury stock 1,123,261 and -0- shares, respectively

    (8,532 )    
           
 

Total shareholders' equity

    101,821     120,910  
           
 

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

  $ 282,802   $ 291,832  
           

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

E-3


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 
  Year Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2010   2009  
 
  (In thousands, except
per share amounts)

 

Revenue

             
   

LendingTree Loans

  $ 124,180   $ 117,670  
   

Exchanges

    61,911     74,910  
           
 

Total revenue

    186,091     192,580  

Cost of revenue

             
   

LendingTree Loans

    44,056     48,998  
   

Exchanges

    5,547     8,284  
           
 

Total cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below)

    49,603     57,282  
           
 

Gross margin

    136,488     135,298  

Operating expenses

             
 

Selling and marketing expense

    72,600     58,270  
 

General and administrative expense

    50,487     57,328  
 

Product development

    3,983     4,788  
 

Litigation settlements and contingencies

    2,072     13,175  
 

Restructuring expense

    2,773     1,007  
 

Amortization of intangibles

    2,716     4,847  
 

Depreciation

    5,460     6,237  
 

Asset impairments

    9,491     6,097  
           
   

Total operating expenses

    149,582     151,749  
           
   

Operating loss

    (13,094 )   (16,451 )

Other income (expense)

             
 

Interest income

    8     88  
 

Interest expense

    (473 )   (617 )
 

Other expense

         
           

Total other expense, net

    (465 )   (529 )
           

Loss before income taxes

    (13,559 )   (16,980 )

Income tax provision

    936     368  
           

Net loss from continuing operations

    (12,623 )   (16,612 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (4,962 )   (7,862 )
           

Net loss available to common shareholders

  $ (17,585 ) $ (24,474 )
           

Weighted average common shares outstanding

    11,014     10,536  
           

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding

    11,014     10,536  
           

Net loss per share from continuing operations

             
 

Basic

  $ (1.15 ) $ (1.58 )
           
 

Diluted

  $ (1.15 ) $ (1.58 )
           

Net loss per share available to common shareholders

             
 

Basic

  $ (1.60 ) $ (2.32 )
           
 

Diluted

  $ (1.60 ) $ (2.32 )
           

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

E-4


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

 
   
  Common Stock    
   
  Treasury Stock  
 
  Total   Number
of Shares
  Amount   Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Number
of Shares
  Amount  

Balance as of December 31, 2008

  $ 138,128     9,369   $ 94   $ 894,577   $ (756,543 )     $  

Comprehensive loss:

                                           
 

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009

    (24,474 )               (24,474 )        
                                           

Comprehensive loss

    (24,474 )                        

Non-cash compensation

    3,892             3,892              

Issuance of common stock

    3,636     935     9     3,627              

Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units, net of withholding taxes

    (272 )   250     3     (275 )            

Issuance of restricted stock

        350     3     (3 )            
                               

Balance as of December 31, 2009

    120,910     10,904     109     901,818     (781,017 )        

Comprehensive loss:

                                           
 

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2010

    (17,585 )               (17,585 )        
                                           

Comprehensive loss

    (17,585 )                        

Non-cash compensation

    3,640             3,640              

Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units, net of withholding taxes

    (570 )   304     3     (573 )            

Issuance of restricted stock

        150     1     (1 )            

Exchange of preferred stock issued by a subsidiary to common stock issued by parent

    3,958     535     5     3,953              

Purchase of treasury stock

    (8,532 )                   1,123     (8,532 )
                               

Balance as of December 31, 2010

  $ 101,821     11,893   $ 118   $ 908,837   $ (798,602 )   1,123   $ (8,532 )
                               

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

E-5


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 
  Year Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2010   2009  
 
  (In thousands)
 

Cash flows from operating activities attributable to continuing operations:

             

Net loss

  $ (17,585 ) $ (24,474 )

Less loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

    4,962     7,862  
           

Loss from continuing operations

    (12,623 )   (16,612 )

Adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities attributable to continuing operations:

             
 

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

    316     1,107  
 

Amortization of intangibles

    2,716     4,847  
 

Depreciation

    5,460     6,237  
 

Intangible impairment

    9,491     6,097  
 

Non-cash compensation expense

    3,640     3,892  
 

Non-cash restructuring expense

    93     583  
 

Deferred income taxes

    (1,270 )   (382 )
 

Gain on origination and sale of loans

    (113,425 )   (110,320 )
 

Loss on impaired loans not sold

    128     647  
 

Loss on sale of real estate acquired in satisfaction of loans

    406     51  
 

Bad debt expense

    10     422  

Changes in current assets and liabilities:

             
 

Accounts receivable

    2,518     16  
 

Origination of loans

    (2,792,041 )   (2,855,246 )
 

Proceeds from sales of loans

    2,892,070     2,969,658  
 

Principal payments received on loans

    2,356     1,422  
 

Payments to investors for loan repurchases and early payoff obligations

    (12,154 )   (8,742 )
 

Prepaid and other current assets

    (44 )   (648 )
 

Accounts payable and other current liabilities

    (9,829 )   14,848  
 

Income taxes payable

    (278 )   (402 )
 

Deferred revenue

    (350 )   151  
 

Other, net

    1,002     2,435  
           

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities attributable to continuing operations

    (21,808 )   20,061  
           

Cash flows from investing activities attributable to continuing operations:

             
 

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

    (250 )   (5,726 )
 

Capital expenditures

    (6,963 )   (3,865 )
 

Restricted cash

    2,191     4,060  
 

Other, net

        (20 )
           

Net cash used in investing activities attributable to continuing operations

    (5,022 )   (5,551 )
           

Cash flows from financing activities attributable to continuing operations:

             
 

Borrowing under warehouse lines of credit

    1,864,905     2,475,106  
 

Repayments of warehouse lines of credit

    (1,842,764 )   (2,472,811 )
 

Issuance of common stock, net of withholding taxes

    (570 )   3,364  
 

Purchase of treasury stock

    (8,532 )    
 

Increase in restricted cash

    (50 )   (875 )
           

Net cash provided by financing activities attributable to continuing operations

    12,989     4,784  
           

Total cash provided by (used in) continuing operations

    (13,841 )   19,294  
           

Net cash used in operating activities attributable to discontinued operations

    (3,170 )   (6,844 )

Net cash used in investing activities attributable to discontinued operations

    (263 )    
           

Total cash used in discontinued operations

    (3,433 )   (6,844 )
           

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

    (17,274 )   12,450  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

    86,093     73,643  
           

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $ 68,819   $ 86,093  
           

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

E-6


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1—ORGANIZATION

Spin-Off

        On August 20, 2008, Tree.com, Inc. ("Tree.com" or the "Company") was spun off from its parent company, IAC/InterActiveCorp ("IAC") into a separate publicly traded company. In these consolidated financial statements, we refer to the separation transaction as the "spin-off." In connection with the spin-off, Tree.com was incorporated as a Delaware corporation in April 2008. Tree.com consists of the businesses that formerly comprised IAC's Lending and Real Estate segments as well as newly acquired or developed brands and businesses. We refer herein to these businesses as the "Tree.com Businesses" as more fully described in the Company Overview below.

        In conjunction with the spin-off, Tree.com completed the following transactions: (1) extinguished all intercompany payable balances with IAC, which totaled $56.2 million, by recording a non-cash contribution from IAC, (2) recapitalized the invested capital balances with common stock in the amount of $0.1 million, whereby holders of IAC stock received one-thirtieth of a share of common stock of Tree.com, and (3) received $55.2 million of cash from IAC.


Company Overview

        Tree.com is the parent of LendingTree, LLC, which owns several brands and businesses that provide information, tools, advice, products and services for critical transactions in our customers' lives. Our family of brands includes: LendingTree.com®, GetSmart.com®, RealEstate.com®, DegreeTree.comSM, HealthTree.comSM, LendingTreeAutos.com, DoneRight.com®, and InsuranceTree.comSM. Together, these brands serve as an ally for consumers who are looking to comparison shop for loans, real estate and other services from multiple businesses and professionals who will compete for their business.

        These businesses and brands are operated under the segments known as LendingTree Loans and the Exchanges.

        The LendingTree Loans segment originates, processes, approves and funds various residential real estate loans through Home Loan Center, Inc. dba LendingTree Loans ("HLC Inc."). The HLC Inc. and LendingTree Loans brand names are collectively referred to in these consolidated financial statements as "LendingTree Loans."

        The Exchanges segment consists of online lead generation networks and call centers that connect consumers and service providers principally in the lending, real estate, higher education, home services, insurance and automobile marketplaces.


Discontinued Operations

        On March 10, 2011, management of the Company made the decision and finalized a plan to close all of the field offices of the proprietary full service real estate brokerage business known as RealEstate.com, REALTORS®, which was previously reported within the Real Estate reporting segment (see Note 8) is presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for all periods presented. The notes

E-7


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 1—ORGANIZATION (Continued)


accompanying these consolidated financial statements reflect our continuing operations and, unless otherwise noted, exclude information related to the discontinued operations.


Business Combinations

        In 2010, Tree.com purchased certain assets of a company with an aggregate purchase price of $0.8 million in cash and contingent consideration. The contingent consideration amount is based on a percentage of estimated cumulative earnings over a period of thirty-six months from the date of acquisition. The minimum payout under the arrangement is zero and the maximum payout is unlimited. There have been no changes in the amount recognized or in the range of payouts since the date of acquisition. The purchase is part of our strategic initiative to diversify our revenue streams outside of the mortgage and real estate industries.

        In 2009, Tree.com purchased certain assets of four separate companies, with an aggregate purchase price of $5.7 million in cash and $1.0 million in contingent consideration. The contingent consideration relates to one of the purchases, and the amount is based on a percentage of estimated cumulative earnings over a period of thirty-six months from the date of acquisition. The minimum payout under the arrangement is zero and the maximum payout is unlimited. In 2010, there was a reduction of $0.8 million in the amount recognized since the date of acquisition. All four transactions are part of our strategic initiative to diversify our revenue streams outside of the mortgage and real estate industries.

        These asset purchases are being accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, the purchase price is allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The purchase price for acquisitions in 2010 has been allocated resulting in $0.8 million to be accounted for as goodwill in the Exchanges segment. The purchase price of the 2009 purchases has been allocated as $3.9 million to intangible assets with useful lives of five months to thirteen years and $2.9 million to goodwill, all of which are recorded in the Exchanges segment. For the 2009 purchases, the goodwill recognized primarily relates to synergies of the combined organizations and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition.

        The pro forma effect of these 2010 and 2009 purchases were not material to our results of operations.

        In November 2010, LendingTree Loans entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with First Residential Mortgage Network, Inc. dba SurePoint Lending ("SurePoint") and the shareholders of SurePoint. The Agreement provides for the purchase by LendingTree Loans of certain specified assets and liabilities of SurePoint. The acquired assets also include all of the equity interests of Real Estate Title Services, LLC. Under the terms of the Agreement, LendingTree Loans will make an initial payment of approximately $6 million in cash upon the closing of the transaction and will make contingent consideration payments on an annual basis for the next thirty-six months based on LendingTree Loans' pre-tax net income derived from the assets acquired. The aggregate purchase price, including the initial payment and contingent consideration, shall not exceed $23 million. The Company expects to use available cash to fund the acquisition. The transaction is projected to close in March 2011.

E-8


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 2—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Consolidation

        The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all entities that are wholly-owned by the Company. Intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated.


Reclassifications

        Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current presentation with no effect on net loss or accumulated deficit. Specifically, compensation and other-employee related costs within the Exchanges segment totaling $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 were reclassified from the Exchanges segment to the LendingTree Loans segment, both within cost of revenue. There was no impact on the consolidated financial results.


Revenue Recognition

        LendingTree Loans' revenues are primarily derived from the origination and sale of mortgage loans. Loans are funded through warehouse lines of credit and are sold to investors, typically within thirty days. The gain or loss on the sale of loans is realized on the date the loans are sold. The Company sells its loans on a servicing released basis in which the Company gives up the right to service the loans.

        Loans are recorded at fair value at the time of origination. Changes in the fair value of loans are recorded through revenue prior to the sale of the loans to investors. At the time of sale, any difference between the estimated fair value of the loan and the sales price is recorded as an adjustment to the gain.

        Loans funded prior to January 1, 2008 are carried at the lower of cost or market value determined on an aggregate basis except for loans that are impaired, which are assessed on an individual basis. Loans are deemed impaired when they have a significant defect impacting the ability of the Company to sell the loan and recoup substantially all of the balance due. Loan origination fees and certain direct costs related to the origination of loans prior to January 1, 2008 were capitalized and deferred until the loans were sold. Upon sale of the loans, the origination fees and costs were recognized as a component of the gain on sale of loans.

        Exchange revenue principally represents match fees and closed-loan fees paid by lenders that received a transmitted loan request or closed a loan for a consumer that originated through one of LendingTree's websites or affiliates. Exchange revenue also includes match fees paid by institutions of higher education and professionals in the real estate, home services, insurance and automobile industries for a transmitted lead or service request. Match fees are recognized at the time qualification forms are transmitted, while closed-loan fees are recognized at the time the lender reports the closed loan to LendingTree, which may be several months after the loan request is transmitted. Cooperative brokerage fees from real estate professionals are recognized when the transmission of a consumer's information results in the purchase or sale of a home and the transaction is reported closed by the participating real estate professional.

E-9


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 2—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


Cash and Cash Equivalents

        Cash and cash equivalents include cash and short-term, highly liquid money market investments.


Restricted Cash

        Restricted cash and cash equivalents consists of the following (in thousands):

 
  December 31,
2010
  December 31,
2009
 

Cash in escrow for future operating lease commitments

  $   $ 788  

Cash in escrow for surety bonds

    5,030     5,030  

Cash in escrow for corporate purchasing card program

    800     2,203  

Minimum required balances for warehouse lines of credit

    1,925     1,875  

Mortgage lending escrow funds

    2,394     1,291  

Other

    400     403  
           
 

Total restricted cash and cash equivalents

  $ 10,549   $ 11,590  
           


Accounts Receivable

        Accounts receivable are stated at amounts due from customers, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts.

        Accounts receivable outstanding longer than the contractual payment terms are considered past due. The Company determines its allowance for doubtful accounts by considering a number of factors, including the length of time accounts receivable are past due, the Company's previous loss history, the specific customer's current ability to pay its obligation to the Company and the condition of the general economy and the customer's industry as a whole. The Company writes off accounts receivable when management deems them uncollectible. Write-offs were $0.4 million and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.


Loans Held for Sale

        LendingTree Loans originates all of its residential real estate loans with the intent to sell them in the secondary market. Loans held for sale consist primarily of residential first and second mortgage loans that are secured by residential real estate throughout the United States.

        Loans held for sale are recorded at fair value, with the exception of any loans that have been repurchased from investors or loans originated prior to January 1, 2008 on which we did not elect the fair value option. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, $0.8 million and $1.4 million, respectively, of such loans were impaired and carried on the balance sheet at the lower of cost or market value assessed on an individual loan basis.

        The fair value of loans held for sale is determined using current secondary market prices for loans with similar coupons, maturities and credit quality. Loans held for sale are pledged as collateral under LendingTree Loans' warehouse lines of credit. LendingTree Loans relies substantially on the secondary mortgage market as all of the loans originated are sold into this market.

E-10


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 2—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

        Prior to August 2010, fees received from borrowers for a commitment to originate a mortgage loan at a specified rate (interest rate lock commitment or "IRLC") were deferred. Such fees are generally credited toward loan origination fees when the loan is funded or recognized as income upon expiration of the commitment in the case of unexercised commitments. Effective August 2010, the Company no longer collects commitment fees for IRLCs.

        Interest on mortgage loans held for sale is recognized as earned and is only accrued if deemed collectible. Interest is generally deemed uncollectible when a loan becomes three months or more delinquent or when a loan has a defect affecting its salability. Delinquency is calculated based on the contractual due date of the loan. Loans are written off when deemed uncollectible.


Loan Loss Obligations

        LendingTree Loans sells loans it originates to investors on a servicing released basis and the risk of loss or default by the borrower is generally transferred to the investor. However, LendingTree Loans is required by these investors to make certain representations relating to credit information, loan documentation and collateral. To the extent LendingTree Loans does not comply with such representations or there are early payment defaults, LendingTree Loans may be required to repurchase loans or indemnify the investors for any losses from borrower defaults. The Company initially records the liability for this obligation at fair value as a reduction in revenue. Subsequently, LendingTree Loans maintains a liability for the estimated obligation related to this exposure based, in part, on historical and projected loss frequency and loss severity using its loan loss history (adjusted for recent trends in loan loss experience as well as market pricing information on loans repurchased), the original principal amount of the loans previously sold, the year the loans were sold, and loan type. There are four loan types used in this analysis that are determined based on the extent of the documentation received (full or limited) and the lien position of the mortgage in the underling property (first or second position). In the case of early payoffs, which occur when a borrower prepays a loan prior to the end of a specified period, LendingTree Loans may be required to repay all or a portion of the premium initially paid by the investor. The estimated obligation associated with early payoffs is calculated based on historical loss experience by loan type.


Real Estate Properties Acquired in Satisfaction of Loans

        Real estate properties acquired in satisfaction of loans are recorded at the lower of carrying amount or estimated fair value less selling costs on their acquisition dates. Subsequent write-downs, costs to maintain the property, and gains or losses realized upon disposition are included in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.


Property and Equipment

        Property and equipment, including significant improvements, are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Repairs and maintenance and any gains or losses on dispositions are included in operations.

        Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis to allocate the cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated service lives. Amortization of assets recorded under capital leases is

E-11


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 2—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


included in depreciation expense. The following table presents the depreciation period for each asset category:

Asset Category
  Depreciation Period

Computer equipment and capitalized software

  1 to 5 years

Leasehold improvements

  Lesser of asset life
or life of lease

Furniture and other equipment

  3 to 7 years


Software Development Costs

        Software development costs primarily include expenses incurred to develop the software that powers our websites. Certain costs incurred during the application development stage are capitalized based on specific activities tracked on internal timesheets and external invoices (or timesheets), while costs incurred during the preliminary project stage and post-implementation/operation stage are expensed as incurred. Capitalized software development costs are amortized over estimated lives of one to three years.


Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

        Goodwill acquired in business combinations is assigned to the reporting units that are expected to benefit from the combination as of the acquisition date.

        Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step of the process is to compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. In performing the first step, Tree.com determines the fair value of its reporting units by using a discounted cash flow ("DCF") analysis. Determining fair value using a DCF analysis requires the exercise of significant judgments, including judgments about appropriate discount rates, perpetual growth rates and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not required. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is required to be performed to measure the amount of impairment, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

E-12


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 2—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

        The impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The estimates of fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets are determined using a DCF valuation analysis that employs a "relief from royalty" methodology in estimating the fair value of its trade names and trademarks. Significant judgments inherent in this analysis include the determination of royalty rates, discount rates and the terminal growth rates.

        Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, primarily trade names and trademarks, are tested annually for impairment as of October 1 or earlier upon the occurrence of certain events or substantive changes in circumstances. In light of the substantive changes in the mortgage and real estate markets and significant changes in leadership and operational focus in the real estate segment, Tree.com performed interim tests as of June 30, 2009, in addition to the annual test on October 1, 2010 and 2009. Tree.com identified impairments in the interim test in 2009 and in the annual tests in 2010 and 2009, as described in Note 4.


Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets with Definite Lives

        Long-lived assets, including property and equipment and intangible assets with definite lives, are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If the carrying amount is deemed to not be recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded as the amount by which the carrying amount of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. Amortization of definite lived intangible assets is recorded on a straight-line basis over their estimated lives.


Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

        Tree.com is exposed to certain risks in connection with its mortgage banking operations. LendingTree Loans is exposed to interest rate risk for loans it originates until those loans are sold in the secondary market. The fair value of interest rate lock commitments ("IRLCs") and loans held for sale are subject to change primarily due to changes in market interest rates. LendingTree Loans economically hedges the changes in fair value of IRLCs and loans held for sale primarily by using derivative instruments that are fully described in Note 11.


Cost of Revenue

        Cost of revenue consists primarily of costs associated with loan originations, compensation and other employee-related costs (including stock-based compensation) related to customer call centers and real estate network support staff and loan officers, as well as credit scoring fees, consumer incentive costs, real estate agent commissions and website network hosting and server fees.


Consumer Promotional Costs

        The Company offers certain consumers that utilize our exchange services promotional incentives to complete a transaction. These include cash payments, gift certificates, airline miles or other discounts or coupons in the event a transaction is completed utilizing our services. The liability is estimated for

E-13


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 2—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


these consumer promotional costs each period based on the number of consumers that are presented such offers, the cost of the item being offered and the historical trends of consumers qualifying for the offer and our payout rates. The estimated costs of the consumer promotional incentives are charged to cost of revenue each period. Consumer promotional expense was $1.3 million and $3.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Consumer promotional costs accrued totaled $0.6 million at both December 31, 2010 and 2009, and are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.


Product Development

        Product development expense consists primarily of compensation and other employee-related costs (including stock-based compensation) for personnel engaged in product development, which include costs related to the design, development, testing and enhancement of technology that are not capitalized.


Advertising

        Advertising costs are expensed in the period incurred (when the advertisement first runs for production costs that are initially capitalized) and principally represent offline costs, including television, print and radio advertising, and online advertising costs, including fees paid to search engines and distribution partners. Advertising expense was $68.7 million and $54.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. There was no prepaid advertising at December 31, 2010 or 2009.


Income Taxes

        Tree.com accounts for income taxes under the liability method, and deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. In estimating future tax consequences, all expected future events are considered. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided on deferred tax assets if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Tree.com records interest on potential tax contingencies as a component of income tax expense and records interest net of any applicable related income tax benefit.

        In accordance with the accounting standard for uncertainty in income taxes, Tree.com recognizes liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on the two-step process prescribed by the accounting standards. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.


Stock-Based Compensation

        Tree.com records stock-based compensation in accordance with the accounting standard for share based payments. See Note 3 for further information.

E-14


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 2—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


Accounting Estimates

        Tree.com's management is required to make certain estimates and assumptions during the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. These estimates and assumptions impact the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. They also impact the reported amount of net earnings during any period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

        Significant estimates underlying the accompanying consolidated financial statements include: valuation allowance for impaired loans held for sale; loan loss obligations; the fair value of loans held for sale and related derivatives; the recoverability of long-lived assets, goodwill and intangible assets; the determination of income taxes payable and deferred income taxes, including related valuation allowances; restructuring reserves; contingent consideration related to business combinations; various other allowances, reserves and accruals; and assumptions related to the determination of stock-based compensation.


Certain Risks and Concentrations

        Tree.com's business is subject to certain risks and concentrations including dependence on third party technology providers, exposure to risks associated with online commerce security and credit card fraud.

        Financial instruments, which potentially subject Tree.com to concentration of credit risk, consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are maintained with quality financial institutions of high credit and are in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits.

        Due to the nature of the mortgage lending industry, changes in interest rates may significantly impact revenue from originating mortgages and subsequent sales of loans to investors, which are the primary source of income for LendingTree Loans. LendingTree Loans originates mortgage loans on property located throughout the United States, with revenue from loans originated for property located in California totaling approximately 12% and 11% of Tree.com's consolidated revenue in 2010 and 2009, respectively.

        LendingTree Loans monitors its relationships with investors and, from time to time, makes adjustments in the amount it sells to any one investor based upon a number of factors, including but not limited to, price, loan review time and funding turnaround, underwriting guidelines and the overall efficiency of its relationship with the investor.

        The following table represents the approximate percentage of Tree.com's revenue for LendingTree Loan's four largest investors (purchasers of the loans originated) for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

 
  Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2010   2009  

Investor 1

    25 %   11 %

Investor 2

    24 %   25 %

Investor 3

    11 %   13 %

E-15


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 2—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

        LendingTree Loans funds loans through warehouse lines of credit. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, 68% and 56%, respectively, of the total balance due on the lines of credit was payable to one lender. The decision regarding how to allocate this balance amongst lenders is based on several factors, including the interest rate and commitment fee.

        Due to the nature of the mortgage lending industry, interest rate increases may negatively impact future revenue from our lending networks as well as revenue from originating and selling loans.

        Further, lenders participating on our lending networks can offer their products directly to consumers through brokers, mass marketing campaigns, or through other traditional methods of credit distribution. These lenders can also offer their products online, either directly to prospective borrowers, through one or more of our online competitors, or both. If a significant number of potential consumers are able to obtain loans from our participating lenders without utilizing our service, our ability to generate revenue may be limited. Because we do not have exclusive relationships with the lenders whose loan offerings are offered on our online marketplace, consumers may obtain offers and loans from these lenders without using our service.

        The Company maintains operations solely in the United States.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        On July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued guidance with the objective of establishing the Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. All existing accounting standards have been superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the codification will be considered non-authoritative. Accordingly, all references to accounting standards have been conformed to the new codification hierarchy.

        On January 1, 2010, Tree.com adopted the accounting standard for transfers and servicing of financial assets, with no material impact to the financials. The objective is to improve relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor's continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. This standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009.

        On January 21, 2010, the FASB amended and Tree.com adopted the accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures, which added new requirements for disclosures about transfers into and out of Level 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. The amendment also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This amendment is effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide the Level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis, which will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. See Note 11 for further information.

        On January 1, 2009, Tree.com adopted the accounting standard for business combinations, which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the

E-16


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 2—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


acquiree and the goodwill acquired. This standard also establishes disclosure requirements that will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The standard applies prospectively to business combinations in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company applied this standard to its business combinations made subsequent to January 1, 2009. See Note 1 for further information.

        On January 1, 2009, Tree.com adopted the updated accounting standard for derivatives and hedging. This standard amends and expands the existing disclosure requirements with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for; and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. See Note 11 for further information.

        On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued and Tree.com adopted the updated accounting standards for financial instruments and interim reporting. The new standards require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. The new standards also require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. See Note 11 for further information.

NOTE 3—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

        Tree.com currently has one active plan ("Tree.com 2008 Stock and Annual Incentive Plan") under which future awards may be granted, which currently covers outstanding stock options to acquire shares of Tree.com common stock and restricted stock units ("RSUs"), and provides for the future grant of these and other equity awards. Under the Tree.com 2008 Stock and Annual Incentive Plan, the Company is authorized to grant stock options, RSUs and other equity based awards for up to 2.75 million shares of Tree.com common stock. The active plan described above authorizes the Company to grant awards to its employees, officers and directors. Finally, this active plan also governs certain equity awards of IAC that were converted into equity awards of Tree.com in connection with the spin-off.

        In addition, the plan described above has a stated term of ten years and provides that the exercise price of stock options granted will not be less than the market price of the Company's common stock on the grant date. The plan does not specify grant dates or vesting schedules as those determinations have been delegated to the Compensation Committee of Tree.com's Board of Directors (the "Committee"). Each grant agreement reflects the vesting schedule for that particular grant as determined by the Committee.

        Prior to the spin-off, Tree.com employees received equity awards that were granted under various IAC stock and annual incentive plans. Upon spin-off, these IAC awards were converted into awards of both Tree.com and other former IAC companies. Tree.com will continue to recognize non-cash compensation expense for all of these awards granted to Tree.com employees.

E-17


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 3—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

        Non-cash stock-based compensation expense related to equity awards is included in the following line items in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):

 
  Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2010   2009  

Cost of revenue

  $ 16   $ 90  

Selling and marketing expense

    187     154  

General and administrative expense

    3,288     3,524  

Product development

    149     124  
           

Non-cash stock-based compensation expense before income taxes

    3,640     3,892  

Income tax benefit

    (1,438 )   (1,537 )
           

Non-cash stock-based compensation expense after income taxes

  $ 2,202   $ 2,355  
           

        The forms of stock-based awards granted to Tree.com employees are principally RSUs, restricted stock and stock options. RSUs are awards in the form of units, denominated in a hypothetical equivalent number of shares of Tree.com common stock and with the value of each award equal to the fair value of Tree.com common stock at the date of grant. RSUs may be settled in cash, stock or both, as determined by the Committee at the time of grant. Each stock-based award is subject to service-based vesting, where a specific period of continued employment must pass before an award vests. Certain restricted stock awards also include performance-based vesting, where certain performance targets set at the time of grant must be achieved before an award vests. Tree.com recognizes expense for all stock-based awards for which vesting is considered probable. For stock-based awards, the accounting charge is measured at the grant date as the fair value of Tree.com common stock and expensed ratably as non-cash compensation over the vesting term. For performance-based awards, the expense is measured at the grant date as the fair value of Tree.com common stock and expensed as non-cash compensation over the vesting period if the performance targets are considered probable of being achieved.

        The amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statement of operations is reduced by estimated forfeitures, as the amount recorded is based on awards ultimately expected to vest. The forfeiture rate is estimated at the grant date based on historical experience and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if the actual forfeiture rate differs from the estimated rate.

        Tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statement of operations are reported as a component of financing cash flows. There were no excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation for the years ended December 31, 2010 or 2009.

        As of December 31, 2010, there was approximately $1.6 million, $2.9 million and $1.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to stock options, RSUs and restricted stock, respectively. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.9 years for stock options, 2.0 years for RSUs and 2.1 years for restricted stock.

E-18


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 3—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)


Stock Options

        A summary of changes in outstanding stock options is as follows:

 
  Shares   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
 
   
   
  (In years)
  (In thousands)
 

Outstanding at January 1, 2010

    1,177,319   $ 9.34              

Granted

                       

Exercised

    (44,835 )   6.73              

Forfeited

    (68,464 )   7.46              

Expired

    (111,351 )   9.57              
                       

Outstanding at December 31, 2010

    952,669   $ 9.58     6.3   $ 87  
                   

Options exercisable

    287,506   $ 12.40     4.4   $ 257  
                   

        Substantially all options outstanding at December 31, 2010 are vested or are expected to vest over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.9 years.

        The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. There were no stock options granted by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2010. There were 21,250 stock options granted by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2009.

        The Black-Scholes option pricing model incorporates various assumptions, including expected volatility and expected term. For purposes of this model, no dividends have been assumed. Expected stock price volatilities are estimated based on the historical volatility of similar companies, as the stock of Tree.com began trading on August 21, 2008, and there was insufficient data at the 2009 grant date to calculate its own historical volatility. The risk-free interest rates are based on U.S. Treasury yields for notes with comparable terms as the awards, in effect at the grant date. The expected term of options granted is based on analyses of historical employee termination rates and option exercise patterns, giving consideration to expectations of future employee behavior. The following are the weighted average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model for year ended December 31, 2009: volatility factor of 70%, risk-free interest rate of 3.4%, expected term of 6.7 years, and a dividend yield of zero.

        The stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2009 were not significant.

        In connection with the spin-off, the Chairman and CEO was awarded two grants of 589,950 stock options, each of which represents the right to acquire 2.5% of the fully diluted equity at exercise prices representing a total equity value of the Company of $100 million and $300 million. The stock options all cliff vest at the end of five years. The weighted average exercise price and the weighted average fair value related to these stock option grants were $16.95 and $4.19, respectively. In 2009, the Company entered into an Option Cancellation Agreement with the Chairman and CEO, in which he surrendered for cancellation in its entirety one stock option award to purchase 589,850 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $25.43 per share.

E-19


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 3—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

        The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between Tree.com's closing stock price on the last trading day of 2010 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31, 2010. This amount changes based on the fair market value of Tree.com's common stock. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $87,000 and $33,000, respectively.

        Cash received from stock option exercises and the related actual tax benefit realized were $302,000 and $36,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010; and, $95,000 and $14,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009, respectively.

        The following table summarizes the information about stock options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2010:

 
  Options Outstanding   Options Exercisable  
Range of Exercise Prices
  Outstanding at
December 31, 2010
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
  Exercisable at
December 31, 2010
  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 

$.01 to $4.99

    11,474     1.63   $ 3.15     11,474   $ 3.15  

$5.00 to $7.45

    12,213     1.93     6.64     12,213     6.64  

$7.46 to $9.99

    746,663     6.99     8.28     81,500     7.60  

$10.00 to $14.99

    54,250     2.35     12.23     54,250     12.23  

$15.00 to $19.99

    81,406     4.40     15.03     81,406     15.03  

$20.00 to $24.99

    46,663     4.44     20.19     46,663     20.19  
                             

    952,669     6.25   $ 9.59     287,506   $ 12.40  
                             


Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock

        Nonvested RSUs and restricted stock outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and changes during the year ended December 31, 2010 were as follows:

 
  RSUs   Restricted Stock  
 
  Number of
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
  Number of
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
 

Nonvested at January 1, 2010

    704,938   $ 8.03     350,000   $ 5.42  

Granted

    509,370     8.09     150,000     9.21  

Vested

    (294,806 )   10.26     (87,500 )   5.42  

Forfeited

    (284,731 )   7.32          
                   

Nonvested at December 31, 2010

    634,771   $ 7.53     412,500   $ 6.80  
                   

        The weighted average grant date fair value of RSUs granted during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 at market prices equal to Tree.com's common stock on the grant date was $8.09, $5.29 and $5.43, respectively.

E-20


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 3—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

        The total fair value of RSUs that vested during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $2.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

        In connection with the spin-off, the Chairman and CEO was granted 117,970 shares of restricted stock in 2008, which were equal to 1% of the fully diluted equity of the Company at the spin-off date. These shares of restricted stock vested during the year ended December 31, 2009, had a total fair value of $0.9 million, and their weighted average grant date fair value was $7.46. The Chairman and CEO was also granted 350,000 shares of restricted stock in 2009, which was treated as a modification of the cancelled stock option award of 589,850 shares discussed above. These shares of restricted stock had a weighted average grant date fair value of $5.42. The incremental non-cash compensation expense for this modification is $0.7 million, which will be recognized over the vesting period of four years. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Chairman and CEO was granted 150,000 shares of restricted stock. These shares of restricted stock had a weighted average grant date fair value of $9.21 and a total fair value of $1.4 million.


Equity Instruments Denominated in the Shares of Certain Subsidiaries

        Subsequent to December 31, 2010, the Company has granted common shares in various operating subsidiaries to certain members of the subsidiaries' management. These equity awards vest over a period of years or upon the occurrence of certain prescribed events. The Company has taken a preferred interest in the subsidiary with a face value equal to its investment cost or a certain other fixed amount. These preferred interests accrete with paid-in-kind dividends at a prescribed rate of return. The equity awards management receives as a whole generally represent a small minority of the total common stock outstanding of each subsidiary. Accordingly, these interests only have value to the extent the relevant business appreciates in value above the preferred interest (including the accretion of dividends), our investment cost or other fixed amount. These interests can have significant value in the event of significant appreciation. The interests are ultimately settled in Tree.com common stock or cash at the sole option of Tree.com, with fair market value determined by negotiation or arbitration, at various dates through 2015. The expense associated with these equity awards is initially measured at fair value at the grant date and is amortized ratably as non-cash compensation over the vesting term. The aggregate number of Tree.com common shares that would be required to settle these interests at current estimated fair values, including vested and unvested interests, will be included in future calculations of diluted earnings per share if the effect is dilutive.

        The operating subsidiaries are party to fair value put and call arrangements with respect to these interests. These put and call arrangements allow management of these businesses to require the relevant operating subsidiary to purchase their interests or allow the operating subsidiary to acquire such interests at fair value, respectively. These put and call arrangements become exercisable by the operating subsidiary and the counter-party at various dates through 2015. These put arrangements are exercisable by the counter-party outside the control of the Company. Accordingly, to the extent that the fair value of these interests exceeds the value determined by normal non-controlling interest accounting, the value of such interests is adjusted to fair value with a corresponding adjustment to additional paid-in capital. Non-controlling interests in the consolidated subsidiaries of the Company should be reported on the consolidated balance sheet within shareholders' equity, separately from the Company's equity. However, in accordance with Accounting Standards Update 2009-04, "Accounting for Redeemable Equity Investments—Amendment to ASC 480-10-599", securities that are redeemable at the option of the holder and not solely within the control of the issuer, must be classified outside of

E-21


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 3—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)


shareholders' equity. Since the redemption of the non-controlling interests is outside the control of the Company, these interests will be included in the mezzanine section of future consolidated balance sheets, outside of shareholders' equity.

NOTE 4—GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

        The balance of goodwill and intangible assets, net is as follows (in thousands):

 
  December 31, 2010   December 31, 2009  

Goodwill

  $ 3,632   $ 2,867  
           

Intangible assets with indefinite lives

  $ 43,242   $ 52,733  

Intangible assets with definite lives, net

    2,177     4,893  
           
 

Total intangible assets, net

  $ 45,419   $ 57,626  
           

        Intangible assets with indefinite lives relate principally to trade names and trademarks acquired in various acquisitions. At December 31, 2010, intangible assets with definite lives relate to the following ($ in thousands):

 
  Cost   Accumulated
Amortization
  Net   Weighted Average
Amortization Life
(Years)
 

Purchase agreements

  $ 75,453   $ (75,288 ) $ 165     5.8  

Technology

    30,491     (29,838 )   653     3.0  

Customer lists

    7,388     (6,692 )   696     3.9  

Other

    9,009     (8,346 )   663     4.1  
                     
 

Total

  $ 122,341   $ (120,164 ) $ 2,177        
                     

        At December 31, 2009, intangible assets with definite lives relate to the following ($ in thousands):

 
  Cost   Accumulated
Amortization
  Net   Weighted Average
Amortization Life
(Years)
 

Purchase agreements

  $ 76,352   $ (74,657 ) $ 1,695     5.7  

Technology

    30,491     (29,396 )   1,095     3.0  

Customer lists

    7,388     (6,631 )   757     3.9  

Other

    9,813     (8,467 )   1,346     4.1  
                     
 

Total

  $ 124,044   $ (119,151 ) $ 4,893        
                     

E-22


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 4—GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)

        Amortization of intangible assets with definite lives is computed on a straight-line basis and, based on December 31, 2010 balances, such amortization is estimated to be as follows (in thousands):

 
  Amount  

Year ending December 31, 2011

  $ 1,084  

Year ending December 31, 2012

    410  

Year ending December 31, 2013

    143  

Year ending December 31, 2014

    84  

Year ending December 31, 2015

    60  

Thereafter

    396  
       
 

Total

  $ 2,177  
       

        The following table presents the balance of goodwill by segment, including changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):

 
  LendingTree Loans   Exchanges   Total  

Balance as of January 1, 2009

                   
 

Goodwill

  $ 46,526   $ 483,088   $ 529,614  
 

Accumulated impairment losses

    (46,526 )   (483,088 )   (529,614 )
               

             
               

Goodwill acquired during the year

        2,867     2,867  

Impairment losses

             

Other deductions

             
               

Balance as of December 31, 2009

                   
 

Goodwill

    46,526     485,955     532,481  
 

Accumulated impairment losses

    (46,526 )   (483,088 )   (529,614 )
               

        2,867     2,867  
               

Goodwill acquired during the year

        765     765  

Impairment losses

             

Other deductions

             
               

Balance as of December 31, 2010

        3,632     3,632  
 

Goodwill

    46,526     486,720     533,246  
 

Accumulated impairment losses

    (46,526 )   (483,088 )   (529,614 )
               

  $   $ 3,632   $ 3,632  
               

        Additions principally relate to business combinations. See Note 1.

        In connection with its annual impairment assessment as of October 1, 2010, Tree.com identified and recorded impairment charges related to trademarks of $9.5 million in the Exchanges. The impairments resulted from the Company's reassessment of its likely future profitability in light of the adverse developments in the mortgage and real estate market conditions and the operational strategies Tree.com has undertaken in response to these market realities. These adverse conditions include,

E-23


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 4—GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)


among others, constrained liquidity, lender focus on low margin conforming loans, uncertainty as to the eventuality and timing of the return of higher margin mortgage offerings, the decline in real estate values and a high rate of delinquency for existing mortgages. Tree.com updated its assessment of mortgage and real estate market conditions and Tree.com's responsive operational strategies and quantified these considerations in the future forecasted results.

        The Company determines the fair values of its reporting units using discounted cash flow ("DCF") analyses. Determining fair value requires the exercise of significant judgment, including judgment about the amount and timing of expected future cash flows and appropriate discount rates. The expected cash flows used in the DCF analyses are based on the Company's most recent budget and, for years beyond the budget, the Company's estimates, which are based, in part, on forecasted growth rates. The discount rates used in the DCF analyses reflect the risks inherent in the expected future cash flows of the respective reporting units.

        The Company determines the fair values of its indefinite-lived intangible assets using avoided royalty DCF valuation analyses. Significant judgments inherent in these analyses include the selection of appropriate royalty and discount rates and estimating the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. The discount rates used in the DCF analyses reflect the risks inherent in the expected future cash flows generated by the respective intangible assets. The royalty rates used in the DCF analyses are based upon an estimate of the royalty rates that a market participant would pay to license the Company's trade names and trademarks.

NOTE 5—PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

        The balance of property and equipment, net is as follows (in thousands):

 
  December 31, 2010   December 31, 2009  

Computer equipment and capitalized software

  $ 35,205   $ 33,366  

Leasehold improvements

    2,311     2,477  

Furniture and other equipment

    2,915     3,244  

Projects in progress

    2,896     1,390  
           

    43,327     40,477  

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

    (31,747 )   (30,082 )
           
 

Total property and equipment, net

  $ 11,580   $ 10,395  
           

        The Company capitalized $5.8 million and $2.4 million of internal software development costs during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Unamortized capitalized software development costs were $7.3 million and $4.5 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Capitalized software development amortization expense was $2.9 million and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Software development costs increased in 2010 due to our expanded investment in the businesses outside of the mortgage and real estate industries.

E-24


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 6—ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

        Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):

 
  December 31, 2010   December 31, 2009  

Accrued loan loss liability related to loans previously sold

  $ 5,459   $ 6,115  

Loan loss settlement liability related to loans previously sold

    300     4,500  

Litigation accruals

    520     12,750  

Accrued advertising expense

    8,979     7,891  

Accrued compensation and benefits

    7,247     7,375  

Accrued professional fees

    1,340     1,528  

Accrued restructuring costs

    1,199     1,594  

Derivative liabilities

    1,634     356  

Customer deposits and escrows

    3,166     3,166  

Deferred rent

    482     619  

Other

    8,413     7,552  
           
 

Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  $ 38,739   $ 53,446  
           

        The other category above reflects an estimated earnout payable related to an acquisition, franchise taxes, self-insured health claims and other miscellaneous accrued expenses.

        An additional $11.5 million and $6.4 million of accrued loan loss liability related to loans previously sold is classified in other long term liabilities at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

        An additional $1.2 million and $0.5 million of accrued restructuring liability is classified in other long term liabilities at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

NOTE 7—WAREHOUSE LINES OF CREDIT

        Borrowings on warehouse lines of credit were $100.6 million and $78.5 million at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

        As of December 31, 2010, LendingTree Loans had two committed lines of credit totaling $150.0 million of borrowing capacity. LendingTree Loans also has a $25.0 million uncommitted line with one of these lenders. Borrowings under these lines of credit are used to fund, and are secured by, consumer residential loans that are held for sale. Loans under these lines of credit are repaid using proceeds from the sales of loans held for sale by LendingTree Loans.

        The $50.0 million first line is scheduled to expire June 29, 2011. This line can be cancelled at the option of the lender without default upon sixty days notice. This first line includes an additional uncommitted credit facility of $25.0 million. This first line is also guaranteed by Tree.com, Inc., LendingTree, LLC and LendingTree Holdings Corp. The interest rate under the first line is 30-day LIBOR or 2.00% (whichever is greater) plus 2.25%. The interest rate under the $25.0 million uncommitted line is 30-day LIBOR plus 1.50%. LendingTree Loans is also required to sell at least 25% of the loans it originates to the lender under this line or pay a "pair-off fee" of 0.25% on the difference between the required and actual volume of loans sold.

E-25


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 7—WAREHOUSE LINES OF CREDIT (Continued)

        The borrowing capacity of the second line was increased from $75.0 million to $100.0 million upon renewal of the line effective October 29, 2010. The expiration date of this line is October 28, 2011. This second line is also guaranteed by Tree.com, Inc., LendingTree, LLC and LendingTree Holdings Corp. The interest rate under this line was decreased from 30-day Adjusted LIBOR or 2.0% (whichever is greater) plus 2.50% to 3.0% prior to renewal, to 30-day Adjusted LIBOR or 2.0% (whichever is greater) plus 2.25% to 2.5% after renewal, for loans being sold to the lender. Additionally, the interest rate for loans not being sold to the lender was decreased from 30-day Adjusted LIBOR or 2.0% (whichever is greater) plus 2.75% prior to renewal, to 30-day Adjusted LIBOR or 2.0% (whichever is greater) plus 2.25% after renewal.

        Under the terms of these warehouse lines, LendingTree Loans is required to maintain various financial and other covenants. These financial covenants include, but are not limited to, maintaining (i) minimum tangible net worth of $25.0 million, (ii) minimum liquidity, (iii) a minimum current ratio, (iv) a maximum ratio of total liabilities to net worth, (v) a maximum leverage ratio, (vi) pre-tax net income requirements and (vii) a maximum warehouse capacity ratio. During the year ended December 31, 2010, LendingTree Loans was in compliance with the covenants under the lines.

        The LendingTree Loans business is highly dependent on the availability of these warehouse lines. Although we believe that our existing lines of credit are adequate for our current operations, reductions in our available credit, or the inability to renew or replace these lines, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Management has determined that it could continue to operate the LendingTree Loans business at a reduced capacity if one, but not both, of the warehouse lines were lost. We intend to renew the lines that are expiring on June 29, 2011 and October 28, 2011.

NOTE 8—SEGMENT INFORMATION

        The overall concept that Tree.com employs in determining its reportable segments and related financial information is to present them in a manner consistent with how the chief operating decision maker and executive management view the Tree.com businesses, how the businesses are organized as to segment management, and the focus of the Tree.com businesses with regards to the types of products or services offered or the target market.

        In connection with exiting the RealEstate.com, REALTORS® business that is discussed in Notes 1, 4 and 9, the Company re-evaluated its reporting segments based on the continuing operations of the Company. In prior periods, the segments "LendingTree Loans", "Exchanges", "Real Estate" and "Unallocated—Corporate" were presented, which have been changed to "LendingTree Loans" and "Exchanges". The "Exchanges" segment now includes the continuing operations of the previous "Real Estate" segment and the previous "Unallocated—Corporate" segment. Segment results for prior periods have been restated to conform to the new presentation.

        During the third quarter of 2010, the Company changed its accounting policy for inter-segment revenue and inter-segment marketing expense between the LendingTree Loans and Exchanges segments. This change only impacts the individual segment results, and does not impact the consolidated financial results of Tree.com.

E-26


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 8—SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

        Marketing expense for the Exchanges is primarily related to the building and maintaining of the Company's core brands, using both online and offline spending, and generates leads not only for the Exchanges but for other segments as well. Previously, marketing expense for LendingTree Loans was primarily comprised of inter-segment purchases of leads from the Exchanges, leveraging the LendingTree and GetSmart brands. The Exchanges received inter-segment revenue for the sale of these leads, and that revenue and the related marketing expense at LendingTree Loans would then be eliminated in consolidation of the total Company results.

        The Company now uses a cost sharing approach for these marketing expenses, whereby LendingTree Loans and the Exchanges now share the marketing expense on a pro rata basis, based on the quantity of leads received by each segment. There is no longer inter-segment revenue or inter-segment marketing expense between these two segments related to these leads. Management believes that this cost sharing approach is preferable because it more closely aligns the overall goals of the Company with the goals of segment management, and may ultimately drive the Company to better performance. Segment reporting results for prior periods have been restated to conform to the new presentation.

        Tree.com's primary performance metrics are EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA excluding (1) non-cash compensation expense, (2) non-cash intangible asset impairment charges, (3) gain/loss on disposal of assets, (4) restructuring expenses, (5) litigation settlements and contingencies, (6) pro forma adjustments for significant acquisitions, and (7) one-time items, which are truly one-time in nature and non-recurring, infrequent or unusual, and have not occurred in the past two years or are not expected to recur in the next two years, in accordance with SEC rules. For the periods presented in this Appendix E, there are no one-time items. These measures are two of the primary metrics by which Tree.com evaluates the performance of its businesses, on which its internal budgets are based and by which management is compensated. Tree.com believes that investors should have access to the same set of tools that it uses in analyzing its results. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have certain limitations in that they do not take into account the impact to Tree.com's statement of operations of certain expenses, as described above. Tree.com endeavors to compensate for the limitations of the non-GAAP measure presented by also providing the comparable GAAP measure with equal or greater prominence and descriptions of the reconciling items, including quantifying such items, to derive the non-GAAP measure.

E-27


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 8—SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

        Summarized information by segment and reconciliation to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA is as follows (in thousands):

 
  For the Year Ended December 31, 2010  
 
  LendingTree
Loans
  Exchanges   Total  

Revenue

  $ 124,180   $ 61,911   $ 186,091  

Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below)

    44,056     5,547     49,603  
               
 

Gross margin

    80,124     56,364     136,488  

Operating expenses:

                   
 

Selling and marketing expense

    22,148     50,452     72,600  
 

General and administrative expense

    24,253     26,234     50,487  
 

Product development

    331     3,652     3,983  
 

Litigation settlements and contingencies

    1,551     521     2,072  
 

Restructuring expense

    (7 )   2,780     2,773  
 

Amortization of intangibles

        2,716     2,716  
 

Depreciation

    1,701     3,759     5,460  
 

Asset impairments

        9,491     9,491  
               
 

Total operating expenses

    49,977     99,605     149,582  
               

Operating income (loss)

    30,147     (43,241 )   (13,094 )

Adjustments to reconcile to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:

                   
 

Amortization of intangibles

        2,716     2,716  
 

Depreciation

    1,701     3,759     5,460  
               

EBITDA from continuing operations

    31,848     (36,766 )   (4,918 )
 

Restructuring expense

    (7 )   2,780     2,773  
 

Asset impairments

        9,491     9,491  
 

Loss on disposal of assets

    56     260     316  
 

Non-cash compensation

    378     3,262     3,640  
 

Litigation settlements and contingencies

    1,551     521     2,072  
 

Post acquisition adjustments

        (928 )   (928 )
               

Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations

  $ 33,826   $ (21,380 ) $ 12,446  
               

Reconciliation to net loss in total:

                   

Operating loss per above

              $ (13,094 )

Other expense, net

                (465 )
                   

Loss before income taxes

                (13,559 )

Income tax provision

                936  
                   

Net loss from continuing operations

                (12,623 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

                (4,962 )
                   

Net loss

              $ (17,585 )
                   

E-28


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 8—SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

 

 
  For the Year Ended December 31, 2009  
 
  LendingTree
Loans
  Exchanges   Total  

Revenue

  $ 117,670   $ 74,910   $ 192,580  

Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below)

    48,998     8,284     57,282  
               
 

Gross margin

    68,672     66,626     135,298  

Operating expenses:

                   
 

Selling and marketing expense

    10,227     48,043     58,270  
 

General and administrative expense

    20,374     36,954     57,328  
 

Product development

    518     4,270     4,788  
 

Litigation settlements and contingencies

    419     12,756     13,175  
 

Restructuring expense

    (1,089 )   2,096     1,007  
 

Amortization of intangibles

    280     4,567     4,847  
 

Depreciation

    2,912     3,325     6,237  
 

Asset impairments

        6,097     6,097  
               
 

Total operating expenses

    33,641     118,108     151,749  
               

Operating income (loss)

    35,031     (51,482 )   (16,451 )

Adjustments to reconcile to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:

                   
 

Amortization of intangibles

    280     4,567     4,847  
 

Depreciation

    2,912     3,325     6,237  
               

EBITDA from continuing operations

    38,223     (43,590 )   (5,367 )
 

Restructuring expense

    (1,089 )   2,096     1,007  
 

Asset impairments

        6,097     6,097  
 

Loss on disposal of assets

    90     1,017     1,107  
 

Non-cash compensation

    245     3,647     3,892  
 

Litigation settlements and contingencies

    419     12,756     13,175  
               

Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations

  $ 37,888   $ (17,977 ) $ 19,911  
               

Reconciliation to net loss in total:

                   

Operating loss per above

              $ (16,451 )

Other expense, net

                (529 )
                   

Loss before income taxes

                (16,980 )

Income tax provision

                368  
                   

Net loss from continuing operations

                (16,612 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

                (7,862 )
                   

Net loss

              $ (24,474 )
                   

E-29


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 8—SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

        Significant components of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows (in thousands):

 
  2010   2009  

LendingTree Loans:

             
 

Origination and sale of loans

  $ 113,425   $ 110,320  
 

Other

    10,755     7,350  
           
   

Total LendingTree Loans

    124,180     117,670  

Exchanges:

             
 

Match fees

    48,682     45,005  
 

Closed loan fees

    9,985     26,855  
 

Other

    3,244     3,050  
           
   

Total Exchanges

    61,911     74,910  
           

Total revenue

  $ 186,091   $ 192,580  
           

        Total assets by segment at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows (in thousands):

 
  2010   2009  

LendingTree Loans

  $ 194,244   $ 167,976  

Exchanges

    78,971     112,058  

Discontinued Operations

    9,587     11,798  
           

Total

  $ 282,802   $ 291,832  
           

        Capital expenditures by segment during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows (in thousands):

 
  2010   2009  

Capital expenditures:

             
 

LendingTree Loans

  $ 1,435   $ 856  
 

Exchanges

    5,528     3,009  
           

Total

  $ 6,963   $ 3,865  
           

NOTE 9—DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

        On March 10, 2011, management of the Company made the decision and finalized a plan to close all of the field offices of the proprietary full service real estate brokerage business known as RealEstate.com, REALTORS®, which was previously reported within the Real Estate reporting segment (see Note 7). The Company exited all markets by March 31, 2011. Accordingly, RealEstate.com, REALTORS® is presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for all periods presented.

E-30


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 9—DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (Continued)

        The revenue and net loss for the aforementioned discontinued operations for the applicable periods were as follows (in thousands):

 
  Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2010   2009  

Revenue

  $ 12,090   $ 24,196  
           

Loss before income taxes

  $ (4,962 ) $ (7,862 )

Income tax provision

         
           

Net loss

  $ (4,962 ) $ (7,862 )
           

        Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2010 includes goodwill disposal charges totaling $1.3 million and restructuring charges totaling $0.7 million. The amount of goodwill allocated to discontinued operations and subsequently disposed of was based on the relative fair values prior to disposition of the business disposed of and the business retained.

        The assets and liabilities of RealEstate.com, REALTORS® reported as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (in thousands):

 
  December 31,
2010
  December 31,
2009
 

Current assets

  $ 219   $ 480  
           

Property and equipment

    1,215     1,861  

Goodwill

    7,967     9,285  

Other non-current assets

    186     172  
           
 

Non-current assets

    9,368     11,318  
           

Current liabilities

    1,031     1,683  

Non-current liabilities

    288     364  
           

Net assets (liabilities)

  $ 8,268   $ 9,751  
           

E-31


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 10—EARNINGS PER SHARE

        The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

 
  2010   2009  
 
  Basic   Diluted   Basic   Diluted  
 
  (In thousands, except per share data)
 

Numerator:

                         

Loss from continuing operations

  $ (12,623 ) $ (12,623 ) $ (16,612 ) $ (16,612 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (4,962 )   (4,962 )   (7,862 )   (7,862 )
                   

Net loss available to common shareholders

  $ (17,585 ) $ (17,585 ) $ (24,474 ) $ (24,474 )
                   

Denominator:

                         

Weighted average common shares

    11,014     11,014     10,536     10,536  
                   

Loss per Share:

                         

Loss from continuing operations

  $ (1.15 ) $ (1.15 ) $ (1.58 ) $ (1.58 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (0.45 )   (0.45 )   (0.74 )   (0.74 )
                   

Net loss per common share

  $ (1.60 ) $ (1.60 ) $ (2.32 ) $ (2.32 )
                   

        Equity awards that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented. See Note 3 for a full description of outstanding equity awards.


Common Stock Repurchases

        On January 11, 2010, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $10 million of Tree.com common stock. During 2010, the Company purchased 810,922 shares of Tree.com common stock for aggregate consideration of $5.7 million. At December 31, 2010, the Company had approximately $4.3 million remaining in its share repurchase authorization.

        In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2010 Tree.com suspended its share repurchase program in lieu of a "Dutch auction" tender offer. The completion of the tender offer was announced on December 23, 2010. During the offer period, which expired on December 17, 2010, Tree.com accepted for purchase 312,339 shares of its common stock at a price of $7.75 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $2.4 million, excluding fees and expenses related to the tender offer.

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

        Tree.com categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the assumptions used in pricing the asset or liability into the following three levels:

E-32


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

        LendingTree Loans enters into commitments with consumers to originate loans at a specified interest rate (interest rate lock commitments—"IRLCs"). Tree.com reports IRLCs as derivative instruments at fair value with changes in fair value being recorded in current earnings as a component of revenue from the origination and sale of loans. IRLCs for loans to be sold to investors using a mandatory or assignment of trade ("AOT") method are hedged using "to be announced mortgage-backed securities" ("TBA MBS") and are valued using quantitative risk models. The IRLCs derive their base value from an underlying loan type with similar characteristics using the TBA MBS market which is actively quoted and easily validated through external sources. The most significant data inputs used in this valuation include, but are not limited to, loan type, underlying loan amount, note rate, loan program, and expected sale date of the loan. IRLCs for loans sold to investors on a best efforts basis are hedged using best efforts forward delivery commitments and are valued on an individual loan basis using a proprietary database program. These valuations are based on investor pricing tables stratified by product, note rate and term. The valuation is adjusted at the loan level to consider the servicing release premium and loan pricing adjustments specific to each loan. The Company applies an anticipated loan funding probability based on its own experience to value IRLCs, which results in the classification of these derivatives as Level 3. The value of the underlying loan and the anticipated loan funding probability are the most significant assumptions affecting the valuation of IRLCs. There were no significant changes to the methods and assumptions for valuing IRLCs in 2010. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, there were $216.6 million and $258.4 million, respectively, of IRLCs notional value outstanding.

        Loans held for sale measured at fair value and sold to investors using a mandatory or AOT method are also hedged using TBA MBS and valued using quantitative risk models. The valuation is based on the loan amount, note rate, loan program, and expected sale date of the loan. Loans held for sale measured at fair value and sold to investors on a best efforts basis are hedged using best efforts forward delivery commitments and are valued using a proprietary database program. The best efforts valuations are based on daily investor pricing tables stratified by product, note rate and term. These valuations are adjusted at the loan level to consider the servicing release premium and loan pricing adjustments specific to each loan. Loans held for sale, excluding impaired loans, are classified as Level 2. Loans held for sale measured at fair value that become impaired are transferred from Level 2 to Level 3, as the estimate of fair value is based on the Company's experience considering equally both lien position and current status of the loan. There were no significant changes to the method and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of impaired loans in 2010. LendingTree Loans recognizes interest income separately from other changes in fair value.

        Under LendingTree Loans' risk management policy, LendingTree Loans economically hedges the changes in fair value of IRLCs and loans held for sale caused by changes in interest rates by using TBA MBS and entering into best efforts forward delivery commitments. These hedging instruments are

E-33


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)


recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in current earnings as a component of revenue from the origination and sale of loans. There were no significant changes to the methods and assumptions for valuing hedging instruments in 2010. TBA MBS used to hedge both IRLCs and loans are valued using quantitative risk models based primarily on inputs related to characteristics of the MBS stratified by product, coupon, and settlement date. These derivatives are classified as Level 2. Best efforts forward delivery commitments are valued using a proprietary database program using investor pricing tables considering the current base loan price. An anticipated loan funding probability is applied to value best efforts commitments hedging IRLCs, which results in the classification of these contracts as Level 3. The current base loan price and the anticipated loan funding probability are the most significant assumptions affecting the value of the best efforts commitments. The best efforts forward delivery commitments hedging loans held for sale are classified as Level 2, so such contracts are transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 at the time the underlying loan is originated. For the purposes of the tables below, we refer to TBA MBS and best efforts forward delivery commitments collectively as "Forward Delivery Contracts".

        The following presents Tree.com's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):

 
  As of December 31, 2010  
 
  Recurring Fair Value Measurements Using  
 
  Quoted Market
Prices in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Total
Fair Value
Measurements
 

Loans held for sale

  $   $ 115,024   $ 884   $ 115,908  

Interest rate lock commitments ("IRLCs")

            5,986     5,986  

Forward delivery contracts

        1,001     3     1,004  
                   

Total

      $ 116,025   $ 6,873   $ 122,898  
                   

 

 
  As of December 31, 2009  
 
  Recurring Fair Value Measurements Using  
 
  Quoted Market
Prices in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Total
Fair Value
Measurements
 

Loans held for sale

  $   $ 91,459   $ 777   $ 92,236  

Interest rate lock commitments ("IRLCs")

            3,680     3,680  

Forward delivery contracts

        2,737     487     3,224  
                   

Total

  $   $ 94,196   $ 4,944   $ 99,140  
                   

E-34


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

        The following presents the changes in Tree.com's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):

 
  Year Ended December 31, 2010  
 
  Interest Rate
Lock
Commitments
  Forward
Delivery
Contracts
  Loans Held
for Sale
 

Balance at January 1, 2010

  $ 3,680   $ 487   $ 777  
 

Transfers into Level 3

            991  
 

Transfers out of Level 3

        (119 )    
 

Total net gains (losses) included in earnings (realized and unrealized)

    107,656     (365 )   (98 )
 

Purchases, sales, and settlements

                   
   

Purchases

             
   

Sales

            (774 )
   

Settlements

    (17,301 )       (12 )
 

Transfers of IRLCs to closed loans

    (88,049 )        
               

Balance at December 31, 2010

  $ 5,986   $ 3   $ 884  
               

 

 
  Year Ended December 31, 2009  
 
  Interest Rate
Lock
Commitments
  Forward
Delivery
Contracts
  Loans
Held
for Sale
 

Balance at January 1, 2009

  $ 5,904   $ (20 ) $ 814  
 

Transfers into Level 3

            1,040  
 

Transfers out of Level 3

        (320 )    
 

Total net gains (losses) included in earnings (realized and unrealized)

    91,712     827     (344 )
 

Purchases, sales, and settlements

                   
   

Purchases

             
   

Sales

            (358 )
   

Settlements

    (38,523 )       (375 )
 

Transfers of IRLCs to closed loans

    (55,413 )        
               

Balance at December 31, 2009

  $ 3,680   $ 487   $ 777  
               

E-35


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

        The following presents the gains included in earnings for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 relating to Tree.com's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in thousands):

 
  Year Ended December 31, 2010  
 
  Interest Rate
Lock
Commitments
  Forward
Delivery
Contracts
  Loans
Held
for Sale
 

Total net gains (losses) included in earnings, which are included in revenue from LendingTree Loans

  $ 107,656   $ (365 ) $ (98 )
               

Change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities still held at December 31, 2010, which are included in revenue from LendingTree Loans

  $ 5,986   $ 3   $ (102 )
               

 

 
  Year Ended December 31, 2009  
 
  Interest Rate
Lock
Commitments
  Forward
Delivery
Contracts
  Loans
Held
for Sale
 

Total net gains (losses) included in earnings, which are included in revenue from LendingTree Loans

  $ 91,712   $ 827   $ (344 )
               

Change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities still held at December 31, 2009, which are included in revenue from LendingTree Loans

  $ 3,680   $ 487   $ (317 )
               

        The following table summarizes the Company's derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):

 
  As of December 31, 2010   As of December 31, 2009  
 
  Balance Sheet Location   Fair Value   Balance Sheet Location   Fair Value  

Interest Rate Lock Commitments

  Prepaid and other current assets   $ 5,991   Prepaid and other current assets   $ 3,919  

Forward Delivery Contracts

  Prepaid and other current assets     2,633   Prepaid and other current assets     3,341  

Interest Rate Lock Commitments

  Accrued expenses and other current liabilities     (5 ) Accrued expenses and other current liabilities     (239 )

Forward Delivery Contracts

  Accrued expenses and other current liabilities     (1,629 ) Accrued expenses and other current liabilities     (117 )
                   

Total Derivatives

      $ 6,990       $ 6,904  
                   

E-36


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

        The gain recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for derivatives for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was as follows (in thousands):

 
  Location of Gain Recognized
in Income on Derivative
  Year Ended
December 31,
2010
  Year Ended
December 31,
2009
 

Interest Rate Lock Commitments

  LendingTree Loans revenue   $ 107,656   $ 91,712  

Forward Delivery Contracts

  LendingTree Loans revenue     (1,970 )   5,070  
               
 

Total

      $ 105,686   $ 96,782  
               

        Tree.com has elected to account for loans held for sale originated on or after January 1, 2008 at fair value. Electing the fair value option allows a better offset of the changes in fair values of the loans and the forward delivery contracts used to economically hedge them without the burden of complying with the requirements for hedge accounting.

        Tree.com did not elect the fair value option on loans held for sale originated prior to January 1, 2008 and on loans that were repurchased from investors on or subsequent to that date. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, 23 and 29 such loans, respectively, all of which were impaired, were included in loans held for sale and were carried at the lower of cost or market ("LOCOM") value assessed on an individual loan basis. The market value (or fair value) of these impaired loans at December 31, 2010 and 2009, measured on a non-recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), was $0.8 million and $1.4 million, respectively. This fair value measurement is management's best estimate of the market value of such loans and considers the lien position and loan status.

        The following presents the difference between the aggregate principal balance of loans held for sale for which the fair value option has been elected and for loans measured at LOCOM as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):

 
  As of December 31, 2010  
 
  Loans Held for
Sale—Measured
at Fair Value
  Loans Held for
Sale—Measured
at LOCOM
  Total Loans
Held For Sale
 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance

  $ 113,116   $ 2,290   $ 115,406  

Difference between fair value and aggregate unpaid principal balance

    2,792         2,792  

Lower of cost or market valuation allowance

        (1,508 )   (1,508 )

Deferred loan fees, net of costs

        (9 )   (9 )
               

Loans held for sale

  $ 115,908   $ 773   $ 116,681  
               

E-37


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

 

 
  As of December 31, 2009  
 
  Loans Held for
Sale—Measured
at Fair Value
  Loans Held for
Sale—Measured
at LOCOM
  Total Loans
Held For Sale
 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance

  $ 91,824   $ 3,217   $ 95,041  

Difference between fair value and aggregate unpaid principal balance

    412         412  

Lower of cost or market valuation allowance

        (1,848 )   (1,848 )

Deferred loan fees, net of costs

        (9 )   (9 )
               

Loans held for sale

  $ 92,236   $ 1,360   $ 93,596  
               

        During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the change in fair value of loans held for sale for which the fair value option has been elected was a gain of $4.8 million and a loss of $0.3 million, respectively, and are included as a component of LendingTree Loans revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.


Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

        The Company's non-financial assets, such as goodwill, intangible assets and property and equipment are measured at fair value when there is an indicator of impairment and recorded at fair value only when an impairment charge is recognized. Such impairment charges incorporate fair value measurements based on Level 3 inputs. See Note 4 for discussion of goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges.

        Real estate properties acquired in satisfaction of loans totaled $0.1 million and $0.9 million, net of estimated selling expenses, at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The estimated fair values are determined using current real estate market conditions and estimated selling expenses, which are unobservable inputs (Level 3).

        The following disclosures represent financial instruments in which the ending balances at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are not carried at fair value in their entirety on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The additional disclosure below of the estimated fair value of financial instruments has been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessarily required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies may have a material impact on the estimated fair value amounts. The Company's financial instruments also include letters of credit and surety bonds, for which the Company had $5.0 million in restricted cash at December 31, 2010 and 2009 as collateral for the surety bonds. These commitments remain in place to facilitate the commercial operations of certain Tree.com subsidiaries.

E-38


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 11—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

 
  December 31, 2010   December 31, 2009  
 
  Carrying
Amount
  Fair
Value
  Carrying
Amount
  Fair
Value
 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 68,819   $ 68,819   $ 86,093   $ 86,093  

Restricted cash and cash equivalents

    10,549     10,549     11,590     11,590  

Accounts receivable, net

    4,264     4,264     6,791     6,791  

Loans held for sale, net

    116,681     116,681     93,596     93,596  

Warehouse lines of credit

    (100,623 )   (100,623 )   (78,481 )   (78,481 )

Accounts payable

    (7,042 )   (7,042 )   (5,470 )   (5,470 )

Accrued expenses

    (38,739 )   (38,739 )   (53,446 )   (53,446 )

Surety bonds and letters of credit

    N/A     (13,497 )   N/A     (10,222 )

        The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets approximate fair value as they are maintained with various high-quality financial institutions or in short-term duration high-quality debt securities. Accounts receivable, net, are short-term in nature and are generally settled shortly after the sale, and therefore the carrying amount approximates fair value. The fair value of loans held for sale, net, was estimated using current secondary market prices for underlying loans with similar coupons, maturity and credit quality. The carrying amounts for the remaining warehouse lines of credit and all other financial instruments approximate their fair value.

NOTE 12—ORIGINATION AND SALE OF LOANS, LOANS HELD FOR SALE AND LOAN LOSS OBLIGATIONS

Origination and Sale of Loans

        LendingTree Loans' revenues are primarily derived from the origination and sale of loans. Mortgage loans are funded through warehouse lines of credit and are recorded at fair value. Changes in the fair value of mortgage loans are recorded through revenue prior to the sale of the loans to investors, which typically occurs within thirty days. The gain or loss on the sale of loans is recognized on the date the loans are sold and is based on the difference between the sale proceeds received and the fair value of the loans. The Company sells its loans on a servicing released basis in which the Company gives up the right to service the loans.

        A summary of the initial unpaid principal balance of loans sold by type of loan for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is presented below ($ amounts in millions):

 
  Years Ended December 31,  
 
  2010   2009  
 
  Amount   %   Amount   %  

Conforming

  $ 2,130     77 % $ 2,375     83 %

FHA and Alt-A

    499     18 %   430     15 %

Jumbo

    141     5 %   41     2 %

Home equity

                 
                   

Total

  $ 2,770     100 % $ 2,846     100 %
                   

E-39


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 12—ORIGINATION AND SALE OF LOANS, LOANS HELD FOR SALE AND LOAN LOSS OBLIGATIONS (Continued)

Loans Held for Sale

        LendingTree Loans originates all of its residential real estate loans with the intent to sell them in the secondary market. Loans held for sale consist primarily of residential first mortgage loans that are secured by residential real estate throughout the United States.

        The following table represents the loans held for sale by type of loan as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 ($ amounts in thousands):

 
  As of
December 31,
2010
  As of
December 31,
2009
 
 
  Amount   %   Amount   %  

Conforming

  $ 86,451     74 % $ 72,670     77 %

FHA and Alt-A

    20,431     18 %   16,596     18 %

Jumbo

    9,129     8 %   3,486     4 %

Subprime

    580     %   720     1 %

Home equity

    90     %   124     %
                   

Total

  $ 116,681     100 % $ 93,596     100 %
                   

        The following presents the difference between the aggregate principal balance of loans on nonaccrual status for which the fair value option has been elected and for loans measured at lower of cost or market as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):

 
  As of December 31, 2010  
 
  Loans on
Nonaccrual—
Measured at
Fair Value
  Loans on
Nonaccrual—
Measured at
LOCOM
  Total Loans on
Nonaccrual
 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance

  $ 1,380   $ 2,290   $ 3,670  

Difference between fair value and aggregate unpaid principal balance

    (496 )       (496 )

Lower of cost or market valuation allowance

        (1,508 )   (1,508 )

Deferred loan fees, net of costs

        (9 )   (9 )
               

Loans on nonaccrual

  $ 884   $ 773   $ 1,657  
               

E-40


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 12—ORIGINATION AND SALE OF LOANS, LOANS HELD FOR SALE AND LOAN LOSS OBLIGATIONS (Continued)

 

 
  As of December 31, 2009  
 
  Loans on
Nonaccrual—
Measured at
Fair Value
  Loans on
Nonaccrual—
Measured at
LOCOM
  Total Loans on
Nonaccrual
 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance

  $ 1,303   $ 3,217   $ 4,520  

Difference between fair value and aggregate unpaid principal balance

    (526 )       (526 )

Lower of cost or market valuation allowance

        (1,848 )   (1,848 )

Deferred loan fees, net of costs

        (9 )   (9 )
               

Loans on nonaccrual

  $ 777   $ 1,360   $ 2,137  
               

        Included within the loans on nonaccrual status are repurchased loans with a net book value of $0.2 million and $0.7 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2010, LendingTree repurchased one loan with a balance of $0.3 million. During the year ended December 31, 2009 LendingTree Loans repurchased one loan with an unpaid principal balance of $0.1 million.

        Real estate properties acquired in satisfaction of loans totaled $0.1 million and $0.9 million, net of estimated selling expenses, at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and are included in prepaid and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.


Loan Loss Obligations

        LendingTree Loans sells loans it originates to investors on a servicing released basis and the risk of loss or default by the borrower is generally transferred to the investor. However, LendingTree Loans is required by these investors to make certain representations relating to credit information, loan documentation and collateral. These representations and warranties may extend through the contractual life of the mortgage loan. Subsequent to the sale, if underwriting deficiencies, borrower fraud or documentation defects are discovered in individual mortgage loans, LendingTree Loans may be obligated to repurchase the respective mortgage loan or indemnify the investors for any losses from borrower defaults if such deficiency or defect cannot be cured within the specified period following discovery.

        In the case of early loan payoffs and early defaults on certain loans, LendingTree Loans may be required to repay all or a portion of the premium initially paid by the investor. The estimated obligation associated with early loan payoffs and early defaults is calculated based on historical loss experience by type of loan.

        The obligation for losses related to the representations and warranties and other provisions discussed above is initially recorded at its estimated fair value, which includes a projection of expected future losses as well as a market based premium. Because LendingTree Loans does not service the loans it sells, it does not maintain nor have access to the current balances and loan performance data with respect to the individual loans previously sold to investors. Accordingly, the Company is unable to determine, with precision, its maximum exposure under its representations and warranties. However,

E-41


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 12—ORIGINATION AND SALE OF LOANS, LOANS HELD FOR SALE AND LOAN LOSS OBLIGATIONS (Continued)


LendingTree Loans utilizes the original loan balance (before it was sold to an investor), historical and projected loss frequency and loss severity ratios by loan segment as well as analyses of losses in process to estimate its exposure to losses on loans previously sold. The Company maintains a liability related to this exposure based, in part, on historical and projected loss frequency and loss severity using its loan loss history (adjusted for recent trends in loan loss experience), the original principal amount of the loans previously sold, the year the loans were sold, and loan type. Accordingly, subsequent adjustments to the obligation, if any, are not made based on changes in the fair value of the obligation, which might include an estimated change in losses that may be expected in the future, but are made once further losses are estimated to be both probable and estimable. As such, given current general industry trends in mortgage loans as well as housing prices, market expectations around losses related to the Company's obligations could vary significantly from the obligation recorded as of the balance sheet date or the range estimated below. In estimating its exposure to loan losses, LendingTree Loans segments its loan sales into four segments based on the extent of the documentation provided by the borrower to substantiate income and/or assets (full or limited documentation) and the lien position of the mortgage in the underling property (first or second position). Each of these segments has a different loss experience with full documentation, first lien position loans generally having the lowest loss ratios and limited documentation, second lien position loans generally having the highest loss ratios.

        The following table represents the loans sold for the period shown and the aggregate loan losses as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:

 
  As of December 31, 2010  
Period of Loan Sales
  Number
of loans
sold
  Original
principal
balance
  Number of
loans with
losses
  Original
principal
balance of
loans with
losses
  Amount of
aggregate
losses
 
 
   
  (in billions)
   
  (in millions)
  (in millions)
 

2010

    12,400   $ 2.8     1   $ 0.4   $ 0.1  

2009

    12,800     2.8     3     0.8     0.1  

2008

    11,000     2.2     20     4.1     0.9  

2007

    36,300     6.1     149     20.2     7.0  

2006

    55,000     7.9     202     23.4     12.7  

2005 and prior years

    86,700     13.0     87     11.7     4.7  
                       

Total

    214,200   $ 34.8     462   $ 60.6   $ 25.5  
                       

E-42


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 12—ORIGINATION AND SALE OF LOANS, LOANS HELD FOR SALE AND LOAN LOSS OBLIGATIONS (Continued)

 

 
  As of December 31, 2009  
Period of Loan Sales
  Number
of loans
sold
  Original
principal
balance
  Number of
loans with
losses
  Original
principal
balance of
loans with
losses
  Amount of
aggregate
losses
 
 
   
  (in billions)
   
  (in millions)
  (in millions)
 

2009

    12,800   $ 2.8       $   $  

2008

    11,000     2.2     12     2.4     0.3  

2007

    36,300     6.1     120     14.7     4.4  

2006

    55,000     7.9     162     18.1     9.4  

2005 and prior years

    86,700     13.0     80     10.5     4.0  
                       

Total

    201,800   $ 32.0     374   $ 45.7   $ 18.1  
                       

        The pipeline of 65 loan repurchase requests and indemnifications as of December 31, 2010 was considered in determining the appropriate reserve amount. The status of these 65 loans varied from an initial review stage, which may result in a rescission of the request, to in process, where the probability of incurring a loss is high, to indemnification, whereby the Company has agreed to reimburse the purchaser of that loan if and when losses are incurred. The indemnification may have a specific term, thereby limiting the Company's exposure. The original principal amount of these loans is approximately $11.7 million, comprised of approximately 75% full documentation first liens, 4% full documentation second liens, 14% low documentation first liens, and 7% low documentation second liens.

        In the fourth quarter of 2009, LendingTree Loans entered into settlement negotiations with two buyers of previously purchased limited documentation loans. The settlement with one buyer was completed in December 2009 and included a payment of $1.9 million related to all second lien loans sold to this buyer, including both full and limited documentation. This amount was not determined on an individual loan basis and is, therefore, not included in the loss amounts disclosed above based on the year such loans were sold. The settlement was included as a charge off to the reserve in 2009. Negotiations with the second buyer were completed in January 2010. This settlement of $4.5 million, which was paid in four equal quarterly installments in 2010, relates to all future losses on limited documentation second lien loans sold to this buyer. LendingTree Loans accrued an additional loss amount of $0.3 million in conjunction with this settlement since it did not sell a certain volume of loans to this buyer in 2010. This amount is included in the total settlement amount and the estimated settlement payments remaining to be paid. This settlement amount is included as a charge off to the reserve in 2010 and is not included in the table above.

        Based on historical experience, it is anticipated that the Company will continue to receive repurchase requests and incur losses on loans sold in prior years. However, the two settlements discussed above will eliminate future repurchase requests from those buyers for the loan types included in those settlements. As of December 31, 2010 LendingTree Loans estimated the range of remaining possible losses due to representations and warranty issues based on the methodology described above, excluding the $0.3 million settlement remaining to be paid in 2011, as $12 million to $21 million. The Company believes that it has adequately reserved for these losses.

E-43


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 12—ORIGINATION AND SALE OF LOANS, LOANS HELD FOR SALE AND LOAN LOSS OBLIGATIONS (Continued)

        The activity related to loss reserves on previously sold loans for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, is as follows (in thousands):

 
  Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2010   2009  

Balance, beginning of year

  $ 16,985   $ 10,451  

Provisions

    12,390     16,420  

Charge offs to reserves(a)

    (12,391 )   (9,886 )
           

Balance, end of year

  $ 16,984   $ 16,985  
           

(a)
The year ended December 31, 2010 includes a charge off for the amount of the $4.5 million loan loss settlement plus the $0.3 million additional accrual discussed above. The remaining settlement payment due of $0.3 million is tracked as a liability separate from the loan loss reserve (see table below).

        Based on an analysis of the Company's historical loan loss experience, it has been determined that a portion of the loan losses expected to be made by investors will be made more than twelve months following the initial sale of the underlying loan. Accordingly, the Company has estimated the portion of its Loans Sold Reserve that it anticipates it will be liable for after twelve months and has classified that portion of the reserve as a long-term liability. The liability for losses on previously sold loans is presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 as follows (in thousands):

 
  As of
December 31,
2010
  As of
December 31,
2009
 

Current portion related to settlement above, included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  $ 300   $ 4,500  

Other current portion, included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities

    5,459     6,115  

Long term portion, included in other long-term liabilities

    11,525     6,370  
           

Total

  $ 17,284   $ 16,985  
           

E-44


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 13—INCOME TAXES

        The components of the income tax provision (benefit) are as follows (in thousands):

 
  Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2010   2009  

Current income tax provision:

             

Federal

  $ 6   $ (269 )

State

    328   $ 283  
           

Current income tax provision

    334     14  
           

Deferred income tax benefit:

             

Federal

    (1,099 )   (323 )

State

    (171 )   (59 )
           

Deferred income tax benefit

    (1,270 )   (382 )
           

Income tax benefit

  $ (936 ) $ (368 )
           

        The tax effects of cumulative temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are presented below (in thousands). The valuation allowance is related to items for which it is more likely than not that the tax benefit will not be realized.

 
  December 31,  
 
  2010   2009  

Deferred tax assets:

             

Provision for accrued expenses

  $ 10,487   $ 15,107  

Net operating loss carryforwards

    21,636     14,787  

Goodwill

    14,879     15,069  

Intangible and other assets

    4,843      

Other

    3,170     2,841  
           

Total deferred tax assets

    55,015     47,804  

Less valuation allowance

    (52,285 )   (46,858 )
           

Net deferred tax assets

    2,730     946  
           

Deferred tax liabilities:

             

Intangible and other assets

    (15,182 )   (13,109 )

Other

    (3,868 )   (5,428 )
           

Total deferred tax liabilities

    (19,050 )   (18,537 )
           

Net deferred tax liability

  $ (16,320 ) $ (17,591 )
           

E-45


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 13—INCOME TAXES (Continued)

        Deferred income taxes are presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as follows (in thousands):

 
  December 31,  
 
  2010   2009  

Deferred tax assets

  $   $  

Deferred tax liabilities

    (16,320 )   (17,591 )
           

Net deferred taxes

  $ (16,320 ) $ (17,591 )
           

        At December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Tree.com had consolidated federal net operating losses ("NOLs") of $27.4 million and $12.7 million, respectively. In addition, Tree.com had separate state NOLs of $245 million that will expire at various times between 2011 and 2030.

        During 2010, the valuation allowance increased by $5.3 million, primarily due to increased net operating losses resulting in deferred tax assets requiring a valuation allowance. At December 31, 2010, Tree.com had a valuation allowance of $52.3 million related to the portion of tax operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the tax benefit will not be realized.

        A reconciliation of total income tax provision to the amounts computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest is shown as follows (in thousands):

 
  Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2010   2009  

Income tax benefit at the federal statutory rate of 35%

  $ (4,746 ) $ (5,859 )

State income taxes, net of effect of federal tax benefit

    (761 )   125  

Non-deductible non-cash compensation expense

    245     210  

Impairment of non-deductible goodwill and intangible assets

    461      

Change in valuation allowance

    3,541     5,346  

Other, net

    324     (190 )
           

Income tax benefit

  $ (936 ) $ (368 )
           

        A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest, is as follows (in thousands):

 
  Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2010   2009  

Balance, beginning of the period

  $ 991   $ 2,211  

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

        150  

Deductions based on tax positions related to the current year

    (599 )    

Reductions for tax positions of prior years

        (1,032 )

Lapse of statute of limitations

    (326 )   (338 )
           

Balance, end of the period

  $ 66   $ 991  
           

E-46


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 13—INCOME TAXES (Continued)

        As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the unrecognized tax benefits, including interest, were $0.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively. The 2009 unrecognized beginning tax benefit included approximately $1.0 million for tax positions included in IAC's consolidated tax return filings. In 2010, unrecognized tax benefits decreased due to lapse of statute of limitations. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate is approximately $0.05 million.

        Tree.com recognizes interest and, if applicable, penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. Included in income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is $0.01 million and $0.07 million, respectively for interest on unrecognized tax benefits. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, Tree.com has accrued $0.01 million and $0.07 million for the payment of interest, respectively. There are no material accruals for penalties.

        Tree.com believes that it is reasonably possible that its unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by approximately $0.1 million within twelve months of the current reporting. This amount may be recognized in the next twelve months due to the expiration of the statute of limitations which could impact the effective tax rate.

        Tree.com is subject to audits by federal, state and local authorities in the area of income tax. These audits include questioning the timing and the amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. Income taxes payable include amounts considered sufficient to pay assessments that may result from examination of prior year returns; however, the amount paid upon resolution of issues raised may differ from the amount provided. Differences between the reserves for tax contingencies and the amounts owed by Tree.com are recorded in the period they become known.

        The Internal Revenue Service is currently examining IAC consolidated tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2001 through 2006. The statute of limitations for these years has been extended to December 31, 2011, and is expected to be extended further. Various state, local and foreign jurisdictions are currently under examination, the most significant of which are California, New York, and New York City for various tax years beginning with December 31, 2003.

        The North Carolina Department of Revenue ("NCDOR") is currently examining the Company's North Carolina corporate income and franchise tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2006 through 2008, and issued preliminary audit reports to the Company in January 2011. The Company has until March 17, 2011 to respond to the NCDOR regarding the preliminary audit reports. The Company has evaluated this matter as a potential loss contingency, and has determined that it is reasonably possible that a loss could be incurred. The range of a possible loss is estimated to be $-0- to $4.0 million. No reserve has been established for this matter as the Company has determined that the likelihood of a loss is not probable.

E-47


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 14—SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

        Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:

 
  Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2010   2009  

Transfer from loans held for sale to prepaid and other current assets

  $ 195   $ 393  

Equipment acquired through capital lease

    89      

Cash paid during the period for:

             

Interest(a)

  $ 2,520   $ 1,264  

Income tax payments

    638     309  

Income tax refunds

    26     6  

(a)
Includes interest expense related to borrowings under warehouse lines of credit. This expense is netted with interest income earned on loans held for sale, both of which are included in revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

NOTE 15—COMMITMENTS

        The Company leases office space, equipment and services used in connection with its operations under various operating leases, many of which contain escalation clauses.

        Future minimum payments under operating lease agreements are as follows (in thousands):

Years Ending December 31,
  Amount  

2011

  $ 2,658  

2012

    2,743  

2013

    3,063  

2014

    3,112  

2015

    951  
       
 

Total

  $ 12,527  
       

        The Company also subleases certain office space to third parties. The total amount of minimum rentals to be received in the future under non-cancelable subleases is $0.4 million as of December 31, 2010.

        Expenses charged to operations under these agreements were $2.5 million and $3.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and are included in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

E-48


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 15—COMMITMENTS (Continued)

        The Company also has funding commitments that could potentially require its performance in the event of demands by third parties or contingent events, such as under letters of credit extended or under guarantees of debt, as follows (in thousands):

 
  Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period  
 
  Total
Amounts
Committed
  Less Than
1 year
  1 - 3 years   3 - 5 years   More Than
5 years
 

Surety bonds

  $ 13,497   $ 13,497   $   $   $  

Purchase obligations

    296     296              
                       
 

Total commercial commitments

  $ 13,793   $ 13,793   $   $   $  
                       

        The total commercial commitments above primarily consist of surety bonds relating to guarantees with mortgage brokers. The purchase obligations primarily relate to marketing event contracts in 2011.

        In conducting its operations, Home Loan Center, Inc., through its wholly-owned subsidiary, HLC Escrow and HLC Settlement Services, Inc., routinely holds customers' assets in escrow pending completion of real estate financing transactions. These amounts are maintained in segregated bank accounts and are offset with the related liabilities resulting in no amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The balances held for LendingTree Loans' customers totaled $2.4 million and $1.3 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

NOTE 16—CONTINGENCIES

        During 2010 and 2009, provisions for litigation settlements of $2.1 million and $13.2 million, respectively, were recorded in litigation settlements and contingencies in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The balance of the related liability was $0.5 million and $12.8 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The litigation matters were either settled, or a firm offer for settlement was extended by the Company, thereby establishing an accrual amount that is both probable and reasonably estimable. The $12.8 million liability at December 31, 2009 was paid in 2010.

        In the ordinary course of business, Tree.com is a party to various lawsuits. Tree.com establishes reserves for specific legal matters when it determines that the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is probable and the loss is reasonably estimable. Management has also identified certain other legal matters where it believes an unfavorable outcome is not probable and, therefore, no reserve is established. Although management currently believes that an unfavorable resolution of claims against Tree.com, including claims where an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible, will not have a material impact on the liquidity, results of operations, or financial condition of Tree.com, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and management's view of these matters may change in the future. It is possible that an unfavorable outcome of one or more of these lawsuits could have a material impact on the liquidity, results of operations, or financial condition of Tree.com. Tree.com also evaluates other contingent matters, including tax contingencies, to assess the probability and estimated extent of potential loss. See Note 12 for a discussion related to income and franchise tax contingencies.

E-49


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 17—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

        In connection with the spin-off, the Chairman and CEO was granted 5,000 shares of Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Preferred Stock"), of LendingTree Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company . The Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share and cumulative cash dividends accrue on the Preferred Stock at the rate of 12% of the liquidation preference per share per year and unpaid dividends compound at a rate per annum equal to the dividend rate.

        On August 30, 2010, the Company entered into and consummated a Share Exchange Agreement (the "Share Exchange Agreement") with the Chairman and CEO. Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, he exchanged 2,902.33 currently outstanding shares of Preferred Stock owned by him, together with $1.1 million in accrued and unpaid dividends in respect of such shares, for a total of 534,900 newly-issued shares of Tree.com common stock. The value of the Common Stock issued pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement was approximately $4.0 million and was determined based on the closing price on the NASDAQ Global Market on the trading day preceding the closing of the exchange.

        During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, $1.7 million and $1.7 million, respectively, was recognized as cash compensation expense, and $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, was recognized as interest expense related to accreting the preferred stock to its redemption value. The related liability is required to be settled in cash in 2013 for $3.1 million.

        In February 2009, the Chairman and CEO purchased 935,000 newly issued shares of unregistered restricted common stock from the Company at $3.91 per share, based on the February 6, 2009 closing share price.

        For purposes of governing certain of the ongoing relationships between Tree.com and IAC at and after the spin-off, and to provide for an orderly transition, Tree.com and IAC entered into a separation agreement, a tax sharing agreement, an employee matters agreement and a transition services agreement (the "Spin-Off Agreements"), among other agreements.

NOTE 18—BENEFIT PLANS

        Effective January 1, 2009, Tree.com established a retirement savings plan in the United States that pending approval, will be qualified under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The net assets available for benefits of the employees of Tree.com were transferred from the IAC plan described below to the newly created Tree.com plan. Employees are eligible to enroll in the plan upon date of hire. Participating employees may contribute up to 50% of their pretax earnings, but not more than statutory limits (generally $16,500 for 2010). Tree.com's match is fifty cents for each dollar a participant contributes to the plan, with a maximum contribution of 3% of a participant's eligible earnings. Matching contributions are invested in the same manner as each participant's voluntary contributions in the investment options provided under the plan. Tree.com stock is not included in the available investment options or the plan assets. Funds contributed to the Tree.com plan vest according to the participant's years of service, with less than three years of service vesting at 0%, and three years or more of service vesting at 100%. Matching contributions were approximately $0.9 million and $1.0 million for the years ending December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

E-50


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 19—RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

        The restructuring charges in 2010 primarily relate to continuing lease obligations on facilities previously used for call center operations, for which management had a plan to exit at December 31, 2009, but the cease-use date did not occur until January 2010. The restructuring charges in 2009 primarily relate to Tree.com's segment reorganizations and aligning the cost structure with future revenue opportunities. Costs that relate to ongoing operations are not part of restructuring charges. Restructuring charges by segment and type are as follows (in thousands):

 
  For The Year Ended December 31, 2010  
 
  Employee
Termination
Costs
  Continuing
Lease
Obligations
  Asset
Write-offs
  Other   Total  

LendingTree Loans

  $   $ (5 ) $ (2 ) $   $ (7 )

Exchanges

    203     2,484     93         2,780  
                       

Total

  $ 203   $ 2,479   $ 91   $   $ 2,773  
                       

 

 
  For The Year Ended December 31, 2009  
 
  Employee
Termination
Costs
  Continuing
Lease
Obligations
  Asset
Write-offs
  Other   Total  

LendingTree Loans

  $ 239   $ (1,272 ) $ (56 ) $   $ (1,089 )

Exchanges

    1,598     (49 )   547         2,096  
                       

Total

  $ 1,837   $ (1,321 ) $ 491   $   $ 1,007  
                       

        Restructuring charges and spending against liabilities are as follows (in thousands):

 
  For The Year Ended December 31, 2010  
 
  Employee
Termination
Costs
  Continuing
Lease
Obligations
  Asset
Write-offs
  Other   Total  

Balance, beginning of period

  $ 1,442   $ 641   $   $   $ 2,083  
 

Restructuring charges

    203     2,479     91         2,773  
 

Payments

    (1,625 )   (1,023 )   2         (2,646 )
 

Write-offs

        242     (93 )       149  
                       

Balance, end of period

  $ 20   $ 2,339   $   $   $ 2,359  
                       

 

 
  For The Year Ended December 31, 2009  
 
  Employee
Termination
Costs
  Continuing
Lease
Obligations
  Asset
Write-offs
  Other   Total  

Balance, beginning of period

  $ 381   $ 3,703   $   $   $ 4,084  
 

Restructuring charges

    1,837     (1,320 )   490         1,007  
 

Payments

    (776 )   (1,742 )   56         (2,462 )
 

Write-offs

            (546 )       (546 )
                       

Balance, end of period

  $ 1,442   $ 641   $   $   $ 2,083  
                       

        At December 31, 2010, restructuring liabilities of $1.2 million are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and $1.2 million are included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying

E-51


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 19—RESTRUCTURING CHARGES (Continued)


consolidated balance sheet. At December 31, 2009, restructuring liabilities of $1.6 million are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and $0.5 million are included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Tree.com does not expect to incur significant additional costs related to the prior restructurings noted above.

NOTE 20—QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)

 
  Quarter Ended
March 31,
  Quarter Ended
June 30,(a)
  Quarter Ended
September 30,
  Quarter Ended
December 31,(b)
 
 
  (In thousands, except per share amounts)
 

Year Ended December 31, 2010

                         

Revenue

  $ 44,724   $ 41,766   $ 50,411   $ 49,190  

Gross margin

    32,976     31,219     37,874     34,419  

Operating income/(loss)

    (4,165 )   268     2,668     (11,865 )

Net income/(loss) from continuing operations

    (4,867 )   (163 )   2,565     (10,158 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (1,279 )   (636 )   (746 )   (2,301 )

Net income/(loss) available to common shareholders

    (6,146 )   (799 )   1,819     (12,459 )

Income/(loss) per share from continuing operations:

                         

Basic earnings/(loss) per share

  $ (0.44 ) $ (0.01 ) $ 0.23   $ (0.92 )

Diluted earnings/(loss) per share

  $ (0.44 ) $ (0.01 ) $ 0.23   $ (0.92 )

Income/(loss) per share available to common shareholders:

                         

Basic earnings/(loss) per share

  $ (0.56 ) $ (0.07 ) $ 0.16   $ (1.12 )

Diluted earnings/(loss) per share

  $ (0.56 ) $ (0.07 ) $ 0.16   $ (1.12 )

Year Ended December 31, 2009

                         

Revenue

  $ 52,786   $ 54,302   $ 43,769   $ 41,723  

Gross margin

    38,321     37,626     29,993     29,358  

Operating income/(loss)

    7,365     2,555     (6,187 )   (20,184 )

Net income/(loss) from continuing operations

    7,344     2,046     (6,146 )   (19,856 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (4,184 )   (1,304 )   (1,254 )   (1,120 )

Net income/(loss) available to common shareholders

    3,160     742     (7,400 )   (20,976 )

Income/(loss) per share from continuing operations:

                         

Basic earnings/(loss) per share

  $ 0.76   $ 0.19   $ (0.57 ) $ (1.82 )

Diluted earnings/(loss) per share

  $ 0.75   $ 0.19   $ (0.57 ) $ (1.82 )

Income/(loss) per share available to common shareholders:

                         

Basic earnings/(loss) per share

  $ 0.33   $ 0.07   $ (0.68 ) $ (1.92 )

Diluted earnings/(loss) per share

  $ 0.32   $ 0.07   $ (0.68 ) $ (1.92 )

(a)
The second quarter of 2009 includes an impairment charge of $3.9 million related to the write-down of definite-lived intangible assets.

(b)
The fourth quarter of 2010 includes an impairment charge of $9.5 million related to the write-down of definite-lived intangible assets. The fourth quarter of 2009 includes a litigation settlement, a contingencies charge of $12.8 million, and a $2.2 million charge related to the impairment of trademarks.

E-52


Table of Contents


Schedule II

TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Description
  Balance at
Beginning of
Period
  Charges to
Earnings
  Charges to
Other
Accounts
  Deductions   Balance at
End of Period
 
 
  (In thousands)
 

2010

                               

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  $ 518   $ 10   $   $ (315 )(b) $ 213  

Deferred tax valuation allowance

    46,858     5,270 (a)   157         52,285  

Reserve for losses on previously sold loans

    16,985     12,390         (12,391 )   16,984  

2009

                               

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  $ 367   $ 422   $   $ (271 )(b) $ 518  

Deferred tax valuation allowance

    62,062     (15,204 )(a)           46,858  

Reserve for losses on previously sold loans

    10,451     16,420         (9,886 )   16,985  

(a)
Amount is primarily related to Tree.com net operating losses and other deferred tax assets including accrued expenses and goodwill which impacted the income tax provision.

(b)
Write-off of uncollectible accounts receivable.

E-53


Table of Contents

APPENDIX F
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2011

Management Overview

        Tree.com is the parent of LendingTree, LLC which owns several brands and businesses that provide information, tools, advice, products and services for critical transactions in our customers' lives. Our family of brands includes: LendingTree.com®, GetSmart.com®, RealEstate.com®, DegreeTree.comSM, HealthTree.comSM, LendingTreeAutos.com, DoneRight.com®, and InsuranceTree.comSM. Together, these brands serve as an ally for consumers who are looking to comparison shop for loans, real estate and other services from multiple businesses and professionals who will compete for their business.

        On March 10, 2011, management of the Company made the decision and finalized a plan to close all of the field offices of the proprietary full service real estate brokerage business known as RealEstate.com, REALTORS®, which was previously reported within the Real Estate reporting segment. The Company exited all markets by March 31, 2011. Accordingly, RealEstate.com, REALTORS® are presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. The following discussion, unless otherwise noted, excludes information related to the discontinued operations.

        In connection with exiting the RealEstate.com, REALTORS® business that is discussed above, the Company re-evaluated its reporting segments based on the continuing operations of the Company. In prior periods, the segments "LendingTree Loans", "Exchanges", "Real Estate" and "Unallocated-Corporate" were presented, which have been changed to "LendingTree Loans" and "Exchanges". The "Exchanges" segment now includes the continuing operations of the previous "Real Estate" segment and the previous "Unallocated—Corporate" segment. Segment results for prior periods have been restated to conform to the new presentation.

        The LendingTree Loans segment originates, processes, approves and funds various residential real estate loans through Home Loan Center, Inc. dba LendingTree Loans ("HLC"). The HLC and LendingTree Loans brand names are collectively referred to in this Appendix F as "LendingTree Loans."

        The Exchanges segment consists of online lead generation networks and call centers that connect consumers and service providers principally in the lending, real estate, higher education, home services, insurance and automobile marketplaces.

        From time to time, we may evaluate the potential acquisition of various assets and other businesses that may complement our current services, enhance our capabilities, improve or sustain our competitive position, or otherwise offer growth opportunities. From time to time, also we may consider the potential disposition of certain of our assets, subsidiaries or lines of businesses. As a general rule, we publicly announce any material acquisitions or dispositions when a definitive agreement has been reached.

        Interest rate and market risk can be substantial in the mortgage business. Fluctuations in interest rates drive consumer demand for new mortgages and the level of refinancing activity, which in turn affects total revenue from the origination and sale of loans. Typically, a decline in mortgage interest rates will lead to an increase in mortgage originations and revenue, and an increase in mortgage interest rates will lead to a decrease in mortgage originations and revenue.

F-1


Table of Contents

        Mortgage rates hit a recent low of 4.2% in November 2010, but swiftly increased to 5.0% by year-end. Consequently, mortgage applications dropped off significantly at the end of 2010 and in the first quarter of 2011. Most economic forecasts also predict an increase in mortgage rates of another 0.50% throughout 2011.

        The operations, cash flows and financial position of the Company were negatively impacted by the continued deterioration in the housing market in 2010 and early 2011. In particular, revenues for the LendingTree Loans and Exchange segments have been impacted by falling home prices and increased foreclosures. While nationwide sales of existing homes have risen in recent months, most of the increase is due to a rise in foreclosure sales and distressed transactions. Overall home prices continued to decline during 2010 and most economic forecasts indicate that conditions are unlikely to improve significantly in 2011. Falling home prices also make it more difficult to make accurate home value appraisals and lenders typically require higher down payments and higher credit scores, which could further restrict the pool of prospective homebuyers.

        As revenues have declined, the Company has focused on expense savings and is taking various initiatives to reduce costs. During the first quarter of 2011, the Company commenced a voluntary severance plan for certain corporate employees and conducted a reduction in force at HLC. In addition, the Company has taken steps to minimize ineffective marketing costs. The Company is seeking to set expenses consistent with its reduced revenues.

        On May 12, 2011, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "APA") with Discover Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discover Financial Services. The APA provides for the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of HLC to Discover Bank. Under the terms of the APA, Discover Bank will pay approximately $55.9 million in cash for the assets, subject to certain adjustments as described in the APA. $35.9 million is due upon the closing of the transaction and $10 million is due on each of the first and second anniversaries of the closing, subject to certain conditions as described in the APA. Discover Bank generally will not assume liabilities of the LendingTree Loans business that arose before the closing date. A portion of the initial purchase price payment will be held in escrow for certain liabilities that will remain with the Company. The transaction is subject to various closing conditions, including regulatory approvals for Discover Bank and the approval of the Company's stockholders. The acquisition is expected to close by the end of 2011. Subject to certain exceptions stated in the APA, the Company has agreed to operate the LendingTree Loans business in the ordinary course until the closing of the acquisition.

F-2


Table of Contents

Results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010:

 
  Three Months Ended March 31,  
 
  2011   $ Change   % Change   2010  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

LendingTree Loans:

                         
 

Origination and sale of loans

  $ 17,309   $ (6,091 )   (26 )% $ 23,400  
 

Other

    1,941     (397 )   (17 )%   2,338  
                   

Total LendingTree Loans

    19,250     (6,488 )   (25 )%   25,738  

Exchanges:

                         
 

Match fees

    12,627     (1,621 )   (11 )%   14,248  
 

Closed loan fees

    1,006     (2,752 )   (73 )%   3,758  
 

Other

    491     (489 )   (50 )%   980  
                   

Total Exchanges

    14,124     (4,862 )   (26 )%   18,986  
                   

Total revenue

  $ 33,374     (11,350 )   (25 )% $ 44,724  
                   

        LendingTree Loans revenue in 2011 decreased from the same period in 2010 reflecting the higher mortgage interest rates experienced in the first quarter of 2011. Refinance originations decreased 20%, purchase mortgage originations decreased 5%, and total loans closed decreased 10% compared to the same period in 2010. The increase in interest rates also caused the revenue per funded loan to be lower by 13% as compared to the same period in 2010. In addition, the provision for previously sold loans, which is recorded as reduction of revenue, increased $2.3 million versus the three months ended March 31, 2010.

        The dollar value of loans closed directly by LendingTree Loans is as follows:

 
  Three Months Ended March 31,  
 
  2011   $ Change   % Change   2010  
 
  (Dollars in millions)
 

Refinance mortgages

  $ 443   $ (109 )   (20 )% $ 552  

Purchase mortgages

    54     (2 )   (5 )%   56  
                   

Total

  $ 497   $ (111 )   (18 )% $ 608  
                   

        LendingTree Loans originates mortgage loans on property located throughout the United States. Revenue from loans originated for property in California totaled approximately 13% and 10% of Tree.com's consolidated revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

        Revenue from Exchanges in 2011 decreased from the same period in 2010 primarily due to fewer loan requests from consumers, resulting in fewer matched requests and fewer loans closed through Network Lenders. Overall, matched requests in the first quarter of 2011 declined 22% from the same period in 2010, which reflects a decline of 30% in home loan matches and a decline of 7% in matches for the new consumer vertical areas of higher education, home services, insurance and automobile. Home loan matches were down because of the rising interest rates in 2011. Revenue from closed loan fees decreased due to a previously announced shift in pricing on home loan related matches to increase the average match fee while decreasing the average closed loan fee, and a 34% decline in closed units in the period as a result of the decline in matched loan requests.

F-3


Table of Contents

        The dollar value of loans closed by Exchange network lenders is as follows:

 
  Three Months Ended March 31,  
 
  2011   $ Change   % Change   2010  
 
  (Dollars in millions)
 

Refinance mortgages

  $ 457   $ (577 )   (56 )% $ 1,034  

Purchase mortgages

    233     (330 )   (59 )%   563  

Other

    70     4     6 %   66  
                   

Total

  $ 760   $ (903 )   (54 )% $ 1,663  
                   

        No single Exchange network lender accounts for revenue representing more than 10% of Tree.com's consolidated revenue for any periods presented.

 
  Three Months Ended March 31,  
 
  2011   $ Change   % Change   2010  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

LendingTree Loans

  $ 10,764   $ 490     5 % $ 10,274  

Exchanges

    1,348     (126 )   (9 )%   1,474  
                   

Cost of revenue

  $ 12,112   $ 364     3 % $ 11,748  
                   

As a percentage of total revenue

    36 %               26 %

 

 
  Three Months
Ended
March 31,
 
As a Percentage of Segment Revenue
  2011   2010  

LendingTree Loans

    56 %   40 %

Exchanges

    10 %   8 %

        Cost of revenue consists primarily of costs associated with loan originations, compensation and other employee related costs (including stock-based compensation) related to customer call centers, real estate network support staff and loan officers, as well as credit scoring fees, consumer incentive costs, and website network hosting and server fees.

        Cost of revenue in 2011 increased from the same period in 2010 primarily due to increases of $0.8 million in compensation costs related to increased headcount for LendingTree Loans following the acquisition of SurePoint, and $0.2 million in server hosting fees and licensing agreements, offset by a decrease of $0.8 million in net origination costs at LendingTree Loans. The net origination costs at LendingTree Loans were lower due to decreased origination volume.

 
  Three Months Ended March 31,  
 
  2011   $ Change   % Change   2010  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

LendingTree Loans

  $ 7,703   $ 2,808     57 % $ 4,895  

Exchanges

    15,630     966     7 %   14,664  
                   

Selling and marketing expense

  $ 23,333   $ 3,774     19 % $ 19,559  
                   

As a percentage of total revenue

    70 %               44 %

F-4


Table of Contents


 
  Three Months
Ended
March 31,
 
As a Percentage of Segment Revenue
  2011   2010  

LendingTree Loans

    40 %   19 %

Exchanges

    111 %   77 %

        Selling and marketing expense consists primarily of advertising and promotional expenditures, fees paid to lead sources and compensation and other employee related costs (including stock-based compensation) for personnel engaged in the sales function. Advertising and promotional expenditures primarily include online marketing, as well as television, print and radio spending. Advertising production costs are expensed in the period the related ad is first run.

        During the third quarter of 2010, the Company changed its accounting policy for inter-segment revenue and inter-segment marketing expense between the LendingTree Loans and Exchanges segments. This change only impacts the segment results, and does not impact the consolidated financial results of Tree.com.

        Marketing expense for the Exchanges is primarily the building and maintaining of the Company's core brands, using both online and offline spending, and generates leads not only for the Exchanges but for the LendingTree Loans segment as well. Previously, marketing expense for LendingTree Loans was primarily comprised of inter-segment purchases of leads from the Exchanges, leveraging the LendingTree and GetSmart brands. The Exchanges received inter-segment revenue for the sale of these leads, and that revenue and the related marketing expense at LendingTree Loans would then be eliminated in consolidation of the total Company results.

        The Company now uses a cost sharing approach for these marketing expenses, whereby LendingTree Loans and the Exchanges share the marketing expense on a pro rata basis, based on the quantity of leads received by each segment. There is no longer inter-segment revenue or inter-segment marketing expense related to these leads. Management believes that this cost sharing approach is preferable because it more closely aligns the overall goals of the Company with the goals of segment management.

        Segment reporting results for prior periods reflect the policy change noted above.

        Advertising expense is the largest component of selling and marketing expense and is comprised of the following:

 
  Three Months Ended March 31,  
 
  2011   $ Change   % Change   2010  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

Online

  $ 12,906   $ (176 )   (1 )% $ 13,082  

Broadcast

    6,768     2,932     76 %   3,836  

Other

    2,229     657     42 %   1,572  
                   

Total advertising expense

  $ 21,903   $ 3,413     18 % $ 18,490  
                   

        The increase in advertising expense is related directly to the increased interest rates compared to the same period in 2010. In a higher interest rate environment, the incentive for consumers to come into the market to refinance is much lower. The Exchanges responded by increasing advertising expense by 18%, but matched requests decreased by 22%, resulting in advertising expense increasing to 70% of revenue compared to 44% for the same period in 2010. The increase in marketing expense per closed loan for LendingTree Loans is also reflected in the table above by the fact that advertising expense remained fairly flat despite a 25% decrease in revenue.

F-5


Table of Contents

        Tree.com anticipates that it will continue to adjust selling and marketing expenditures generally in relation to revenue producing opportunities and that selling and marketing will continue to represent a high percentage of revenue as it continues to promote its brands both online and offline.

 
  Three Months Ended March 31,  
 
  2011   $ Change   % Change   2010  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

LendingTree Loans

  $ 7,145   $ 2,329     48 % $ 4,816  

Exchanges

    5,958     (624 )   (9 )%   6,582  
                   

General and administrative expense

  $ 13,103   $ 1,705     15 % $ 11,398  
                   

As a percentage of total revenue

    39 %               25 %

 

 
  Three Months
Ended
March 31,
 
As a Percentage of Segment Revenue
  2011   2010  

LendingTree Loans

    37 %   19 %

Exchanges

    42 %   35 %

        General and administrative expense consists primarily of compensation and other employee related costs (including stock-based compensation) for personnel engaged in finance, legal, tax, corporate information technology, human resources and executive management functions, as well as facilities and infrastructure costs and fees for professional services.

        General and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased compared to the same period for 2010, primarily reflecting a $1.3 million increase in compensation and other employee-related costs (excluding non-cash compensation) due to higher headcount both in the existing business and as part of the SurePoint acquisition.

        General and administrative expense within the LendingTree Loans segment increased $2.3 million primarily due to increases of $1.7 million in compensation and other employee related costs (excluding non-cash compensation) due to higher headcount both in the existing business and as part of the SurePoint acquisition.

        General and administrative expense within the Exchanges segment decreased $0.6 million primarily due to lower compensation and other employee-related costs due to a reduction in headcount.

 
  Three Months Ended March 31,  
 
  2011   $ Change   % Change   2010  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

LendingTree Loans

  $ 246   $ 115     88 % $ 131  

Exchanges

    1,289     179     16 %   1,110  
                   

Product development

  $ 1,535   $ 294     24 % $ 1,241  
                   

As a percentage of total revenue

    5 %               3 %

F-6


Table of Contents


 
  Three Months
Ended
March 31,
 
As a Percentage of Segment Revenue
  2011   2010  

LendingTree Loans

    1 %   1 %

Exchanges

    9 %   6 %

        Product development expense consists primarily of compensation and other employee related costs (including stock-based compensation) for personnel engaged in product development, which include costs related to the design, development, testing and enhancement of technology that are not capitalized.

        Product development expense in the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased from the same period in 2010, due to an increase in use of temporary labor.

        Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ("Adjusted EBITDA") is a non-GAAP measure and is defined in "Tree.com's Principles of Financial Reporting". For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to operating income (loss) for Tree.com's operating segments and to net loss in total, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements attached as Appendix G to the proxy statement to which this Appendix F is attached.

 
  Three Months Ended March 31,,  
 
  2011   $ Change   % Change   2010  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

LendingTree Loans

  $ (6,455 )   (12,208 )   NM   $ 5,753  

Exchanges

    (8,953 )   (5,076 )   (131 )%   (3,877 )
                   

Adjusted EBITDA

  $ (15,408 ) $ (17,284 )   NM   $ 1,876  
                   

As a percentage of total revenue

    (46 )%               4 %

 

 
  Three Months
Ended
March 31,
 
As a Percentage of Segment Revenue
  2011   2010  

LendingTree Loans

    (34 )%   22 %

Exchanges

    (63 )%   (20 )%

        The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the same period for 2010 reflects the Company's decreased revenue at LendingTree Loans, increased expenses for advertising and general and administrative expenses.

 
  Three Months Ended March 31,  
 
  2011   $ Change   % Change   2010  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

LendingTree Loans

  $ (7,302 ) $ (12,411 )   NM   $ 5,109  

Exchanges

    (21,188 )   (11,914 )   (128 )%   (9,274 )
                   

Operating loss

  $ (28,490 ) $ (24,325 )   (584 )% $ (4,165 )
                   

As a percentage of total revenue

    (85 )%               (9 )%

F-7


Table of Contents


 
  Three Months
Ended
March 31,
 
As a Percentage of Segment Revenue
  2011   2010  

LendingTree Loans

    (38 )%   20 %

Exchanges

    (150 )%   (49 )%

        Operating loss in the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased from the same period in 2010 due to the reduction in revenue and the increase in operating expenses. In addition to the reasons provided above, operating expenses were higher in 2011 due to a $4.5 million increase in legal settlement and contingency costs, offset by a $2.2 million decrease to restructuring expense. The increase in legal settlement costs was the result of the Company entering into settlement discussions regarding a pending legal matter in 2011. The reduction in restructuring expense is a result of restructuring expenses recorded in the first quarter of 2010 that primarily related to continuing lease obligations on facilities previously used for call center operations.

        Additionally, in connection with closing all of the field offices of RealEstate.com, REALTORS® as described in the Management Overview section, the Company incurred impairment charges totaling $5.0 million in the first quarter of 2011. Trademark impairment totaled $4.1 million and property and equipment impairment totaled $0.9 million.

        For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, Tree.com recorded a tax provision of $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively, which represents effective tax rates of (0.9%) and (12.6)%, respectively. In the first quarter of 2011, the tax rate is lower than the federal statutory rate of 35% mainly due to the change in the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. In the first quarter of 2010, the tax rate was lower than the federal statutory rate of 35% due to the change in the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and an increase to the FIN 48 reserve.

        Tree.com's unrecognized tax benefits increased by an immaterial amount in the first quarter of 2011. The increase was due to penalty and interest on uncertain tax positions in prior years. Tree.com believes that it is reasonably possible that its remaining unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by approximately $0.1 million within twelve months of the current reporting date due to the expiration of state statute of limitations. An estimate of other changes in unrecognized tax benefits cannot be made, but are not expected to be significant.

        For the three months ended March 31, 2011, Tree.com determined that its activity yielded an unusual effective tax rate; therefore, Tree.com utilized the actual year to date effective tax rate for purposes of determining year to date tax expense. This approach is consistent with the three months ended March 31, 2010.

F-8


Table of Contents


Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources

        As of March 31, 2011, Tree.com had $63.5 million of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents, compared to $79.5 million as of December 31, 2010.

        Net cash provided by operating activities was $29.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to $14.1 million used in operating activities in the same period in 2010. The change from cash used in operating activities in 2010 to cash provided by operating activities in 2011 was primarily due to a $53.9 million increase in the amount of net cash proceeds from the origination and sale of loans and a $14.2 million increase in accounts payable and other current liabilities, which principally related to litigation payments of $8.0 million that were made in 2010.

        Net cash used in investing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2011 of $10.7 million primarily resulted from the SurePoint acquisition expenditures of $7.8 million and capital expenditures of $3.5 million. Net cash used in investing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2010 of $1.2 million primarily resulted from capital expenditures of $1.4 million, offset by the release of restricted cash of $0.2 million.

        Net cash used in financing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2011 of $34.1 million was primarily due to net repayments of warehouse line credit related to the decrease in loans held for sale as discussed above. Net cash provided by financing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2010 of $3.2 million was primarily due to net borrowings under warehouse lines of credit of $5.0 million less purchase of treasury stock of $0.7 million, releases of restricted cash of $0.6 million, and issuances of common stock of $0.5 million.

        As of March 31, 2011, LendingTree Loans had two committed lines of credit totaling $150.0 million of borrowing capacity. LendingTree Loans also has a $25.0 million uncommitted line with one of these lenders. Borrowings under these lines of credit are used to fund, and are secured by, consumer residential loans that are held for sale. Loans under these lines of credit are repaid using proceeds from the sales of loans by LendingTree Loans.

        The $50.0 million first line is scheduled to expire on June 29, 2011. This line can be cancelled at the option of the lender without default upon sixty days notice. This first line includes an additional uncommitted credit facility of $25.0 million. This first line is also guaranteed by Tree.com, Inc., LendingTree, LLC and LendingTree Holdings Corp. The interest rate under the first line is the 30-day London InterBank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") or 2.00% (whichever is greater) plus 2.25%. The interest rate under the $25.0 million uncommitted line is the 30-day LIBOR plus 1.50%. LendingTree Loans is also required to sell at least 25% of the loans it originates to the lender under this line or pay a "pair-off fee" of 0.25% on the difference between the required and actual volume of loans sold.

        The $100.0 million second line is scheduled to expire on October 28, 2011. This line is also guaranteed by Tree.com, Inc., LendingTree, LLC and LendingTree Holdings Corp. The interest rate under this line is the 30-day Adjusted LIBOR or 2.0% (whichever is greater) plus 2.25% to 2.5% for loans being sold to the lender and 30-day Adjusted LIBOR or 2.0% (whichever is greater) plus 2.25% for loans not being sold to the lender.

        Under the terms of these warehouse lines, LendingTree Loans is required to maintain various financial and other covenants. These financial covenants include, but are not limited to, maintaining (i) minimum tangible net worth of $25.0 million, (ii) minimum liquidity, (iii) a minimum current ratio, (iv) a maximum ratio of total liabilities to net worth, (v) a maximum leverage ratio, (vi) pre-tax net income requirements and (vii) a maximum warehouse capacity ratio. During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, LendingTree Loans was in compliance with the covenants under these lines.

        The LendingTree Loans business is highly dependent on the availability of these warehouse lines. Although we believe that our existing lines of credit are adequate for our current operations,

F-9


Table of Contents


reductions in our available credit, or the inability to renew or replace these lines, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Management has determined that it could continue to operate the LendingTree Loans business at a reduced capacity if one, but not both, of the warehouse lines were lost. We intend to renew both of these lines upon expiration.

        Tree.com anticipates that it will need to make capital and other expenditures in connection with the development and expansion of its overall operations.

        As discussed in Item 4—Controls and Procedures, the Company has concluded that due to a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to income taxes as of December 31, 2010, as described in the Company's annual report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "2010 Form 10K"), the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are not effective as of March 31, 2011. The Company has taken appropriate actions in 2011 to address and remediate the deficiencies that gave rise to the material weakness. However, the material weakness will not be fully remediated until, in the opinion of management, the revised control procedures have been operating for a sufficient period of time to provide reasonable assurances as to their effectiveness, and management does not believe that a sufficient period of time has passed to make this determination. The Company does not believe this would have a significant impact on liquidity.


Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

 
  Payments Due by Period  
Contractual Obligations as of March 31, 2011
  Total   Less Than
1 Year
  1 - 3
Years
  3 - 5
Years
  More Than
5 Years
 
 
  (In thousands)
 

Short-term borrowings(a)

  $ 66,472   $ 66,472   $   $   $  

Capital lease obligations

    56     30     26          

Purchase obligations(b)

    6,048     6,048              

Loan loss settlement obligations

    300     300              

Preferred stock liquidation value and accreted interest(c)

    3,112     3,112              

Termination fee for restructured lease agreement(d)

    1,448     730     418     299      

Operating leases

    23,133     4,588     11,747     6,716     83  
                       

Total contractual cash obligations

  $ 100,569   $ 81,280   $ 12,191   $ 7,015   $ 83  
                       

(a)
The short-term borrowings are the Company's warehouse lines of credit that are used exclusively for funding loans held for sale. These borrowings are collateralized by and are repaid from proceeds from selling the loans held for sale. Interest on these borrowings as of March 31, 2011 is not significant.

(b)
The purchase obligations primarily relate to marketing event contracts in 2011.

(c)
The preferred stock obligation represents the obligation the Company has to redeem at maturity the 2,902.33 shares of Series A redeemable preferred stock which the Company's CEO was granted in LendingTree Holdings Corp., a subsidiary of Tree.com at the time of the spin-off from IAC. These shares earn dividends at 12%, will fully vest on August 20, 2011 but are not payable until 2013, and have a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share.

(d)
Termination fee payable to lessor for early building lease cancellation.

F-10


Table of Contents


Seasonality

        LendingTree Loans and Exchanges revenue is subject to the cyclical and seasonal trends of the U.S. housing market. Home sales typically rise during the spring and summer months and decline during the fall and winter months. Refinancing and home equity activity is principally driven by mortgage interest rates as well as real estate values. The broader cyclical trends in the mortgage and real estate markets have upset the usual seasonal trends.


New Accounting Pronouncements

        Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements attached as Appendix G to the proxy statement to which this Appendix F is attached for a description of recent accounting pronouncements.


Tree.com's Principles of Financial Reporting

        Tree.com reports Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ("EBITDA"), and adjusted for certain items discussed below ("Adjusted EBITDA"), as supplemental measures to GAAP. These measures are two of the primary metrics by which Tree.com evaluates the performance of its businesses, on which its internal budgets are based and by which management is compensated. Tree.com believes that investors should have access to the same set of tools that it uses in analyzing its results. These non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to results prepared in accordance with GAAP, but should not be considered a substitute for or superior to GAAP results. Tree.com provides and encourages investors to examine the reconciling adjustments between the GAAP and non-GAAP measure discussed below.

        Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA excluding (1) non-cash compensation expense, (2) non-cash intangible asset impairment charges, (3) gain/loss on disposal of assets, (4) restructuring expenses, (5) litigation settlements and contingencies, (6) pro forma adjustments for significant acquisitions, and (7) one-time items. Adjusted EBITDA has certain limitations in that it does not take into account the impact to Tree.com's statement of operations of certain expenses, including depreciation, non-cash compensation and acquisition related accounting. Tree.com endeavors to compensate for the limitations of the non-GAAP measure presented by also providing the comparable GAAP measure with equal or greater prominence and descriptions of the reconciling items, including quantifying such items, to derive the non-GAAP measure.

        Tree.com will only present EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA on a pro forma basis if it views a particular transaction as significant in size or transformational in nature. For the periods presented in Appendix G to the proxy statement to which this Appendix F is attached, there are no transactions that Tree.com has included on a pro forma basis.

        EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are presented before one-time items, if applicable. These items are truly one-time in nature and non-recurring, infrequent or unusual, and have not occurred in the past two years or are not expected to recur in the next two years, in accordance with SEC rules. For the periods presented in Appendix G to the proxy statement to which this Appendix F is attached, there are no one-time items.

F-11


Table of Contents

        Non-cash compensation expense consists principally of expense associated with the grants of restricted stock units and stock options. These expenses are not paid in cash, and Tree.com will include the related shares in its future calculations of fully diluted shares outstanding. Upon vesting of restricted stock units and the exercise of certain stock options, the awards will be settled, at Tree.com's discretion, on a net basis, with Tree.com remitting the required tax withholding amount from its current funds.

        Amortization and impairment of intangibles are non-cash expenses relating primarily to acquisitions. At the time of an acquisition, the intangible assets of the acquired company, such as purchase agreements, technology and customer relationships, are valued and amortized over their estimated lives.


Reconciliation of EBITDA

        For a reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to operating income (loss) for Tree.com's operating segments and to net loss in total for the three months March 31, 2011 and 2010, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements attached as Appendix G to the proxy statement to which this Appendix F is attached.


Other

        REALTORS®—a registered collective membership mark that identifies a real estate professional who is a member of the National Association of REALTORS® and subscribes to its strict Code of Ethics.

F-12


Table of Contents


APPENDIX G

TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2011

TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

 
  Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
  2011   2010  
 
  (In thousands, except
per share amounts)

 

Revenue

             
   

LendingTree Loans

  $ 19,250   $ 25,738  
   

Exchanges

    14,124     18,986  
           
 

Total revenue

    33,374     44,724  

Cost of revenue

             
   

LendingTree Loans

    10,764     10,274  
   

Exchanges

    1,348     1,474  
           
 

Total cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below)

    12,112     11,748  
           
 

Gross margin

    21,262     32,976  

Operating expenses

             
 

Selling and marketing expense

    23,333     19,559  
 

General and administrative expense

    13,103     11,398  
 

Product development

    1,535     1,241  
 

Litigation settlements and contingencies

    4,502     16  
 

Restructuring expense

    389     2,610  
 

Amortization of intangibles

    307     943  
 

Depreciation

    1,576     1,374  
 

Asset impairments

    5,007      
           
   

Total operating expenses

    49,752     37,141  
           
   

Operating loss

    (28,490 )   (4,165 )

Other income (expense)

             
 

Interest income

        7  
 

Interest expense

    (80 )   (166 )
           

Total other expense, net

    (80 )   (159 )
           

Loss before income taxes

    (28,570 )   (4,324 )

Income tax provision

    (265 )   (543 )
           

Net loss from continuing operations

    (28,835 )   (4,867 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   
(10,660

)
 
(1,279

)
           

Net loss available to common shareholders

  $ (39,495 ) $ (6,146 )
           

Weighted average common shares outstanding

    10,882     10,960  
           

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding

    10,882     10,960  
           

Net loss per share from continuing operations

             
 

Basic

  $ (2.65 ) $ (0.44 )
           
 

Diluted

  $ (2.65 ) $ (0.44 )
           

Net loss per share available to common shareholders

             
 

Basic

  $ (3.63 ) $ (0.56 )
           
 

Diluted

  $ (3.63 ) $ (0.56 )
           

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

G-1


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 
  March 31,
2011
  December 31,
2010
 
 
  (unaudited)
   
 
 
  (In thousands, except
par value and share amounts)

 

ASSETS:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 53,520   $ 68,819  

Restricted cash and cash equivalents

    9,933     10,549  

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $160 and $213, respectively

    6,893     4,264  

Loans held for sale ($72,697 and $115,908 measured at fair value, respectively)

    73,296     116,681  

Prepaid and other current assets

    11,313     11,750  

Current assets of discontinued operations

    232     219  
           
 

Total current assets

    155,187     212,282  

Property and equipment, net

    12,594     11,580  

Goodwill

    10,741     3,632  

Intangible assets, net

    41,013     45,419  

Other non-current assets

    650     521  

Non-current assets of discontinued operations

    171     9,368  
           
 

Total assets

  $ 220,356   $ 282,802  
           

LIABILITIES:

             

Warehouse lines of credit

  $ 66,472   $ 100,623  

Accounts payable, trade

    14,451     7,042  

Deferred revenue

    257     1,540  

Deferred income taxes

    2,358     2,358  

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

    38,871     38,739  

Current liabilities of discontinued operations

    2,381     1,031  
           
 

Total current liabilities

    124,790     151,333  

Income taxes payable

    99     96  

Other long-term liabilities

    17,322     15,302  

Deferred income taxes

    14,211     13,962  

Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations

    282     288  
           
 

Total liabilities

    156,704     180,981  

Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)

             

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:

             

Preferred stock $.01 par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares; none issued or outstanding

         

Common stock $.01 par value; authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued 12,111,999 and 11,893,468 shares, respectively, and outstanding 10,988,738 and 10,770,207 shares, respectively

    121     118  

Additional paid-in capital

    910,160     908,837  

Accumulated deficit

    (838,097 )   (798,602 )

Treasury stock 1,123,261 shares

    (8,532 )   (8,532 )
           
 

Total shareholders' equity

    63,652     101,821  
           
 

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

  $ 220,356   $ 282,802  
           

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

G-2


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

(Unaudited)

 
   
  Common Stock    
   
  Treasury Stock  
 
  Total   Number
of Shares
  Amount   Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Number
of Shares
  Amount  
 
  (In thousands)
 

Balance as of December 31, 2010

  $ 101,821     11,893   $ 118   $ 908,837   $ (798,602 )   1,123   $ (8,532 )

Comprehensive loss:

                                           
 

Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2011

    (39,495 )               (39,495 )        
                                           

Comprehensive loss

    (39,495 )                        

Non-cash compensation

    1,301             1,301              

Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units, net of withholding taxes

    25     219     3     22              
                               

Balance as of March 31, 2011

  $ 63,652     12,112   $ 121   $ 910,160   $ (838,097 )   1,123   $ (8,532 )
                               

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

G-3


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

 
  Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
 
  2011   2010  
 
  (In thousands)
 

Cash flows from operating activities attributable to continuing operations:

             

Net loss

  $ (39,495 ) $ (6,146 )

Less loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

    10,660     1,279  
           

Loss from continuing operations

    (28,835 )   (4,867 )

Adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities attributable to continuing operations:

             
 

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

        4  
 

Amortization of intangibles

    307     943  
 

Depreciation

    1,576     1,374  
 

Intangible impairment

    4,100      
 

Property and equipment impairment

    907      
 

Non-cash compensation expense

    1,301     1,094  
 

Non-cash restructuring expense

        93  
 

Deferred income taxes

    249     530  
 

Gain on origination and sale of loans

    (17,309 )   (23,400 )
 

Loss on impaired loans not sold

    84      
 

(Gain) loss on sale of real estate acquired in satisfaction of loans

    (19 )   368  
 

Bad debt expense

    (15 )   75  

Changes in current assets and liabilities:

             
 

Accounts receivable

    (2,565 )   (386 )
 

Origination of loans

    (497,233 )   (608,365 )
 

Proceeds from sales of loans

    562,952     626,226  
 

Principal payments received on loans

    274     180  
 

Payments to investors for loan repurchases and early payoff obligations

    (164 )   (2,236 )
 

Prepaid and other current assets

    (1,533 )   (175 )
 

Accounts payable and other current liabilities

    5,920     (8,274 )
 

Income taxes payable

    (3 )   59  
 

Deferred revenue

    (1,293 )   (36 )
 

Other, net

    944     2,679  
           

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities attributable to continuing operations

    29,645     (14,114 )
           

Cash flows from investing activities attributable to continuing operations:

             
 

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

    (7,804 )    
 

Capital expenditures

    (3,498 )   (1,428 )
 

Other, net

    616     259  
           

Net cash used in investing activities attributable to continuing operations

    (10,686 )   (1,169 )
           

Cash flows from financing activities attributable to continuing operations:

             
 

Borrowing under warehouse lines of credit

    138,500     551,088  
 

Repayments of warehouse lines of credit

    (172,651 )   (546,070 )
 

Issuance of common stock, net of withholding taxes

    25     (539 )
 

Purchase of treasury stock

        (667 )
 

Increase in restricted cash

        (600 )
           

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities attributable to continuing operations

    (34,126 )   3,212  
           

Total cash used in continuing operations

    (15,167 )   (12,071 )
           

Net cash used in operating activities attributable to discontinued operations

    (132 )   (790 )

Net cash used in investing activities attributable to discontinued operations

        (181 )
           

Total cash used in discontinued operations

    (132 )   (971 )
           

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

    (15,299 )   (13,042 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

    68,819     86,093  
           

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $ 53,520   $ 73,051  
           

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

G-4


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1—ORGANIZATION

Company Overview

        Tree.com, Inc. ("Tree.com" or the "Company") is the parent of LendingTree, LLC, which owns several brands and businesses that provide information, tools, advice, products and services for critical transactions in our customers' lives. Our family of brands includes: LendingTree.com®, GetSmart.com®, RealEstate.com®, DegreeTree.comSM, HealthTree.comSM, LendingTreeAutos.com, DoneRight.com®, and InsuranceTree.comSM. Together, these brands serve as an ally for consumers who are looking to comparison shop for loans, real estate and other services from multiple businesses and professionals who will compete for their business.

        These businesses and brands are operated under the segments known as LendingTree Loans and the Exchanges.

        The LendingTree Loans segment originates, processes, approves and funds various residential real estate loans through Home Loan Center, Inc. dba LendingTree Loans ("HLC"). The HLC and LendingTree Loans brand names are collectively referred to in these consolidated financial statements as "LendingTree Loans."

        The Exchanges segment consists of online lead generation networks and call centers that connect consumers and service providers principally in the lending, real estate, higher education, home services, insurance and automobile marketplaces.


Discontinued Operations

        On March 10, 2011, management of the Company made the decision and finalized a plan to close all of the field offices of the proprietary full service real estate brokerage business known as RealEstate.com, REALTORS®, which was previously reported within the Real Estate reporting segment (see Note 8). The Company exited all markets by March 31, 2011. Accordingly, RealEstate.com, REALTORS® is presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for all periods presented. The notes accompanying these consolidated financial statements reflect our continuing operations and, unless otherwise noted, exclude information related to the discontinued operations.

        Tree.com maintains operations solely in the United States.


Business Combinations

        On March 15, 2011, Tree.com, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, HLC, completed its acquisition of certain assets of First Residential Mortgage Network, Inc. dba SurePoint Lending ("SurePoint") and certain shareholders of SurePoint. The Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") was previously announced on November 16, 2010. SurePoint, a LendingTree network lender for eleven years, was a full service residential mortgage provider licensed in 45 states and employing over 500 people, including more than 300 licensed loan officers. The Agreement provides for the purchase by HLC of certain specified assets and liabilities of SurePoint related to its business of originating, refinancing, processing, underwriting, funding and closing residential mortgage loans; providing title and escrow services; and

G-5


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 1—ORGANIZATION (Continued)


providing other mortgage related services, as further described in the Agreement. The acquired assets also include all of the equity interests of Real Estate Title Services, LLC. Under the terms of the Agreement, HLC paid $8.0 million in cash upon the closing of the transaction, subject to certain adjustments as described in the Agreement. The Company used available cash to fund the acquisition.

        This asset purchase is being accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, the purchase price is allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The allocation of the purchase price, including goodwill, if any, is not yet complete and will be finalized upon completion of the analysis of the fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities. The pro forma effect of this purchase was not material to our results of operations.


Basis of Presentation

        The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the three months then ended have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for annual financial statements. In the opinion of the Company's management, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited financial statements, and include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the Company's financial position for the periods presented. The results for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011, or any other period. These financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in Appendix E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix G is attached for the year ended December 31, 2010.

NOTE 2—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Accounting Estimates

        Tree.com's management is required to make certain estimates and assumptions during the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). These estimates and assumptions impact the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. They also impact the reported amount of net earnings during any period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

        Significant estimates underlying the accompanying consolidated financial statements include: valuation allowance for impaired loans held for sale; loan loss obligations; the fair value of loans held for sale and related derivatives; the recoverability of long-lived assets, goodwill and intangible assets; the determination of income taxes payable and deferred income taxes, including related valuation allowances; restructuring reserves; contingent consideration related to business combinations; various other allowances, reserves and accruals; and assumptions related to the determination of stock-based compensation.

G-6


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 2—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


Cash and Cash Equivalents

        Cash and cash equivalents include cash and short-term, highly liquid money market investments.


Restricted Cash

        Restricted cash and cash equivalents consists of the following (in thousands):

 
  March 31,
2011
  December 31,
2010
 

Cash in escrow for surety bonds

  $ 5,031   $ 5,030  

Cash in escrow for corporate purchasing card program

    800     800  

Minimum required balances for warehouse lines of credit

    1,925     1,925  

Mortgage lending escrow funds

    1,770     2,394  

Other

    407     400  
           
 

Total restricted cash and cash equivalents

  $ 9,933   $ 10,549  
           


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        On January 21, 2010, the FASB amended and Tree.com adopted the accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures, which added new requirements for disclosures about transfers into and out of Level 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. The amendment also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This amendment is effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide the Level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis, which will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. See Note 10 for further information.

NOTE 3—GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

        The balance of goodwill and intangible assets, net is as follows (in thousands):

 
  March 31,
2011
  December 31,
2010
 

Goodwill

  $ 10,741   $ 3,632  
           

Intangible assets with indefinite lives

  $ 39,142   $ 43,242  

Intangible assets with definite lives, net

    1,871     2,177  
           
 

Total intangible assets, net

  $ 41,013   $ 45,419  
           

        Intangible assets with indefinite lives relate principally to trade names and trademarks acquired in various acquisitions.

G-7


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 3—GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)

        At March 31, 2011, intangible assets with definite lives relate to the following (in thousands):

 
  Cost   Accumulated
Amortization
  Net   Weighted Average
Amortization Life
(Years)
 

Purchase agreements

  $ 75,453   $ (75,300 ) $ 153     5.8  

Technology

    30,491     (29,949 )   542     3.0  

Customer lists

    7,388     (6,707 )   681     3.9  

Other

    9,009     (8,514 )   495     4.4  
                     
 

Total

  $ 122,341   $ (120,470 ) $ 1,871        
                     

        At December 31, 2010, intangible assets with definite lives relate to the following (in thousands):

 
  Cost   Accumulated
Amortization
  Net   Weighted Average
Amortization Life
(Years)
 

Purchase agreements

  $ 75,453   $ (75,288 ) $ 165     5.8  

Technology

    30,491     (29,838 )   653     3.0  

Customer lists

    7,388     (6,692 )   696     3.9  

Other

    9,009     (8,346 )   663     4.1  
                     
 

Total

  $ 122,341   $ (120,164 ) $ 2,177        
                     

        Amortization of intangible assets with definite lives is computed on a straight-line basis and, based on March 31, 2011 balances, such amortization for the next five years is estimated to be as follows (in thousands):

 
  Amount  

Nine months ending December 31, 2011

  $ 777  

Year ending December 31, 2012

    410  

Year ending December 31, 2013

    144  

Year ending December 31, 2014

    84  

Year ending December 31, 2015

    60  

Thereafter

    396  
       
 

Total

  $ 1,871  
       

G-8


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 3—GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)

        The following table presents the balance of goodwill by segment (in thousands):

 
  LendingTree
Loans
  Exchanges   Total  

Balance as of December 31, 2010

                   
 

Goodwill

  $ 46,526   $ 486,720   $ 533,246  
 

Accumulated impairment losses

    (46,526 )   (483,088 )   (529,614 )
               

        3,632     3,632  
               
 

Goodwill resulting from business combinations

    7,109         7,109  

Balance as of March 31, 2011

                   
 

Goodwill

    53,635     486,720     540,355  
 

Accumulated impairment losses

    (46,526 )   (483,088 )   (529,614 )
               

  $ 7,109   $ 3,632   $ 10,741  
               

        Goodwill acquired in 2011 relates to the acquisition of SurePoint that is discussed in Note 1.

        In connection with closing all of the field offices of RealEstate.com, REALTORS® as described in Note 1, the Company incurred impairment charges totaling $5.0 million in the first quarter of 2011. Trademark impairment totaled $4.1 million and property and equipment impairment totaled $0.9 million. As described in Note 7, in connection with exiting this business, the Company changed its reporting segments. See Note 7 for information regarding the allocation of segment results.

NOTE 4—PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

        The balance of property and equipment, net is as follows (in thousands):

 
  March 31,
2011
  December 31,
2010
 

Computer equipment and capitalized software

  $ 35,258   $ 36,101  

Leasehold improvements

    2,352     2,915  

Furniture and other equipment

    2,994     2,311  

Projects in progress

    4,085     2,896  
           

    44,689     44,223  

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

    (32,095 )   (32,643 )
           
 

Total property and equipment, net

  $ 12,594   $ 11,580  
           

G-9


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 5—ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

        Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):

 
  March 31,
2011
  December 31,
2010
 

Accrued loan loss liability related to loans previously sold

  $ 6,928   $ 5,459  

Loan loss settlement liability related to loans previously sold

    300     300  

Litigation accruals

    4,795     520  

Accrued advertising expense

    5,823     8,979  

Accrued compensation and benefits

    5,606     7,247  

Accrued professional fees

    1,067     1,340  

Accrued restructuring costs

    1,109     1,199  

Derivative liabilities

    892     1,634  

Customer deposits and escrows

    3,870     3,166  

Deferred rent

    396     482  

Other

    8,085     8,413  
           
 

Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  $ 38,871   $ 38,739  
           

        The other category above reflects an earnout payable related to an acquisition, franchise taxes, self-insured health claims and other miscellaneous accrued expenses.

        An additional $13.1 million and $11.5 million of accrued loan loss liability related to loans previously sold is classified in other long term liabilities at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

        An additional $1.1 million and $1.2 million of accrued restructuring liability is classified in other long term liabilities at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

NOTE 6—WAREHOUSE LINES OF CREDIT

        Borrowings on warehouse lines of credit were $66.5 million and $100.6 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

        As of March 31, 2011, LendingTree Loans had two committed lines of credit totaling $150.0 million of borrowing capacity. LendingTree Loans also has a $25.0 million uncommitted line with one of these lenders. Borrowings under these lines of credit are used to fund, and are secured by, consumer residential loans that are held for sale. Loans under these lines of credit are repaid using proceeds from the sales of loans by LendingTree Loans.

        The $50.0 million first line is scheduled to expire on June 29, 2011. This line can be cancelled at the option of the lender without default upon sixty days notice. This first line includes an additional uncommitted credit facility of $25.0 million. This first line is also guaranteed by Tree.com, Inc., LendingTree, LLC and LendingTree Holdings Corp. The interest rate under the first line is the 30-day London InterBank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") or 2.00% (whichever is greater) plus 2.25%. The interest rate under the $25.0 million uncommitted line is the 30-day LIBOR plus 1.50%. LendingTree Loans is also required to sell at least 25% of the loans it originates to the lender under this line or pay a "pair-off fee" of 0.25% on the difference between the required and actual volume of loans sold.

G-10


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 6—WAREHOUSE LINES OF CREDIT (Continued)

        The $100.0 million second line is scheduled to expire on October 28, 2011. This line is also guaranteed by Tree.com, Inc., LendingTree, LLC and LendingTree Holdings Corp. The interest rate under this line is the 30-day Adjusted LIBOR or 2.0% (whichever is greater) plus 2.25% to 2.5% for loans being sold to the lender and 30-day Adjusted LIBOR or 2.0% (whichever is greater) plus 2.25% for loans not being sold to the lender.

        Under the terms of these warehouse lines, LendingTree Loans is required to maintain various financial and other covenants. These financial covenants include, but are not limited to, maintaining (i) minimum tangible net worth of $25.0 million, (ii) minimum liquidity, (iii) a minimum current ratio, (iv) a maximum ratio of total liabilities to net worth, (v) a maximum leverage ratio, (vi) pre-tax net income requirements and (vii) a maximum warehouse capacity ratio. During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, LendingTree Loans was in compliance with the covenants under these lines.

        The LendingTree Loans business is highly dependent on the availability of these warehouse lines. Although we believe that our existing lines of credit are adequate for our current operations, reductions in our available credit, or the inability to renew or replace these lines, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Management has determined that it could continue to operate the LendingTree Loans business at a reduced capacity if one, but not both, of the warehouse lines were lost. We intend to renew both of these lines upon expiration.

NOTE 7—SEGMENT INFORMATION

        The overall concept that Tree.com employs in determining its reportable segments and related financial information is to present them in a manner consistent with how the chief operating decision maker and executive management view the Tree.com businesses, how the businesses are organized as to segment management, and the focus of the Tree.com businesses with regards to the types of products or services offered or the target market.

        In connection with exiting the RealEstate.com, REALTORS® business that is discussed in Notes 1, 3 and 8, the Company re-evaluated its reporting segments based on the continuing operations of the Company. In prior periods, the segments "LendingTree Loans", "Exchanges", "Real Estate" and "Unallocated-Corporate" were presented, which have been changed to "LendingTree Loans" and "Exchanges". The "Exchanges" segment now includes the continuing operations of the previous "Real Estate" segment and the previous "Unallocated—Corporate" segment. Segment results for prior periods have been restated to conform to the new presentation.

        During the third quarter of 2010, the Company changed its accounting policy for inter-segment revenue and inter-segment marketing expense between the LendingTree Loans and Exchanges segments. This change only impacts the individual segment results, and does not impact the consolidated financial results of Tree.com.

        Marketing expense for the Exchanges is primarily related to the building and maintaining of the Company's core brands, using both online and offline spending, and generates leads not only for the Exchanges but for other segments as well. Previously, marketing expense for LendingTree Loans was primarily comprised of inter-segment purchases of leads from the Exchanges, leveraging the LendingTree and GetSmart brands. The Exchanges received inter-segment revenue for the sale of these

G-11


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 7—SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)


leads, and that revenue and the related marketing expense at LendingTree Loans would then be eliminated in consolidation of the total Company results.

        The Company now uses a cost sharing approach for these marketing expenses, whereby LendingTree Loans and the Exchanges now share the marketing expense on a pro rata basis, based on the quantity of leads received by each segment. There is no longer inter-segment revenue or inter-segment marketing expense between these two segments related to these leads. Management believes that this cost sharing approach is preferable because it more closely aligns the overall goals of the Company with the goals of segment management, and may ultimately drive the Company to better performance. Segment reporting results for prior periods have been restated to conform to the new presentation.

        Tree.com's primary performance metrics are EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA excluding (1) non-cash compensation expense, (2) non-cash intangible asset impairment charges, (3) gain/loss on disposal of assets, (4) restructuring expenses, (5) litigation settlements and contingencies, (6) pro forma adjustments for significant acquisitions, and (7) one-time items, which are truly one-time in nature and non-recurring, infrequent or unusual, and have not occurred in the past two years or are not expected to recur in the next two years, in accordance with SEC rules. For the periods presented in this report, there are no one-time items. These measures are two of the primary metrics by which Tree.com evaluates the performance of its businesses, on which its internal budgets are based and by which management is compensated. Tree.com believes that investors should have access to the same set of tools that it uses in analyzing its results. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have certain limitations in that they do not take into account the impact to Tree.com's statement of operations of certain expenses, as described above. Tree.com endeavors to compensate for the limitations of the non-GAAP measure presented by also providing the comparable GAAP measure with equal or greater prominence and descriptions of the reconciling items, including quantifying such items, to derive the non-GAAP measure.

G-12


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 7—SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

        Summarized information by segment and reconciliation to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA is as follows (in thousands):

 
  For the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2011
 
 
  LendingTree
Loans
  Exchanges   Total  

Revenue

  $ 19,250   $ 14,124   $ 33,374  

Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below)

    10,764     1,348     12,112  
               
 

Gross margin

    8,486     12,776     21,262  

Operating expenses:

                   
 

Selling and marketing expense

    7,703     15,630     23,333  
 

General and administrative expense

    7,145     5,958     13,103  
 

Product development

    246     1,289     1,535  
 

Litigation settlements and contingencies

    2     4,500     4,502  
 

Restructuring expense

    295     94     389  
 

Amortization of intangibles

        307     307  
 

Depreciation

    397     1,179     1,576  
 

Asset impairments

        5,007     5,007  
               
 

Total operating expenses

    15,788     33,964     49,752  
               

Operating loss

    (7,302 )   (21,188 )   (28,490 )

Adjustments to reconcile to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:

                   
 

Amortization of intangibles

        307     307  
 

Depreciation

    397     1,179     1,576  
               

EBITDA from continuing operations

    (6,905 )   (19,702 )   (26,607 )
 

Restructuring expense

    295     94     389  
 

Non-cash compensation

    153     1,148     1,301  
 

Litigation settlements and contingencies

    2     4,500     4,502  
 

Asset impairments

        5,007     5,007  
               

Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations

  $ (6,455 ) $ (8,953 ) $ (15,408 )
               

Reconciliation to net loss in total:

                   

Operating loss per above

              $ (28,490 )

Other expense, net

                (80 )
                   

Loss before income taxes

                (28,570 )

Income tax provision

                (265 )
                   

Net loss from continuing operations

                (28,835 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

                (10,660 )
                   

Net loss

              $ (39,495 )
                   

G-13


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 7—SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

 
  For the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2010
 
 
  LendingTree
Loans
  Exchanges   Total  

Revenue

  $ 25,738   $ 18,986   $ 44,724  

Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below)

    10,274     1,474     11,748  
               
 

Gross margin

    15,464     17,512     32,976  

Operating expenses:

                   
 

Selling and marketing expense

    4,895     14,664     19,559  
 

General and administrative expense

    4,816     6,582     11,398  
 

Product development

    131     1,110     1,241  
 

Litigation settlements and contingencies

    16         16  
 

Restructuring expense

    7     2,603     2,610  
 

Amortization of intangibles

        943     943  
 

Depreciation

    490     884     1,374  
               
 

Total operating expenses

    10,355     26,786     37,141  
               

Operating income (loss)

    5,109     (9,274 )   (4,165 )

Adjustments to reconcile to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:

                   
 

Amortization of intangibles

        943     943  
 

Depreciation

    490     884     1,374  
               

EBITDA from continuing operations

    5,599     (7,447 )   (1,848 )
 

Restructuring expense

    7     2,603     2,610  
 

Non-cash compensation

    131     963     1,094  
 

Loss on disposal of assets

        4     4  
 

Litigation settlements and contingencies

    16         16  
               

Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations

  $ 5,753   $ (3,877 ) $ 1,876  
               

Reconciliation to net loss in total:

                   

Operating loss per above

              $ (4,165 )

Other expense, net

                (159 )
                   

Loss before income taxes

                (4,324 )

Income tax provision

                (543 )
                   

Net loss from continuing operations

                (4,867 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

                (1,279 )
                   

Net loss

              $ (6,146 )
                   

G-14


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 7—SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

        Significant components of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands):

 
  Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
 
  2011   2010  

LendingTree Loans:

             
 

Origination and sale of loans

  $ 17,309   $ 23,400  
 

Other

    1,941     2,338  
           
   

Total LendingTree Loans

    19,250     25,738  
           

Exchanges:

             
 

Match fees

    12,627     14,248  
 

Closed loan fees

    1,006     3,758  
 

Other

    491     980  
           
   

Total Exchanges

    14,124     18,986  
           

Total revenue

  $ 33,374   $ 44,724  
           

        Total assets by segment at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows (in thousands):

 
  March 31,
2011
  December 31,
2010
 

LendingTree Loans

  $ 138,457   $ 194,244  

Exchanges

    81,496     78,971  

Discontinued Operations

    403     9,587  
           

Total

  $ 220,356   $ 282,802  
           

NOTE 8—DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

        On March 10, 2011, management of the Company made the decision and finalized a plan to close all of the field offices of the proprietary full service real estate brokerage business known as RealEstate.com, REALTORS®, which was previously reported within the Real Estate reporting segment (see Note 7). The Company exited all markets by March 31, 2011. Accordingly, RealEstate.com, REALTORS® is presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for all periods presented.

        The revenue and net loss for the aforementioned discontinued operations for the applicable periods were as follows (in thousands):

 
  Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
 
  2011   2010  

Revenue

  $ 1,792   $ 3,287  
           

Loss before income taxes

  $ (10,660 ) $ (1,177 )

Income tax provision

        (102 )
           

Net loss

  $ (10,660 ) $ (1,279 )
           

G-15


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 8—DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (Continued)

        Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2011 includes goodwill disposal charges totaling $8.0 million and restructuring charges totaling $1.9 million. The amount of goodwill allocated to discontinued operations and subsequently disposed of was based on the relative fair values prior to disposition of the business disposed of and the business retained.

        The assets and liabilities of RealEstate.com, REALTORS® reported as discontinued operations as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):

 
  March 31,
2011
  December 31,
2010
 

Current assets

  $ 232   $ 219  
           

Property and equipment

        1,215  

Goodwill

        7,967  

Other non-current assets

    171     186  
           
 

Non-current assets

    171     9,368  
           

Current liabilities

    2,381     1,031  

Non-current liabilities

    282     288  
           

Net assets (liabilities)

  $ (2,260 ) $ 8,268  
           

NOTE 9—EARNINGS PER SHARE AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

        The following table sets forth the computation of Basic and Diluted earnings per share:

 
  Three Months Ended March 31,  
 
  2011   2010  
 
  Basic   Diluted   Basic   Diluted  
 
  (In thousands, except per share data)
 

Numerator:

                         

Loss from continuing operations

  $ (28,835 ) $ (28,835 ) $ (4,867 ) $ (4,867 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (10,660 )   (10,660 )   (1,279 )   (1,279 )
                   

Net loss available to common shareholders

  $ (39,495 ) $ (39,495 ) $ (6,146 ) $ (6,146 )
                   

Denominator:

                         

Weighted average common shares

    10,882     10,882     10,960     10,960  
                   

Loss per Share:

                         

Loss from continuing operations

  $ (2.65 ) $ (2.65 ) $ (0.44 ) $ (0.44 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (0.98 )   (0.98 )   (0.12 )   (0.12 )
                   

Net loss per common share

  $ (3.63 ) $ (3.63 ) $ (0.56 ) $ (0.56 )
                   

G-16


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 9—EARNINGS PER SHARE AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

        Non-cash compensation expense related to equity awards is included in the following line items in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

 
  Three Months
Ended
March 31,
 
 
  2011   2010  

Cost of revenue

  $ 3   $ 15  

Selling and marketing expense

    160     68  

General and administrative expense

    1,042     957  

Product development

    96     54  
           

Non-cash compensation expense

  $ 1,301   $ 1,094  
           

        The forms of stock-based awards granted to Tree.com employees are principally restricted stock units ("RSUs"), restricted stock and stock options. RSUs are awards in the form of units, denominated in a hypothetical equivalent number of shares of Tree.com common stock and with the value of each award equal to the fair value of Tree.com common stock at the date of grant. RSUs may be settled in cash, stock or both, as determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant. Each stock-based award is subject to service-based vesting, where a specific period of continued employment must pass before an award vests. Certain restricted stock awards also include performance-based vesting, where certain performance targets set at the time of grant must be achieved before an award vests. Tree.com recognizes expense for all stock-based awards for which vesting is considered probable. For stock-based awards, the accounting charge is measured at the grant date as the fair value of Tree.com common stock and expensed ratably as non-cash compensation over the vesting term. For performance-based awards, the expense is measured at the grant date as the fair value of Tree.com common stock and expensed as non-cash compensation over the vesting period if the performance targets are considered probable of being achieved.

        The amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statement of operations is reduced by estimated forfeitures, as the amount recorded is based on awards ultimately expected to vest. The forfeiture rate is estimated at the grant date based on historical experience and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if the actual forfeiture rate differs from the estimated rate.

        A summary of changes in outstanding stock options for the three months ended March 31, 2011 is as follows:

 
  Shares   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
 
   
   
  (In years)
  (In thousands)
 

Outstanding at January 1, 2011

    952,669   $ 9.58              

Granted

                     

Exercised

    (5,101 )   4.19              

Forfeited

    (875 )   7.46              

Expired

    (4,173 )   7.97              
                       

Outstanding at March 31, 2011

    942,520   $ 9.62     6.0   $ 21  
                   

Options exercisable at March 31, 2011

    315,756   $ 12.01     4.6   $ 21  
                   

G-17


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 9—EARNINGS PER SHARE AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

        The following table summarizes the information about stock options outstanding and exercisable as of March 31, 2011:

 
  Options Outstanding   Options Exercisable  
Range of Exercise Prices
  Outstanding at
March 31, 2011
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
  Exercisable at
March 31, 2011
  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 

$.01 to $4.99

    7,012     2.24   $ 2.89     7,012   $ 2.89  

$5.00 to $7.45

    11,290     1.77     6.65     11,290     6.65  

$7.46 to $9.99

    742,780     6.74     8.29     116,016     7.56  

$10.00 to $14.99

    53,369     2.07     12.24     53,369     12.24  

$15.00 to $19.99

    81,406     4.15     15.03     81,406     15.03  

$20.00 to $24.99

    46,663     4.19     20.19     46,663     20.19  
                             

    942,520     6.03   $ 9.62     315,756   $ 12.01  
                             

        Additionally, on April 8, 2011 the Chairman and CEO was granted 153,868 stock options that vest in three equal installments beginning on April 8, 2012. The weighted average exercise price and the weighted average fair value related to these stock options were $5.89 and $2.60, respectively.

        Nonvested RSUs and restricted stock outstanding as of March 31, 2011 and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2011 were as follows:

 
  RSUs   Restricted Stock  
 
  Number of
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
  Number of
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Nonvested at January 1, 2011

    634,771   $ 7.53     412,500   $ 6.80  

Granted

    297,916     7.47          

Vested

    (190,871 )   7.17     (137,500 )   6.80  

Forfeited

    (2,672 )   7.26          
                   

Nonvested at March 31, 2011

    739,144   $ 7.63     275,000   $ 6.80  
                   

NOTE 10—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

        Tree.com categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the assumptions used in pricing the asset or liability into the following three levels:

G-18


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 10—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

        LendingTree Loans enters into commitments with consumers to originate loans at a specified interest rate (interest rate lock commitments—"IRLCs"). Tree.com reports IRLCs as derivative instruments at fair value with changes in fair value being recorded in current earnings as a component of revenue from the origination and sale of loans. IRLCs for loans to be sold to investors using a mandatory or assignment of trade ("AOT") method are hedged using "to be announced mortgage-backed securities" ("TBA MBS") and are valued using quantitative risk models. The IRLCs derive their base value from an underlying loan type with similar characteristics using the TBA MBS market which is actively quoted and easily validated through external sources. The most significant data inputs used in this valuation include, but are not limited to, loan type, underlying loan amount, note rate, loan program, and expected sale date of the loan. IRLCs for loans sold to investors on a best efforts basis are hedged using best efforts forward delivery commitments and are valued on an individual loan basis using a proprietary database program. These valuations are based on investor pricing tables stratified by product, note rate and term. The valuation is adjusted at the loan level to consider the servicing release premium and loan pricing adjustments specific to each loan. The Company applies an anticipated loan funding probability based on its own experience to value IRLCs, which results in the classification of these derivatives as Level 3. The value of the underlying loan and the anticipated loan funding probability are the most significant assumptions affecting the valuation of IRLCs. There were no significant changes to the methods and assumptions for valuing IRLCs in the period ended March 31, 2011. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were $301.7 million and $216.6 million, respectively, of IRLCs notional value outstanding.

        Loans held for sale measured at fair value and sold to investors using a mandatory or AOT method are also hedged using TBA MBS and valued using quantitative risk models. The valuation is based on the loan amount, note rate, loan program, and expected sale date of the loan. Loans held for sale measured at fair value and sold to investors on a best efforts basis are hedged using best efforts forward delivery commitments and are valued using a proprietary database program. The best efforts valuations are based on daily investor pricing tables stratified by product, note rate and term. These valuations are adjusted at the loan level to consider the servicing release premium and loan pricing adjustments specific to each loan. Loans held for sale, excluding impaired loans, are classified as Level 2. Loans held for sale measured at fair value that become impaired are transferred from Level 2 to Level 3, as the estimate of fair value is based on the Company's experience considering lien position and current status of the loan. There were no significant changes to the method and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of impaired loans in the period ended March 31, 2011. LendingTree Loans recognizes interest income separately from other changes in fair value.

        Under LendingTree Loans' risk management policy, LendingTree Loans economically hedges the changes in fair value of IRLCs and loans held for sale caused by changes in interest rates by using TBA MBS and entering into best efforts forward delivery commitments. These hedging instruments are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in current earnings as a component of revenue from the origination and sale of loans. There were no significant changes to the methods and assumptions for valuing hedging instruments in the period ended March 31, 2011. TBA MBS used to hedge both IRLCs and loans are valued using quantitative risk models based primarily on inputs related to characteristics of the MBS stratified by product, coupon, and settlement date. These

G-19


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 10—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)


derivatives are classified as Level 2. Best efforts forward delivery commitments are valued using a proprietary database program using investor pricing tables considering the current base loan price. An anticipated loan funding probability is applied to value best efforts commitments hedging IRLCs, which results in the classification of these contracts as Level 3. The current base loan price and the anticipated loan funding probability are the most significant assumptions affecting the value of the best efforts commitments. The best efforts forward delivery commitments hedging loans held for sale are classified as Level 2, so such contracts are transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 at the time the underlying loan is originated. For the purposes of the tables below, we refer to TBA MBS and best efforts forward delivery commitments collectively as "Forward Delivery Contracts".

        The following presents Tree.com's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

 
  As of March 31, 2011  
 
  Recurring Fair Value Measurements Using  
 
  Quoted Market
Prices in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Total
Fair Value
Measurements
 

Loans held for sale

  $   $ 71,735   $ 962   $ 72,697  

Interest rate lock commitments ("IRLCs")

            5,628     5,628  

Forward delivery contracts

        (181 )   112     (69 )
                   

Total

  $   $ 71,554   $ 6,702   $ 78,256  
                   

 

 
  As of December 31, 2010  
 
  Recurring Fair Value Measurements Using  
 
  Quoted Market
Prices in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Total
Fair Value
Measurements
 

Loans held for sale

  $   $ 115,024   $ 884   $ 115,908  

Interest rate lock commitments ("IRLCs")

            5,986     5,986  

Forward delivery contracts

        1,001     3     1,004  
                   

Total

  $   $ 116,025   $ 6,873   $ 122,898  
                   

G-20


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 10—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

        The following presents the changes in Tree.com's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

 
  Three Months Ended
March 31, 2011
 
 
  Interest Rate
Lock
Commitments
  Forward
Delivery
Contracts
  Loans
Held for
Sale
 

Balance at January 1, 2011

  $ 5,986   $ 3   $ 884  
 

Transfers into Level 3

            335  
 

Transfers out of Level 3

        (28 )    
 

Total net gains (losses) included in earnings (realized and unrealized)

    15,940     195     (32 )
 

Purchases, sales, and settlements

                   
   

Purchases(a)

    970     (58 )    
   

Sales

            (220 )
   

Settlements

    (3,441 )       (5 )
 

Transfers of IRLCs to closed loans

    (13,827 )        
               

Balance at March 31, 2011

  $ 5,628   $ 112   $ 962  
               

(a)
Purchased in conjunction with the acquisition of certain assets of SurePoint.

 
  Three Months Ended
March 31, 2010
 
 
  Interest Rate
Lock
Commitments
  Forward
Delivery
Contracts
  Loans
Held for
Sale
 

Balance at January 1, 2010

  $ 3,680   $ 487   $ 777  
 

Transfers into Level 3

             
 

Transfers out of Level 3

        25      
 

Total net gains (losses) included in earnings (realized and unrealized)

    21,333     (359 )   1  
 

Purchases, sales, and settlements

                   
   

Purchases

             
   

Sales

             
   

Settlements

    (4,714 )       (2 )
 

Transfers of IRLCs to closed loans

    (14,791 )        
               

Balance at March 31, 2010

  $ 5,508   $ 153   $ 776  
               

G-21


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 10—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

        The following presents the gains (losses) included in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 relating to Tree.com's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in thousands):

 
  Three Months
Ended March 31, 2011
 
 
  Interest Rate
Lock
Commitments
  Forward
Delivery
Contracts
  Loans
Held
for Sale
 

Total net gains (losses) included in earnings, which are included in revenue from LendingTree Loans

  $ 15,940   $ 195   $ (32 )
               

Change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities still held at March 31, 2011, which are included in revenue from LendingTree Loans

  $ 4,832   $ 129   $ (99 )
               

 

 
  Three Months
Ended March 31, 2010
 
 
  Interest Rate
Lock
Commitments
  Forward
Delivery
Contracts
  Loans
Held
for Sale
 

Total net gains included in earnings, which are included in revenue from LendingTree Loans

  $ 21,333   $ (359 ) $ 1  
               

Change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities still held at March 31, 2010 which are included in revenue from LendingTree Loans

  $ 5,508   $ 153   $ 1  
               

        The following table summarizes the Company's derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

   
  March 31, 2011   December 31, 2010  
   
  Balance Sheet Location   Fair Value   Balance Sheet Location   Fair Value  
 

Interest Rate Lock Commitments

  Prepaid and other current assets   $ 5,707   Prepaid and other current assets   $ 5,991  
 

Forward Delivery Contracts

  Prepaid and other current assets     744   Prepaid and other current assets     2,633  
 

Interest Rate Lock Commitments

  Accrued expenses and other current liabilities     (79 ) Accrued expenses and other current liabilities     (5 )
 

Forward Delivery Contracts

  Accrued expenses and other current liabilities     (813 ) Accrued expenses and other current liabilities     (1,629 )
                     
 

Total Derivatives

      $ 5,559       $ 6,990  
                     

G-22


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 10—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

        The gain/(loss) recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for derivatives for the periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was as follows (in thousands):

   
   
  Three Months Ended  
   
  Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized
in Income on Derivative
  March 31,
2011
  March 31,
2010
 
 

Interest Rate Lock Commitments

  LendingTree Loans revenue   $ 15,940   $ 21,333  
 

Forward Delivery Contracts

  LendingTree Loans revenue     (904 )   (2,073 )
                 
   

Total

      $ 15,036   $ 19,260  
                 

        Tree.com has elected to account for loans held for sale originated on or after January 1, 2008 at fair value. Electing the fair value option allows a better offset of the changes in fair values of the loans and the forward delivery contracts used to economically hedge them without the burden of complying with the requirements for hedge accounting.

        Tree.com did not elect the fair value option on loans held for sale originated prior to January 1, 2008 and on loans that were repurchased from investors on or subsequent to that date. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, 20 and 23 such loans, respectively, all of which were impaired, were included in loans held for sale and were carried at the lower of cost or market ("LOCOM") value assessed on an individual loan basis. The market value (or fair value) of these impaired loans at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, measured on a non-recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), was $0.6 million and $0.8 million, respectively. This fair value measurement is management's best estimate of the market value of such loans and considers the lien position and loan status.

        The following presents the difference between the aggregate principal balance of loans held for sale for which the fair value option has been elected and for loans measured at LOCOM as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

 
  As of March 31, 2011  
 
  Loans Held
for Sale—
Measured at
Fair Value
  Loans Held
for Sale—
Measured at
LOCOM
  Total Loans
Held For
Sale
 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance

  $ 71,159   $ 1,895   $ 73,054  

Difference between fair value and aggregate unpaid principal balance

    1,538         1,538  

Lower of cost or market valuation allowance

        (1,288 )   (1,288 )

Deferred loan fees, net of costs

        (8 )   (8 )
               

Loans held for sale

  $ 72,697   $ 599   $ 73,296  
               

G-23


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 10—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

 

 
  As of December 31, 2010  
 
  Loans Held
for Sale—
Measured at
Fair Value
  Loans Held
for Sale—
Measured at
LOCOM
  Total Loans
Held For
Sale
 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance

  $ 113,116   $ 2,290   $ 115,406  

Difference between fair value and aggregate unpaid principal balance

    2,792         2,792  

Lower of cost or market valuation allowance

        (1,508 )   (1,508 )

Deferred loan fees, net of costs

        (9 )   (9 )
               

Loans held for sale

  $ 115,908   $ 773   $ 116,681  
               

        During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the change in fair value of loans held for sale for which the fair value option was elected was a loss of $1.6 million and a gain of $2.0 million, respectively, and is included as a component of LendingTree Loans revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.


Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

        The Company's non-financial assets, such as goodwill, intangible assets and property and equipment are measured at fair value when there is an indicator of impairment and recorded at fair value only when an impairment charge is recognized. Such impairment charges incorporate fair value measurements based on Level 3 inputs. See Notes 3 and 8 for discussion of goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges.

NOTE 11—ORIGINATION AND SALE OF LOANS, LOANS HELD FOR SALE AND LOAN LOSS OBLIGATIONS

Origination and Sale of Loans

        LendingTree Loans' revenues are primarily derived from the origination and sale of loans. Mortgage loans are funded through warehouse lines of credit and are recorded at fair value. Changes in the fair value of mortgage loans are recorded through revenue prior to the sale of the loans to investors, which typically occurs within thirty days. The gain or loss on the sale of loans is recognized on the date the loans are sold and is based on the difference between the sale proceeds received and the fair value of the loans. The Company sells its loans on a servicing released basis in which the Company gives up the right to service the loans.

G-24


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 11—ORIGINATION AND SALE OF LOANS, LOANS HELD FOR SALE AND LOAN LOSS OBLIGATIONS (Continued)

        A summary of the initial unpaid principal balance of loans sold by type of loan for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is presented below ($ amounts in millions):

 
  Three Months Ended March 31,  
 
  2011   2010  
 
  Amount   %   Amount   %  

Conforming

  $ 397     74 % $ 460     77 %

FHA

    116     21 %   110     18 %

Jumbo

    26     5 %   32     5 %
                   

Total

  $ 539     100 % $ 602     100 %
                   


Loans Held for Sale

        LendingTree Loans originates all of its residential real estate loans with the intent to sell them in the secondary market. Loans held for sale consist primarily of residential first mortgage loans that are secured by residential real estate throughout the United States.

        The following table represents the loans held for sale by type of loan as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 ($ amounts in thousands):

 
  March 31, 2011   December 31,
2010
 
 
  Amount   %   Amount   %  

Conforming

  $ 54,229     74 % $ 86,451     74 %

FHA and Alt-A

    15,898     22 %   20,431     18 %

Jumbo

    2,672     4 %   9,129     8 %

Subprime

    407     %   580     %

Home equity

    90     %   90     %
                   

Total

  $ 73,296     100 % $ 116,681     100 %
                   

G-25


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 11—ORIGINATION AND SALE OF LOANS, LOANS HELD FOR SALE AND LOAN LOSS OBLIGATIONS (Continued)

        The following presents the difference between the aggregate principal balance of loans on nonaccrual status for which the fair value option has been elected and for loans measured at lower of cost or market valuation as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

 
  As of March 31, 2011  
 
  Loans on
Nonaccrual—
Measured at
Fair Value
  Loans on
Nonaccrual—
Measured at
LOCOM
  Total Loans on
Nonaccrual
 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance

  $ 1,492   $ 1,895   $ 3,387  

Difference between fair value and aggregate unpaid principal balance

    (530 )       (530 )

Lower of cost or market valuation allowance

        (1,288 )   (1,288 )

Deferred loan fees, net of costs

        (8 )   (8 )
               

Loans on nonaccrual

  $ 962   $ 599   $ 1,561  
               

 

 
  As of December 31, 2010  
 
  Loans on
Nonaccrual—
Measured at
Fair Value
  Loans on
Nonaccrual—
Measured at
LOCOM
  Total Loans on
Nonaccrual
 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance

  $ 1,380   $ 2,290   $ 3,670  

Difference between fair value and aggregate unpaid principal balance

    (496 )       (496 )

Lower of cost or market valuation allowance

        (1,508 )   (1,508 )

Deferred loan fees, net of costs

        (9 )   (9 )
               

Loans on nonaccrual

  $ 884   $ 773   $ 1,657  
               

        Included within the loans on nonaccrual status are repurchased loans with a net book value of $0.2 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, LendingTree Loans did not repurchase any loans.

        Real estate properties acquired in satisfaction of loans totaled $0.2 million and $0.1 million, net of estimated selling expenses, at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and are included in prepaid and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The estimated fair values are determined using current real estate market conditions and estimated selling expenses, which are unobservable inputs (Level 3).


Loan Loss Obligations

        LendingTree Loans sells loans it originates to investors on a servicing released basis so the risk of loss or default by the borrower is generally transferred to the investor. However, LendingTree Loans is required by these investors to make certain representations relating to credit information, loan documentation and collateral. These representations and warranties may extend through the contractual

G-26


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 11—ORIGINATION AND SALE OF LOANS, LOANS HELD FOR SALE AND LOAN LOSS OBLIGATIONS (Continued)


life of the mortgage loan. Subsequent to the sale, if underwriting deficiencies, borrower fraud or documentation defects are discovered in individual mortgage loans, LendingTree Loans may be obligated to repurchase the respective mortgage loan or indemnify the investors for any losses from borrower defaults if such deficiency or defect cannot be cured within the specified period following discovery.

        In the case of early loan payoffs and early defaults on certain loans, LendingTree Loans may be required to repay all or a portion of the premium initially paid by the investor. The estimated obligation associated with early loan payoffs and early defaults is calculated based on historical loss experience by type of loan.

        The obligation for losses related to the representations and warranties and other provisions discussed above is initially recorded at its estimated fair value, which includes a projection of expected future losses as well as a market based premium. Because LendingTree Loans does not service the loans it sells, it does not maintain nor have access to the current balances and loan performance data with respect to the individual loans previously sold to investors. Accordingly, the Company is unable to determine, with precision, its maximum exposure under its representations and warranties. However, LendingTree Loans utilizes the original loan balance (before it was sold to an investor), historical and projected loss frequency and loss severity ratios by loan type as well as analyses of losses in process to estimate its exposure to losses on loans previously sold. The Company maintains a liability related to this exposure based, in part, on historical and projected loss frequency and loss severity using its loan loss history (adjusted for recent trends in loan loss experience), the original principal amount of the loans previously sold, the year the loans were sold, and loan type. Accordingly, subsequent adjustments to the obligation, if any, are not made based on changes in the fair value of the obligation, which might include an estimated change in losses that may be expected in the future, but are made once further losses are estimated to be both probable and estimable. As such, given current general industry trends in mortgage loans as well as housing prices, market expectations around losses related to the Company's obligations could vary significantly from the obligation recorded as of the balance sheet date or the range estimated below. In estimating its exposure to loan losses, LendingTree Loans segments its loan sales into four segments based on the extent of the documentation provided by the borrower to substantiate income and/or assets (full or limited documentation) and the lien position of the mortgage in the underlying property (first or second position). Each of these segments has a different loss experience with full documentation, first lien position loans generally having the lowest loss ratios and limited documentation, second lien position loans generally having the highest loss ratios.

G-27


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 11—ORIGINATION AND SALE OF LOANS, LOANS HELD FOR SALE AND LOAN LOSS OBLIGATIONS (Continued)

        The following table represents the loans sold for the period shown and the aggregate loan losses through March 31, 2011:

 
  As of March 31, 2011  
Period of Loan Sales
  Number
of loans
sold
  Original
principal
balance
  Number of
loans with
losses
  Original
principal
balance of
loans with
losses
  Amount of
aggregate
losses
 
 
   
  (in billions)
   
  (in millions)
  (in millions)
 

Three months ended March 31, 2011

    2,500   $ 0.5     0   $ 0   $ 0  

2010

    12,400     2.8     2     0.6     0.1  

2009

    12,800     2.8     3     0.8     0.1  

2008

    11,000     2.2     21     4.3     1.1  

2007

    36,300     6.1     149     20.2     7.0  

2006

    55,000     7.9     202     23.4     12.7  

2005 and prior years

    86,700     13.0     87     11.7     4.7  
                       

Total

    216,700   $ 35.3     464   $ 61.0   $ 25.7  
                       

        The pipeline of 97 loan repurchase requests and indemnifications as of March 31, 2011 was considered in determining the appropriate reserve amount. The status of these 97 loans varied from an initial review stage, which may result in a rescission of the request, to in process, where the probability of incurring a loss is high, to indemnification, whereby the Company has agreed to reimburse the purchaser of that loan if and when losses are incurred. The indemnification may have a specific term, thereby limiting the Company's exposure. The original principal amount of these loans is approximately $18.2 million, comprised of approximately 76% full documentation first liens, 3% full documentation second liens, 15% limited documentation first liens, and 6% limited documentation second liens.

        In the fourth quarter of 2009, LendingTree Loans entered into settlement negotiations with two buyers of previously purchased limited documentation loans. The settlement with one buyer was completed in December 2009 and included a payment of $1.9 million related to all second lien loans sold to this buyer, including both full and limited documentation. This amount was not determined on an individual loan basis and is, therefore, not included in the loss amounts disclosed above based on the year such loans were sold. The settlement was included as a charge off to the reserve in 2009. Negotiations with the second buyer were completed in January 2010. This settlement of $4.5 million, which was paid in four equal quarterly installments in 2010, relates to all future losses on limited documentation second lien loans sold to this buyer. LendingTree Loans must also pay an additional amount of up to $0.3 million in conjunction with this settlement since it did not sell a certain volume of loans to this buyer in 2010. This amount is included in the total settlement amount and the estimated settlement payments remaining to be paid. This settlement amount is included as a charge off to the reserve in 2010 and is not included in the table above.

        Based on historical experience, it is anticipated that the Company will continue to receive repurchase requests and incur losses on loans sold in prior years. However, the two settlements discussed above will eliminate future repurchase requests from those buyers for the loan types included in those settlements. As of March 31, 2011, LendingTree Loans estimated the range of remaining

G-28


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 11—ORIGINATION AND SALE OF LOANS, LOANS HELD FOR SALE AND LOAN LOSS OBLIGATIONS (Continued)


possible losses due to representations and warranty issues based on the methodology described above, excluding the $0.3 million settlement remaining to be paid in 2011, as $16 million to $26 million. The Company believes that it has adequately reserved for these losses.

        The activity related to loss reserves on previously sold loans for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, is as follows (in thousands):

 
  Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
 
  2011   2010  

Balance, beginning of period

  $ 16,984   $ 16,985  

Provisions

    3,250     1,464  

Charge offs to reserves(a)

    (196 )   (5,617 )
           

Balance, end of period

  $ 20,038   $ 12,832  
           

(a)
The three months ended March 31, 2010 includes a charge off for the amount of the $4.5 million loan loss settlement plus a portion of the $0.3 million additional accrual discussed above. The remaining settlement payment due of $0.3 million is tracked as a liability separate from the loan loss reserve (see table below).

        Based on an analysis of the Company's historical loan loss experience, it has been determined that a portion of the loan losses expected to be made by investors will be made more than twelve months following the initial sale of the underlying loan. Accordingly, the Company has estimated the portion of its loans sold reserve that it anticipates it will be liable for after twelve months and has classified that portion of the reserve as a long-term liability. The liability for losses on previously sold loans is presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 as follows (in thousands):

 
  As of March 31,
2011
  As of December 31,
2010
 

Current portion related to settlement above, included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  $ 300   $ 300  

Other current portion, included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities

    6,928     5,459  

Long term portion, included in other long-term liabilities

    13,110     11,525  
           

Total

  $ 20,338   $ 17,284  
           

NOTE 12—INCOME TAXES

        For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, Tree.com recorded a tax provision of $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively, which represents effective tax rates of (0.9)% and (12.6)%, respectively. In the first quarter of 2011, the tax rate is lower than the federal statutory rate of 35%

G-29


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 12—INCOME TAXES (Continued)


mainly due to the change in the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. In the first quarter of 2010, the tax rate was lower than the federal statutory rate of 35% due to the change in the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and an increase to the FIN 48 reserve.

        Tree.com's unrecognized tax benefits increased by an immaterial amount in the first quarter of 2011. The increase was due to penalty and interest on uncertain tax positions in prior years. Tree.com believes that it is reasonably possible that its remaining unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by approximately $0.06 million within twelve months of the current reporting date due to the expiration of state statute of limitations. An estimate of other changes in unrecognized tax benefits cannot be made, but are not expected to be significant.

        For the three months ended March 31, 2011, Tree.com determined that its activity yielded an unusual effective tax rate; therefore, Tree.com utilized the actual year to date effective tax rate for purposes of determining year to date tax expense. This approach is consistent with the three months ended March 31, 2010.

NOTE 13—CONTINGENCIES

        During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, provisions for litigation settlements and contingencies of $4.5 million and $-0- million, respectively, were recorded in litigation settlements and contingencies in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The balance of the related liability was $4.8 million and $0.5 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

        In the ordinary course of business, Tree.com is a party to various lawsuits. Tree.com establishes reserves for specific legal matters when it determines that the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is probable and the loss is reasonably estimable. Management has also identified certain other legal matters where it believes an unfavorable outcome is not probable and, therefore, no reserve is established. Although management currently believes that an unfavorable resolution of claims against Tree.com, including claims where an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible, will not have a material impact on the liquidity, results of operations, or financial condition of Tree.com, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and management's view of these matters may change in the future. It is possible that an unfavorable outcome of one or more of these lawsuits could have a material impact on the liquidity, results of operations, or financial condition of Tree.com. Tree.com also evaluates other contingent matters, including tax contingencies, to assess the probability and estimated extent of potential loss.

G-30


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 14—RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

        The restructuring charges in 2010 primarily relate to continuing lease obligations on facilities previously used for call center operations, for which management had a plan to exit at December 31, 2009, but the cease-use date did not occur until January 2010. Costs that relate to ongoing operations are not part of restructuring charges. Restructuring charges by segment and type are as follows (in thousands):

 
  For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2011  
 
  Employee
Termination
Costs
  Continuing
Lease
Obligations
  Asset
Write-offs
  Total  

LendingTree Loans

  $ 295   $   $   $ 295  

Exchanges

    94             94  
                   

Total

  $ 389   $   $   $ 389  
                   

 

 
  For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2010  
 
  Employee
Termination
Costs
  Continuing
Lease
Obligations
  Asset
Write-offs
  Total  

LendingTree Loans

  $   $ 9   $ (2 ) $ 7  

Exchanges

    47     2,463     93     2,603  
                   

Total

  $ 47   $ 2,472   $ 91   $ 2,610  
                   

        Restructuring charges and spending against liabilities are as follows (in thousands):

 
  For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2011  
 
  Employee
Termination
Costs
  Continuing
Lease
Obligations
  Asset
Write-offs
  Other   Total  

Balance, beginning of period

  $ 19   $ 2,339   $   $   $ 2,358  
 

Restructuring charges

    389                 389  
 

Payments

    (136 )   (411 )           (547 )
 

Write-offs

                     
                       

Balance, end of period

  $ 272   $ 1,928   $   $   $ 2,200  
                       

        At March 31, 2011, restructuring liabilities of $1.1 million are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and $1.1 million are included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. At December 31, 2010, restructuring liabilities of $1.2 million are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and $1.2 million are included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Tree.com does not expect to incur significant additional costs related to the prior restructurings noted above.

G-31


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 15—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

        On May 12, 2011, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Discover Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Discover Financial Services. The Asset Purchase Agreement provides for the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of our LendingTree Loans segment to Discover Bank.

        Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, Discover Bank has agreed to pay approximately $55.9 million in cash for the assets, subject to certain adjustments as described in the Asset Purchase Agreement. $35.9 million is due upon the closing of the transaction and $10 million is due on each of the first and second anniversaries of the closing, subject to certain conditions as described in the Asset Purchase Agreement, including maintenance of the LendingTree Exchange and certain financial and operational metrics associated with the LendingTree Exchange business.

        Discover Bank generally will not assume liabilities of the LendingTree Loans business that arose before the closing date. A portion of the initial purchase price payment will be held in escrow pending the discharge of certain liabilities that will remain with us.

        The transaction is subject to various closing conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals and loan repurchase proposals for Discover Bank and the approval of our stockholders. Our board of directors has unanimously recommended that our stockholders approve the transaction. Douglas Lebda, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, who beneficially owns approximately 20% of our outstanding shares, a subsidiary of Liberty Media Corporation which owns approximately 25% of our outstanding shares, and various funds managed by Second Curve, LLC, which own less than 5% of our outstanding shares, have entered into voting and support agreements with Discover Bank which obligate them to vote in favor of the transaction. The transaction is expected to close by the end of 2011.

        The Asset Purchase Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants and indemnification obligations of the parties.

        The Asset Purchase Agreement also includes covenants of us and Discover Bank. Subject to certain exceptions stated in the Asset Purchase Agreement, we have agreed to operate the LendingTree Loans business in the ordinary course and to maintain certain operational and financial metrics until the closing of the transaction. Our covenants include requirements to maintain personnel in our LendingTree Loans business, to maintain certain quality thresholds for our loan pipeline, to maintain warehouse line capacity and compliance with our warehouse lending agreement, and subject to certain exceptions, not to introduce new loan products without Discover Bank's consent. If the requirements of these covenants are not met, Discover Bank has the option to terminate the Asset Purchase Agreement. Subject to certain exceptions, we have also agreed not to solicit or initiate discussion with third parties regarding other proposals to acquire the assets of the LendingTree Loans business or substantial equity interests in our company, and to certain restrictions on our ability to respond to or accept any such proposals.

        The Asset Purchase Agreement also includes customary termination provisions, including that each of our company and Discover Bank may terminate the Asset Purchase Agreement if the other party has materially breached any representation, warranty or covenant contained in the Asset Purchase Agreement and failed to cure such breach, if our stockholders do not approve the transaction or if the closing has not occurred within 150 days from the signing (subject to certain extensions for up to 150 additional days). Discover Bank may terminate the Asset Purchase Agreement if our board of directors determines, after considering any modified proposals from Discover Bank, to change its

G-32


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

NOTE 15—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Continued)


recommendation to our stockholders because a failure to do so would constitute a breach of its fiduciary duties, or if we materially breach our non-solicitation obligations or our obligation to hold a meeting of our stockholders to approve the transaction. If the Asset Purchase Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, including due to a change of recommendation by our board of directors, we will be required to pay Discover Bank a termination fee of $2.2 million. If Discover Bank does not complete the acquisition as a result of its inability to obtain proposals for loan purchase arrangements that are customary for a bank that is similarly situated to Discover Bank, Discover Bank will be required to pay us a termination fee of $5 million.

        We have also agreed to perform certain services to Discover Bank in connection with its mortgage origination business for a two-year term commencing on the date of entry into the Asset Purchase Agreement. Discover Bank has also agreed to be a participating lender in the LendingTree Network following the closing of the acquisition.

G-33


Table of Contents

APPENDIX H

TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

        The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements give effect to the HLC asset sale transaction. The statements are derived from, and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and the notes thereto included in Appendix E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix F is attached and our Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Appendix D to the proxy statement to which this Appendix F.

        The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2011 assumes the HLC asset sale transaction occurred March 31, 2011. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements of operations for the years end December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 give effect to the HLC asset sale transaction as if it had occurred as of the beginning of those periods.

        The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is based upon estimates by our management, which are based upon available information and certain assumptions that our management believes are reasonable. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information is not intended to be indicative of actual results of operations or financial position that would have been achieved had the HLC asset sale transaction been completed as of the beginning of each period indicated above, nor does it purport to indicate results which may be attained in the future. Actual amounts could differ materially from these estimates.

        The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and certain assumptions that management believes are reasonable in the circumstances. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes thereto.

H-1


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

MARCH 31, 2011
(In thousands, except par value and share amounts)

 
  As
Reported(a)
  Dispositions(b)   Pro Forma  

ASSETS:

                   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 53,520   $ 38,163   $ 91,683  

Restricted cash and cash equivalents

    9,933     (1,237 )   8,696  

Accounts receivable, net

    6,893     (7 )   6,886  

Loans held for sale

    73,296     (1,561 )   71,735  

Prepaid and other current assets

    11,313     (8,470 )   2,843  

Current assets of discontinued operations

    232         232  
               
 

Total current assets

    155,187     26,888     182,075  

Property and equipment, net

    12,594     (3,788 )   8,806  

Goodwill

    10,741     (7,109 )   3,632  

Intangible assets, net

    41,013         41,013  

Other non-current assets

    650     (535 )   115  

Non-current assets of discontinued operations

    171         171  
               
 

Total assets

  $ 220,356   $ 15,456   $ 235,812  
               

LIABILITIES:

                   

Warehouse lines of credit

  $ 66,472   $   $ 66,472  

Accounts payable, trade

    14,451     (218 )   14,233  

Deferred revenue

    257         257  

Deferred income taxes

    2,358     6     2,364  

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

    38,871     (3,108 )   35,763  

Current liabilities of discontinued operations

    2,381         2,381  
               
 

Total current liabilities

    124,790     (3,320 )   121,470  

Income taxes payable

    99         99  

Other long-term liabilities

    17,322         17,322  

Deferred income taxes

    14,211         14,211  

Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations

    282         282  
               
 

Total liabilities

    156,704     (3,320 )   153,384  

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:

                   

Preferred stock $.01 par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares; none issued or outstanding

             

Common stock $.01 par value; authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued 12,111,999 shares and outstanding 10,988,738 shares

    121         121  

Additional paid-in capital

    910,160         910,160  

Accumulated deficit

    (838,097 )   18,776     (819,321 )

Treasury stock 1,123,261 shares

    (8,532 )       (8,532 )
               
 

Total shareholders' equity

    63,652     18,776     82,428  
               
 

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

  $ 220,356   $ 15,456   $ 235,812  
               

H-2


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 
  As Reported(a)   Disposition(c)   Pro Forma  

Revenue

                   
   

LendingTree Loans

  $ 19,250   $ (19,250 ) $  
   

Exchanges

    14,124         14,124  
               
 

Total revenue

    33,374     (19,250 )   14,124  

Cost of revenue

                   
   

LendingTree Loans

    10,764     (10,764 )    
   

Exchanges

    1,348         1,348  
               
 

Total cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below)

    12,112     (10,764 )   1,348  
               
 

Gross margin

    21,262     (8,486 )   12,776  

Operating expenses

                   
 

Selling and marketing expense

    23,333     (7,703 )   15,630  
 

General and administrative expense

    13,103     (7,145 )   5,958  
 

Product development

    1,535     (246 )   1,289  
 

Litigation settlements and contingencies

    4,502     (2 )   4,500  
 

Restructuring expense

    389     (295 )   94  
 

Amortization of intangibles

    307         307  
 

Depreciation

    1,576     (397 )   1,179  
 

Asset impairments

    5,007         5,007  
               
   

Total operating expenses

    49,752     (15,788 )   33,964  
               
   

Operating loss

    (28,490 )   7,302     (21,188 )

Other expense

                   
 

Interest expense

    (80 )       (80 )
               

Total other expense, net

    (80 )       (80 )
               

Loss before income taxes

    (28,570 )   7,302     (21,268 )

Income tax provision

    (265 )   (3,551 )   (3,816 )
               

Net loss from continuing operations

    (28,835 )   3,751     (25,084 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (10,660 )       (10,660 )
               

Net loss available to common shareholders

  $ (39,495 ) $ 3,751   $ (35,744 )
               

Weighted average common shares outstanding

    10,882           10,882  
                 

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding

    10,882           10,882  
                 

Net loss per share from continuing operations

                   
 

Basic

  $ (2.65 )       $ (2.31 )
                 
 

Diluted

  $ (2.65 )       $ (2.31 )
                 

Net loss per share available to common shareholders

                   
 

Basic

  $ (3.63 )       $ (3.28 )
                 
 

Diluted

  $ (3.63 )       $ (3.28 )
                 

H-3


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 
  As Reported(a)   Disposition(c)   Pro Forma  

Revenue

                   
   

LendingTree Loans

  $ 25,738   $ (25,738 ) $  
   

Exchanges

    18,986         18,986  
               
 

Total revenue

    44,724     (25,738 )   18,986  

Cost of revenue

                   
   

LendingTree Loans

    10,274     (10,274 )    
   

Exchanges

    1,474         1,474  
               
 

Total cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below)

    11,748     (10,274 )   1,474  
               
 

Gross margin

    32,976     (15,464 )   17,512  

Operating expenses

                   
 

Selling and marketing expense

    19,559     (4,895 )   14,664  
 

General and administrative expense

    11,398     (4,816 )   6,582  
 

Product development

    1,241     (131 )   1,110  
 

Litigation settlements and contingencies

    16     (16 )    
 

Restructuring expense

    2,610     (7 )   2,603  
 

Amortization of intangibles

    943         943  
 

Depreciation

    1,374     (490 )   884  
               
   

Total operating expenses

    37,141     (10,355 )   26,786  
               
   

Operating loss

    (4,165 )   (5,109 )   (9,274 )

Other income (expense)

                   
 

Interest income

    7         7  
 

Interest expense

    (166 )       (166 )
               

Total other expense, net

    (159 )       (159 )
               

Loss before income taxes

    (4,324 )   (5,109 )   (9,433 )

Income tax provision

    (543 )   908     365  
               

Net loss from continuing operations

    (4,867 )   (4,201 )   (9,068 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (1,279 )       (1,279 )
               

Net loss available to common shareholders

  $ (6,146 ) $ (4,201 ) $ (10,347 )
               

Weighted average common shares outstanding

    10,960           10,960  
                 

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding

    10,960           10,960  
                 

Net loss per share from continuing operations

                   
 

Basic

  $ (0.44 )       $ (0.83 )
                 
 

Diluted

  $ (0.44 )       $ (0.83 )
                 

Net loss per share available to common shareholders

                   
 

Basic

  $ (0.56 )       $ (0.94 )
                 
 

Diluted

  $ (0.56 )       $ (0.94 )
                 

H-4


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 
  As
Reported(d)
  Disposition(c)   Pro Forma  

Revenue

                   
   

LendingTree Loans

  $ 124,180   $ (124,180 ) $  
   

Exchanges

    61,911         61,911  
               
 

Total revenue

    186,091     (124,180 )   61,911  

Cost of revenue

                   
   

LendingTree Loans

    44,056     (44,056 )    
   

Exchanges

    5,547         5,547  
               
 

Total cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below)

    49,603     (44,056 )   5,547  
               
 

Gross margin

    136,488     (80,124 )   56,364  

Operating expenses

                   
 

Selling and marketing expense

    72,600     (22,148 )   50,452  
 

General and administrative expense

    50,487     (24,253 )   26,234  
 

Product development

    3,983     (331 )   3,652  
 

Litigation settlements and contingencies

    2,072     (1,551 )   521  
 

Restructuring expense

    2,773     7     2,780  
 

Amortization of intangibles

    2,716         2,716  
 

Depreciation

    5,460     (1,701 )   3,759  
 

Asset impairments

    9,491         9,491  
               
   

Total operating expenses

    149,582     (49,977 )   99,605  
               
   

Operating loss

    (13,094 )   (30,147 )   (43,241 )

Other income (expense)

                   
 

Interest income

    8         8  
 

Interest expense

    (473 )       (473 )
               

Total other expense, net

    (465 )       (465 )
               

Loss before income taxes

    (13,559 )   (30,147 )   (43,706 )

Income tax provision

    936     (9,037 )   9,973  
               

Net loss from continuing operations

    (12,623 )   (21,110 )   (33,733 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (4,962 )       (4,962 )
               

Net loss available to common shareholders

  $ (17,585 ) $ (21,110 ) $ (38,695 )
               

Weighted average common shares outstanding

    11,014           11,014  
                 

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding

    11,014           11,014  
                 

Net loss per share from continuing operations

                   
 

Basic

  $ (1.15 )       $ (3.06 )
                 
 

Diluted

  $ (1.15 )       $ (3.06 )
                 

Net loss per share available to common shareholders

                   
 

Basic

  $ (1.60 )       $ (3.51 )
                 
 

Diluted

  $ (1.60 )       $ (3.51 )
                 

H-5


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 
  As
Reported(d)
  Disposition(c)   Pro Forma  

Revenue

                   
   

LendingTree Loans

  $ 117,670   $ (117,670 ) $  
   

Exchanges

    74,910         74,910  
               
 

Total revenue

    192,580     (117,670 )   74,910  

Cost of revenue

                   
   

LendingTree Loans

    48,998     (48,998 )    
   

Exchanges

    8,284         8,284  
               
 

Total cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below)

    57,282     (48,998 )   8,284  
               
 

Gross margin

    135,298     (68,672 )   66,626  

Operating expenses

                   
 

Selling and marketing expense

    58,270     (10,227 )   48,046  
 

General and administrative expense

    57,328     (20,374 )   36,954  
 

Product development

    4,788     (518 )   4,270  
 

Litigation settlements and contingencies

    13,175     (419 )   12,756  
 

Restructuring expense

    1,007     1,089     2,096  
 

Amortization of intangibles

    4,847     (280 )   4,567  
 

Depreciation

    6,237     (2,912 )   3,325  
 

Asset impairments

    6,097         6,097  
               
   

Total operating expenses

    151,749     (33,641 )   118,108  
               
   

Operating loss

    (16,451 )   (35,031 )   (51,482 )

Other income (expense)

                   
 

Interest income

    88         88  
 

Interest expense

    (617 )   2     (615 )
               

Total other expense, net

    (529 )   2     (527 )
               

Loss before income taxes

    (16,980 )   (35,029 )   (52,009 )

Income tax provision

    368     10,816     11,184  
               

Net loss from continuing operations

    (16,612 )   (24,213 )   (40,825 )

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (7,862 )       (7,862 )
               

Net loss available to common shareholders

  $ (24,474 ) $ (24,213 ) $ (48,687 )
               

Weighted average common shares outstanding

    10,536           10,536  
                 

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding

    10,536           10,536  
                 

Net loss per share from continuing operations

                   
 

Basic

  $ (1.58 )       $ (3.88 )
                 
 

Diluted

  $ (1.58 )       $ (3.88 )
                 

Net loss per share available to common shareholders

                   
 

Basic

  $ (2.32 )       $ (4.62 )
                 
 

Diluted

  $ (2.32 )       $ (4.62 )
                 

H-6


Table of Contents


TREE.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

        (a)   Historical activity as reported in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.

        (b)   To eliminate certain assets and liabilities of HLC as a result of the planned sale of these assets and liabilities, after adjusting for estimated cash proceeds to be received at closing. Pro Forma cash and cash equivalents includes the portion of the purchase price held in escrow pending the discharge of certain liabilities that will remain with us that are included in pro forma liabilities.

        (c)   To reflect the elimination of the HLC historical results of operations.

        (d)   Historical activity as reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as adjusted for the presentation of RealEstate.com, REALTORS as discontinued operations, which are included in our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 included in Appendix E to the proxy statement to which this Appendix F is attached.

H-7


Table of Contents


APPENDIX I

HOME LOAN CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 
  March 31,
2011
  December 31,
2010
  December 31,
2009
 
 
  (In thousands, except
par value and share amounts)

 

ASSETS:

                   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 39,179   $ 57,395   $ 56,520  

Restricted cash and cash equivalents

    3,693     4,319     3,167  

Accounts receivable

    751     730     429  

Loans held for sale

    73,296     116,681     93,596  

Property and equipment, net

    3,788     3,074     3,400  

Prepaid and other assets

    2,656     2,374     2,279  

Derivative assets

    6,451     8,624     7,260  

Intangible assets, net

    7,109          

Income tax receivable—parent

    2,470          

Deferred tax assets, net

    22,694     21,632     21,614  
               
 

Total assets

  $ 162,087   $ 214,829   $ 188,265  
               

LIABILITIES:

                   

Warehouse lines of credit

  $ 66,472   $ 100,623   $ 78,481  

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

    7,329     7,104     5,509  

Intercompany payable—parent

    2,054     4,663     2,099  

Derivative liabilities

    892     1,634     356  

Other liabilities

    2,066     2,591     2,503  

Income tax payable—parent

        9,395     8,302  

Loan loss obligations

    20,338     17,284     16,985  
               
 

Total liabilities

    99,151     143,294     114,235  

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:

                   

Common stock $.0001 par value; authorized, issued and outstanding , 100 shares

             

Additional paid-in capital

    65,835     70,683     75,304  

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

    (2,899 )   852     (1,274 )
               
 

Total shareholders' equity

    62,936     71,535     74,030  
               
 

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

  $ 162,087   $ 214,829   $ 188,265  
               

I-1


Table of Contents


HOME LOAN CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 
  Year Ended
December 31,
 
 
  2010   2009  
 
  (In thousands)
 

Revenue

             
   

Interest income

  $ 5,501   $ 4,839  
   

Interest expense

    (2,730 )   (1,285 )
           
   

Net interest income

    2,771     3,554  
   

Non-interest income:

             
     

Origination and sale of loans

    113,425     110,320  
     

Other income

    7,984     3,796  
           
 

Total non-interest income

    121,409     114,116  
           
 

Total revenue

    124,180     117,670  

Operating expenses

             
 

Salaries and benefits

    43,634     39,600  
 

Selling and marketing

    27,859     17,196  
 

Depreciation and amortization

    1,701     3,192  
 

Occupancy

    2,804     1,523  
 

Loan origination

    6,972     15,980  
 

General and administrative

    16,647     10,803  
           
   

Total operating expenses

    99,617     88,294  
           

Net income before income taxes

    24,563     29,376  

Income tax provision

    (9,037 )   (10,816 )
           

Net income

  $ 15,526   $ 18,560  
           

I-2


Table of Contents


HOME LOAN CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)


 
  Three Months
Ended March 31,
 
 
  2011   2010  
 
  (In thousands)
 

Revenue

             
   

Interest income

  $ 858   $ 1,035  
   

Interest expense

    (325 )   (377 )
           
   

Net interest income

    533     658  
   

Non-interest income:

             
     

Origination and sale of loans

    17,309     23,400  
     

Other income

    1,409     1,679  
           
 

Total non-interest income

    18,718     25,079  
           
 

Total revenue

    19,251     25,737  

Operating expenses

             
 

Salaries and benefits

    12,210     9,311  
 

Selling and marketing

    7,736     7,925  
 

Depreciation and amortization

    397     490  
 

Occupancy

    871     630  
 

Loan origination

    1,654     1,858  
 

General and administrative

    3,685     3,379  
           
   

Total operating expenses

    26,553     23,593  
           

Net income (loss) before income taxes

    (7,302 )   2,144  

Income tax benefit (provision)

    3,551     (908 )
           

Net income (loss)

  $ (3,751 ) $ 1,236  
           

I-3


Table of Contents


HOME LOAN CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

 
   
  Common Stock    
   
 
 
  Total   Number
of Shares
  Amount   Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Retained Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
 

Balance as of December 31, 2008

  $ 119,397     100   $   $ 76,589   $ 42,808  

Non-cash compensation

    244             244      

Dividend to parent

    (64,171 )           (1,529 )   (62,642 )

Net income

    18,560                 18,560  
                       

Balance as of December 31, 2009

    74,030     100         75,304     (1,274 )

Non-cash compensation

    379             379        

Dividend to parent

    (18,400 )           (5,000 )   (13,400 )

Net income

    15,526                 15,526  
                       

Balance as of December 31, 2010

  $ 71,535     100   $   $ 70,683   $ 852  
                       

I-4


Table of Contents


HOME LOAN CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 
  Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2010   2009  
 
  (In thousands)
 

Cash flows from operating activities:

             

Net income

  $ 15,526   $ 18,560  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

             
 

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

    56     90  
 

Depreciation and amortization

    1,701     3,192  
 

Non-cash compensation expense

    379     244  
 

Deferred income taxes

    678      
 

Gain on origination and sale of loans

    (113,425 )   (110,320 )
 

Loss on impaired loans not sold

    128     647  
 

Loss on sale of real estate acquired in satisfaction of loans

    406     51  

Changes in current assets and liabilities:

             
 

Origination of loans

    (2,792,041 )   (2,855,246 )
 

Proceeds from sales of loans

    2,892,070     2,969,658  
 

Principal payments received on loans

    2,356     1,422  
 

Payments to investors for loan repurchases and early payoff obligations

    (12,154 )   (8,742 )
 

Accounts receivable

    (301 )   (159 )
 

Prepaid and other assets

    (307 )   (738 )
 

Deferred tax assets, net

    (695 )   5,247  
 

Restricted cash

    (1,102 )    
 

Income taxes payable—parent

    1,092     6,799  
 

Intercompany payable—parent

    2,564     2,099  
 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

    1,525     (1,455 )
 

Other liabilities

    88     (1,169 )
           

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

    (1,456 )   30,180  
           

Cash flows from investing activities:

             
 

Capital expenditures

    (1,360 )   (953 )
 

Decrease in intercompany receivable

        44,171  
           

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

    (1,360 )   43,218  
           

Cash flows from financing activities:

             
 

Borrowing under warehouse lines of credit

    1,864,905     2,475,107  
 

Repayments of warehouse lines of credit

    (1,842,764 )   (2,472,811 )
 

Increase in restricted cash

    (50 )   (1,317 )
 

Dividends paid to parent

    (18,400 )   (64.171 )
           

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

    3,691     (63,192 )
           

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

    875     10,206  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

    56,520     46,314  
           

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

    57,395     56,520  
           

I-5


Table of Contents


HOME LOAN CENTER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)


 
  Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
 
  2011   2010  
 
  (In thousands)
 

Cash flows from operating activities:

             

Net income (loss)

  $ (3,751 ) $ 1,236  

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

             
 

Depreciation and amortization

    397     490  
 

Non-cash compensation expense

    153     131  
 

Gain on origination and sale of loans

    (17,309 )   (23,400 )
 

Loss on impaired loans not sold

    84      
 

(Gain) loss on sale of real estate acquired in satisfaction of loans

    (19 )   368  

Changes in current assets and liabilities:

             
 

Origination of loans

    (497,233 )   (608,365 )
 

Proceeds from sales of loans

    562,952     626,226  
 

Principal payments received on loans

    274     180  
 

Payments to investors for loan repurchases and early payoff obligations

    (164 )   (2,236 )
 

Accounts receivable

    29     (387 )
 

Prepaid and other assets

    51     191  
 

Income taxes receivable—parent

    (2,470 )    
 

Deferred tax assets, net

    (1,062 )   (476 )
 

Restricted cash

    626      
 

Income taxes payable—parent

    (9,395 )   1,307  
 

Intercompany payable—parent

    (2,610 )   1,609  
 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

    (207 )   (386 )
 

Other liabilities

    (527 )   752  
           

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

    29,819     (2,760 )
           

Cash flows from investing activities:

             
 

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

    (7,804 )    
 

Capital expenditures

    (1,080 )   (11 )
           

Net cash used in investing activities

    (8,884 )   (11 )
           

Cash flows from financing activities:

             
 

Borrowing under warehouse lines of credit

    138,500     551,088  
 

Repayments of warehouse lines of credit

    (172,651 )   (546,070 )
 

Increase in restricted cash

        (1,124 )
 

Dividends paid to parent

    (5,000 )    
           

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

    (39,151 )   3,894  
           

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

    (18,216 )   1,123  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

    57,395     56,520  
           

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $ 39,179     57,643  
           

I-6


 

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.  PLEASE VOTE TODAY.

 

We encourage you to take advantage of Internet or telephone voting.
Both are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

 

Internet and telephone voting are available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time on August 25, 2011.

 

 

INTERNET
http://www.proxyvoting.com/tree

Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site.

 

 

 

OR

 

 

Tree.com, Inc.

TELEPHONE

1-866-540-5760

 

Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you call.

 

 

 

If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.

 

 

 

To vote by mail, mark and sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

 

 

 

Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.

 

âFOLD AND DETACH HEREâ

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 1, THE HLC ASSET SALE PROPOSAL, “FOR” PROPOSAL 2, THE HLC TRANSACTION-RELATED COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS PROPOSAL AND “FOR” PROPOSAL 3, THE PROPOSAL TO ADJOURN OR POSTPONE THE SPECIAL MEETING, IF NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE, TO SOLICIT ADDITIONAL PROXIES IF THERE ARE INSUFFICIENT VOTES AT THE TIME OF THE SPECIAL MEETING TO APPROVE PROPOSAL 1.

 

Please mark your vote as indicated in this example

x

 

 

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

 

 

 

 

PROPOSAL 1: HLC ASSET SALE PROPOSAL
To approve the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of Home Loan Center, Inc. as contemplated by the asset purchase agreement by and among Tree.com, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries LendingTree, LLC, Home Loan Center, Inc. and HLC Escrow, Inc., on the one hand, and Discover Bank on the other, dated as of May 12, 2011 and described in the proxy statement.

o

o

o

 

 

 

 

 

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

 

 

 

 

PROPOSAL 2: THE HLC TRANSACTION-RELATED COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS PROPOSALS

o

o

o

To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation to certain of our named executive officers in connection with the HLC asset sale transaction.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

 

 

 

 

PROPOSAL 3: THE PROPOSAL TO ADJOURN OR POSTPONE THE SPECIAL MEETING

o

o

o

To approve the adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the HLC Asset Sale Proposal.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mark Here for Address Change or Comments
SEE REVERSE

o

 

Note:  please sign as name appears hereon.  Joint owners should each sign.  When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, Please give full title as such.

 

 

Signature:

 

 

Signature:

 

 

Date:

 

 

1



 

You can now access your Tree.com, Inc. account online.

 

Access your Tree.com, Inc. account online via Investor Service Direct ® (ISD).

 

BNY Mellon Shareowner Services, the transfer agent for Tree.com, Inc., now makes it easy and convenient to get current information on your stockholder account.

 

·              View Account status

 

·              View payment history for dividends

·              View certificate history

 

·              Make address changes

·              View book-entry information

 

·              Obtain a duplicate 1099 tax form

 

Visit us on the web at www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/equity access

For Technical Assistance Call 1-877-978-7778 between 9am-7pm

Monday-Friday Eastern Time

 

Investor ServiceDirect®

Available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week

TOLL FREE NUMBER: 1-800-370-1163

 

Choose MLink™ for fast, easy and secure 24/7 online access to your future proxy materials, investment plan statements, tax documents and more. Simply log onto Investor ServiceDirect® at www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/equityaccess where step-by-step instructions will prompt you through enrollment

 

FOLD AND DETACH HERE

 

PROXY

TREE.COM, INC.

Special Meeting of Stockholders – August 26, 2011

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TREE.COM, INC.

 

The undersigned hereby appoints Erin Eklund and James Ipock, and each of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided on the other side, all the shares of Tree.com, Inc. Common Stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote, and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Special Meeting of Stockholders of Tree.com, Inc. to be held on August 26, 2011 or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present at the Special Meeting.

 

If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors.

 

Address Change/Comments
(Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)

 

 

 

 

BNY MELLON SHAREOWNER SERVICES
P. O. BOX 3550
SOUTH HACKENSACK, NJ 07606-9250

 

(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)

 

2